Impact of iron supplementation in maintenance haemodialysis on hemoglobin variability
-
摘要: 目的 观察维持性血液透析(hemodialysis,HD)患者肾性贫血治疗达标后,不同补铁方式对血红蛋白变异度(hemoglobin variation,Hb-Var)的影响。 方法 选择2015年1-12月厦门大学附属中山医院行HD的患者160例,按照随机数字表法分入静脉补铁组(蔗糖铁注射液100 mg,每周1次,静脉滴注)与口服补铁组(多糖铁复合物100 mg,每天1次,口服)并随访1年,观察2种维持性补铁方式对Hb-Var的影响。 结果 采用4种方法对Hb-Var进行评估:①静脉组患者剩余标准差明显低于口服组[(8.04±4.58) g/L vs.(12.25±6.85) g/L,P=0.042]。②静脉组患者血红蛋白(hemoglobin,Hb)振幅低于口服组[(15.88±8.07) g/L vs.(27.00±15.88) g/L,P=0.015]。③连续测量相邻时间点Hb变化绝对值,静脉组患者Hb的个体变化值及其标准差均较口服组明显降低[分别为(8.64±4.91) g/L vs.(13.69±7.60) g/L及(6.25±3.76) g/L vs.(11.23±8.49) g/L,均P<0.05]。④观察期内4次检测血红蛋白高于、处于及低于靶目标(Hb:110~130 g/L)的比例分别为:静脉组12.85%、71.14%及16.01%;口服组6.90%、55.17%及37.93%(χ2=7.164,P=0.028)。静脉组转铁蛋白饱和度及铁蛋白在治疗后均增高[分别为(29.29±11.80)% vs.(39.36±12.32)%,P=0.025;(375.39±223.77) ng/ml vs.(463.05±303.26) ng/ml,P=0.005]。 结论 不同的维持性补铁方式对Hb-Var的影响程度不同,静脉补铁较口服补铁更有助于血液透析患者Hb的持续达标,其原因可能与铁储备的稳定性及铁离子利用率的提高有关。Abstract: Objective To observe the impact of the way of maintenance iron supplementation on hemoglobin variability (Hb-Var) in hemodialysis (HD) patients. Methods A total of 160 HD patients in zhongshan hospital affiliated to Xiamen University from January, 2015 to December, 2015 were consecutively enrolled into this study. The patients were randomly allocated into vein group and oral group. Hb-Var were analyzed after iron supplementation through vein (iron sucrose injection 100 mg per week) or oral (iron polysaccharide complex 100 mg per day) during the maintain treatment of renalanemia. All patients were followed up for one year. Results Assessment of Hb-Var:① The residual standard deviation (SD) of the intravenous injection (IV) group was significantly lower than that in oral group[(8.04±4.58)g/L vs. (12.25±6.85)g/L, P=0.042]. ② The hemoglobin (Hb) amplitude of the IV group was lower than that in oral group[(15.88±8.07)g/L vs. (27.00±15.88)g/L, P=0.015]. ③ The individual changes and SD of the IV group which measured continuously in the adjacent time points was lower than that in oral group[respectively (8.64±4.91)g/L vs. (13.69±7.60)g/L and (6.25±3.76)g/L vs. (11.23±8.49)g/L, both P<0.05]. ④ The proportion of each groups such as above, within and below the scope of the targe (Hb:110-130 g/L):IV group was 12.85%, 71.14% and 16.01%, oral group was 6.9%, 55.17% and 37.93% (χ2=7.164, P=0.028). Transferrin saturation (TAST) and serum ferritin (SF) increased in the IV iron group[(29.29±11.80)% vs. (39.36±12.3)%, P=0.025 and (375.39±223.77)ng/ml vs. (463.05±303.26)ng/ml, P=0.005]. Conclusion The supplement methods of iron supplementation can influence Hb-Var. IV iron treatment would be more available in keeping continuous qualified Hb than oral treatment. The reason may be concerned with the stability of iron storage and the raise of ferric ion availability.
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 292
- HTML全文浏览量: 49
- PDF下载量: 1
- 被引次数: 0