Clinical study of predicted the prognosis use NRS2002 score in ICU adult critically ill patients
-
摘要: 目的 应用营养风险筛查2002(NRS2002)预测ICU成人重症患者的预后。 方法 选择2017年1-5月滨州市人民医院重症医学科收治的成人重症患者201例,进行调查性研究。24 h内完成NRS2002评分、急性生理学及慢性健康状况评分(APACHEⅡ),入选患者均经过肠内和/或肠外营养支持。根据患者预后分为死亡组和存活组,比较2组NRS2002评分和APACHEⅡ评分;观察不同营养风险组APACHEⅡ评分和病死率差异;分析NRS2002评分和APACHEⅡ评分对预后的预测价值。应用SPSS 16.0统计软件进行统计分析。 结果 危重患者中度以上营养风险高达88.6%;死亡组和存活组NRS2002评分和APACHEⅡ评分比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);不同营养风险组APACHEⅡ评分和病死率比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),中度和重度营养风险组病死率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);NRS2002评分和APACHEⅡ评分与预后呈正相关,相关系数r分别为0.269和0.329;两种评分ROC曲线下面积分别为0.644和0.682,两者比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。 结论 ICU成人重症患者存在较高的营养风险,NRS2002评分可反映患者病情危重程度,可对重症患者预后进行预测,尽早营养支持可改善重症患者预后。Abstract: Objective To predict the prognosis in ICU adult critically ill patients by application of Nutritional Risk Screening (NRS2002). Methods The 201 adult critically ill patients at Binzhou City People's Hospital of intensive care unit from January, 2017 to May, 2017, were used investigative research. The patients were scored NRS2002 and APACHEⅡ in 24 hours to complete the score. To give Enteral and/or Parenteral nutrition support.According to the prognosis of patients were divided into death and survival groups, to compare two groups NRS2002 score and APACHEⅡ; Observe there groups APACHEⅡand case fatality rate difference; Analysis the predictive value of NRS2002 and APACHEⅡ on prognosis. Use SPSS 16.0 statistical software for statistical analysis. Results The risk of moderate nutritional risk was 88.6% in critical patients. Death and survival groups NRS2002 and APACHEⅡ comparison difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Different nutritional risk group APACHEⅡ and case fatality rate comparison difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). There was no statistical significance in the moderate and severe nutritional risk group (P>0.05). NRS2002 with and APACHEⅡ prognosis presented positive correlation, the correlation coefficient r of 0.269 and 0.329, respectively. The two rated ROC curves were 0.644 and 0.682 respectively, and the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05). Conclusion There are high nutritional risks in adult critical patients. The NRS2002 reflects the severity of the patient's condition, which can predict the prognosis of a critical patient. Early nutritional support can improve patient outcomes.
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 235
- HTML全文浏览量: 38
- PDF下载量: 4
- 被引次数: 0