Expert tibial nail for open distal tibial fractures
-
摘要: 目的 评价专家型髓内钉(expert tibial nail,ETN)治疗胫骨下段开放性骨折的安全性及有效性。 方法 选择河南省焦煤集团中央医院2013年3月-2014年9月应用ENT治疗胫骨下段开放性骨折22例,其中男性14例,女性8例,平均年龄40.4岁(22~56岁),Gustilo分型:Ⅰ型10例,Ⅱ型8例,ⅢA型4例。所有患者均急诊行清创闭合复位ENT内固定术,观察手术时间、术中出血量、术后伤口和骨折愈合情况及并发症,通过随访患者影像学资料及术后1年依据Johner-Wruhs评分标准评价临床疗效。 结果 22例患者获术后随访9~24个月(平均16.4个月)。手术平均时间75 min(55~110 min)。术中出血量平均65 ml(40~100 ml)。术后2例Ⅱ型伤口浅表感染,换药后愈合;2例ⅢA型骨折创面坏死缺损,行皮瓣覆盖, 其中1例出现深部感染。骨折愈合时间为3.5~13.6个月(平均4.8个月),所有患者均得到解剖或功能复位,对位对线满意。其中骨折延迟愈合2例,经取出近端锁钉动力化后愈合,骨不连1例,经更换较大直径髓内钉并植骨后愈合。所有患者无断钉、畸形愈合、肢体短缩等并发症,按Johner-Wruhs评分标准,优12例,良7例,可3例,优良率为86.4%。 结论 专家型髓内钉治疗胫骨下段开放性骨折,具有软组织干扰小、固定牢靠、功能恢复好等优点,对Gustilo Ⅰ、Ⅱ型骨折治疗安全有效,并发症少,而ⅢA型骨折因组织损伤严重,疗效较差。Abstract: Objective To evaluate the safety and efficacy of expert type intramedullary nail (expert tibial nail, ETN) in the treatment of open distal tibial fracture. Methods Total 22 cases of open distal tibial fractures in our hospital between March, 2013 and September, 2014 were enrolled into this study. There were 14 males and 8 females, with a mean age of 40.4 (from 22-56) years old, including 10 Gustilo type Ⅰ, 8 type Ⅱ and 4 type ⅢA. All patients were debrided and close reducted and fixed with ETN in the emergency treatment. The duration of surgery, blooding volume, time for clinical heal of the wound and fracture, and incidence of complications were analyzed. All patients were followed up by periodic X-ray examination. Functional outcomes were evaluated according to the Johner-Wruhs standard one year after surgery. Results All 22 patients were followed up for 9-24 months (average 16.4 months). The mean time of surgery was 75 mins (55-110 mins). The intraoperative bleeding volume was 65ml (40-100 ml). Superficial infection occurred in 2 cases with Gustilo typeⅡand healed by dressing. Two cases of type ⅢA fractures were necrotic and covered with skin flap, with deep infection in 1 case. The fractures healed 4.8 months (from 3.5-13.6 months)after surgery, Anatomical or functional reduction were achieved and maintained in all cases. Two fractures of delayed union healed by dynamization through removing the proximal locking nail. The nonunion of bone occurred in 1 case, which healed by replacing the larger diameter nail and bone graft. No nail breakage, malunion or limb shorting occurred. By Johner-Wruhs criteria, the final outcomes were excellent in 12 cases, good in 7 cases and fair in three. The good rate was 86.4%. Conclusion Expert Tibial Nail has the advantages of minimally invasive trauma, stronger fixation, better functional recovery for the treatment of open distal tibial fractures. It is safe and effective in the treatment of Gustilo type Ⅰ, Ⅱ fractures with low incidence of complications. But it is less effective for type ⅢA fractures with serious tissue injury.
-
Key words:
- Open distal tibial fractures /
- Expert tibial nail /
- Internal fixation
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 197
- HTML全文浏览量: 30
- PDF下载量: 0
- 被引次数: 0