The application value of pubo-femoral distance measured by different body positions ultrasound in the screening of developmental dysplasia of the Hip
-
摘要: 目的 探讨应用不同体位超声获得耻骨-股骨距(PFD)在髋关节发育不良(DDH)筛查中的诊断价值。 方法 选取2017年3月—2019年3月间于浙江康复医院及杭州市萧山区第一人民医院就诊的结合临床表现与超声结果疑似DDH的65例患儿作为DDH组,采用随机数字表法选取同期健康小儿69例作为对照组。所有小儿均行超声检查,比较两髋PFD值、α角、骨缘覆盖率(BRP)等资料,并用ROC曲线评估不同指标对DDH筛查的诊断效能。 结果 DDH组患儿α角和BRP均小于对照组(均P<0.05),DDH组PFD大于对照组(P<0.05);男、女DDH患儿与对照组之间的ΔPFD比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),男、女DDH患儿的ΔPFD均高于对照组(均P<0.017);单、双侧DDH患儿与对照组之间的ΔPFD比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),单、双侧DDH患儿的ΔPFD均高于对照组(均P<0.017);PFD筛查DDH的最佳截点为5.03,此时AUC为0.988,显著优于α角和BRP(Z=3.747、4.966;均P<0.001),PFD诊断敏感性为90.14%,显著优于其他指标(P<0.05)。 结论 PFD对超声筛查DDH具有较好的诊断效能,显著优于α角和BRP,并且两髋PFD差值与患儿性别相互独立,PFD有可能成为超声诊断DDH的观察指标之一。Abstract: Objective To explore the diagnostic value of pubo-femoral distance(PFD) measured by different body positions ultrasound in the screening of developmental dysplasia of the Hip(DDH). Methods A total of 65 children with suspected DDH diagnosed by ultrasound combine with clinical feature from March 2017 to March 2019 in our hospital and the first people's hospital of Xiaoshan district of Hangzhou were enrolled as DDH group, while 69 healthy children were enrolled as control group. All children were examined by ultrasonography. PFD, α angle and bone rim percentage(BRP) were compared. ROC curve was used to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of different indexes in DDH screening. Results The α angle, BRP in the DDH group were lower than those in the control group(all P<0.05). The PFD in the DDH group was higher than that in the control group(P<0.05). The ΔPFD in the male and female children with DDH were higher than those in the control group(all P<0.017). The ΔPFD in the unilateral and bilateral DDH patients were higher than those in the control group(all P<0.017). The best cut-off point of PFD screening DDH was 5.03, AUC was 0.988, which was significantly better than α angle and BRP(Z=3.747, 4.966; all P<0.001). The diagnostic sensitivity of PFD was 90.14%, which was significantly better than other indexes(P<0.05). Conclusion The diagnostic efficacy of PFD for screening DDH is prominent and better than α angle and BRP, and the difference of PFDs between the two hips is independent of the sex of the child. PFD may become one of the observation indexes of ultrasonic diagnosis of DDH.
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 168
- HTML全文浏览量: 24
- PDF下载量: 1
- 被引次数: 0