CT differential diagnosis of hypervascular early-stage ultra small renal cell carcinoma and renal angiomyolipoma with minimal fat
-
摘要: 目的 对比早期富血供超小肾癌(usRCC)与肾乏脂肪血管平滑肌脂肪瘤(mfAML)的影像学特征差异,提高鉴别诊断的准确率。 方法 回顾性对比分析中国科学院大学附属肿瘤医院(浙江省肿瘤医院)2014年1月—2019年5月经病理证实的直径≤2 cm的47例富血供usRCC和22例富血供mfAML的CT图像,包括传统影像学特征及CT增强扫描参数,同时绘制受试者工作特征曲线评价诊断效能。 结果 传统影像学特征对比:富血供usRCC与mfAML在性别、有无囊变/坏死、假包膜征及增强扫描实质期强化均匀性比较差异有统计学意义(均P<0.05);2组肿瘤在年龄、形态、位置、肿瘤中心、有无楔形征、皮质掀起征、黑星征、皮质期强化均匀性以及强化方式比较差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。增强扫描定量参数对比:usRCC内富血供区的皮质期CT值、实质期CT值、双期NEV值及REV值均高于mfAML(均P<0.01),其ROC曲线下面积分别为0.748、0.779、0.787、0.844、0.800及0.789。当实质期NEV取73.6作为临界值时,诊断RCC的灵敏度为85.1%,特异度为77.3%。 结论 传统小肾癌(直径≤4 cm)诊断中的形态学特征对鉴别早期富血供usRCC和mfAML有一定的意义,但诊断效能有限,肿瘤CT值定量参数的测定在两者的鉴别诊断中有比较重要的价值,其中肿瘤实质期NEV的诊断效能较好。Abstract: Objective To compare the imaging features and difference of hypervascular early-stage ultra small renal cell carcinoma(usRCC) and angiomyolipoma with minimal fat(mfAML), and to improve the accuracy of differential diagnosis. Methods The CT images of hypervascular usRCC(47 cases) and hypervascular mfAML(22 cases) both with diameter of 2 cm or less confirmed by pathology in Cancer Hospital of University of Chinese Academy of Sciences(Zhejiang Cancer Hospital) from January 2014 to May 2019 were compared and analyzed retrospectively, including traditional imaging features and CT dynamic enhanced parameters, meanwhile receiver operating characteristic curves were drawn to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy. Results Traditional imaging features: the sex, cystic degeneration or necrosis, pseudocapsule sign, and enhance uniformity in parenchymal phase had significant differences between usRCC and mfAML(all P<0.05); the age, shape, location, tumor central point, wedge sign, cortex set off sign, black star sign, enhance uniformity in cortical phase and enhancement mode had no significance difference between usRCC and mfAML(all P>0.05). CT dynamic enhanced parameters: the CT value, NEV and REV of usRCC were all higher than those of mfAML in both cortical phase and nephrographic phase(all P<0.01). The area under the ROC curve was 0.748, 0.779, 0.787, 0.844, 0.800 and 0.789, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of RCC were 85.1% and 77.3% respectively when the NEV of nephrographic phase was 73.6 as the critical value. Conclusion Morphological features in the traditional diagnosis of small renal carcinoma(diameter of 4 cm or less) have certain significance in differentiating hypervascular usRCC and mfAML at the early stage, but the diagnostic efficacy was limited. The CT quantitative parameters have relatively important value in differential diagnosis, among which the NEV in nephrographic phase have better diagnostic efficacy.
-
Key words:
- X-ray computed /
- Tomography /
- Renal tumor /
- Renal cell carcinoma /
- Angiomyolipoma
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 251
- HTML全文浏览量: 39
- PDF下载量: 2
- 被引次数: 0