胸腔镜下老年肺癌患者术中脑氧饱和度变化与PEEP水平相关性的研究

于汝; 梁启胜; 刘磊; 符炜; 姜玉玉; 王康武

doi:10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.001764

胸腔镜下老年肺癌患者术中脑氧饱和度变化与PEEP水平相关性的研究

doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.001764

蚌埠医学院第一附属医院麻醉科，安徽蚌埠 233004

基金项目:

安徽省教育厅高校自然科学研究重点项目 KJ2019A0366

详细信息

通讯作者:
梁启胜，E-mail：bbyemenlqs@126.com

中图分类号: R616.5 R614.1
计量
- 文章访问数: 114
- HTML全文浏览量: 24
- PDF下载量: 2
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2020-06-21
- 网络出版日期: 2022-02-19

Study on the correlation between cerebral oxygen saturation and PEEP level of thoracoscopic elderly patients with lung cancer

Department of Anesthesiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College, Bengbu, Anhui 233004, China

摘要

摘要: 目的探讨胸腔镜老年肺癌患者术中使用不同水平呼气末正压(PEEP)与脑氧饱和度(rSO₂)变化的相关性。方法选取蚌埠医学院第一附属医院2019年10月—2020年2月老年胸腔镜肺叶切除患者60例，按入院先后顺序分为A组、B组、C组，每组20例。单肺通气时，3组患者潮气量(V_T)设为5 mL/kg，A、B、C组PEEP分别设为0、5、10 cm H₂O(1 cm H₂O=0.098 kPa)。观察记录患者麻醉诱导后15 min(T0)和单肺通气10 min(T1)、30 min(T2)、60 min(T3)及恢复双肺通气20 min(T4)5个时点的脉氧饱和度(SpO₂)、气道峰压(Ppeak)、肺动态顺应性(Cdyn)、氧分压(PaO₂)及脑氧饱和度数值(rSO₂)。结果 B组rSO₂最小值，rSO₂平均值较A、C组明显升高(均P < 0.05)，B组rSO₂最大百分比较A、C组明显降低(均P < 0.05)。T2~T4时点B组rSO₂高于A、C组，其中C组高于A组(均P < 0.05)。T1~T4时点B组Ppeak较A、C组降低(均P < 0.05)。T1~T4时点B组Cydn高于A组，T1时点B组Cydn高于A、C组(均P < 0.05)。T2~T4时点B、C组PaO₂显著高于A组(均P < 0.05)，3组患者T0~T4时点SpO₂差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。结论胸腔镜老年肺癌切除术患者单肺通气时脑氧饱和度数值变化与PEEP水平具有相关性，且5 cm H₂O PEEP具有较好的rSO₂水平。
- 呼气末正压 /
- 单肺通气 /
- 胸腔镜手术 /
- 肺功能 /
- 局部脑氧饱和度
Abstract: Objective To investigate the correlation between positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and cerebral oxygen saturation (rSO₂) in elderly patients with thoracoscopic lung cancer. Methods A total of 60 elderly patients with thoracoscopic lobectomy from October 2019 to February 2020 were selected from the First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College. They were divided into group A, group B and group C according to the order of admission, with 20 patients in each group. In the case of one-lung ventilation, tidal volume (V_T) was set at 5 mL/kg in the 3 groups, and PEEP was set at 0, 5, and 10 cm H₂O in the A, B, and C groups, respectively. Pulse oxygen saturation (SpO₂), airway peak pressure (Ppeak), pulmonary dynamic compliance (Cdyn), oxygen partial pressure (PaO₂) and cerebral oxygen saturation values (rSO₂) were observed and recorded at five time points after anesthesia induction: 15 min (T0), 10 min (T1), 30 min (T2), 60 min (T3), and 20 min (T4) after recovery of bilateral ventilation. Results The minimum and average values of rSO₂ in group B was significantly higher than that in group A and C (all P < 0.05), and the maximum percentage of rSO₂ in group B was significantly lower than that in group A and C (all P < 0.05). At the time point T2-T4, rSO₂ in group B was higher than that in group A and C, with group C higher than that in group A (all P < 0.05). At time point T1-T4, Ppeak in group B was lower than that in group A and C (all P < 0.05). Cydn of group B at time T1-T4 was higher than that of group A, and that of group B at time T1 was higher than that of group A and C (all P < 0.05). PaO₂ in group B and C was significantly higher than that in group A at T2-T4 (all P < 0.05), and SpO₂ showed no statistically significant difference between the three groups at T0-T4 (all P>0.05). Conclusion There was a correlation between brain oxygen saturation value and PEEP level during single lung ventilation in elderly patients undergoing thoracoscopic lung resection for lung cancer, and PEEP level at 5 cm H₂O had a better rSO₂ level.
- End-expiratory pressure /
- One-lung ventilation /
- Thoracoscopic surgery /
- Pulmonary function /
- Regional cerebral oxygen saturation

HTML全文

表 1 3组老年肺癌患者术前一般情况比较(x ±s)

组别	例数	年龄(岁)	BMI	ASA例数(Ⅱ/Ⅲ)	术前Hb(g/L)	FEV1/FVC(%)	OLV时间(min)
A组	20	67.05±3.43	23.13±2.68	9/11	118.00±13.01	81.54±4.75	70.65±4.12
B组	20	66.68±3.30	23.15±2.85	10/10	115.40±11.89	80.52±4.32	70.35±5.94
C组	20	66.38±3.46	23.97±2.89	8/12	118.40±11.30	79.90±4.06	70.65±6.29
统计量		0.291^a	0.586^a	0.082^b	0.326^a	0.706^a	0.020^a
P值		0.820	0.560	0.817	0.723	0.498	0.981
注：^a为F值，^b为χ²值。

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 3组老年肺癌患者不同时间点Ppeak比较(x ±s)

组别	例数	T0	T1	T2	T3	T4	F值	P值
A组	20	15.00±1.56	20.45±1.63^a	21.05±2.31^a	20.10±1.37^a	17.40±1.54^a	65.857	< 0.001
B组	20	14.25±1.77	19.15±1.81	19.30±2.00	18.50±1.91	16.15±2.13	7.472	< 0.001
C组	20	14.63±1.84	20.30±1.78^a	20.75±2.07^a	19.80±1.57^a	17.70±1.68^a	54.017	< 0.001
F值		0.943	3.320	3.875	5.425	4.152
P值		0.396	0.043	0.027	0.007	0.021
注：与同时间点B组比较，^aP < 0.05。

下载: 导出CSV

表 3 3组老年肺癌患者各时间点肺动态顺应性比较(x ±s)

组别	例数	T0	T1	T2	T3	T4	F值	P值
A组	20	56.10±6.48	38.20±4.32^a	36.05±4.17^ab	33.30±3.77^ab	41.45±3.44^ab	279.872	< 0.001
B组	20	54.85±6.96	45.85±7.21	43.00±7.65	43.65±1.41	47.95±6.13	23.669	< 0.001
C组	20	55.90±4.72	41.55±6.05^a	43.25±7.15	43.15±6.52	45.05±5.74	164.056	< 0.001
F值		0.240	8.215	7.891	18.307	7.734
P值		0.787	0.001	0.001	< 0.001	0.001
注：与同时间点B组比较，^aP < 0.05;与同时间点C组比较，^bP < 0.05。

下载: 导出CSV

表 4 3组老年肺癌患者各时间SpO₂、PaO₂、rSO₂比较(x ±s)

组别	例数	SpO₂(%)					F值	P值
组别	例数	T0	T1	T2	T3	T4	F值	P值
A组	20	98.05±1.08	96.35±1.18	93.70±0.73	93.75±0.79	95.90±0.97	123.973	< 0.001
B组	20	98.35±0.81	96.45±1.05	94.00±0.65	94.05±0.60	96.15±0.81	101.435	< 0.001
C组	20	98.05±0.82	96.25±1.02	93.65±0.59	93.90±0.64	96.00±0.73	104.273	< 0.001
F值		0.706	0.170	1.651	0.968	0.447
P值		0.498	0.844	0.201	0.386	0.642

组别	例数	PaO₂(mm Hg)					F值	P值
组别	例数	T0	T1	T2	T3	T4	F值	P值
A组	20	451.15±14.43	410.60±16.36	215.65±39.56^ab	253.65±34.24^ab	310.80±34.95^ab	280.788	< 0.001
B组	20	450.80±12.36	414.65±13.32	255.05±32.79	301.15±31.96	349.60±26.73	210.131	< 0.001
C组	20	452.30±16.00	412.05±16.99	237.90±26.15	287.00±45.24	334.20±29.52	220.294	< 0.001
F值		0.060	0.344	7.043	8.415	8.153
P值		0.942	0.710	0.002	0.001	0.001

组别	例数	rSO₂(%)					F值	P值
组别	例数	T0	T1	T2	T3	T4	F值	P值
A组	20	75.50±3.05	68.15±3.40^a	66.25±3.20^ab	65.75±2.24^ab	69.45±2.24^ab	39.264	< 0.001
B组	20	77.85±4.55	71.65±3.25	70.85±3.56	70.20±3.07	74.10±2.93	17.203	< 0.001
C组	20	76.55±3.88	69.00±3.39	68.60±3.50^a	67.80±2.70^a	71.85±3.26^a	24.397	< 0.001
F值		1.840	5.944	9.014	13.655	11.603
P值		0.168	0.005	< 0.001	< 0.001	< 0.001
注：与同时间点B组比较，^aP < 0.05；与同时间点C组比较, ^bP < 0.05。

下载: 导出CSV

表 5 3组老年肺癌患者术中rSO₂min、rSO₂max%、rSO₂avg比较(x ±s)

组别	例数	rSO₂min	rSO₂max%	rSO₂avg
A组	20	66.65±2.72^ab	13.95±4.16^ab	71.70±6.04^ab
B组	20	71.70±4.50	8.90±1.77	76.40±2.66
C组	20	69.15±4.27^a	11.45±2.72^a	73.75±2.15^a
F值		8.342	13.722	8.736
P值		0.001	< 0.001	0.001
注：与B组比较，^aP < 0.05；与C组比较, ^bP < 0.05。

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(21)

[1]	沈心怡, 余建明. 脑氧饱和度监测在单肺通气中的应用进展[J]. 浙江中西医结合杂志, 2019, 29(4): 343-345. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-4561.2019.04.030
[2]	WANG M, GENG N, GAO Y, et al. Comparison of the effects of different positive end-expiratory pressure levels on respiratory mechanics and oxygenation in laparoscopic surgery: a protocol for systematic review and network meta-analyses[J]. Medicine(Baltimore), 2018, 97(48): e13396. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30508938
[3]	WU X, ZHENG R, ZHUANG Z Q. Effect of transpulmonary pressure-guided positive end-expiratory pressure titration on lung injury in pigs with acute respiratory distress syndrome[J]. J Clin Monit Comput, 2019, 22(2): 102-109. doi: 10.1007/s10877-019-00267-2
[4]	EERTMANS W, DEYNE C, GENBRUGGE C, et al. Association between postoperative delirium and postoperative cerebral oxygen desaturation in older patients after cardiac surgery[J]. Br J Anaesth, 2020, 124(2): 146-153. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2019.09.042
[5]	郭辉, 张钰, 孙伟林, 等. 老年肺癌治疗的外科进展[J]. 当代医学, 2017, 23(18): 189-192. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-4393.2017.18.094
[6]	UEDA K. Safety and advantage of no drain policy after thoracoscopic major lung resection[J]. J Thorac Dis, 2020, 12(3): 1136-1137. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2019.12.61
[7]	LIU K, HUANG CY, XU M, et al. PEEP guided by electrical impedance tomography during one-lung ventilation in elderly patients undergoing thoracoscopic surgery [J]. Ann Transl Med, 2019, 7(23): 757. doi: 10.21037/atm.2019.11.95
[8]	WEI S, LI S, DONG H, et al. Effects of lung protective ventilation on the cognitive function level of patients with esophageal cancer[J]. Iran J Public Health, 2019, 48(2): 256-261. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31205879
[9]	KIM K T, MORTON S, HOWE S, et al. Model-based PEEP titration versus standard practice in mechanical ventilation: a randomised controlled trial[J]. Trials, 2020, 21(1): 130. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-4035-7
[10]	李伟, 李妍, 王民, 等. 不同水平的呼气末正压对胸腔镜肺大疱切除术单肺通气患者血气分析及血流动力学影响[J]. 现代仪器与医疗, 2016, 22(3): 54-56. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XDYI201603021.htm
[11]	周鸿丽, 欧阳婷, 白毅平, 等. 单肺通气期间使用不同呼气末正压通气值对呼吸力学和血流动力学的影响[J]. 浙江医学, 2019, 41(16): 1754-1759. doi: 10.12056/j.issn.1006-2785.2019.41.16.2019-45
[12]	ZHANG L, XIONG W, PENG Y, et al. The effect of an intraoperative, lung-protective ventilation strategy in neurosurgical patients undergoing craniotomy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial[J]. Trials, 2018, 19(1): 85. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2447-4
[13]	GUMULAK R, LUCANOVA L C, ZIBOLEN M et al. Use of near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) in cerebral tissue oxygenation monitoring in neonates[J]. Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub, 2017, 161(2): 128-133. doi: 10.5507/bp.2017.012
[14]	杨芳芳, 金孝岠. 近红外线光谱仪用于脑氧饱和度监测的临床进展[J]. 国际麻醉学与复苏杂志, 2017, 38(9): 837-841. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4378.2017.09.016
[15]	陈远辉, 万海方, 张一肖. 术中脑氧饱和度干预对老年脊柱结核手术患者术后谵妄的影响[J]. 中华全科医学, 2020, 18(3): 415-418. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYQY202003021.htm
[16]	TANAKA N, KATOH R I, YAMAMOTO M, et al. Changes in cerebral oxygen saturation during one-lung ventilation determined using spatially resolved spectroscopy and contributing factors[J]. J Clin Anesth, 2020, 12(59): 99-100. http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/periodical/0c74bf09d5e44743eecddf37ecfe1cbf
[17]	EL T, PASIN L, MARCZIN N, et al. Impact of low tidal volumes during one-lung ventilation: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J]. Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth, 2017, 31(5): 1767-1773. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2017.06.015
[18]	KISS T, WITTENSTEIN J, BECKER C, et al. Protective ventilation with high versus low positive end-expiratory pressure during one-lung ventilation for thoracic surgery (PROTHOR): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial[J]. Trials, 2019, 20(1): 213. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3208-8
[19]	ZHAO Z, WANG W, ZHANG Z, et al. Influence of tidal volume and positive end-expiratory pressure on ventilation distribution and oxygenation during one-lung ventilation[J]. Physiol Meas, 2018, 39(3): 034003. doi: 10.1088/1361-6579/aaaeb2
[20]	龚亚红, 王维嘉, 魏伟, 等. 胸科手术单肺通气期间患者局部脑氧饱和度降低的相关因素分析[J]. 中国医学科学院学报, 2017, 39(6): 774-778. doi: 10.3881/j.issn.1000-503X.2017.06.007
[21]	闫婷婷, 柴小青, 魏昕, 等. 控制性降压时不同通气策略对沙滩椅体位手术患者脑氧饱和度的影响[J]. 临床麻醉学杂志, 2018, 34(6): 566-569. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LCMZ201806014.htm