iRoot SP单尖法用于窦道型根尖周炎的疗效观察

李秀娟; 韩雪松; 钟良军; 陈幸; 丁成

doi:10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.001767

iRoot SP单尖法用于窦道型根尖周炎的疗效观察

doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.001767

1.
杭州师范大学附属医院口腔科, 浙江杭州 310015
2.
浙江省立同德医院口腔科，浙江杭州 310012

基金项目:

浙江省医药卫生科技计划 2019KY497

杭州市卫生科技计划 2018A21

详细信息

通讯作者:
韩雪松，E-mail：840952873@qq.com

中图分类号: R781.341 R781.05
计量
- 文章访问数: 172
- HTML全文浏览量: 134
- PDF下载量: 1
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2020-03-23
- 网络出版日期: 2022-02-19

Clinical observation of iRoot SP single tip method for sinus periapical periodontitis

1.
Department of Stomatology, Affiliated Hospital of Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310015, China

摘要

摘要: 目的评价iRoot SP单尖法充填与iRoot SP热牙胶垂直加压充填法用于后牙窦道型慢性根尖周炎的临床疗效。方法选取2018年3月—2019年2月杭州师范大学附属医院口腔科收治的后牙窦道型慢性根尖周炎共100例，患者均为单颗牙患病；按照随机数字表法分为研究组和对照组，每组50颗，对照组患者采用iRoot SP热牙胶垂直加压法充填，研究组患者采用iRoot SP单尖法充填，比较2组患者术后1周疼痛反应情况，术后2周窦道愈合情况，术后3、6个月后根尖周阴影变化，治疗6个月后综合疗效评价。结果比较术后1周的疼痛反应，研究组与对照组疼痛反应率分别为24.0%、20.0%，差异无统计学意义(χ²=0.233，P=0.629);术后2周窦道愈合率分别为96.0%、94.0%，研究组情况优于对照组，差异无统计学意义(χ²=0.001，P>0.999)；术后3个月根尖暗影情况比较，研究组及对照组有效率分别为100.0%、76.0%，差异有统计学意义(χ²=13.636，P=0.001);术后6个月根尖暗影情况比较，研究组及对照组有效率分别为100.0%、96.0%，差异无统计学意义(χ²=0.501，P=0.475)。术后6个月综合疗效评估，研究组与对照组治疗有效率分别为98.0%、96.0%, 差异无统计学意义(χ² < 0.001，P>0.999)。结论 iRoot SP单尖法用于后牙窦道型慢性根尖周炎，临床操作方便，充填效率高，术后疼痛轻且成功率高，值得临床推广。
- iRoot SP /
- 慢性根尖周炎 /
- 一次法根管治疗
Abstract: Objective To evaluate the clinical efficacy of iRoot SP single-tip filling and iRoot SP warm vertical technique in patients with chronic apical periodontitis with sinus in posterior teeth. Methods A total of 100 posterior teeth diagnosed as chronic apical periodontitis with sinus were selected as research object from March 2018 to February 2019. According to the random number table, each group has 50 cases. The control group were treated with iRoot SP warm vertical technique and the study group were with iRoot SP single-tip filling. Pain rate 1week after operation, sinus status 2 weeks after operation, apical shadow 3, 6 months after operation and 6 months follow-up of clinical effect were compared. Results Compared with the pain score at 1 week after operation, the response rates of the study group and the control group were 24.0% and 20.0%, respectively, with no significant difference (χ²=0.233, P=0.629); the sinus healing rates at 2 weeks after operation were 96.0% and 94.0%, respectively, with no significant difference (χ²=0.001, P>0.999); the effective rates of the study group and the control group at 3 months after operation were 100.0% and 76.0%, respectively, the difference was statistically significant (χ²=13.636, P=0.001). Six months after operation, the effective rates of the study group and the control group were 100.0% and 96.0%, respectively, with no statistically significant difference (χ²=0.501, P=0.475). Six months after operation, the comprehensive efficacy evaluation showed that the effective rates of the study group and the control group were 98.0% and 96.0%, respectively, with no statistically significant difference (χ² < 0.001, P>0.999). Conclusion iRoot SP single-tip method for chronic apical periodontitis patients is with high filling efficiency, ease of clinical operation, low incidence of postoperative pain and high treatment success rate, it is worthy of clinical promotion.
- iRoot SP /
- Chronic apical periodontitis /
- One-time root canal treatment

HTML全文

表 1 2组后牙窦道型慢性根尖周炎患者术后1周疼痛反应情况比较[例(%)]

组别	牙数	无痛	轻中度	重度	疼痛反应(%)
研究组	50	38(76.0)	8(16.0)	4(8.0)	24.0
对照组	50	40(80.0)	6(12.0)	4(8.0)	20.0
注：2组疼痛反应率比较，χ²=0.233，P=0.629。

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 2组后牙窦道型慢性根尖周炎患者术后2周窦道情况比较[例(%)]

组别	牙数	无效	改善	成功	愈合率(%)
研究组	50	2(4.0)	8(16.0)	40(80.0)	96.0
对照组	50	3(6.0)	6(12.0)	41(82.0)	94.0
注：2组窦道愈合及好转率比较，χ² < 0.001，P>0.999。

下载: 导出CSV

表 3 2组后牙窦道型慢性根尖周炎患者术后3个月根尖暗影情况比较[例(%)]

组别	牙数	无好转	有好转	成功	有效率(%)
研究组	50	0(0.0)	34(68.0)	16(32.0)	100.0
对照组	50	12(24.0)	27(54.0)	11(22.0)	76.0
注：2组有效率比较，χ²=13.636，P=0.001。

下载: 导出CSV

表 4 2组后牙窦道型慢性根尖周炎患者术后6个月根尖暗影情况比较[例(%)]

组别	牙数	无好转	有好转	成功	有效率(%)
研究组	50	0(0.0)	18(36.0)	32(64.0)	100.0
对照组	50	2(4.0)	30(60.0)	18(36.0)	96.0
注：2组有效率比较，χ²=0.501，P=0.475。

下载: 导出CSV

表 5 2组后牙窦道型慢性根尖周炎患者术后6个月疗效比较[例(%)]

组别	牙数	成功	改善	失败	有效率(%)
研究组	50	32(64.0)	17(34.0)	1(2.0)	98.0
对照组	50	18(36.0)	30(60.0)	2(4.0)	96.0
注：2组有效率比较，χ² < 0.001，P>0.999。

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(20)

[1]	龙飒, 杨健, 辛悦. 超声辅助iRoot SP单尖法根管充填对根尖封闭性效果的体外研究[J]. 宜春学院学报, 2018, 40(9): 63-66. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-380X.2018.09.015
[2]	李响, 蔡兴伟, 何鑫, 等. iRoot SP一次性根管治疗前牙窦道型慢性根尖周炎疗效观察[J]. 实用口腔医学杂志, 2017, 33(3): 393-396. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3733.2017.03.024
[3]	NEGM M M. Effect of intracanal use of nonsteroidal anti inflammatory agents on posttreatment endodontic pain[J]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol, 1994, 77(5): 507-513. doi: 10.1016/0030-4220(94)90233-X
[4]	彭俐, 王祖华. iRoot SP的理化性质和生物学性能[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2018, 45(1): 78-84. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GWKQ201801018.htm
[5]	黎晶, 蒋宏伟. iRoot SP的特性及根管封闭剂超充的研究进展[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(1): 56-62. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-1366.2019.01.011
[6]	杜田丰, 吴来迪, 唐学智, 等. 硅酸钙基根管封闭材料对牙本质小管内粪肠球菌生物膜的影响[J]. 中华口腔医学杂志, 2019, 54(10): 656-661.
[7]	GANDHI B, HALEBATHI-GOWDRA R. Comparative evaluation of the apical sealing ability of a ceramic based sealer and MTA as root- end filling materials- An in-vitro study[J]. J Clin Exp Dent, 2017, 9(7): e901-e905. http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5549589?pdf=render
[8]	KHALLAF M E. Effect of two contemporary root canal sealers on root canal dentin microhardness[J]. J Clin Exp Dent, 2017, 9(1): e67-e70. http://www.medicinaoral.com/medoralfree01/aop/53052.pdf
[9]	丁伯福, 姚莉莉, 李婵娟, 等. 采用iRoot SP根充糊剂一次法和两次法治疗慢性根尖周炎的临床研究[J]. 口腔生物医学, 2019, 10(3): 146-148. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KQSW201903010.htm
[10]	胡西娜尔·艾尼瓦尔, 叶琴, 周瑾. iRoot SP单尖法充填用于慢性根尖周炎后牙行一次法根管治疗的临床疗效[J]. 临床口腔医学杂志, 2018, 34(9): 543-545. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-1634.2018.09.010
[11]	ZAKI D Y, ZAAZOU M H, KHALLAF M E, et al. In vivo comparative evaluation of periapical healing in response to a calcium silicate and calcium hydroxide based endodontic sealers[J]. Open Access Maced J Med Sci, 2018, 6(8): 1475-1479. doi: 10.3889/oamjms.2018.293
[12]	张莹, 马素荣, 朱琳虹, 等. iRoot SP糊剂用于根管再治疗的疗效[J]. 医学信息, 2019, 32(21): 106-107. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.21.033
[13]	董丽娜, 张静, 刘伟芳, 等. IRoot SP根充术后疼痛的临床观察[J]. 临床医药文献电子杂志, 2019, 6(73): 17-18. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LCWX201973010.htm
[14]	马骏, 叶茂昌, 陈梅梅, 等. iRoot SP根充糊剂在外伤性露髓前牙一次性根管治疗中的应用效果[J]. 安徽医学, 2018, 39(11): 1367-1370. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0399.2018.11.019
[15]	韦爱君. iRoot SP生物陶瓷类根管封闭剂加单尖充填法作为根管充填的临床疗效研究[J]. 全科口腔医学电子杂志, 2016, 3(18): 56-57. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-7882.2016.18.039
[16]	莫清波. 单尖法根管充填临床对比研究[J]. 口腔医学, 2016, 36(7): 632-634, 652. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KQYX201607015.htm
[17]	魏星. 两种根管封闭剂对椭圆形根管单尖法充填效果的临床对比[J]. 全科口腔医学电子杂志, 2018, 5(18): 84, 86. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QKKQ201818047.htm
[18]	万长青, 陈学群, 文燕. 根管封闭剂iRoot SP对粗大型根管填充应用效果分析[J]. 实用临床医学, 2018, 19(2): 73-74, 79. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LCSY201802026.htm
[19]	DELONG C, HE J, WOODMANSEY K F. The effect of ob-turation technique on the push-out bond strength of calcium silicate sealers[J]. J Endod, 2015, 41(3): 385-388. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2014.11.002
[20]	QU W, BAI W, LIANG Y H, et al. Influence of warmvertical compaction technique on physical propertiesof root canal sealers[J]. J Endod, 2016, 42(12): 1829-1833. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2016.08.014