Study on the effect of extracorporeal shock wave on pain and inflammatory factor levels in patients with shoulder periarthritis
-
摘要:
目的 分析体外冲击波治疗肩关节周围炎的疗效及对患者疼痛与炎症因子水平的改善作用。 方法 选取绍兴市越城区人民医院骨科2019年1月—2020年1月收治的肩关节周围炎患者120例，根据不同治疗方案分为A组与B组各60例，A组应用玻璃酸钠肩关节腔注射治疗，B组应用玻璃酸钠肩关节腔注射联合电磁式体外冲击波治疗，比较2组患者临床疗效、疼痛程度、肩关节功能、肩关节活动度以及炎症因子水平。 结果 治疗后, B组的总有效率(93.33%)高于A组(78.33%)，B组的VAS评分[(2.21±0.72)分]低于A组[(4.19±1.04)分]，Constant-Murley评分[(70.76±5.89)分]高于A组[(64.22±6.15)分]。治疗后，B组肩关节外展、前屈、后伸的活动度(133.12°±7.25°、137.81°±8.27°、40.06°±3.15°)均大于A组(108.43°±6.87°、102.54°±7.82°、33.82°±2.90°)。治疗后，B组的白介素-6、肿瘤坏死因子-α水平[(47.93±4.01)ng/L、(11.02±1.76)ng/L]低于A组[(56.61±3.27)ng/L、(18.21±2.05)ng/L]，均P < 0.05。 结论 体外冲击波治疗肩关节周围炎的疗效确切，可明显减轻患者疼痛，改善肩关节功能，增加肩关节活动度，减轻炎症反应，临床总有效率高，有助于患者尽早康复。 Abstract:Objective To analyze the efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave (ESW) in the treatment of scapulohumeral periarthritis and the improvement of pain and inflammatory factors. Methods A total of 120 patients with shoulder periarthritis in the Department of Orthopedics of our hospital from January 2019 to January 2020 were selected. According to different treatment plans, they were divided into group A and group B with 60 cases each. Group A was treated with sodium hyaluronate injection in the shoulder joint cavity, and group B were used sodium hyaluronate injection in the shoulder joint cavity combined with electromagnetic extracorporeal shock wave therapy. The clinical efficacy, pain degree, shoulder joint function, shoulder joint range of motion and inflammatory factor levels were compared between the two groups. Results After treatment, the total effective rate of group B (93.33%) was higher than that of group A (78.33%), the VAS score of group B [(2.21±0.72) points] was lower than that of group A [(4.19±1.04) points], and the Constant-Murley score[(70.76±5.89) points] was higher than that of group A [(64.22±6.15) points]. After treatment, the range of movement of shoulder joint abduction, flexion and extension (133.12°±7.25°, 137.81°±8.27°, 40.06°±3.15°) of group B was greater than that of group A (108.43°±6.87°, 102.54°±7.82°, 33.82°±2.90°). After treatment, the levels of interleukin-6 and tumor necrosis factor-α in group B [(47.93±4.01) ng/L, (11.02±1.76) ng/L] were lower than those in group A [(56.61±3.27) ng/L, (18.21±2.05)ng/L], all P < 0.05. Conclusion ESW treatment of shoulder periarthritis has a definite effect, which can significantly reduce the pain of patients, improve shoulder joint function, increase shoulder joint mobility, reduce inflammation, and have a high clinical total effective rate, which can help patients recover as soon as possible. -
表 1 2组肩关节周围炎患者临床疗效比较(例)
组别 例数 治愈 显效 有效 无效 总有效[例(%)] A组 60 10 18 19 13 47(78.33) B组 60 17 23 16 4 56(93.33) 注：2组总有效率比较，χ2=5.551，P=0.018。 
下载: 导出CSV
表 2 2组肩关节周围炎患者VAS评分比较(x ±s，分)
组别 例数 治疗前 治疗后 A组 60 7.14±0.53 4.19±1.04 B组 60 7.20±0.50 2.21±0.72 t值 0.638 12.125 P值 0.262 ＜0.001
下载: 导出CSV
表 3 2组肩关节周围炎患者Constant-Murley评分比较(x ±s，分)
组别 例数 治疗前 治疗后 A组 60 40.45±5.76 64.22±6.15 B组 60 40.40±5.69 70.76±5.89 t值 0.048 5.949 P值 0.481 ＜0.001
下载: 导出CSV
表 4 2组肩关节周围炎患者肩关节活动度对比(x ±s，°)
组别 例数 外展 前屈 后伸 治疗前 治疗后 治疗前 治疗后 治疗前 治疗后 A组 60 65.23±6.34 108.43±6.87 42.43±6.13 102.54±7.82 13.65±2.26 33.82±2.90 B组 60 65.20±6.39 133.12±7.25 42.38±6.15 137.81±8.27 13.60±2.28 40.06±3.15 t值 0.026 19.148 0.045 24.003 0.121 11.289 P值 0.490 ＜0.001 0.482 ＜0.001 0.452 ＜0.001
下载: 导出CSV
表 5 2组肩关节周围炎患者炎症因子水平比较(x ±s，ng/L)
组别 例数 白介素-6 肿瘤坏死因子-α 治疗前 治疗后 治疗前 治疗后 A组 60 82.54±6.15 56.61±3.27 26.23±2.76 18.21±2.05 B组 60 82.29±6.12 47.93±4.01 26.30±2.73 11.02±1.76 t值 0.223 12.994 0.140 20.613 P值 0.412 ＜0.001 0.445 ＜0.001
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] 唐铭含, 宋浩, 魏治中. 温针灸治疗肩周炎的临床效果研究[J]. 中华全科医学, 2019, 17(10): 1745-1748. [2] 黄蓬辉. 条口透刺承山穴结合推拿手法对肩周炎患者肩关节功能和疼痛的影响[J]. 现代中西医结合杂志, 2018, 27(7): 703-706, 710. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-8849.2018.07.006 [3] 宿小满, 连树林. 艾灸联合米乐祛痛贴治疗肩周炎对患者疼痛感受、关节功能评分的影响[J]. 辽宁中医杂志, 2018, 45(9): 1938-1940. [4] 周亚锋, 殷建权, 严伟. 肩三针温针灸治疗肩周炎87例分析[J]. 中华全科医学, 2017, 15(5): 868-870. [5] 黄建军, 李建伟, 张景春, 等. 体外冲击波联合肩胛上神经脉冲射频治疗肩周炎50例[J]. 中国中医骨伤科杂志, 2020, 28(9): 68-70. [6] 常红侠, 景桂霞. 臂丛神经阻滞麻醉下麦肯基手法松解术对肩周炎患者疼痛及肩关节活动度的影响[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2020, 24(3): 108-110, 114. [7] 杨立. 半导体激光联合肩三针温针灸对肩周炎疼痛程度及肩关节功能的影响[J]. 现代诊断与治疗, 2019, 30(11): 1804-1805. [8] 张晓燕, 张凌娟, 张礼璐, 等. 中药热熨、针灸联合点揉法治疗老年肩周炎效果及对患者肩关节功能、炎症状态、疼痛递质的影响[J]. 陕西中医, 2020, 41(10): 1492-1495. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7369.2020.10.043 [9] 石新明. 温针灸联合推拿对急性期肩周炎患者疼痛程度及关节功能恢复的影响[J]. 中外医学研究, 2020, 18(5): 131-133. [10] 王新昌, 郝连升, 陈健. 放散式体外冲击波联合关节腔注射和功能锻炼治疗肩周炎的临床研究[J]. 中医正骨, 2017, 29(8): 36-38, 41. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-6015.2017.08.007 [11] 陈新合. 拨穴通络推拿手法联合玻璃酸钠肩关节腔内注射对肩周炎患者疼痛程度改善及生活质量的影响[J]. 现代医用影像学, 2018, 27(4): 1340-1341. [12] 万云峰, 曹寅生, 易强, 等. 关节腔内复方倍他米松注射联合玻璃酸钠注射对原发性冻结肩的疗效[J]. 河南医学研究, 2020, 29(7): 1176-1179. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-437X.2020.07.009 [13] 郭子龙, 郭英慧, 张雪娇. 臭氧痛点阻滞联合玻璃酸钠关节腔内注射对肩周炎患者疼痛及肩关节活动度的影响[J]. 中国保健营养, 2020, 30(5): 36, 38. [14] 任佳悦, 杨燕冰, 季晶俊, 等. 体外冲击波穴位治疗对肩关节周围炎患者肩部疼痛及血清5-HT、PGE2影响的临床观察[J]. 上海中医药杂志, 2019, 53(8): 68-71. [15] 刘初容, 池沛沛, 张新斐, 等. 电针联合体外冲击波治疗对肩关节周围炎患者疼痛和肩关节活动度的影响[J]. 上海针灸杂志, 2017, 36(5): 598-601. [16] 欧梁, 龚志贤, 张永辉, 等. 舒经活络外敷包热熨配合体外冲击波治疗肩周炎(冻结期)的随机对照试验[J]. 中医药导报, 2018, 24(22): 90-92, 98. [17] 陆大远, 夏文兰, 韩奇, 等. 压力式与电磁式体外冲击波治疗肩周炎的对照研究[J]. 老年医学与保健, 2018, 24(5): 503-505, 520. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-8296.2018.05.009 [18] 吴国林, 季向荣, 黄洪斌, 等. 关节松动训练联合体外冲击波靶点治疗肩关节周围炎的疗效分析[J]. 中国康复, 2018, 33(4): 301-304. [19] 张增富. 针刀与局部封闭法治疗肩周炎患者的疼痛介质及炎性因子影响的研究[J]. 中医临床研究, 2018, 10(8): 82-84. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-7860.2018.08.038 [20] 高俊虎, 王博, 左冬冬. 电针结合Mulligan动态关节松动手法对肩周炎的临床效果及炎症因子TNF-α、IL-6的影响[J]. 针灸临床杂志, 2020, 36(6): 42-46. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-0779.2020.06.012 -
点击查看大图
表(5)
计量
- 文章访问数: 254
- HTML全文浏览量: 43
- PDF下载量: 4
- 被引次数: 0
