结直肠侧向发育型肿瘤内镜下诊治的临床研究

胡红娜; 章礼久; 宋莎莎

doi:10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.001995

结直肠侧向发育型肿瘤内镜下诊治的临床研究

doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.001995

1.
安徽医科大学第二附属医院消化内科，安徽合肥 230601
2.
安徽医科大学公共卫生学院流行病与卫生统计学系，安徽合肥 230032

基金项目:

2017年安徽省自然科学基金 1708085QH192

详细信息

通讯作者:
章礼久, E-mail: zhanglijiu6336@163.com

中图分类号: R735.3 R730.56
计量
- 文章访问数: 171
- HTML全文浏览量: 81
- PDF下载量: 1
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2020-11-18
- 网络出版日期: 2022-02-16

Clinical study on endoscopic diagnosis and treatment of laterally spreading tumor

1.
Department of Gastroenterology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui 230601, China

摘要

摘要: 目的研究结直肠侧向发育型肿瘤(laterally spreading tumor, LST)的内镜病理特征及内镜下治疗方法。方法回顾性分析安徽医科大学第二附属医院2014年1月—2019年12月经内镜诊断并行内镜下治疗的48例LST患者的临床病理资料。按病变部位将其分成直肠组(27例)和结肠组(21例)，分别记录直径大小、病变亚型及术后病理结果。27例行内镜下黏膜剥离术(endoscopic submucosal dissection，ESD)，19例行内镜黏膜下剥离术(endoscopic mucosal resection，EMR)/内镜下分片黏膜切除术(endoscopic piece mucosal resection，EPMR)，另有2例行预切开的黏膜切除术(pre-cut-endoscopic mucosal resection，Pre-cut-EMR)，观察内镜下治疗的残留率、出血率、穿孔率及复发率。结果 2组患者年龄、性别差异无统计学意义(均P > 0.05)。直肠组中，病变直径为(3.27±1.29)cm，以结节混合型为主；结肠组直径为(2.61±0.78)cm，以颗粒均一型为主，差异均有统计学意义(均P < 0.05)。直肠组中高级别上皮内瘤变和癌变比例相比结肠组明显升高(P < 0.05)。直肠LST以ESD治疗为主(74.1%)，结肠LST主要采用EMR/EPMR法(61.9%)。1例结肠LST因病灶长径过长无法行ESD有效完整切除，转外科手术，余47例均完整切除。1例术后出血(2.1%)，再次内镜下止血治疗好转。1例术后4年复发，并再次内镜下完整切除。本组患者均无残留、穿孔并发症。结论直肠LST病变范围较大，以结节混合型为主，具有相对较高的恶性潜能，以ESD治疗为主；结肠LST以颗粒均一型多见，多采用EMR/EPMR治疗，部分患者可考虑行pre-cut-EMR治疗。
- 侧向发育型肿瘤 /
- 内镜病理特征 /
- 内镜下诊治技术
Abstract: Objective To study the endoscopic pathological features and endoscopic treatment method of laterally spreading tumor (LST). Methods The clinic pathological data of 48 LST patients diagnosed and treated with endoscopy in the Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University from January 2014 to December 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the lesion site, the patients were divided into the rectal group (27 cases) and the colon group (21 cases), and their diameters, lesion subtypes and postoperative pathological Results were recorded respectively. Twenty-seven cases underwent endoscopic mucosal dissection (ESD), 19 cases underwent endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR/EPMR), and 2 cases underwent expected mucosal resection (pre-cut-off EMR). The residual rate, bleeding rate, perforation rate and recurrence rate of endoscopic treatment were observed. Results There was no significant difference in age and gender between the two groups (all P > 0.05). In the rectal group, the diameter of the lesions was (3.27±1.29) cm, and the nodules were mainly of mixed type, while in the colon group the diameter was (2.61±0.78) cm, and the main particles were all of the homogeneous type, with statistically significant differences (all P < 0.05). Compared with the colon group, the proportion of high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia and cancerization in the rectal group was significantly increased (P < 0.05). Rectal LST was mainly treated with ESD (74.1%), while colon LST was mainly treated with EMR/EPMR (61.9%). One case of colon LST was unable to receive effective complete resection with ESD due to excessive length of lesion length, and was transferred to surgical operation. The remaining 47 cases were all completely removed. Postoperative hemorrhage in 1 case (2.1%) was improved by endoscopic hemostasis therapy again. One patient recurred 4 years after operation and underwent complete endoscopic resection again. None of the patients in this group had residual or perforation complications. Conclusion Rectal LST lesions have a large range, mainly nodular mixed type, with relatively high malignant potential, mainly ESD therapy. Colonic LST is commonly treated with granular homogeneous type, and EMR/EPMR treatment is more common. Pre-cut-EMR treatment may be considered in some cases.
- Laterally spreading tumor /
- The endoscopic pathological features /
- Endoscopic diagnosis and treatment techniques

HTML全文

图 1 直肠ESD

注：A为内镜分型LST-GM，B为靛胭脂染色后边界清晰，C为病灶周边黏膜切开，D为金属夹封闭创面。

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 结肠EPMR

注：A为内镜分型LST-GH，B为靛胭脂染色后边界清晰，C为EPMR法切除后创面，D为金属夹封闭创面。

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 2组LST患者内镜及病理特征比较

组别	例数	直径(x±s，cm)	内镜分型[例(%)]				HGIN+癌变[例(%)]
组别	例数	直径(x±s，cm)	LST-GM	LST-GH	LST-FE	LST-PD	HGIN+癌变[例(%)]
直肠组	27	3.27±1.29	18(66.7)	2(7.4)	6(22.2)	1(3.7)	9(33.3)
结肠组	21	2.61±0.78	6(28.6)	11(52.4)	4(19.0)	0(0.0)	1(4.8)
统计量		2.195^a					4.243^c
P值		0.034	0.002^b				0.039
注：^a为t值，^b为采用Fisher精确检验，^c为χ²值。

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(20)

[1]	冯轶, 牛应林, 李鹏, 等. 结直肠侧向发育型肿瘤的内镜表现及病理特点研究[J]. 中国内镜杂志, 2019, 25(1): 79-84. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-1989.2019.01.016
[2]	高志强, 张学松, 宋毓飞, 等. 结直肠侧向发育型肿瘤的诊治分析(附17例报告)[J]. 中国内镜杂志, 2017, 23(9): 103-107. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGNJ201709020.htm
[3]	徐威, 姚平, 胡学军, 等. 内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗直肠侧向发育型肿瘤的疗效分析[J]. 中国临床医学, 2015, 22(3): 356-359. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LCYX201503024.htm
[4]	张菊嫦, 王学青, 李爱民, 等. 结直肠侧向发育型肿瘤的临床病理特征和治疗方法的发展趋势分析[J]. 中华消化杂志, 2017, 37(2): 88-93. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-1432.2017.02.004
[5]	OKA S, TANAKA S, SAITO Y, et al. Local recurrence after endoscopic resection for large colorectal neoplasia: A multicenter prospective study in Japan[J]. Am J Gastroenterol, 2015, 110(5): 697-707. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2015.96
[6]	林良兜, 卢杰夫, 李超芹. 大肠侧向发育型肿瘤的诊断与内镜治疗进展[J]. 微创医学, 2016, 11(3): 356-359. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-WCYX201603018.htm
[7]	王华秀, 练晶晶, 陈世耀, 等. 内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗巨大结直肠侧向发育型肿瘤的临床研究[J]. 中国内镜杂志, 2017, 23(7): 80-84. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGNJ201707017.htm
[8]	曾玉婷, 孙克文, 陈建平, 等. 内镜治疗结直肠侧向发育型肿瘤64例临床观察[J]. 国际消化病杂志, 2017, 37(3): 198-200. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-534X.2017.03.017
[9]	贾婷婷, 夏满奎, 郭慧敏, 等. 内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗巨大直肠侧向发育型肿瘤的临床研究[J]. 中华消化内镜杂志, 2018, 35(7): 510-513. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-5232.2018.07.012
[10]	JEON H H, LEE H S, YOUN Y H, et al. Learning curve analysis of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection(ESD) for laterally spreading tumors by endoscopists experienced in gastric ESD[J]. Surg Endosc, 2016, 30(6): 2422-2430. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4493-2
[11]	徐玫丽, 吴杰, 汪春莲, 等. 直肠和结肠来源的侧向发育型肿瘤的临床病理特征的差异[J]. 中南大学学报(医学版), 2018, 43(2): 192-197. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HNYD201802018.htm
[12]	SHIGITA K, OKA S, TANAKA S, et al. Clinical significance and validity of the subclassification for colorectal laterally spreading tumor granular type[J]. J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2016, 31(5): 973-979. doi: 10.1111/jgh.13238
[13]	中华医学会消化内镜学分会. 中国早期结直肠癌筛查及内镜诊治指南(2014, 北京)[J]. 中华医学杂志, 2015, 95(28): 2235-2252. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2015.28.002
[14]	BAE J H, YANG D H, LEE J Y, et al. Clinical outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for large colorectal neoplasms: A comparison of protruding and laterally spreading tumors[J]. Surg Endosc, 2016, 30(4): 1619-1628. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4392-6
[15]	BRIEDIGKEIT A, SULTANIE O, SIDO B, et al. Endoscopic mucosal resection of colorectal adenomas>20 mm: Risk factors for recurrence[J]. World J Gastrointest Endosc, 2016, 8(5): 276-281. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v8.i5.276
[16]	NISHIZAWA T, YAHAGI N. Endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection: Technique and new directions[J]. Curr Opin Gastroenterol, 2017, 33(5): 315-319. doi: 10.1097/MOG.0000000000000388
[17]	廖斐, 刘玉兰, 沈磊, 等. 内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗直径大于20 mm的结直肠侧向发育型肿瘤的临床研究[J]. 临床内科杂志, 2016, 33(4): 239-242. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-9057.2016.04.005
[18]	ACQUISTAPACE F, MATERNINI F, SNIDER L, et al. Endoscopic treatment of superficial colorectal neoplasms. Retrospective analysis of a single center technique and results[J]. G Chir, 2015, 36(6): 247-250. http://www.giornalechirurgia.it/common/php/portiere.php?ID=79a764ef59ea9187db81a3ec6324c854
[19]	AREZZO A, PASSERA R, MARCHESE N, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of endoscopic submucosal dissection vs endoscopic mucosal resection for colorectal lesions[J]. United European Gastroenterol J, 2016, 4(1): 18-29. doi: 10.1177/2050640615585470
[20]	金燕, 龚镭, 唐学军, 等. 预切开内镜黏膜切除术诊治结肠侧向发育型肿瘤的临床疗效评价[J]. 中国内镜杂志, 2016, 22(8): 94-98. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGNJ201608023.htm