Intervention effect of individualised psychological counselling combined with ear acupoint pressing on anxiety and depression during puerperium
-
摘要:
目的 探讨个体化心理辅导联合耳穴压豆对产褥期产妇焦虑、抑郁的影响。 方法 按照纳入标准随机选择2019年1月—2020年1月在亳州市人民医院分娩的产妇100例。采用随机数字表法分为观察组和对照组,每组50例。对照组仅进行常规护理,观察组在常规护理基础上行个体化心理辅导联合耳穴压豆。比较2组产妇分娩前后汉密尔顿焦虑量表(Hamilton anxiety scale,HAMA),汉密尔顿抑郁量表(Hamilton depression scale,HAMD)评分和心理健康知识知晓率评分。 结果 2组产妇的年龄、妊娠周期、教育水平等指标比较差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05);观察组产褥期健康知识问卷知晓率达94.00%,显著高于对照组74.00%,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。分娩前对照组HAMA评分为(11.74±1.20)分,HAMD评分为(12.10±2.35)分,观察组HAMA评分为(11.72±1.99)分,HAMD评分为(12.04±2.37)分,2组差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05),而分娩后1周,对照组HAMA评分为(11.38±0.75)分,HAMD评分为(11.80±0.98)分,观察组HAMA评分为(5.90±0.54)分,HAMD评分为(7.29±1.55)分,2组比较差异有统计学意义(均P < 0.05)。 结论 在产妇产褥期护理中,个体化心理辅导联合耳穴压豆方案可以有效改善产褥期产妇的焦虑、抑郁情况,提高产妇的自理能力,促进产妇产褥期恢复。 Abstract:Objective To explore the effect of individualised psychological counselling combined with ear acupoint pressing beans on anxiety and depression during puerperium. Methods According to the inclusion criteria, 100 women who gave birth in Bozhou People's Hospital from January 2019 to January 2020 were randomly selected. Using the random number table method, they were divided into observation group and control group, with 50 cases each. The pregnant women in the control group only received routine nursing care, whilst the observation group was given individualised psychological counselling combined with ear acupoint pressing on the basis of routine nursing care. The Hamilton anxiety scale (HAMA), Hamilton depression scale (HAMD) and mental health knowledge awareness scores were compared between the two groups before and after delivery. Results No significant differences were observed in the age, pregnancy cycle, education level and other indicators of the two groups (all P>0.05). The awareness rate of the puerperal health knowledge questionnaire in the observation group reached 94.00%, which was significantly higher than that in the control group (74.00%), and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The HAMA score (11.74±1.20) and HAMD score (12.10±2.35) of the control group before delivery were not significantly different from those (11.72±1.99 and 12.04±2.37) of the observation group (all P>0.05). One week after delivery, the HAMA and HAMD scores of the control group (11.38±0.75 and 11.80±0.98) and observation group (5.90±0.54 and 7.29±1.55) were statistically different (all P < 0.05). Conclusion In puerperium nursing, individualised psychological counselling combined with ear acupoint pressing can effectively improve the anxiety and depression, improve the self-care ability and promote the recovery of the puerpera. -
Key words:
- Individualised psychological counselling /
- Ear pressing beans /
- Puerperium /
- Anxiety /
- Depression
-
表 1 2组产妇基线资料比较
组别 例数 年龄(x±s, 岁) 妊娠周期(x±s, 周) 教育水平(例) 大专及以下 本科及以上 观察组 50 25.08±2.17 39.95±0.92 31 19 对照组 50 25.24±2.20 39.92±0.88 34 16 统计量 0.387a 0.164a 0.396b P值 0.460 0.871 0.529 注:a为t检验, b为χ2值。 表 2 2组产妇分娩前与分娩1周后HAMA、HAMD评分比较(x±s,分)
组别 例数 HAMA评分 t值 P值 HAMD评分 t值 P值 分娩前 分娩后 分娩前 分娩后 对照组 50 11.74±1.20 11.38±0.75 1.800 0.075 12.10±2.35 11.80±0.98 0.833 0.497 观察组 50 11.72±1.99 5.90±0.54 21.546 < 0.001 12.04±2.37 7.29±1.55 11.861 < 0.001 t值 0.256 41.930 0.132 9.387 P值 0.799 < 0.001 0.901 < 0.001 -
[1] 张冬梅. 以罗伊适应模式为指导的护理干预对产妇产后抑郁、睡眠质量及满意度的影响[J]. 现代医药卫生, 2020, 36(7): 1078-1080. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-5519.2020.07.042 [2] NAKIC RADOS S, TADINAC M, HERMAN R. Anxiety during pregnancy and postpartum: course, predictors and comorbidity with postpartum depression[J]. Acta Clin Croat, 2018, 57(1): 39-51. doi: 10.20471/acc.2018.57.01.05 [3] 李静如, 郭晓琴, 章娟. 产褥期妇女自我护理需求的质性分析[J]. 国际护理学杂志, 2019, 38(2): 177-180. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4351.2019.02.011 [4] LIU Z H, HE S T, DENG C M, et al. Neuraxial labour analgesia is associated with a reduced risk of maternal depression at 2 years after childbirth: A multicentre, prospective, longitudinal study[J]. Eur J Anaesthesiol, 2019, 36(10): 745-754. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001058 [5] 岳晓燕, 孙喜燕. 产妇抑郁情绪的原因评估及护理防范[J]. 中国农村卫生, 2017, 20(6): 64. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NCWS201706071.htm [6] 刘晓玲, 刘红梅, 刘寨华. 产褥期抑郁症的中西医诊治进展[J]. 中国中医基础医学杂志, 2017, 23(10): 1495-1498. [7] 袁坤, 尹丽娜, 高丽红, 等. 耳穴护理与综合护理干预对产后抑郁症产妇生活质量的影响[J]. 现代中西医结合杂志, 2017, 26(14): 1585-1587. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-8849.2017.14.036 [8] ZHANG H, SU Q, YAO D, et al. Prolactin, a potential mediator of reduced social interactive behavior in newborn infants following maternal perinatal depressive symptoms[J]. J Affect Disord, 2017, 215(3): 274-280. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ShoppingCartURL&_method=add&_eid=1-s2.0-S0165032716319644&originContentFamily=serial&_origin=article&_ts=1490015964&md5=5dd13761b778dc39321e50ccc3391a8d [9] 罗曼. 舒适护理在孕产妇的应用效果及对妊娠结局和抑郁心理的影响[J]. 国际护理学杂志, 2019, 38(11): 1590-1593. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4351.2019.11.018 [10] 于惬, 代香君, 杜晓艳. 自我效能联合抚触护理在妊娠期高血压产妇心理应激反应与母婴结局中的应用[J]. 护理实践与研究, 2019, 16(11): 108-109. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9676.2019.11.045 [11] 周亚萍, 武静. 延续性护理对初产妇产褥期恢复的影响[J]. 齐鲁护理杂志, 2018, 24(2): 70-72. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7256.2018.02.028 [12] 毛红芳, 荣荷花, 王子文, 等. 上海市嘉定区孕产妇心理健康状况和保健需求变化调查[J]. 中国妇幼保健, 2017, 32(12): 2729-2734. [13] 涂静. 延续性护理对初产妇产褥期身体与心理恢复的干预效果分析[J]. 护理实践与研究, 2018, 15(18): 88-90. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9676.2018.18.039 [14] 杜稳侠, 王荣, 李佰成, 等. 产后访视健康教育在产妇产褥期中的应用效果[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2016, 20(18): 150-152. doi: 10.7619/jcmp.201618048 [15] 李秀玲. 益气养血安神方联合耳穴治疗心脾两虚型产后抑郁临床观察[J]. 陕西中医, 2017, 38(2): 230-231. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SXZY201702042.htm [16] 邓姗丹, 李秒. 穴位按摩法联合心理护理干预对高龄产妇分娩结局的影响[J]. 检验医学与临床, 2020, 17(10): 1432-1434. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9455.2020.10.035 [17] 杨洪萍. 穴位按摩联合导乐分娩对初产妇心理状态、分娩情况及母婴结局的影响[J]. 长春中医药大学学报, 2017, 33(1): 108-111. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CZXX201701038.htm [18] 钱春红, 陈渊, 周竞奋, 等. 个体化心理干预对产妇产后抑郁状况, 睡眠质量及泌乳情况的影响[J]. 现代中西医结合杂志, 2016, 25(2): 210-212. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XDJH201602035.htm [19] 刘想想, 黄勤瑾, 唐美玉, 等. 中医体质辨识在孕产妇保健中的应用[J]. 上海医药, 2019, 40(2): 59-62. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYIY201902020.htm [20] 谢丽君, 徐丽虹, 黄利明. 中医护理在改善产褥期产妇生理和心理状况中的应用[J]. 全科护理, 2018, 16(21): 2639-2641. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JTHS201821033.htm
点击查看大图
表(2)
计量
- 文章访问数: 118
- HTML全文浏览量: 137
- PDF下载量: 2
- 被引次数: 0