留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

新预测模型AULTS评分对缺血性脑卒中的预测价值

王娅 周厚援 罗志强 孟定强 郑颖颖

王娅, 周厚援, 罗志强, 孟定强, 郑颖颖. 新预测模型AULTS评分对缺血性脑卒中的预测价值[J]. 中华全科医学, 2021, 19(10): 1666-1668,1696. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002137
引用本文: 王娅, 周厚援, 罗志强, 孟定强, 郑颖颖. 新预测模型AULTS评分对缺血性脑卒中的预测价值[J]. 中华全科医学, 2021, 19(10): 1666-1668,1696. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002137
WANG Ya, ZHOU Hou-yuan, LUO Zhi-qiang, MENG Ding-qiang, ZHENG Ying-ying. Predictive value of the new predictive model AULTS score for ischemic stroke[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2021, 19(10): 1666-1668,1696. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002137
Citation: WANG Ya, ZHOU Hou-yuan, LUO Zhi-qiang, MENG Ding-qiang, ZHENG Ying-ying. Predictive value of the new predictive model AULTS score for ischemic stroke[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2021, 19(10): 1666-1668,1696. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002137

新预测模型AULTS评分对缺血性脑卒中的预测价值

doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002137
基金项目: 

国家自然科学基金项目 81760043

详细信息
    通讯作者:

    周厚援,E-mail: 465491791@qq.com

  • 中图分类号: R743.3  R544.1

Predictive value of the new predictive model AULTS score for ischemic stroke

  • 摘要:   目的  本研究旨在建立新的预测模型,为脑卒中发病风险的评估提供新的方法。  方法  选择2012—2017年于重庆铜梁区中医院神经内科临床诊断为脑卒中和同时期住院或门诊体检的非脑卒中患者为研究对象。SPSS 22.0统计学软件和R语言用来进行数据分析和模型构建,根据ROC曲线下面积排序,筛选构建模型所用的变量,模型的构建采用R语言进行,并用列线图来呈现。  结果  单因素分析显示缺血性脑卒中组和对照组饮酒、尿酸、血脂和收缩压差异有统计学意义(均P < 0.05)。通过ROC曲线下面积排序进入最终模型的变量为年龄(AUC=0.737)、尿酸(AUC=0.567)、甘油三酯(AUC=0.537)、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(AUC=0.541)、收缩压(AUC=0.615),预测模型对脑卒中的预测价值的ROC曲线下面积为0.789(95% CI:0.765~0.814, P < 0.001)。根据模型预测积分构建新型列线图,按照模型预测可能性积分四分位,位于Q1发生脑卒中的概率为18.3%,Q2发生脑卒中的概率为40.3%,Q3发生脑卒中的概率为60.0%,Q4发生脑卒中的概率为82.7%。  结论  本研究显示新型风险预测模型对脑卒中有良好的预测价值,值得推广应用。

     

  • 图  1  预测脑卒中风险的列线图

    图  2  新型模型预测脑卒中的准确性

    表  1  脑卒中组和健康对照组临床资料比较

    组别 例数 年龄(x ±s,岁) 性别[例(%)] 吸烟[例(%)] 饮酒[例(%)] 尿素氮(x ±s,mmol/L) 肌酐(x ±s,μmol/L) 尿酸(x ±s,mmol/L) 葡萄糖(x ±s,mmol/L)
    男性 女性
    脑卒中组 644 49.76±14.50 340(52.80) 304(47.20) 190(29.50) 46(7.14) 4.79±1.90 72.16±21.46 290.37±78.72 5.32±2.03
    对照组 662 50.47±17.00 350(52.87) 312(47.13) 158(23.87) 73(11.03) 4.94±1.54 70.87±19.38 276.68±81.84 5.24±1.73
    统计量 -0.636a 0.001b 2.900b 5.947b 1.645a -1.089a -3.076a -0.710a
    P 0.557 0.978 0.091 0.016 0.100 0.276 0.002 0.478
    组别 例数 TC (x ±s,mmol/L) TG (x ±s,mmol/L) HDL-C (x ±s,mmol/L) LDL-C (x ±s,mmol/L) BMI (x ±s) 收缩压(x ±s,mm Hg) 舒张压(x ±s,mm Hg)
    脑卒中组 644 4.50±1.18 1.74±1.67 1.19±0.37 2.93±0.97 25.98±4.29 145.36±24.84 89.05±18.86
    对照组 662 4.68±1.15 1.52±1.11 1.27±0.43 2.73±0.85 26.41±4.20 136.10±23.05 87.10±20.21
    统计量 2.828a -2.847a 3.762a 3.990a 1.803a 6.900a 1.701a
    P 0.005 0.004 < 0.001 < 0.001 0.072 < 0.001 0.089
    注:at值,b为χ2值; 1 mm Hg=0.133 kPa。
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  多变量logistic回归分析结果

    变量 B SE Wald χ2 P OR(95% CI)
    年龄 0.071 0.006 145.291 < 0.001 1.074(1.062~1.087)
    性别 0.011 0.163 0.005 0.944 1.011(0.735~1.391)
    肌酐 -0.001 0.003 0.217 0.642 0.999(0.992~1.005)
    尿酸 0.002 0.001 6.740 0.009 1.002(1.001~1.004)
    甘油三酯 0.134 0.055 5.868 0.015 1.143(1.026~1.275)
    总胆固醇 0.075 0.112 0.447 0.504 1.077(0.866~1.341)
    高密度脂蛋白 -0.009 0.189 0.002 0.964 0.991(0.685~1.435)
    低密度脂蛋白 0.317 0.128 6.173 0.013 1.374(1.070~1.764)
    吸烟 0.510 0.211 5.826 0.016 1.666(1.101~2.522)
    饮酒 -0.033 0.288 0.013 0.908 0.967(0.550~1.701)
    收缩压 0.032 0.005 40.909 < 0.001 1.033(1.022~1.043)
    舒张压 -0.062 0.008 65.377 0.089 0.939(0.925~0.109)
    常数项 4.304 0.586 54.001 < 0.001 73.982
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  3  入选变量的ROC曲线下面积

    变量 AUC SE P 95% CI
    年龄 0.737 0.014 < 0.001 0.710~0.774
    尿酸 0.567 0.016 < 0.001 0.535~0.598
    甘油三酯 0.537 0.016 0.024 0.505~0.568
    低密度脂蛋白 0.541 0.016 0.012 0.509~0.572
    收缩压 0.615 0.016 < 0.001 0.585~0.646
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] ZHOU M, WANG H, ZHU J, et al. Cause-specific mortality for 240 causes in China during 1990-2013: A systematic subnational analysis for the global burden of disease study 2013[J]. Lancet, 2016, 387(10015): 251-272. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00551-6
    [2] YANG X, LI J, HU D, et al. Predicting the 10-year risks of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in Chinese population: The China-PAR Project (prediction for ASCVD risk in China)[J]. Circulation, 2016, 134(19): 1430-1440. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.022367
    [3] PIKULA A, BEISER A S, WANG J, et al. Lipid and lipoprotein measurements and the risk of ischemic vascular events: Framingham Study[J]. Neurology, 2015, 84(5): 472-479. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000001202
    [4] LONG C, LI M. Age and stroke severity: Hazards for intravenous thrombolysis?[J]. Med Princ Pract, 2016, 25(1): 99-100. doi: 10.1159/000439383
    [5] ALONSO DE LECINANA M, MAZYA M V, KOSTULAS N, et al. Stroke care and application of thrombolysis in Ibero-America: Report from the SITS-SIECV Ibero-American stroke register[J]. Stroke, 2019, 50(9): 2507-2512. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.025668
    [6] WAJNGARTEN M, SILVA G S. Hypertension and stroke: Update on treatment[J]. Eur Cardiol, 2019, 14(2): 111-115. doi: 10.15420/ecr.2019.11.1
    [7] PISISTOIA F, SACCO S, DEGAN D, et al. Hypertension and stroke: Epidemiological aspects and clinical evaluation[J]. High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev, 2016, 23(1): 9-18. doi: 10.1007/s40292-015-0115-2
    [8] LEE S, NA Y, TAE W S, et al. Clinical and neuroimaging factors associated with aphasia severity in stroke patients: Diffusion tensor imaging study[J]. Sci Rep, 2020, 10(1): 12874. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-69741-1
    [9] SRIPRAPADANG C, THEWJITCHAROEN Y, BURANAPIN S, et al. Effectiveness and safety of sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors in Thai adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A real-world study[J]. Curr Med Res Opin, 2020, 36(10): 1601-1610. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2020.1808454
    [10] TAN B Y Q, TAN J T C, CHEAH D, et al. Long-Term trends in ischemic stroke incidence and risk factors: Perspectives from an Asian stroke registry[J]. J Stroke, 2020, 22(3): 396-399. doi: 10.5853/jos.2020.00878
    [11] TU W J, QIU H C, LIU Y K, et al. Elevated levels of adiponectin associated with major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events and mortality risk in ischemic stroke[J]. Cardiovasc Diabetol, 2020, 19(1): 125. doi: 10.1186/s12933-020-01096-3
    [12] PRABHAKAR S, SURAVARAPU S, MATHAI D, et al. Risk factors for stroke in rural population of telangana state of India, an unmatched case control study[J]. J Neurosci Rural Pract, 2020, 11(3): 448-453. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1713291
    [13] KONO Y, TERASAWA Y, SAKAI K, et al. Risk factors, etiology, and outcome of ischemic stroke in young adults: A Japanese multicenter prospective study[J]. J Neurol Sci, 2020, 417: 117068. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2020.117068
    [14] MAI X, LIANG X. Risk factors for stroke based on the national health and nutrition examination survey[J]. J Nutr Health Aging, 2020, 24(7): 791-795. doi: 10.1007/s12603-020-1430-4
    [15] IFEJIKA N L, BHADANE M, CAI C C, et al. Characteristics of acute stroke patients readmitted to inpatient rehabilitation facilities: A cohort study[J]. PM R, 2021, 13(5): 479-487. doi: 10.1002/pmrj.12462
    [16] 张爽, 刘相城, 胡姣月, 等. 脑梗死患者血清高迁移率族蛋白B1及S100β水平与认知功能关系[J]. 中华实用诊断与治疗杂志, 2019, 33(7): 675-677. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HNZD201907015.htm
    [17] ELDHOLM R S, PERSSON K, BARCA M L, et al. Association between vascular comorbidity and progression of Alzheimer's disease: A two-year observational study in Norwegian memory clinics[J]. BMC Geriatr, 2018, 18(1): 120. doi: 10.1186/s12877-018-0813-4
    [18] UITERWIJK R, STAALS J, HUIJTS M, et al. Framingham stroke risk profile is related to cerebral small vessel disease progression and lower cognitive performance in patients with hypertension[J]. J Clin Hypertens(Greenwich), 2018, 20(2): 240-245. doi: 10.1111/jch.13175
    [19] YIN J X, YU C Y, LIU H X, et al. A model to predict unstable carotid plaques in population with high risk of stroke[J]. BMC Cardiovasc Disord, 2020, 20(1): 164. doi: 10.1186/s12872-020-01450-z
  • 加载中
图(2) / 表(3)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  192
  • HTML全文浏览量:  103
  • PDF下载量:  5
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2020-11-01
  • 网络出版日期:  2022-02-15

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回