Analysis of dietary energy intake in overweight and obese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus
-
摘要:
目的 调查和分析超重与肥胖2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者的膳食能量摄入情况。 方法 选取2018年2月—2020年2月在浙江省人民医院天台分院内分泌科就诊的T2DM患者128例为研究对象,根据BMI将患者分为体重正常组(45例)、超重组(48例)和肥胖组(35例)。选取同期在我院门诊就诊的健康非糖尿病体检者(健康体检组)45例作为对照组。比较和分析各组日均摄入总能量、膳食纤维摄入量,比较各组三大营养素的摄入量和供能及供能比。 结果 肥胖组患者日均总能量摄入明显高于体重正常组和超重组患者(均P < 0.01)。肥胖组患者碳水化合物摄入量明显高于体重正常组和超重组患者(均P < 0.01)。肥胖组患者碳水化合物供能明显高于体重正常组和超重组患者(均P < 0.01);3组患者脂肪供能、蛋白质供能比较差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。3组患者的碳水化合物、脂肪和蛋白质供能比之间比较差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05),均高于指南推荐量。3组患者膳食纤维摄入量比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),均低于指南推荐量。 结论 T2DM患者的膳食能量摄入不合理,肥胖T2DM患者的日均总能量摄入过量,能量过量的食物来源主要为碳水化合物,临床应对肥胖T2DM患者限制总能量和碳水化合物的摄入,降低脂肪供能比,并适当增加膳食纤维的摄入量。 Abstract:Objective To investigate and analyse the dietary energy intake of overweight and obese patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM). Methods A total of 128 T2DM patients admitted at our hospital from February 2018 to February 2020 were selected as the research object. They were divided into the normal weight group (45 cases), overweight group (35 cases) and obesity group (48 cases). A total of 45 healthy non-diabetic patients (healthy physical examination group) who visited our outpatient department during the same period were selected as controls. The daily total energy intake and dietary fibre intake of the three groups were compared and analysed, and the intake, energy supply and energy ratio of the three nutrients in each group were compared. Results The average daily total energy intake of the obesity group was significantly higher than that of the normal weight group and the hyperrecombination group (all P < 0.01). The carbohydrate intake in the obesity group was significantly higher than that in the normal weight group and the hyperrecombination group (all P < 0.01). The carbohydrate energy supply in the obesity group was significantly higher than that in the normal weight group and the hyperrecombination group (all P < 0.01). No statistical significance was observed in the comparison of fat and protein energy supply amongst the three groups (all P>0.05). The carbohydrate, fat and protein energy ratio results of the three groups were not statistically significant (all P>0.05) and were all higher than the recommended amount in the guidelines. No statistically significant difference was observed in dietary fibre intake amongst the three groups (P>0.05), which was lower than the recommended amount in the guidelines. Conclusion The dietary energy intake and daily total energy intake of obese T2DM patients are high, and the food source of excess energy is mainly carbohydrate. Clinical treatment for obese T2DM patients should involve limiting the intake of total energy and carbohydrate, reducing the fat energy supply ratio and appropriately increasing the intake of dietary fibre. -
Key words:
- Type 2 diabetes /
- Overweight /
- Obesity /
- Dietary energy intake
-
表 1 3组T2DM患者总能量摄入评价比较[例(%)]
组别 例数 摄入不足 摄入理想 摄入过量 体重正常组 45 0(0.00) 29(64.44) 16(35.56)a 超重组 48 1(2.08) 26(54.17) 21(43.75)a 肥胖组 35 0(0.00) 1(2.86) 34(97.14) 注:3组总能量摄入情况比较,H=31.963, P < 0.001;与肥胖组比较,aP < 0.01。 表 2 各组碳水化合物摄入情况比较(x±s)
组别 例数 碳水化合物摄入量(g) 碳水化合物供能(kcal) 碳水化合物供能比(%) 体重正常组 45 265.83±51.36 1 063.68±102.76a 50.76±3.87 超重组 48 273.25±52.65 1 125.79±105.69a 51.26±4.95 肥胖组 35 365.26±51.76ab 1 376.75±103.96ab 51.63±3.86 健康体检组 45 243.65±52.68abc 935.72±101.98 51.83±3.92 F值 39.747 123.104 0.549 P值 < 0.001 < 0.001 0.603 注:与体重正常组比较,aP < 0.01;与超重组比较,bP < 0.01;与肥胖组比较,cP < 0.05。 表 3 各组蛋白质摄入情况比较(x±s)
组别 例数 蛋白质摄入量(g) 蛋白质供能(kcal) 蛋白质供能比(%) 体重正常组 45 87.73±11.26 354.79±13.86 16.36±1.95 超重组 48 88.15±12.31 354.68±13.96 16.25±1.97 肥胖组 35 91.35±11.25 351.31±15.77 15.68±1.98 健康体检组 45 86.75±11.32 358.65±15.98 15.85±1.92 F值 1.118 1.635 1.119 P值 0.343 0.183 0.343 表 4 各组脂肪摄入量比较(x±s)
组别 例数 脂肪摄入量(g) 脂肪供能(kcal) 脂肪供能比(%) 体重正常组 45 76.81±8.72a 688.48±15.65a 32.28±2.18a 超重组 48 77.13±9.89a 689.28±15.72a 31.63±2.23a 肥胖组 35 78.19±8.75a 691.51±15.71a 32.72±2.15a 健康体检组 45 69.19±8.91 665.65±15.82 23.75±2.13 F值 8.514 26.015 167.534 P值 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 注:与健康体检组比较,aP < 0.01。 -
[1] 谢秀梅. 2型糖尿病肥胖患者的标准化饮食护理干预[J]. 广东医学, 2017, 38(z2): 196-197. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-9448.2017.z2.081 [2] 乔巧. 肥胖和糖尿病患者的饮食行为学分析[J]. 临床医药文献电子杂志, 2018, 5(19): 1-3. doi: 10.3877/j.issn.2095-8242.2018.19.001 [3] 陈璐璐. 中美2型糖尿病合并肥胖综合心理专家共识[J]. 中华内分泌代谢杂志, 2016, 32(8): 11-12. [4] 王宏星, 管崟. 2型糖尿病肥胖患者膳食摄入及代谢特点[C]//中国营养学会临床营养分会: 中国营养学会. 第16届全国临床营养学术会议资料汇编, 苏州, 2018. [5] 中华医学会糖尿病学分会. 中国2型糖尿病防治指南(2017年版)[J]. 中国实用内科杂志, 2018, 38(4): 292-344. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYNK201804009.htm [6] 高霜, 张艳丽, 吴姗姗, 等. 2型糖尿病患者的糖尿病痛苦现状调查及影响因素分析[J]. 中华全科医学, 2020, 18(12): 2136-2139. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYQY202012042.htm [7] 郑云芝. 超重与肥胖2型糖尿病患者的膳食结构调查分析[D]. 福州: 福建医科大学, 2018. [8] 杨茜, 邹大进. 肥胖与2型糖尿病的共同起源: 能量过剩引发肝脏胰岛素抵抗[J]. 中华糖尿病杂志, 2016, 8(2): 116-119. [9] 郑云芝, 林忆阳, 徐向进. 超重与肥胖2型糖尿病患者的膳食结构调查分析[J]. 中华糖尿病杂志, 2019, 11(11): 742-746. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-5809.2019.11.009 [10] TAUBES G. What if sugar is worse than just empty calories?An essay by Gary Taubes[J]. BMJ, 2018, 360: j5808. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.j5808. [11] 石小琴. 父代高血糖改变子代下丘脑摄食调节神经通路加速肥胖形成的分子机制研究[D]. 重庆: 重庆医科大学, 2017. [12] 杨玉彬, 柯斌, 秦鉴. 不同热量限制方法对肥胖胰岛素抵抗大鼠体质量及摄食的影响[J]. 中医药导报, 2017, 23(16): 26-32. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HNZB201716009.htm [13] 邓军. 南街社区93例2型糖尿病患者膳食调查及营养干预[J]. 大家健康(学术版), 2015, 9(10): 239-240. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JKXS201510287.htm [14] 周岳琴, 周新荣, 张付生, 等. 300例2型糖尿病患者膳食摄入情况调查[J]. 实用预防医学, 2017, 24(10): 1227-1229. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-3110.2017.10.021 [15] 王卫光, 章小艳, 斯彩娟, 等. 碳水化合物计数法对糖尿病合并非酒精性脂肪肝患者的疗效观察[J]. 中华全科医学, 2019, 17(6): 981-983, 1017. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYQY201906026.htm [16] 陈懿, 冷俊逸. 比较低碳水化合物饮食和低脂肪饮食1年对2型糖尿病患者体质量及血糖的影响[J]. 实用临床护理学电子杂志, 2019, 4(49): 13. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SLHL201949014.htm [17] 范美球, 徐谷根, 田慧. 膳食纤维强化饮食干预对早期肥胖型2型糖尿病的疗效分析[J]. 新医学, 2019, 50(11): 845-849. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-9802.2019.11.011
计量
- 文章访问数: 193
- HTML全文浏览量: 78
- PDF下载量: 6
- 被引次数: 0