链式管理预防小儿神经外科手术压力性损伤的效果

王煜; 韩丁; 边寒雪; 吴新雁; 陈梅丽; 潘守东

doi:10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002212

链式管理预防小儿神经外科手术压力性损伤的效果

doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002212

1.
首都儿科研究所附属儿童医院麻醉科，北京 100020
2.
首都儿科研究所附属儿童医院护理部，北京 100020

基金项目:

首都临床特色应用研究项目 Z181100001718096

首都儿科研究所青年课题基金 QN-2019-22

详细信息

通讯作者:
潘守东, E-mail: panshoudong@shouer.com.cn

中图分类号: R473.6 R651
计量
- 文章访问数: 168
- HTML全文浏览量: 123
- PDF下载量: 2
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2020-08-12
- 网络出版日期: 2022-02-15

Application of chain management to prevent pressure injury in paediatric neurosurgery

1.
Department of Anesthesiology, Children's Hospital Affiliated to Capital Institute of Pediatrics, Beijing 100020, China

摘要

摘要: 目的在小儿神经外科手术中应用链式管理，观察分析其预防小儿神经外科手术压力性损伤的效果。方法选取2019年3月—2020年1月在首都儿科研究所附属儿童医院符合纳入标准的神经外科手术患儿120例。按随机数字表法分为对照组和实验组，各60例。对照组接受常规护理模式预防压力性损伤。观察组采用链式管理预防压力性损伤, 建立多科合作的压力性损伤护理小组, 在病房、手术室、麻醉恢复室、重症监护室，针对皮肤情况和预防压力性损伤的措施, 采取“链条式”闭环管理。比较2组患儿手术后2 d内各观测时点压力损伤评分、医护人员满意度和患儿满意度。结果观察组和对照组围术期压力性损伤发生率分别为3.3%(2/60)和11.7%(7/60), 差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术后即刻至术后24 h，观察组患儿受压部位皮肤情况优于对照组(P < 0.05)。观察组患儿家长满意度和医护满意度均显著高于对照组(均P < 0.05)。结论作为一种多科室协同合作的管理模式，链式管理用于小儿神经外科手术有利于降低围术期压力性损伤发生率, 提高家长满意度和医护满意度，促进团队合作, 值得在临床推广。
- 链式管理 /
- 压力性损伤 /
- 小儿 /
- 护理管理 /
- 神经外科
Abstract: Objective To observe and analyse the effect of chain management to prevent pressure injury in paediatric neurosurgery. Methods A total of 120 neurosurgical children who met the inclusion criteria from March 2019 to January 2020 in our hospital were selected. According to the random number table generated by SPSS 22.0, the patients were divided into control group and experimental group with 60 cases in each group. The control group received routine nursing mode to prevent pressure injury. The observation group received chain management to prevent pressure injury. A multidisciplinary cooperative nursing group for pressure injury was formed in the ward, operating room, anaesthesia recovery room and intensive care unit, specific to the skin conditions to stress injury prevention measure. The closed-loop 'chain' management was applied. The score of pressure injury within 2 days after operation and satisfaction rate of medical staff and children were compared between the two groups. Results The incidences of perioperative pressure injury in the observation group and control group were 3.3% (2/60) and 11.7% (7/60), respectively, with no statistical difference (P>0.05). From immediately after surgery to 24-h post-surgery, the skin condition of the pressure site was better in the observation group than in the control group (P < 0.05). The satisfaction rates of parents and medical staff in the observation group were significantly higher than those in the control group (all P < 0.05). Conclusion As a multidisciplinary collaborative management mode, the use of chain management in paediatric neurosurgery is helpful to reduce the incidence of perioperative pressure injury, improve parents' and medical staff's satisfaction rates and promote team cooperation, which is worthy of clinical promotion.
- Chain management /
- Pressure injury /
- Children /
- Nursing management /
- Neurosurgery

HTML全文

表 1 2组手术患儿基线资料比较

组别	例数	性别 (男/女，例)	年龄 [M(P₂₅, P₇₅)，岁]	体重 [M(P₂₅, P₇₅)，kg]	手术时长[M(P₂₅, P₇₅)，min]	体位(例)				头部固定(例)
组别	例数	性别 (男/女，例)	年龄 [M(P₂₅, P₇₅)，岁]	体重 [M(P₂₅, P₇₅)，kg]	手术时长[M(P₂₅, P₇₅)，min]	仰卧位	仰卧头侧位	俯卧位	侧卧位	头架	头托	头圈
对照组	60	34/26	3.4(1.7, 7.1)	17.1(11.1, 25.1)	300(262, 330)	16	19	21	4	11	3	46
观察组	60	36/24	5.5(2.5, 10.0)	20.5(12.4, 37.1)	320(270, 398)	16	30	11	3	16	4	40
统计量		0.137^a	-1.874^b	-1.677^b	-1.401^b	5.726^a
P值		0.711	0.061	0.094	0.161	0.124				0.485^c
注：^a为χ²值, ^b为Z值，^c为Fisher精确检验。

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 2组手术患儿术后不同测点受压部位皮肤情况的比较(例)

组别	例数	时点	皮肤情况
组别	例数	时点	良好	压红	1期PI	2期PI
对照组	60	术后即刻	39	16	3	2
		术后0.5 h	39	16	3	2
		术后2 h	39	15	4	2
		术后4 h	39	14	5	2
		术后24 h	39	14	4	3
		术后2 d	45	8	4	3
观察组	60	术后即刻	49	10	0	1
		术后0.5 h	49	10	0	1
		术后2 h	49	10	0	1
		术后4 h	49	9	1	1
		术后24 h	50	8	1	1
		术后2 d	52	6	1	1

下载: 导出CSV

表 3 2组手术患儿家长满意度和医护满意度的比较(x±s，分)

组别	例数	患儿家长满意度评分	医护满意度评分
对照组	60	82.1±3.2	84.4±2.2
观察组	60	90.6±2.3	89.6±1.7
t值		-16.846	-10.105
P值		< 0.001	< 0.001

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(23)

[1]	北京护理学会手术室专业委员会. 术中获得性压力性损伤预防与护理专家共识[J]. 中华现代护理杂志, 2020, 26(28): 3853-3861. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115682-20200204-00415
[2]	郝雪梅, 胡小灵, 马丽, 等. 小儿发生手术压疮的危险因素分析[J]. 解放军护理杂志, 2013, 30(15): 34-36. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-9993.2013.15.011
[3]	EDSBERG L E, BLACK J M, GOLDBERG M, et al. Revised national pressure ulcer advisory panel pressure injury staging system: Revised pressure injury staging system[J]. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs, 2016, 43(6): 585-597. doi: 10.1097/WON.0000000000000281
[4]	EKEH A P, ILYAS S, SAXE J M, et al. Successful placement of intracranial pressure monitors by trauma surgeons[J]. J Trauma Acute Care Surg, 2014, 76(2): 286-290. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000092
[5]	HAYES R M, SPEAR M E, LEE S I, et al. Relationship between time in the operating room and incident pressure ulcers: A matched case-control study[J]. Am J Med Qual, 2015, 30(6): 591-597. doi: 10.1177/1062860614545125
[6]	胡娟娟, 高兴莲, 杨英, 等. 手术室护士和病房护士皮肤合作评估及管理在手术高危压疮患者中的应用[J]. 现代临床护理, 2018, 17(3): 29-32. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-8283.2018.03.007
[7]	裴瑾, 刘晓黎, 魏彦姝. 链式管理在预防围手术期压力性损伤中的应用现状[J]. 中国实用护理杂志, 2019, 35(21): 1678-1681. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1672-7088.2019.21.016
[8]	吴玲, 陆巍, 傅巧美, 等. 压力性损伤链式管理临床实践[J]. 中国护理管理, 2018, 18(1): 22-25, 32. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-1756.2018.01.007
[9]	亓秀梅, 周军, 王君霞, 等. 儿童压疮高危风险触发工具形成及信效度检验[J]. 中国实用护理杂志, 2018, 34(18): 1398-1402. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1672-7088.2018.18.009
[10]	贾红影, 段征征, 吴欣娟, 等. 临床护士压疮风险评估现状及影响因素研究进展[J]. 护理研究, 2016, 30(13): 1537-1540. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6493.2016.13.001
[11]	熊英, 孟伟, 宗楠, 等. 不同护理方法对小儿神经外科长时间手术压疮的预防效果[J]. 中华现代护理杂志, 2016, 22(19): 2770-2772. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-2907.2016.19.029
[12]	章勤, 宋长春, 邹琪, 等. 改良经口气管插管固定法对ICU患者口面颈部器械性压力损伤的效果观察[J]. 中华全科医学, 2020, 18(8): 1421-1424. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYQY202008047.htm
[13]	徐洪莲, 郝建玲. 2014版压疮预防和治疗临床实践指南的更新及解读[J]. 上海护理, 2018, 18(6): 5-8. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-8399.2018.06.001
[14]	魏彦姝, 武沛璋, 刘晓华, 等. 基于敏感风险指标的术中压力性损伤链式管理策略[J]. 护理研究, 2019, 33(6): 966-969. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SXHZ201906012.htm
[15]	唐绪容, 周蓉, 屈虹, 等. 护理敏感指标在儿童神经外科手术术中压力性损伤管理中的应用[J]. 检验医学与临床, 2020, 17(16): 2357-2359. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9455.2020.16.026
[16]	付伟, 陆连芳, 魏丽丽, 等. 医院压疮现患率调查与压疮管理[J]. 解放军护理杂志, 2015, 32(8): 16-20. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JFHL201508006.htm
[17]	蒋琪霞, 王桂玲, 翁志强. 压疮愈合计分量表在国内外压疮应用中的信度效度研究进展[J]. 护理学报, 2017, 24(6): 27-30. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NFHL201706008.htm
[18]	朱礼霞, 姜小琴, 丁晔. 医疗联合体助推压疮延伸服务模式的构建及实施[J]. 护理学报, 2016, 23(17): 36-38. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NFHL201617009.htm
[19]	封海霞, 谭靓靓, 李慧敏, 等. 基于医联体模式下压疮链式管理体系的构建与应用[J]. 解放军护理杂志, 2018, 35(8): 61-64. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JFHL201808019.htm
[20]	朱勤春, 吴燕. 诱导等待期间接台手术患者焦虑水平与信息需求的调查分析[J]. 中国临床医学, 2020, 27(2): 254-259. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LCYX202002019.htm
[21]	许瑛. 护理干预应用于微创颅内血肿清除术的临床效果[J]. 中华全科医学, 2016, 14(3): 494-495, 511. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYQY201603052.htm
[22]	侯丹丹. 护士在手术患者压力性损伤风险知情告知中体验的质性研究[J]. 当代护士(中旬刊), 2019, 26(3): 111-112. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DDHS201903050.htm
[23]	蒋维连. 护士对手术患者实施压力性损伤风险告知的体验[J]. 解放军护理杂志, 2019, 36(2): 41-44. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JFHL201902013.htm