Stanford A型主动脉夹层手术死亡风险因素分析

李艳丽; 高晴云; 冯俊波; 张成鑫; 葛圣林

doi:10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002266

Stanford A型主动脉夹层手术死亡风险因素分析

doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002266

安徽医科大学第一附属医院心脏大血管外科，安徽合肥 230022

基金项目:

安徽省自然科学基金项目 1808085MH279

详细信息

通讯作者:
葛圣林, E-mail: aydgsl@sina.com

中图分类号: R654.2 R543.1
计量
- 文章访问数: 294
- HTML全文浏览量: 101
- PDF下载量: 9
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2020-05-16
- 网络出版日期: 2022-03-03

The death risk factors of Stanford A aortic dissection surgery

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui 230022, China

摘要

摘要: 目的收集Stanford A型夹层患者围术期的临床资料以分析探讨夹层术后死亡的独立风险因素。方法收集2012年1月—2020年1月安徽医科大学第一附属医院心脏大血管外科收治共68例Stanford A型主动脉夹层手术患者的围手术期资料，根据患者预后分为术后存活组(50例)和术后死亡组(18例)。收集患者临床资料，对于术前、术中和术后资料进行t/χ²检验，经检验分析差异有统计学意义的术前和术中资料再行logistic多因素回归分析明确夹层手术死亡的风险因素。结果 2组患者术前临床资料的单因素分析可见，左心射血分数(LVEF) < 50%、术前低血压、术前心包积液、术前神经症状、累及冠脉和累及主动脉瓣的对比差异有统计学意义(均P＜0.05)。术中资料分析中，术中乳酸、超滤、尿量以及并行辅助时间的对比差异有统计学意义(均P＜0.05)。上述差异有统计学意义指标的二分类logistic回归分析中可见，术前LVEF < 50%(OR=33.163，P=0.037)和并行辅助时间(OR=1.248，P=0.004)差异有统计学意义。术后资料的风险因素分析中，拔管时间、二次手术、二次插管、苏醒时间、连续肾脏替代治疗、术后乳酸、ICU监护时间差异有统计学意义(均P < 0.05)。结论术前LVEF < 50%和并行辅助时间是A型主动脉夹层术后患者死亡的风险因素。
- A型主动脉夹层 /
- 风险因素 /
- 外科手术 /
- 体外循环
Abstract: Objective To explore the death risk factors after Stanford A aortic dissection surgery based on the perioperative data of patients with Stanford A aortic dissection. Methods A total of 68 patients with Stanford A aortic dissection from January 2012 to January 2020 were enrolled in the Cardiovascular Surgery Department of the First Affiliated Hospital of AnHui Medical University for the retrospective analysis. Based on clinical outcome, patients were divided into survival group (n=50) and death group (n=18). The preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative clinical data was summarized and studied retrospectively. Univariate analysis was performed by t/χ² test and further, multivariate analysis was performed by logistic regression based on significant results from univariate analysis to identify the death risk factors after Stanford A aortic dissection surgery. Results There were significant differences between two groups by univariate analysis for preoperative LVEF < 50%, preoperative hypotension, preoperative pericardial effusion, preoperative neurological disorder, involved coronary arteries, involved aortic valve, intraoperative lactic acid, ultrafiltration, urine volume and supportive cardiopulmonary by pass running time (all P < 0.05). Subsequently, preoperative LVEF < 50% (OR=33.163, P=0.037) and supportive cardiopulmonary bypass running time (OR=1.248, P=0.004) were significant factors by logistic regression analysis. Postoperatively, there were significant differences for extubation time, reoperation, re-intubation, awaking time, CRRT, postoperative lactic acid and ICU stay (all P < 0.05). Conclusion Both preoperative LVEF < 50% and supportive cardiopulmonary bypass running time are the death risk factors of Stanford A aortic dissection surgery.
- Type A aortic dissection /
- Risk factors /
- Surgery /
- Cardiopulmonary bypass

HTML全文

表 1 2组急性Stanford A型主动脉夹层患者术前资料对比(例)

组别	例数	年龄> 60岁	性别 (男/女，例)	BMI> 28	吸烟史	饮酒史	高血压病史 >10年	服药史	LVEF < 50%	术前低血压	术前心包积液	术前神经症状	累及冠脉系统	累及主动脉瓣
存活组	50	27	30/20	25	33	32	43	38	6	9	7	9	11	14
死亡组	18	12	9/9	11	11	11	15	14	7	11	9	10	12	10
χ²值		0.871	0.540	0.662	0.134	0.051	0.083	0.021	4.572	11.853	9.531	9.274	11.800	4.402
P值		0.351	0.463	0.483	0.714	0.830	0.781	0.832	0.033	0.001	0.002	0.021	0.001	0.042
注：LVEF为左心室射血分数。

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 2组急性Stanford A型主动脉夹层患者术中资料对比

组别	例数	手术>300 min(例)	体外循环> 250 min(例)	主动脉阻断> 180 min(例)	DHCA> 30 min(例)	自动复跳 (例)	输血量> 4 U(例)	失血量> 1 000 mL(例)	乳酸(x ±s， mmol/L)	超滤 (x ±s，mL)	尿量 (x ±s，mL)	并行辅助时间 (x ±s，min)
存活组	50	44	43	40	19	46	45	38	8.29±2.33	3 819.80±599.61	1 199.20±364.89	59.80±11.44
死亡组	18	15	16	13	9	15	16	16	9.98±2.90	3 162.78±446.67	907.78±201.92	83.11±15.55
统计量		0.011^a	< 0.001^a	0.123^a	0.791^a	0.342^a	0.670^a	0.672^a	-2.463^b	4.240^b	3.211^b	-7.061^b
P值		0.920	0.999	0.762	0.363	0.561	0.999	0.412	0.022	< 0.001	0.002	< 0.001
注：DHCA为深低温停循环。^a为χ²值，^b为t值。

下载: 导出CSV

表 3 术后死亡影响因素二分类logistic回归分析

项目	B	SE	Wald χ²	P值	OR值	95% CI
LVEF < 50%	3.501	1.679	4.347	0.037	33.163	1.234~888.912
并行辅助时间(min)	0.222	0.078	8.191	0.004	1.248	1.072~1.453
注：因变量中死亡=1，非死亡=0；自变量中LVEF < 50%=1，LVEF≥50%=0；并行辅助时间以实际值赋值。

下载: 导出CSV

表 4 2组急性Stanford A型主动脉夹层患者术后资料对比

组别	例数	血管活性药物 >96 h(例)	拔管 < 48 h (例)	二次手术 (例)	苏醒时间 < 10 h(例)	CRRT (例)	二次插管 (例)	48 h乳酸 (x±s，mmol/L)	ICU监护 (x±s，h)
存活组	50	15	40	12	40	9	13	4.09±1.60	111.38±18.72
死亡组	18	10	7	11	6	12	10	8.79±2.56	165.61±45.32
统计量		3.721^a	10.482^a	8.144^a	13.173^a	14.691^a	5.170^a	-9.021^b	4.244^b
P值		0.052	0.001	0.001	< 0.001	< 0.001	0.023	< 0.001	< 0.001
注：CRRT为连续性肾脏替代治疗。^a为χ²值，^b为t值。

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(20)

[1]	OKITA Y, MIYATA H, MOTOMURAN N, et al. A study of brain protection during total arch replacement comparing antegrade cerebral perfusion versus hypothermic circulatory arrest, with or without retrograde cerebral perfusion: Analysis based on the Japan Adult Cardiovascular Surgery Database[J]. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2015, 149(2): 65-67. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.08.070
[2]	TRIMARCHI S, NIENABER C A, RAMPOLDI V, et al. Contemporary results of surgery in acute type A aortic dissection: The International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection experience[J]. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2005, 129(1): 112-122. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2004.09.005
[3]	MESZAROS I, MOROCZ J, SZLAVI J, et al. Epidemiology and clinicopathology of aortic dissection[J]. Chest, 2000, 117(5): 1271-1278. doi: 10.1378/chest.117.5.1271
[4]	EVANGELISTA A, ISSELBACHER E M, BOSSONE E, et al. Insights From the international registry of acute aortic dissection: A 20-Year experience of collaborative clinical research[J]. Circulation, 2018, 137(17): 1846-1860. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.031264
[5]	TSAI T T, TRIMARCHI S, NIENAABER C A. Acute aortic dissection: Perspectives from the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (IRAD)[J]. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 2008, 37(2): 149-159.
[6]	IMOTO K, UCHIDA K, KARUBE N, et al. Risk analysis and improvement of strategies inpatients who have acute type A aortic dissection with coronary artery dissection[J]. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2013, 44(3): 419-424. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezt060
[7]	张明明, 伊力哈木江·克尤木, 吴元元, 等. Stanford A型主动脉夹层急诊行外科手术治疗的临床探讨[J]. 中华急诊医学杂志, 2016, 25(1): 79-82. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZHHL201805013.htm
[8]	TEO L Y, CHAN L L, LAM C S. Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in hypertension[J]. Curr Opin Cardiol, 2016, 31(4): 410-416. doi: 10.1097/HCO.0000000000000292
[9]	丁绍祥, 张乐, 高云涛, 等. 左心室射血分数与心电图QRS波时程比值对老年心力衰竭患者心功能的评估[J]. 中华老年心脑血管病杂志, 2019, 21(8): 801-803. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-0126.2019.08.005
[10]	李志超, 王传合, 孙志军. 射血分数保留型心力衰竭患者入院血红蛋白浓度与出院后心衰易损期发生联合终点事件的关系[J]. 山东医药, 2020, 60(6): 72-75. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SDYY202006018.htm
[11]	贺继刚, 李洪荣, 李永武, 等. 急性Stanford A型主动脉夹层动脉瘤手术死亡风险因素研究[J]. 中国全科医学, 2017, 20(10): 1196-1199. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-9572.2017.10.011
[12]	李军, 周荟, 李红艳, 等. 重度全身炎性反应综合征对全主动脉弓置换术后早期临床结局的影响[J]. 中国分子心脏病学杂志, 2018, 18(1): 2339-2341. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGFB201801003.htm
[13]	BERRETTA P, TRIMACHI S, PATEL H J, et al. Malperfusionsyndromes in type A aortic dissection: What we have learned from IRAD[J]. J Vis Surg, 2018, 10(4): 65-72.
[14]	NARAYAN P, ROGERS C A, BENEDETTO U, et al. Malperfusion rather than merely timing of operative repair determines early and late outcome in type A aortic dissection[J]. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2017, 154(1): 81-86. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.03.041
[15]	胡知朋, 张敏, 王志维, 等. 急性A型主动脉夹层合并腹腔脏器灌注不良的治疗[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2017, 33(23): 4011-4012. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2017.23.042
[16]	张莉莉, 王效增, 刘艳杰, 等. 急性降主动脉夹层合并冠心病患者临床特点与危险因素分析[J]. 临床军医杂志, 2017, 45(6): 584-588. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JYGZ201706008.htm
[17]	赵明明, 郭子健, 孙雨薇, 等. 急性A型主动脉夹层的累及特性与术后重度急性肾损伤的关系[J]. 心肺血管病杂志, 2019, 38(7): 741-746, 760. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-5062.2019.07.007
[18]	胡知朋, 张敏, 王志维, 等. 急性A型主动脉夹层合并腹腔脏器灌注不良的治疗[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2017, 33(23): 4011-4012. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2017.23.042
[19]	韩晓霞, 韩萍, 李瑞枝. 心脏瓣膜置换患者围手术期医院感染的预防[J]. 中华医院感染学杂志, 2014, 24(14): 3547-3548, 3559. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZHYY201414064.htm
[20]	刘菁菁, 张菁, 贺茂林. 老年急性脑梗死合并肺部感染患者的危险因素和预后相关性研究[J]. 中华老年心脑血管病杂志, 2011, 13(9): 824-826. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LNXG201109023.htm