Effect of Sanhuang Sanxian Decoction on cancer-related fatigue in patients with advanced breast cancer of spleen and kidney deficiency type
-
摘要:
目的 观察三黄三仙汤治疗脾肾亏虚型晚期乳腺癌患者癌因性疲乏(CRF)的疗效,为提高晚期乳腺癌患者的生存质量提供参考。 方法 采用随机数字表法将浙江省肿瘤医院2019年9月—2020年5月收治的80例脾肾亏虚型晚期乳腺癌患者分为对照组(40例)与观察组(40例),对照组给予姑息性化疗及相应的对症治疗;观察组在对照组的基础上联合中药“三黄三仙汤”治疗。对比分析2组治疗前后的生活质量(KPS)与中医临床症状评分、Piper疲乏量表评分,血清细胞因子与T淋巴细胞亚群各指标的变化,并记录不良反应情况。 结果 观察组治疗后中医临床症状评分、Piper疲乏量表评分、肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)和白细胞介素-4(IL-4)水平低于对照组,KPS评分、干扰素-γ(IFN-γ)和白细胞介素-2(IL-2)水平高于对照组(P < 0.05)。观察组治疗后CD4+、CD8+、CD4+/CD8+比值均优于对照组[(40.30±11.21)% vs.(35.06±9.37)%、(15.30±3.29)% vs.(17.17±3.53)%、(2.52±0.48)vs.(1.90±0.41),均P < 0.05]。观察组不良反应发生率低于对照组(10.00% vs. 27.50%,P < 0.05)。 结论 三黄三仙汤能有效改善脾肾亏虚型晚期乳腺癌患者临床症状和生活质量,缓解患者癌因性疲乏症状,降低炎性因子水平,提高机体免疫能力,且安全有效。 Abstract:Objective To observe the effect of Sanhuang Sanxian Decoction on cancer-related fatigue (CRF) in patients with advanced breast cancer of spleen kidney deficiency type and to provide reference for improving the quality of life of patients with advanced breast cancer. Methods Eighty cases of advanced breast cancer patients of spleen kidney deficiency type in Zhejiang Cancer Hospital from September 2019 to May 2020 were randomly divided into the control group (40 cases) and observation group (40 cases). The control group was given palliative chemotherapy and symptomatic treatment, whereas the observation group was treated on the basis of the control group in combination with Sanhuang Sanxian Decoction. The Karnofsky performance scale (KPS), traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) clinical symptom score, Piper Fatigue Scale scores, serum cytokines and T lymphocyte subsets were compared before and after treatment, and the adverse reactions were recorded. Results After treatment, the TCM clinical symptom score, Piper Fatigue Scale score and tumour necrosis factor-α and interleukin (IL)-4 levels in the observation group were lower than those in the control group, whereas the KPS score and interferon-γ and IL-2 levels in the observation group were higher than those in the control group (P < 0.05). After treatment, the CD4+, CD8+ and CD4+/CD8+ ratio in the observation group were better than those in the control group (40.30±11.21)% vs. (35.06±9.37)%, (15.30±3.29)% vs. (17.17±3.53)%, (2.52±0.48)% vs. (1.90±0.41)%, respectively, all P < 0.05. The incidence of adverse reactions in the observation group was lower than that in the control group (10.00% vs. 27.50%, P < 0.05). Conclusion Sanhuang Sanxian Decoction can effectively improve the clinical symptoms and quality of life of patients with advanced breast cancer of spleen kidney deficiency type, relieve CRF symptoms of patients with advanced breast cancer, reduce the level of inflammatory factors and improve the immune capacity of the body, and it is safe and effective. -
表 1 2组乳腺癌患者一般资料比较
Table 1. Comparison of general data of two groups of breast cancer patients
组别 例数 年龄
(x±s,岁)病程
(x±s,月)BMI
(x±s)合并高血压[例(%)] 合并糖尿病[例(%)] 肿瘤转移(肝转移/骨转移/肺转移,例) 病理类型(浸润性腺癌/导管癌/小叶癌,例) 对照组 40 57.08±8.62 12.64±1.25 21.08±3.12 18(45.00) 15(37.50) 16/14/10 20/13/7 观察组 40 57.13±8.67 12.58±1.19 21.10±3.09 19(47.50) 13(32.50) 15/13/12 22/10/8 统计量 0.026a 0.220a 0.029a 0.050b 0.220b 0.251b 0.553b P值 0.979 0.827 0.977 0.823 0.639 0.882 0.758 注:a为t值,b为χ2值。 表 2 2组患者治疗前后中医临床症状与KPS评分比较(x±s,分)
Table 2. Comparison of clinical symptoms of traditional Chinese Medicine and KPS scores between the patients in two groups before and after treatment (x±s, points)
组别 例数 中医临床症状评分 KPS评分 治疗前 治疗后 治疗前 治疗后 对照组 40 1.50±0.46 1.30±0.48a 62.39±6.08 64.71±6.30 观察组 40 1.48±0.47 0.98±0.27a 61.22±6.02 70.09±6.81a t值 0.192 3.675 0.865 3.668 P值 0.848 0.001 0.390 0.001 注:与同组治疗前比较,aP < 0.05。 表 3 2组患者治疗前后Piper疲乏量表评分比较(x±s,分)
Table 3. Comparison of Piper Fatigue Scale scores between the patients in two groups before and after treatment (x±s, points)
组别 例数 行为维度 情感维度 感觉维度 认知维度 总分 治疗前 治疗后 治疗前 治疗后 治疗前 治疗后 治疗前 治疗后 治疗前 治疗后 对照组 40 4.50±1.40 4.14±0.87 4.38±1.37 4.08±0.92 4.60±1.38 4.18±0.85 4.61±1.42 4.15±0.76 4.39±1.35 4.17±0.85 观察组 40 4.40±1.38 2.69±0.92a 4.40±1.39 2.60±0.68a 4.56±1.34 2.61±0.63a 4.56±1.38 2.70±0.52a 4.42±1.37 2.54±0.52a t值 0.322 7.243 0.065 8.182 0.132 9.385 0.160 9.959 0.099 10.346 P值 0.749 < 0.001 0.949 < 0.001 0.896 < 0.001 0.874 < 0.001 0.099 < 0.001 注:与同组治疗前比较,aP < 0.05。 表 4 2组患者治疗前后血清细胞因子水平比较(x±s,ng/L)
Table 4. Comparison of serum cytokine levels between the patients in two groups before and after treatment (x±s, ng/L)
组别 例数 TNF-α IFN-γ IL-2 IL-4 治疗前 治疗后 治疗前 治疗后 治疗前 治疗后 治疗前 治疗后 对照组 40 47.85±10.64 23.83±4.61a 31.03±8.72 47.92±14.51a 23.94±6.02 53.21±8.69a 44.18±9.08 35.27±8.52a 观察组 40 47.72±10.86 7.84±2.35a 31.18±8.54 58.52±17.42a 24.42±6.08 71.96±11.48a 45.20±8.96 31.38±6.46a t值 0.054 19.544 0.078 2.957 0.355 8.236 0.506 2.301 P值 0.957 < 0.001 0.938 0.004 0.724 < 0.001 0.615 0.024 注:与同组治疗前比较,aP < 0.05。 表 5 观察组与对照组患者治疗前后的免疫功能指标情况比较(x±s)
Table 5. Comparison of immune function indexes between the patients in observation group and control group before and after treatment (x±s)
组别 例数 CD4+(%) CD8+(%) CD4+/CD8+ 治疗前 治疗后 治疗前 治疗后 治疗前 治疗后 对照组 40 30.89±9.32 35.06±9.37a 21.09±6.10 17.17±3.53a 1.68±0.39 1.90±0.41a 观察组 40 30.24±9.28 40.30±11.21a 21.15±6.23 15.30±3.29a 1.62±0.37 2.52±0.48a t值 0.313 2.268 0.044 2.909 0.706 6.212 P值 0.755 0.026 0.965 0.005 0.482 < 0.001 注:与同组治疗前比较,aP < 0.05。 -
[1] SUN G Y, WANG S L, SONG Y W, et al. Radiation-induced lymphopenia predicts poorer prognosis in patients with breast cancer: A post hoc analysis of a randomized controlled trial of postmastectomy hypofractionated radiation therapy[J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2020, 108(1): 277-285. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.02.633 [2] GUERINI A E, PEDRETTI S, SALAH E, et al. A single-center retrospective safety analysis of cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors concurrent with radiation therapy in metastatic breast cancer patients[J]. Sci Rep, 2020, 10(1): 797-806. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-57225-w [3] 王务萍, 林海燕, 钱媛媛, 等. 淋巴瘤化疗患者癌因性疲乏现状及影响因素分析[J]. 中华全科医学, 2019, 17(6): 1042-1045. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.000857WANG W P, LIN H Y, QI Y Y, et al. Cancer-related fatigue and influencing factors analysis in lymphoma patients receiving chemotherapy[J]. Chin J Gen Pract, 2019, 17(6): 1042-1045. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.000857 [4] 陈元东, 林力. 乳腺癌患者SCL-90评分及与癌因性疲乏的相关性研究[J]. 中国肿瘤临床与康复, 2019, 26(8): 963-965. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGZK201908029.htmCHEN Y D, LIN L. SCL-90 score in patients with breast cancer and its correlation with cancer-related fatigue[J]. Chin J Oncol Rehabil, 2019, 26(8): 963-965. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGZK201908029.htm [5] 徐象威, 周美红, 陈银巧, 等. 肺癌化疗药学监护路径对化疗患者健康行为及生活质量的影响观察[J]. 药物流行病学杂志, 2020, 29(4): 256-261. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YWLX202004008.htmXU X W, ZHOU M H, CHEN Y Q, et al. Influence of Pharmaceutical Care Pathway on Health Behaviors and Quality of Life of Lung Cancer Patients with Chemotherapy[J]. Chin J Pharmacoepidemiol, 2020, 29(4): 256-261. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YWLX202004008.htm [6] 刘昌林. 延续性护理对乳腺癌术后患者癌性疲乏及生存质量的影响研究[J]. 中华肿瘤防治杂志, 2018, 25(S2): 168, 170. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QLZL2018S2109.htmLIU C L. Effect of continuous nursing on cancer fatigue and quality of life of breast cancer patients after operation[J]. Chin J Cancer Prev Treat, 2018, 25(S2): 168, 170. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QLZL2018S2109.htm [7] 周猜, 田华琴, 曾白玉, 等. 疲三针治疗乳腺癌患者癌因性疲乏临床观察[J]. 中医学报, 2018, 33(6): 950-953. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HNZK201806008.htmZHOU C, TIAN H Q, ZENG B Y, et al. Clinical observation on acupuncture on three anti-fatigue acupoints in the treatment of cancer-induced fatigue in patients with breast cancer[J]. Acta Chin Med, 2018, 33(6): 950-953. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HNZK201806008.htm [8] PARK H, CASTAÑO J, ÁVILA P, et al. An information retrieval approach to ICD-10 classification[J]. Stud Health Technol Inform, 2019, 264(1): 1564-1565. [9] 郑筱萸. 中药新药临床研究指导原则[M]. 北京: 中国医药科技出版社, 2002: 511-515.ZHENG X Y. Guiding principles for clinical research of new traditional Chinese medicine[M]. Beijing: China Medical Science and Technology Press, 2002: 511-515. [10] INNO A, RUSSO G L, SALGARELLO M, et al. The evolving landscape of criteria for evaluating tumor response in the era of cancer immunotherapy: From Karnofsky to iRECIST[J]. Tumori, 2018, 104(2): 88-95. doi: 10.1177/0300891618766173 [11] JANG Y, KIM J H, LEE K. Validation of the revised piper fatigue scale in Koreans with chronic hepatitis B[J]. PLoS One, 2017, 12(5): e0177690. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177690. [12] INGLIS J E, JANELSINS M C, CULAKOVA E, et al. Longitudinal assessment of the impact of higher body mass index on cancer-related fatigue in patients with breast cancer receiving chemotherapy[J]. Support Care Cancer, 2020, 28(1): 1411-1418. [13] FOX R S, ANCOLI-ISRAEL S, ROESCH S C, et al. Sleep disturbance and cancer-related fatigue symptom cluster in breast cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy[J]. Support Care Cancer, 2020, 28(5): 845-855. [14] 于欢, 黄杰, 仇珺, 等. 甲状腺癌患者术后癌因性疲乏的发生情况及其与生活质量的相关性分析[J]. 新疆医科大学学报, 2019, 42(3): 397-401. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XJYY201903027.htmYU H, HUANG J, QIU J, et al. Correlation analysis of postoperative cancer-induced fatigue and quality of life in thyroid cancer patients[J]. J Xinjiang Med University, 2019, 42(3): 129-133. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XJYY201903027.htm [15] 李冉冉, 杨富国, 范敏, 等. 感知控制、自我管理对乳腺癌化疗患者癌因性疲乏的影响[J]. 国际肿瘤学杂志, 2020, 47(1): 18-19, 23. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-422X.2020.01.003LI R R, YANG F G, FAN M, et al. Effect of perception control and self-management on cancer-related fatigue in breast cancer patients with chemotherapy[J]. J Int Oncol, 2020, 47(1): 18-19, 23. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-422X.2020.01.003 [16] SALEHIFAR E, AZIMI S, JANBABAI G, et al. Efficacy and safety of bupropion in cancer-related fatigue, a randomized double blind placebo controlled clinical trial[J]. BMC Cancer, 2020, 20(5): 1432-1440. [17] THONG M S Y, VAN NOORDEN C J F, STEINDORF K, et al. Cancer-related fatigue: Causes and current treatment options[J]. Curr Treat Options Oncol, 2020, 21(11): 127-137. [18] 习隽丽, 石磊, 张昌欨, 等. 中医健脾法配合FOLFOX化疗方案对结肠癌术后癌因性疲乏、Th1/Th2免疫应答平衡和周围神经病变的影响观察[J]. 中华中医药学刊, 2019, 37(6): 1503-1505. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZYHS201906057.htmXI J L, SHI L, ZHANG C X, et al. Effect of Chinese medicine invigorating spleen combined with FOLFOX chemotherapy on cancer-related fatigue, Th1/Th2 immune response balance and peripheral neuropathy in patients with colon cancer after operation[J]. Chin Arch Tradit Chin Med, 2019, 37(6): 1503-1505. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZYHS201906057.htm [19] 刘彧宏, 魏克民. 三黄三仙汤加味治疗肿瘤相关性贫血25例[J]. 浙江中医杂志, 2012, 47(6): 418. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0411-8421.2012.06.025LIU Y H, WEI K M. 25 cases of tumor associated anemia treated with modified Sanhuang Sanxian Decoction[J]. Zhejiang J Tradit Chin Med, 2012, 47(6): 418. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0411-8421.2012.06.025 [20] 冷玉玲, 吴勇, 周先阳, 等. 培土固本灸治疗消化道恶性肿瘤化疗相关性癌因性疲乏的疗效观察[J]. 中华全科医学, 2021, 19(9): 1565-1568. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002113LENG Y L, WU Y, ZHOU X Y, et al. Effect of Peitu Guben Moxibustion on chemotherapy-related cancer-related fatigue of gastrointestinal tumour[J]. Chin J Gen Pract, 2021, 19(9): 1565-1568. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002113 [21] 卢璐, 李薇晗, 郭小川, 等. 雷火灸治疗乳腺癌化疗患者气虚型癌因性疲乏的临床研究[J]. 针刺研究, 2018, 43(2): 110-113. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XCYJ201802011.htmLU L, LI W H, GUO X C, et al. Thunder-fire moxibustion for qi deficiency-induced fatigue in breast cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy[J]. Acupuncture Research, 2018, 43(2): 110-113. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XCYJ201802011.htm
计量
- 文章访问数: 206
- HTML全文浏览量: 77
- PDF下载量: 6
- 被引次数: 0