留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

IgA肾病预后相关危险因素分析

范晶 黄冠文 包继文 张敏芳 周文彦 王琴 倪兆慧 王玲

范晶, 黄冠文, 包继文, 张敏芳, 周文彦, 王琴, 倪兆慧, 王玲. IgA肾病预后相关危险因素分析[J]. 中华全科医学, 2022, 20(5): 731-734. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002441
引用本文: 范晶, 黄冠文, 包继文, 张敏芳, 周文彦, 王琴, 倪兆慧, 王玲. IgA肾病预后相关危险因素分析[J]. 中华全科医学, 2022, 20(5): 731-734. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002441
FAN Jing, HUANG Guan-wen, BAO Ji-wen, ZHANG Min-fang, ZHOU Wen-yan, WANG Qin, NI Zhao-hui, WANG Ling. Analysis of risk factors for the prognosis of IgA nephropathy[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2022, 20(5): 731-734. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002441
Citation: FAN Jing, HUANG Guan-wen, BAO Ji-wen, ZHANG Min-fang, ZHOU Wen-yan, WANG Qin, NI Zhao-hui, WANG Ling. Analysis of risk factors for the prognosis of IgA nephropathy[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2022, 20(5): 731-734. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002441

IgA肾病预后相关危险因素分析

doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002441
基金项目: 

上海市自然科学基金项目 19ZR1430800

上海申康专科疾病临床“五新”转化项目 16CR3022A

详细信息
    通讯作者:

    王玲,E-mail:shwangling@126.com

  • 中图分类号: R692.6

Analysis of risk factors for the prognosis of IgA nephropathy

  • 摘要:   目的  通过分析IgA肾病患者临床及病理资料,探讨影响IgA肾病患者预后的危险因素,为临床提供参考,重视早期诊断及长期随访。  方法  分析2012年12月—2015年12月于上海交通大学医学院附属仁济医院行肾活检确诊为IgA肾病患者的临床及病理资料,每3个月记录患者血肌酐、24小时蛋白尿等指标,血清肌酐水平比基础值升高50%及以上或进入终末期肾病为终点事件,采用Kaplan-Meier生存分析法分析IgA肾病患者肾脏生存率;用Cox回归分析IgA肾病预后的危险因素。  结果  共有163例IgA肾病患者在仁济医院长期随访, 中位随访时间为29个月,活检中位年龄为33岁,男性82例(50.3%),7例(4.3%)患者进入随访终点,4年肾存活率为86.8%。Cox比例风险模型多因素分析结果显示基线收缩压(HR=1.073,95%CI:1.018~1.132,P=0.009)、时间平均蛋白尿(HR=2.123,95%CI:1.367~3.329,P=0.001)是IgA肾病预后的独立影响因素。  结论  多种因素和预后相关,而基线收缩压、时间平均蛋白尿是IgA肾病预后的独立影响因素。

     

  • 图  1  IgAN的Kaplan-Meier肾生存曲线

    Figure  1.  Kidney survival curves of Kaplan-Meier from IgAN

    图  2  Kaplan-Meier肾生存曲线图

    注:A为根据TA-UPE值所作Kaplan-Meier肾生存曲线图;B为根据SBP值所作Kaplan-Meier肾生存曲线图。

    Figure  2.  Graph of kidney survival with Kaplan-Meier

    表  1  163例IgA肾病患者肾活检时总体人口学及临床指标

    Table  1.   Demographic and clinical data of 163 patients with IgA nephropathy at renal biopsy

    项目 数据
    年龄[M(P25, P75),岁] 33.00(28.00, 49.00)
    性别(男/女,例) 82/81
    BMI[M(P25, P75)] 23.22(20.75, 24.92)
    镜检尿红细胞[M(P25, P75), /HP] 23.50(7.90, 60.00)
    镜检尿白细胞[M(P25, P75), /HP] 2.90(1.00, 1.50)
    UPE[M(P25, P75), g/d] 1.27(0.60, 2.46)
    SBP[M(P25, P75), mm Hg] 123.00(118.00, 133.00)
    DBP[M(P25, P75), mm Hg] 80.00(71.00, 86.50)
    Hb(x±s, g/L) 130.41±19.75
    SCr[M(P25, P75)μmol/L] 87.00(69.00, 113.00)
    BUN[M(P25, P75), mmol/L] 5.70(4.50, 6.70)
    UA(x±s, μmol/L) 356.94±100.04
    eGFR[M(P25, P75), mL/(min·1.73 m2)] 85.50(61.75, 109.00)
    ALB[M(P25, P75), g/L] 39.00(35.00, 42.00)
    AG[M(P25, P75), mmol/L] 1.36(1.02, 1.80)
    AC[M(P25, P75), mmol/L] 4.83(4.30, 5.75)
    IgA(x±s, g/L) 3.26±0.95
    IgG(x±s, g/L) 10.79±3.07
    IgM[M(P25, P75), g/L] 1.05(0.74, 1.48)
    肾小球硬化比例[M(P25, P75), %] 31.00(13.00, 52.00)
    M1[例(%)] 127(77.9)
    E1[例(%)] 49(30.1)
    S1[例(%)] 123(75.5)
    T1+T2[例(%)] 89(54.9)
    C1+C2[例(%)] 72(44.2)
    Lee分级4级以上[例(%)] 100(61.3)
    炎症细胞浸润[例(%)] 26(16.0)
    注:1 mm Hg=0.133 kPa。
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  变量赋值方法

    Table  2.   Variable assignment method

    变量 赋值
    性别 男性=1, 女性=2
    是否Lee分级≥4级 否=1, 是=2
    结局事件 否=1, 是=2
    连续变量 以实际值纳入
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  3  IgAN进展影响因素的Cox单因素分析结果

    Table  3.   Cox univariate analysis of the influencing factors of IgAN progression

    项目 B SE Wald χ2 P HR 95%CI
    年龄(岁) 0.009 0.032 0.080 0.777 1.009 0.947~1.075
    性别 0.453 0.765 0.351 0.554 1.573 0.351~7.045
    SBP(mm Hg) 0.075 0.023 10.647 0.001 1.078 1.031~1.128
    DBP(mm Hg) 0.023 0.035 0.439 0.508 1.024 0.955~1.097
    Hb(g/L) -0.041 0.022 3.442 0.064 0.960 0.910~1.002
    BMI 0.018 0.118 0.024 0.877 1.018 0.809~1.282
    UPE(g/d) 0.325 0.123 7.008 0.008 1.384 1.088~1.760
    TA-UPE(g/d) 0.640 0.204 9.795 0.002 1.896 1.270~2.830
    BUN(mmol/L) 0.360 0.103 12.102 0.001 1.433 1.170~1.755
    SCr(μmol/L) 0.014 0.004 10.225 0.001 1.014 1.005~1.022
    UA(μmol/L) 0.006 0.004 2.012 0.156 1.006 0.998~1.014
    TA-UA(μmol/L) 0.012 0.003 12.134 <0.001 1.012 1.005~1.019
    eGFR[mL/(min·1.73 m2)] -0.081 0.023 12.242 0.007 0.942 0.902~0.983
    ALB(g/L) -0.106 0.053 3.978 0.046 0.900 0.811~0.998
    TA-ALB(g/L) -0.308 0.089 11.868 0.001 0.735 0.617~0.876
    Lee分级4级以上 0.912 1.081 0.712 0.399 2.490 0.299~20.697
    肾小球硬化率(%) 4.350 1.641 7.030 0.008 77.474 3.109~1 930.506
    新月体比例(%) 0.006 0.143 0.002 0.966 1.112 0.760~1.333
    镜检尿红细胞(/HP) 0.000 0.003 0.014 0.907 1.000 0.995~1.006
    镜检尿白细胞(/HP) -0.001 0.017 0.005 0.946 0.999 0.966~1.032
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  4  IgAN进展影响因素的Cox多因素分析结果

    Table  4.   Cox multivariate analysis of the influencing factors of IgAN progression

    项目 B SE Wald χ2 P HR 95%CI
    SBP(mm Hg) 0.071 0.027 6.774 0.009 1.073 1.018~1.132
    TA-UPE(g/d) 0.757 0.227 11.121 0.001 2.123 1.367~3.329
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] HAO Y, ZHAO Y L, HUANG R S, et al. Analysis of the relationship between Oxford classification, IgM deposition and multiple indexes and the adverse prognosis of patients with primary IgA nephropathy and related risk factors[J]. Exp Ther Med, 2019, 17(2): 1234-1239.
    [2] 范晶, 王玲, 陈雅, 等. IgA肾病在终末期肾病中构成比横断面调查[J]. 上海医学, 2019, 42(2): 70-75.

    FAN J, WANG L, CHEN Y, et al. Cross-section study of the constituent ratio of IgA nephropathy in End-stage renal disease[J]. Shanghai Med J, 2019, 42(2): 70-75.
    [3] SUZUKI H. Biomarkers for IgA nephropathy on the basis of multi-hit pathogenesis[J]. Clin Exp Nephrol, 2019, 23(1): 26-31.
    [4] KIDNEY F N. K/DOQI clinical practice guidelines for chronic kidney disease: Evaluation, classification, and stratification[J]. Am J Kidney Dis, 2002, 39: 1-266.
    [5] LEVEY A S, STEVENS L A, SCHMID C H, et al. A new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate[J]. Ann Intern Med, 2009, 150(9): 604-612.
    [6] LAA S M K, RAO V M, FRANKLIN W A, et al. IgA nephropathy: Morphologic predictors of progressive renal disease[J]. Hum Pathol, 1982, 13(4): 314-322.
    [7] TRIMARCHI H, BARRATT J, CATTRAN D C, et al. Oxford Classification of IgA nephropathy 2016: An update from the IgA nephropathy classification working group[J]. Kidney Int, 2017, 91(5): 1014-1021.
    [8] NI Z H, YUAN Y H, WANG Q, et al. Time-averaged albumin predicts the long-term prognosis of IgA nephropathy patients who achieved remission[J]. J Transl Med, 2014, 12(1): 194.
    [9] LI M, WANG L, SHI D C, et al. Genome-wide meta-analysis identifies three novel susceptibility loci and reveals ethnic heterogeneity of genetic susceptibility for IgA nephropathy[J]. J Am Soc Nephrol, 2020, 31(12): 2949-2963.
    [10] MAIXNEROVA D, REILY C, BIAN Q, et al. Markers for the progression of IgA nephropathy[J]. J Nephrol, 2016, 29(4): 535-541.
    [11] SEVILLANO A M, DIAZ M, CARAVACA-FONTAN F, et al. IgA nephropathy in elderly patients[J]. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol, 2019, 14(8): 1183-1192.
    [12] NAGARAJU S P, RANGASWAMY D, MAREDDY A S, et al. Impact of body mass index on progression of primary immunoglobulin a nephropathy[J]. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl, 2018, 29(2): 318-325.
    [13] MORENO J A, YUSTE C, GUTIERREZ E, et al. Haematuria as a risk factor for chronic kidney disease progression in glomerular diseases: A review[J]. Pediatr Nephrol, 2016, 31(4): 523-533.
    [14] SHU D H, XU F F, SU Z, et al. Risk factors of progressive IgA nephropathy which progress to end stage renal disease within ten years: A case-control study[J]. BMC Nephrol, 2017, 18(1): 11.
    [15] NAM K H, KIE J H, LEE M J, et al. Optimal proteinuria target for renoprotection in patients with IgA nephropathy[J]. PLoS One, 2014, 9(7): e101935.
    [16] 汪晶华, 杨洁, 刘宇, 等. 伴有高血压的IgA肾病临床表现、病理特点及高血压发生的影响因素分析[J]. 解放军医药杂志, 2016, 28(10): 73-76. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HBGF201610020.htm

    WANG J H, YANG J, LIU Y, et, al. A study on clinical and pathological characteristics of iga nephropathy patients associated with hypertension and influential factors of hypertension pathogenesy[J]. Med & Pharm J Chin PL, 2016, 28(10): 73-76. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HBGF201610020.htm
    [17] SHI S F, WANG S X, JIANG L, et al. Pathologic predictors of renal outcome and therapeutic efficacy in IgA nephropathy: Validation of the oxford classification[J]. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol, 2011, 6(9): 2175-2184.
    [18] HAO Y, ZHAO Y L, HUANG R S, et al. Analysis of the relationship between Oxford classification, IgM deposition and multiple indexes and the adverse prognosis of patients with primary IgA nephropathy and related risk factors[J]. Exp Ther Med, 2019, 17(2): 1234-1239.
    [19] LV J C, YANG Y H, ZHANG H, et al. Prediction of outcomes in crescentic IgA nephropathy in a multicenter cohort study[J]. J Am Soc Nephrol, 2013, 24: 2118-2125.
    [20] ZHANG W, ZHOU Q, HONG L Y, et al. Clinical outcomes of IgA nephropathy patients with different proportions of crescents[J]. Medicine, 2017, 96(11): e6190.
    [21] 王蔚, 李贵森, 邹玉蓉, 等. IgA肾病呈单纯性血尿和/或轻度蛋白尿的病理特点及预后分析[J]. 实用医院临床杂志, 2017, 14(6): 94-97. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YYLC201706024.htm

    WANG W, LI G S, ZOU Y R, et al. Pathological features and outcomes of IgA nephropathy with hematuria and / or minimal pro-teinuria[J]. Practical Journal of Clinical Medicine, 2017, 14(6): 94-97. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YYLC201706024.htm
    [22] 陈蕊, 刘昌华, 高波. 无症状尿检异常患者的临床病理和预后分析[J]. 中华全科医学, 2012, 10(12): 1845-1846. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYQY201212009.htm

    CHEN R, LIU C H, GAO B, et al. Clinicopathological and prognostic analysis of patients presented with asymptomatic urinary abnormalities[J]. Chinese general practice, 2012, 10(12): 1845-1846. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYQY201212009.htm
  • 加载中
图(2) / 表(4)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  374
  • HTML全文浏览量:  109
  • PDF下载量:  28
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2021-05-25
  • 网络出版日期:  2022-09-05

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回