以漫画为核心的“互联网+”健康管理模式对中青年心血管病高危人群的管理效果评价

李夏; 陈玉娇; 陈丽丽; 程鎏; 陆春宇; 徐晓英

doi:10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002462

以漫画为核心的“互联网+”健康管理模式对中青年心血管病高危人群的管理效果评价

doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002462

上海市静安区江宁路街道社区卫生服务中心，上海 200041

基金项目:

上海市全科医学临床质量控制研究项目 HQKZKYJ004

详细信息

通讯作者:
徐晓英, E-mail: 2696051559@qq.com

中图分类号: R54 R499
计量
- 文章访问数: 133
- HTML全文浏览量: 60
- PDF下载量: 3
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2021-01-15
- 网络出版日期: 2022-09-05

Evaluation of the effect of the "Internet plus" health management model core with comics on the management of young and middle-aged people at high risk of cardiovascular disease

Jiangning Road Street Community Health Service Center, Jing'an District, Shanghai 200041, China

摘要

摘要: 目的探索一种以漫画为核心的新型“互联网+”健康管理模式(以下简称新型管理)在中青年心血管病高危人群(以下简称高危人群)管理中的应用效果。方法选取2019年2—4月在上海某街道写字楼员工中筛选出118例高危人员, 通过随机数字表法分为新型管理组及常规管理组，每组各59例。所有人员入组后填写健康知识测验，并对其进行6个月的健康管理。6个月后再次填写风险评估问卷及医学知识测验。对比分析2组理化指标、知行指标、失访率及满意度。结果干预后，新型管理组与常规管理组在BMI降幅[1.3(0.9, 1.6) vs. 0.9(0.3, 1.3)]、收缩压降幅[20.0(14.5, 23.0) mm Hg vs. 16.0(12.0, 19.0) mm Hg, 1 mm Hg=0.133 kPa]、舒张压降幅[10.0(14.5, 23.0) mm Hg vs. 8.0(5.0, 9.0) mm Hg]、LDL-C降幅[1.1(0.7, 1.3) mmol/L vs. 0.7(0.2, 1.0) mmol/L]、血压监测次数及健康知识知晓程度比较差异均有统计学意义(均P＜0.05)，2组健康知识知晓程度干预前后比较差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05)。干预后，新型管理组吸烟量低于干预前(P＜0.001)；新型管理组失访率低于常规管理组(P＜0.05)；服务满意度比例高于常规管理组(P＜0.05)。结论将新型管理模式用于高危人群，能增加该类人群对疾病及自身状态的了解，提高血压、血脂、BMI、吸烟量的控制水平，增强依从性，提高满意度。
- 互联网+ /
- 中青年 /
- 心血管病高危人群 /
- 健康管理
Abstract: Objective To explore the application effect of the new 'Internet plus' health management model with comics as the core (new management for short) in the management of young and middle-aged people at high risk of cardiovascular disease (high-risk population for short). Methods A total of 118 cases were selected from office buildings around a street in Shanghai from February through April 2019 as the research objects. They were divided into a new management group (n=59) and a conventional management group (n=59) by simple random grouping. All personnel completed the health knowledge test after joining the group and carried out health management for six months. After 6 months, the two groups filled out the risk assessment questionnaire and health knowledge test again. The physical and chemical indexes, knowledge and behaviour indexes, loss to follow-up rate and satisfaction rate of the two groups were compared and analysed. Results After the intervention, the reduction of BMI [1.3 (0.9, 1.6) vs. 0.9 (0.3, 1.3)], systolic blood pressure [20.0 (14.5, 23.0) mm Hg vs. 16.0 (12.0, 19.0) mm Hg, 1 mm Hg=0.133 kPa], diastolic blood pressure [10.0 (14.5, 23.0) mm Hg vs. 8.0 (5.0, 9.0) mm Hg], LDL-C [1.1 (0.7, 1.3) mmol/L vs. 0.7 (0.2, 1.0) mmol/L], the frequency of blood pressure monitoring and the health knowledge awareness level in the new management group were higher than those in the conventional management group (all P < 0.05). Moreover, significant differences were observed in the health knowledge awareness level before and after the intervention between the two groups (P < 0.05). After the intervention, the smoking volume in the new management group was lower than that before the intervention (P < 0.001). The loss to follow-up rate in the new management group was lower than that in the conventional management group (P < 0.05). The proportion of service satisfaction was higher than that in the conventional management group (P < 0.05). Conclusion Applying the new management model to the health management of high-risk population can increase their understanding of diseases and their own status. It can also improve the control level of blood pressure, blood lipids, BMI and smoking, enhance compliance, and improve satisfaction.
- Internet plus /
- Young and middle-aged people /
- High-risk population of cardiovascular disease /
- Health management

HTML全文

表 1 2组人群管理模式比较

Table 1. Comparison of crowd management mode between two groups

组别	宣教载体	触达途径	监测模式	趣味性	参与模式	人力分配
新型管理组	科普漫画	手机微信客户端	手机端记录平台，可显示变化趋势，有提醒功能	以漫画为主，文字为辅，风趣幽默	医患共同参与	医师挑选适宜科普漫画及制定规则，由信息人员负责发送及维护
常规管理组	现场讲解+文字版健康教育手册	需到达现场	纸质版记录表	纯文字，表述平淡，缺乏趣味性	以医生为主导，患者被动接受	医师联系现场宣教组织者，现场宣讲、派发健康教育手册

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 2组人群一般资料比较

Table 2. Comparison of general data between the two groups

组别	例数	性别[例(%)]		年龄[M(P₂₅, P₇₅)，岁]	文化程度[例(%)]			BMI(x±s)	收缩压[M(P₂₅, P₇₅)，mm Hg]	舒张压[M(P₂₅, P₇₅)，mm Hg]	空腹血糖(x±s，mmol/L)	LDL-C[M(P₂₅, P₇₅)，mmol/L]
组别	例数	女性	男性	年龄[M(P₂₅, P₇₅)，岁]	初高中	大学(含专科)	硕士及以上	BMI(x±s)	收缩压[M(P₂₅, P₇₅)，mm Hg]	舒张压[M(P₂₅, P₇₅)，mm Hg]	空腹血糖(x±s，mmol/L)	LDL-C[M(P₂₅, P₇₅)，mmol/L]
新型管理组	59	32(54.2)	27(45.8)	46(43, 48)	4(6.8)	48(81.4)	7(11.9)	26.3±1.8	150(146, 153)	92(90, 95)	5.4±0.6	3.6(3.2, 3.8)
常规管理组	53	30(56.6)	23(43.4)	46(44, 49)	4(7.5)	42(79.2)	7(13.2)	26.4±1.9	150(146, 153)	94(90, 96)	5.3±0.6	3.6(3.2, 3.8)
统计量		0.063^a		1 497.000^b	3 003.500^b			-0.186^c	1 616.000^b	1 521.500^b	0.833^c	1 489.500^b
P值		0.801		0.699	0.940			0.853	0.761	0.808	0.407	0.667
注：^a为χ²值，^b为W值，^c为t值。1 mm Hg=0.133 kPa。

下载: 导出CSV

表 3 2组人群干预后BMI、LDL-C、血压降幅比较[M(P₂₅, P₇₅)]

Table 3. The reduction of BMI, LDL-C and blood pressure between the two groups after intervention were compared [M(P₂₅, P₇₅)]

组别	例数	BMI降幅	LDL-C降(mmol/L)	血压降幅(mm Hg)
组别	例数	BMI降幅	LDL-C降(mmol/L)	收缩压降幅	舒张压降幅
新型管理组	59	1.3(0.9, 1.6)	1.1(0.7, 1.3)	20.0(14.5, 23.0)	10.0(14.5, 23.0)
常规管理组	53	0.9(0.3, 1.3)	0.7(0.2, 1.0)	16.0(12.0, 19.0)	8.0(5.0, 9.0)
W值		2 053.500	2 269.500	1 964.000	2 201.000
P值		0.004	＜0.001	0.020	＜0.001

下载: 导出CSV

表 4 2组人群干预后吸烟量比较[例(%)]

Table 4. Comparison of smoking quantity between two groups after intervention[cases (%)]

组别	例数	干预前吸烟量(支/d)				干预后吸烟量(支/d)
组别	例数	0	1~10	11~20	20以上	0	1~10	11~20	20以上
新型管理组	59	32(54.2)	8(13.6)	11(18.6)	3(5.1)	41(69.5)	16(27.1)	2(3.4)	0^a
常规管理组	53	31(58.5)	10(18.9)	7(13.2)	1(1.9)	32(60.4)	10(18.9)	10(18.9)	1(1.9)^b
W值		2 880.500				3 216.000
P值		0.461				0.125
注：与组内干预前比较，^aP＜0.001，^bP=0.625。

下载: 导出CSV

表 5 2组人群干预后血压监测依从性、健康知识知晓程度比较

Table 5. Comparison of blood pressure monitoring compliance and health knowledge between the two groups after intervention

组别	例数	血压测量次数[例(%)]			健康知识知晓程度[M(P₂₅, P₇₅)]
组别	例数	优	良	差	干预前	干预后
新型管理组	59	22(37.3)	30(50.8)	7(11.9)	0.52(0.45, 0.62)	0.71(0.62, 0.81)^a
常规管理组	53	3(5.7)	32(60.4)	18(34.0)	0.57(0.52, 0.62)	0.62(0.57, 0.62)^b
W值		3 647.000			1 274.500	2 348.000
P值		＜0.001			0.090	＜0.001
注：与组内干预前比较, ^aP < 0.001, ^bP < 0.05。

下载: 导出CSV

表 6 2组人群失访率及服务满意度比较[例(%)]

Table 6. Comparison of loss to follow-up rate and service satisfaction between the two groups[cases (%)]

组别	例数	是否失访		满意度
组别	例数	是	否	满意	一般	不满意
新型管理组	59	0	59(100.0)	49(83.1)	9(15.3)	1(1.7)
常规管理组	53	6(10.2)	53(89.8)	17(32.1)	30(56.6)	6(11.3)
统计量		4.390^a		3 803.500^b
P值		0.036		＜0.001
注：^a为χ²值，^b为W值。

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(22)

[1]	国家心血管病中心. 中国心血管病报告2018[M]. 北京: 中国大百科全书出版社, 2019. National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases. China Cardiovascular Disease Report 2018[M]. Beijing: China Encyclopedia Publishing House, 2019.
[2]	中国心血管病预防指南(2017)写作组, 中华心血管病杂志编辑委员会. 中国心血管病预防指南(2017)[J]. 中华心血管病杂志, 2018, 46(1): 10-25. Writing Group for Chinese Guidelines for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention(2017), Editorial Board of Chinese Journal of Cardiology. Chinese Guidelines for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention (2017)[[J]. Chinese Journal of Cardiology, 2018, 46(1): 10-25.
[3]	国务院办公厅. 中国防治慢性病中长期规划(2017-2025年)[EB/OL]. (2017-02-14)[2020-12-07]. http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2017-02/14/content_5167886.htm. General Office of the State Council. China Medium- and Long-Term Plan for the Prevention and Treatment of Chronic Diseases (2017-2025)[EB/OL]. (2017-02-14)[2020-12-07]. http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2017-02/14/content_5167886.htm.
[4]	庞元捷, 吕筠, 余灿清, 等. 多组学在慢性病病因学研究中的应用及其进展[J]. 中华流行病学杂志, 2021, 42(1): 1-9. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112338-20201201-01370 PANG Y J, LV J, YU C Q, et al. Application of multi-omics in the etiological study of chronic diseases and its progress[J]. Chinese Journal of Epidemiology, 2021, 42(1): 1-9. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112338-20201201-01370
[5]	德勤咨询. 2018中国移动消费者调研报告[EB/OL]. (2019-01-25)[2020-12-07]. http://www.199it.com/archives/826771.html. Deloitte Consulting. 2018 China Mobile Consumer Survey Report[EB/OL]. (2019-01-25)[2020-12-07]. http://www.199it.com/archives/826771.html.
[6]	刘政, 王锡榜, 周艳红, 等. 互联网+医生的社区高血压患者慢病管理模式效果[J]. 解放军医院管理杂志, 2020, 27(2): 156-161. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JFYG202002017.htm LIU Z, WANG X B, ZHOU Y H, et al. Effect of internet plus doctor's chronic disease management model for community hypertensive patients[J]. Chinese People's Liberation Army Hospital Management Journal, 2020, 27(2): 156-161. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JFYG202002017.htm
[7]	李佳梅, 陈鸿芳, 李换则, 等. "互联网+"慢性病管理模式在原发性高血压患者中的应用效果[J]. 临床医学研究与实践, 2020, 5(17): 148-149, 152. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YLYS202017056.htm LI J M, CHEN H F, LI H Z, et al. Effect of internet + chronic disease management model in patients with essential hypertension[J]. Clinical Medical Research and Practice, 2020, 5(17): 148-149, 152. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YLYS202017056.htm
[8]	曾令先, 杜小林, 夏孟红. "互联网+慢病管理"创新模式与成效[J]. 中国医药指南, 2020, 18(2): 292-293. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YYXK202002246.htm ZENG L X, DU X L, XIA M H. Innovative model and effectiveness of "Internet plus Chronic Disease Management"[J]. Chinese Pharmaceutical Guidelines, 2020, 18(2): 292-293. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YYXK202002246.htm
[9]	王琳青. 手机新媒体在稳定期慢阻肺患者慢病管理中的应用研究[D]. 沈阳: 中国医科大学, 2020. WANG L Q. Application of new mobile phone media in chronic disease management of stable COPD patients[D]. Shenyang: China Medical University, 2020.
[10]	王力, 陈康, 魏文志, 等. 互联网+全程慢病管理模式对高血压慢病的疗效研究[J]. 河北医药, 2018, 40(12): 1803-1806. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-7386.2018.12.010 WANG L, CHEN K, WEI W Z, et al. Efficacy of Internet plus whole-course chronic disease management mode on hypertensive chronic disease[J]. Hebei Medicine, 2018, 40(12): 1803-1806. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-7386.2018.12.010
[11]	买力曼·巴哈尼, 王朝阳, 刘泉泉, 等. 基于移动医疗的干预影响慢病患者依从性的meta分析[J]. 电脑知识与技术, 2021, 17(3): 236-238, 249. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DNZS202103094.htm BUYMAN B, WANG C Y, LIU Q Q, et al. Meta-analysis of mHealth based interventions affecting adherence in patients with chronic diseases[J]. Computer Knowledge and Technology, 2021, 17(3): 236-238, 249. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DNZS202103094.htm
[12]	VORRINK S, HUISMAN C, KORT H, et al. Perceptions of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and their physiotherapists regarding the use of an ehealth intervention[J]. JMIR Hum Factors, 2017, 4(3): e20. DOI: 10.2196/humanfactors.7196.
[13]	徐春华, 王冬莉, 宁淑贞. 微信随访在糖尿病慢病管理中的应用研究[J]. 临床医药实践, 2019, 28(7): 547-550. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SXLC201907024.htm XU C H, WANG D L, NING S Z. Application of Wechat follow-up in the management of chronic diabetic disease[J]. Clinical Medicine Practice, 2019, 28(7): 547-550. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SXLC201907024.htm
[14]	刘妮. "互联网+"背景下医院-社区-家庭三级健康教育模式在痛风患者中的应用[D]. 太原: 山西医科大学, 2019. LIU N. The application of hospital, community and family three-level health education model in gout patients in the context of "Internet plus"[D]. Taiyuan: Shanxi Medical University, 2019.
[15]	李松, 杨郗, 郭秀婷, 等. 全科医生移动APP健康管理模式在社区糖尿病管理中的应用效果评价[J]. 中国初级卫生保健, 2019, 33(6): 15-17. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-568X.2019.06.0006 LI S YANG C, GUO X T, et al. Evaluation of the application effect of general practitioner mobile APP health management model in community diabetes management[J]. Chinese Primary Health Care, 2019, 33(6): 15-17. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-568X.2019.06.0006
[16]	周志衡, 黄志杰, 郑晓芬, 等. "互联网+"糖尿病三方共管健康管理模式构建与应用研究[J]. 中华全科医学, 2020, 18(10): 1707-1710. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.001599 ZHOU Z H, HUANG Z J, ZHENG X F, et al. Construction and application of tripartite co-management health management model for "internet plus" diabetes[J]. Chinese general practice, 2020, 18(10): 1707-1710. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.001599
[17]	谢红燕, 应莉, 崔英. 基于"互联网+"院外管理对台州地区高血压脑病患者血压变异性的影响[J]. 中华全科医学, 2020, 18(7): 1227-1229, 1244. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.001471 XIE H Y, YING L, CUI Y. Effect of "internet plus" extramural management on blood pressure variability in patients with hypertensive encephalopathy in Taizhou area[J]. Chinese general practice, 2020, 18(7): 1227-1229, 1244. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.001471
[18]	黄蛟灵, 刘娜娜, 刘茜, 等. 社区居民与家庭医生签约状况及人口特征分析[J]. 中国初级卫生保健, 2020, 34(1): 40-41, 87. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGCW202001012.htm HUANG J L, LIU N N, LIU X, et al. Community residents and family doctors signed status and demographic characteristics analysis[J]. Chinese Primary Health Care, 2020, 34(1): 40-41, 87. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGCW202001012.htm
[19]	梁雪, 武宁, 陈连庆, 等. 焦虑和自我效能对中青年冠心病患者健康素养的影响[J]. 山西医药杂志, 2019, 48(5): 632-633. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-9926.2019.05.049 LIANG X, WU N, CHEN L Q, et al. Effect of anxiety and self-efficacy on health literacy in young and middle-aged patients with coronary heart disease[J]. Shanxi Medical Journal, 2019, 48(5): 632-633. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-9926.2019.05.049
[20]	陈远虹, 郑羽翔, 王朝昕. 社区卫生服务中心内部控制的现状及改进[J]. 中国社区医师, 2020, 36(32): 180-181. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XCYS202032088.htm CHEN Y H, ZHENG Y X, WANG Z X. Present situation and improvement of internal control in community health service center[J]. Chinese Community Doctors, 2020, 36(32): 180-181. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XCYS202032088.htm
[21]	林洁, 郭静, 杨永华, 等. 上海市某区基层医务人员权益诉求分析[J]. 中华医院管理杂志, 2019, 35(11): 940-943. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1000-6672.2019.11.014 LIN J, GUO J, YANG Y H, et al. Analysis of the rights appeal of primary medical staff in a district of Shanghai[J]. Chinese Journal of Hospital Management, 2019, 35(11): 940-943. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1000-6672.2019.11.014
[22]	陈哲, 刘竟芳, 陈伟, 等. 医院-社区-家庭三位一体老年慢性病管理模式探讨[J]. 医学临床研究, 2019, 36(12): 2384-2386. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYQY201310062.htm CHEN Z, LIU Y F, CHEN W, et al. Hospital-community-family trinity chronic disease management model in the elderly to investigate[J]. Journal of Clinical Research, 2019, 36(12): 2384-2386. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYQY201310062.htm