留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

结直肠癌患者癌组织中IL-23表达水平与预后的相关性研究

苏博 闫振宇 王欣欣 钱国武 张森 王晶璇

苏博, 闫振宇, 王欣欣, 钱国武, 张森, 王晶璇. 结直肠癌患者癌组织中IL-23表达水平与预后的相关性研究[J]. 中华全科医学, 2022, 20(8): 1295-1298. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002580
引用本文: 苏博, 闫振宇, 王欣欣, 钱国武, 张森, 王晶璇. 结直肠癌患者癌组织中IL-23表达水平与预后的相关性研究[J]. 中华全科医学, 2022, 20(8): 1295-1298. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002580
SU Bo, YAN Zhen-yu, WANG Xin-xin, QIAN Guo-wu, ZHANG Sen, WANG Jing-xuan. Expression of interleukin-23 in carcinoma tissues and its relationship with clinical prognosis in patients with colorectal cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2022, 20(8): 1295-1298. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002580
Citation: SU Bo, YAN Zhen-yu, WANG Xin-xin, QIAN Guo-wu, ZHANG Sen, WANG Jing-xuan. Expression of interleukin-23 in carcinoma tissues and its relationship with clinical prognosis in patients with colorectal cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2022, 20(8): 1295-1298. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002580

结直肠癌患者癌组织中IL-23表达水平与预后的相关性研究

doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002580
基金项目: 

河南省医学科技攻关计划项目 182102311210

详细信息
    通讯作者:

    闫振宇, E-mail: yanzy0418@163.com

  • 中图分类号: R735.3

Expression of interleukin-23 in carcinoma tissues and its relationship with clinical prognosis in patients with colorectal cancer

  • 摘要:   目的  探讨结直肠癌患者癌组织中IL-23表达水平与预后的关系。  方法  选取2015年1月1日—2016年12月31日于南阳市中心医院就诊的164例结直肠癌患者并采用免疫组化法检测癌组织中IL-23的表达,染色强度得分×阳性表达率得分为0~1分、2~3分、4~5分和≥6分时分别计为阴性、弱阳性、中度阳性和强阳性,将“中度和强度阳性”视为IL-23高表达,其余为IL-23低表达;纳入2019年1月1日—2019年12月31日南阳市中心医院70例结直肠癌患者(观察组)和35例健康者(对照组),比较血清中IL-23表达的差异。影响因素和诊断效能用Cox风险比例模型和受试者操作特征曲线分析。  结果  癌组织中IL-23高表达119例,低表达45例,主要表达于胞浆中。淋巴结转移(N1~N2)、TNM分期(Ⅲ期)和IL-23表达水平(高表达)是CRC患者预后的独立危险因素(均P < 0.01)。结直肠癌观察组血清中IL-23表达显著高于对照组(t=12.173,P < 0.001)。IL-23诊断结直肠癌的AUC为0.935(95% CI:0.888~0.981),截断值为36.195 ng/mL,诊断灵敏度和特异度为94.30%和80.00%。  结论  IL-23高表达与结直肠癌不良预后有关,可作为预测预后的一项血清学筛查标志物。

     

  • 图  1  结直肠癌患者癌组织中IL-23的不同表达状态(免疫组化SP法,×200)

    注:A示癌组织中IL-23表达阴性(-);B示癌组织中IL-23表达弱阳性(+);C示癌组织中IL-23表达中度阳性(++);D示癌组织中IL-23表达强阳性(+++)。

    Figure  1.  Different Expressions of IL-23 in colorectal cancer tissues (SP method, ×200)

    图  2  血清中IL-23表达水平诊断结直肠癌的ROC曲线

    Figure  2.  ROC curve of serum IL-23 in the diagnosis of colorectal cancer

    表  1  结直肠癌患者癌组织中IL-23表达水平与临床-病理特征的关系(例)

    Table  1.   IL-23 expression in colorectal cancer patients with carcinoma tissue level relationship with the clinical, pathological features (cases)

    项目 IL-23低表达组(n=45) IL-23高表达组(n=119) χ2 P
    性别 2.726 0.099
        男性 20 70
        女性 25 49
    年龄 0.355 0.551
        ≥60岁 23 67
         < 60岁 22 52
    肿瘤部位 2.588 0.108
        直肠 29 60
        结肠 16 59
    肿瘤大小 0.384 0.536
        ≥5 cm 18 54
         < 5 cm 27 65
    肿瘤细胞分化程度 19.713 < 0.001
        高分化 29 32
        中~低分化 16 87
    淋巴结转移 6.276 0.012
        N0 26 43
        N1~N2 19 76
    TNM分期 10.579 0.001
        Ⅰ~Ⅱ 37 65
        Ⅲ 8 54
    CEA 0.481 0.488
        阳性 23 68
        阴性 22 51
    CA19-9 2.726 0.099
        阳性 25 49
        阴性 20 70
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  变量赋值方法

    Table  2.   Variable assignment method

    变量 赋值方法
    性别 男性=1;女性=0
    年龄 ≥60岁=1; < 60岁=0
    肿瘤部位 结肠=1;直肠=0
    肿瘤大小 ≥5 cm=1; < 5 cm=0
    肿瘤细胞分化程度 中~低分化=1;高分化=0
    淋巴结转移 N1~N2=1;N0=0
    TNM分期 Ⅲ期=1;Ⅰ~Ⅱ期=0
    CEA CEA阳性=1CEA阴性=0
    CA19-9 CA19-9阳性=1CA19-9阴性=0
    IL-23 IL-23高表达=1;IL-23低表达=0
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  3  结直肠癌患者复发的多因素Cox比例风险回归模型分析

    Table  3.   Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression model analysis of colorectal cancer recurrence

    变量 B SE Wald χ2 HR 95% CI P
    淋巴结转移(N1~N2) 0.697 0.254 7.530 2.007 1.367~5.119 < 0.001
    TNM分期(Ⅲ期) 0.997 0.381 6.848 2.711 1.327~5.379 < 0.001
    IL-23表达情况(高表达) 1.045 0.467 5.007 2.843 1.612~5.127 < 0.001
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] ZHU J, TAN Z, HOLLIS-HANSEN K, et al. Epidemiological trends in colorectal cancer in China: An ecological study[J]. Dig Dis Sci, 2017, 62(1): 235-243. doi: 10.1007/s10620-016-4362-4
    [2] DEKKER E, TANIS P J, VLEUGELS J L A, et al. Colorectal cancer[J]. Lancet, 2019, 394(10207): 1467-1480. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32319-0
    [3] GAO R, GAO Z, HUANG L, et al. Gut microbiota and colorectal cancer[J]. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis, 2017, 36(5): 757-769. doi: 10.1007/s10096-016-2881-8
    [4] WROBEL P, AHMED S. Current status of immunotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer[J]. Int J Colorectal Dis, 2019, 34(1): 13-25. doi: 10.1007/s00384-018-3202-8
    [5] TUOMISTO A E, MÄKINEN M J, VÄYRYNEN J P. Systemic inflammation in colorectal cancer: Underlying factors, effects, and prognostic significance[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2019, 25(31): 4383-4404. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i31.4383
    [6] SHAWKI S, ASHBURN J, SIGNS S A, et al. Colon cancer: Inflammation-associated cancer[J]. Surg Oncol Clin N Am, 2018, 27(2): 269-287. doi: 10.1016/j.soc.2017.11.003
    [7] ZHU G, CHENG Z, LIN C, et al. MyD88 regulates LPS-induced NF-κB/MAPK cytokines and promotes inflammation and malignancy in colorectal cancer cells[J]. Cancer Genomics Proteomics, 2019, 16(6): 409-419. doi: 10.21873/cgp.20145
    [8] SUZUKI Y, OKABAYASHI K, HASEGAWA H, et al. Comparison of preoperative inflammation-based prognostic scores in patients with colorectal cancer[J]. Ann Surg, 2018, 267(3): 527-531. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002115
    [9] YAN J, SMYTH M J, TENG M W L. Interleukin (IL)-12 and IL-23 and their conflicting roles in cancer[J]. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol, 2018, 10(7): a028530. DOI: 10.1101/cshperspect.a028530.
    [10] WANG J J, LEI K F, HAN F. Tumor microenvironment: Recent advances in various cancer treatments[J]. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci, 2018, 22(12): 3855-3864.
    [11] VITALE I, MANIC G, COUSSENS L M, et al. Macrophages and metabolism in the tumor microenvironment[J]. Cell Metab, 2019, 30(1): 36-50. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2019.06.001
    [12] 牛玉苗, 严翔, 齐宏妍, 等. 肿瘤微环境中主要炎症细胞因子对PD-L1表达调控的研究进展[J]. 中国病理生理杂志, 2020, 36(9): 1704-1708. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-4718.2020.09.024

    NIU Y M, YAN X, QI H Y, et al. Progress on regulation of PD-L1 expression by major inflammatory cytokines in tumor microenvironment[J]. Chinese Journal of Pathophysiology, 2020, 36(9): 1704-1708. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-4718.2020.09.024
    [13] SINGH N, BABY D, RAJGURU J P, et al. Inflammation and cancer[J]. Ann Afr Med, 2019, 18(3): 121-126. doi: 10.4103/aam.aam_56_18
    [14] 张小聪, 陈小伍, 朱达坚. IL-23与结直肠癌发生及发展的研究进展[J]. 医学理论与实践, 2017, 30(23): 3475-3477. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YXLL201723011.htm

    ZHANG X C, CHEN X W, ZHU D J. Research progress of IL-23 and the genesis and development of colorectal cancer[J]. The Journal of Medical Theory and Practice, 2017, 30(23): 3475-3477. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YXLL201723011.htm
    [15] TAMASSIA N, ARRUDA-SILVA F, WRIGHT H L, et al. Human neutrophils activated via TLR8 promote Th17 polarization through IL-23[J]. J Leukoc Biol, 2019, 105(6): 1155-1165. doi: 10.1002/JLB.MA0818-308R
    [16] HURTADO C G, WAN F, HOUSSEAU F, et al. Roles for interleukin 17 and adaptive immunity in pathogenesis of colorectal cancer[J]. Gastroenterology, 2018, 155(6): 1706-1715. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.08.056
    [17] LIM K S, YONG Z W E, WANG H, et al. Inflammatory and mitogenic signals drive interleukin 23 subunit alpha (IL23A) secretion independent of IL12B in intestinal epithelial cells[J]. J Biol Chem, 2020, 295(19): 6387-6400. doi: 10.1074/jbc.RA120.012943
    [18] CHEN J, ZHU Z, LI Q, et al. Neutrophils enhance cutaneous vascular dilation and permeability to aggravate psoriasis by releasing matrix metallopeptidase 9[J]. J Invest Dermatol, 2021, 141(4): 787-799. doi: 10.1016/j.jid.2020.07.028
    [19] KHABBAZI S, HASSANSHAHI M, HASSANSHAHI A, et al. Opioids and matrix metalloproteinases: The influence of morphine on MMP-9 production and cancer progression[J]. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol, 2019, 392(2): 123-133. doi: 10.1007/s00210-019-01613-6
    [20] ELESSAWI D F, ALKADY M M, IBRAHIM I M. Diagnostic and prognostic value of serum IL-23 in colorectal cancer[J]. Arab J Gastroenterol, 2019, 20(2): 65-68. doi: 10.1016/j.ajg.2019.05.002
    [21] 赖志亨, 邹江. LINC00261和miR-522-3p在结直肠癌中的表达及其与患者预后的关系[J]. 国际检验医学杂志, 2021, 42(8): 991-995. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-4130.2021.08.023

    LAI Z H ZOU J. Expression of LINC00261 and miR-522-3p and their relationship with prognosis in colorectal cancer patients[J]. International Journal of Laboratory Medicine, 2021, 42(8): 991-995. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-4130.2021.08.023
    [22] 潘丽, 孙国平. 结直肠癌根治术后复发危险因素分层分析[J]. 中华肿瘤防治杂志, 2018, 25(4): 270-274. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QLZL201804009.htm

    PAN L, SUN G P. Risk stratification analysis of recurrence after radical resection of colorectal cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Cancer Prevention and Treatment, 2018, 25(4): 270-274. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QLZL201804009.htm
  • 加载中
图(2) / 表(3)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  154
  • HTML全文浏览量:  53
  • PDF下载量:  17
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2021-03-15
  • 网络出版日期:  2022-09-26

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回