留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

磁共振MRS、DWI及SWI序列在脑胶质瘤分级诊断中的应用价值

李欣 谢继承 王静 庞坚信 吴玲 季文斌

李欣, 谢继承, 王静, 庞坚信, 吴玲, 季文斌. 磁共振MRS、DWI及SWI序列在脑胶质瘤分级诊断中的应用价值[J]. 中华全科医学, 2022, 20(9): 1541-1544. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002644
引用本文: 李欣, 谢继承, 王静, 庞坚信, 吴玲, 季文斌. 磁共振MRS、DWI及SWI序列在脑胶质瘤分级诊断中的应用价值[J]. 中华全科医学, 2022, 20(9): 1541-1544. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002644
LI Xin, XIE Ji-cheng, WANG Jing, PANG Jian-xin, WU Ling, JI Wen-bin. The application value of magnetic resonance MRS, DWI and SWI sequences in the grading diagnosis of glioma[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2022, 20(9): 1541-1544. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002644
Citation: LI Xin, XIE Ji-cheng, WANG Jing, PANG Jian-xin, WU Ling, JI Wen-bin. The application value of magnetic resonance MRS, DWI and SWI sequences in the grading diagnosis of glioma[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2022, 20(9): 1541-1544. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002644

磁共振MRS、DWI及SWI序列在脑胶质瘤分级诊断中的应用价值

doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002644
基金项目: 

国家自然科学基金项目 82102114

浙江省医药卫生科技计划项目 2019KY777

台州市科技计划项目 1902KY30

详细信息
    通讯作者:

    季文斌, E-mail: jiwb@enzemed.com

  • 中图分类号: R739.4 R445.2

The application value of magnetic resonance MRS, DWI and SWI sequences in the grading diagnosis of glioma

  • 摘要:   目的  探讨氢质子磁共振波谱分析(1H-MRS)、扩散加权成像(DWI)及磁敏感加权成像(SWI)在胶质瘤分级诊断中的应用价值。  方法  收集2016年12月—2020年3月浙江省台州医院经手术或活检病理证实的胶质瘤患者共76例,按照2016版WHO中枢神经系统肿瘤分类标准,将所有病例分为低级别组(Ⅰ~Ⅱ级,31例)和高级别组(Ⅲ~Ⅳ级,45例)。原始数据利用GE ADW 4.5工作站Functool软件处理,分别选取磁共振波谱(MRS)、DWI及SWI软件,测量肿瘤实质区MRS主要代谢物(胆碱、肌酸、氮-乙酰天门冬氨酸)并测算出比值、表观扩散系数(ADC)及肿瘤磁敏感信号强度(ITSS),并采用Mann-Whitney U检验对2组结果进行统计分析。  结果  低级别脑胶质瘤组Cho/NAA中位数为1.780,Cho/Cr中位数为1.920,NAA/Cr中位数为0.930,ADC值中位数为1.730×10-3mm2/s,ITSS评分中位数为1.0。高级别脑胶质瘤组Cho/NAA中位数为4.390,Cho/Cr中位数为3.560,NAA/Cr中位数为0.780,ADC值中位数为1.030×10-3mm2/s,ITSS评分中位数为2.0。2组Cho/NAA、Cho/Cr、NAA/Cr、ADC值及ITSS评分比较差异均有统计学意义(均P < 0.001)。  结论  MR多模态成像(MRS、DWI及SWI)在胶质瘤分级诊断中有重要的应用价值。

     

  • 图  1  高级别胶质瘤SWI、ADC、MRS图

    注:男性,58岁,左侧枕叶胶质母细胞瘤Ⅳ级。A为SWI序列,B为ADC图,C、D为MRS序列。SWI序列病灶内多发点条状低信号,肿瘤实质ADC值约为1.09×10-3mm2/s,MRS重点监测肿瘤实质与瘤周水肿各项峰值的变化,显示肿瘤实质Cho峰明显升高、Cr峰稍升高,NAA峰明显降低,并可见稍高双“L”峰。

    Figure  1.  SWI, ADC, and MRS Images of high-grade gliomas

    图  2  低级别胶质瘤SWI、ADC、MRS图

    注:男性,39岁,右侧额叶弥漫性星形细胞瘤Ⅱ级。A为SWI序列,B为ADC图,C为MRS序列。SWI序列右侧额叶病灶内似见点状、短条状低信号影,肿瘤实质ADC值约为1.91×10-3mm2/s,MRS重点监测肿瘤实质与对照区各项峰值的变化。

    Figure  2.  SWI, ADC, and MRS Maps of low-grade gliomas

    表  1  低、高级别组胶质瘤实质部分ADC值及ITSS评分比较[M(P25, P75)]

    Table  1.   Comparison of ADC values and ITSS scores in parenchyma of low and high grade gliomas [M(P25, P75)]

    组别 例数 ADC值(×10-3mm2/s) ITSS评分(分)
    低级别组 31 1.730(1.630,1.770) 1.0(0,1.0)
    高级别组 45 1.030(0.935,1.135) 2.0(2.0,2.0)
    Z -7.064 -7.697
    P <0.001 <0.001
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  低、高级别组胶质瘤实质部分各主要代谢物值比较[M(P25, P75)]

    Table  2.   Comparison of main metabolites in parenchyma of glioma between low and high grade groups [M(P25, P75)]

    组别 例数 Cho/NAA Cho/Cr NAA/Cr
    低级别组 31 1.780(1.470,2.270) 1.920(1.710,2.310) 0.930(0.790,1.270)
    高级别组 45 4.390(3.570,5.250) 3.560(2.840,4.215) 0.780(0.600,0.880)
    Z -7.372 -6.934 -4.230
    P <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] 周瑞芳, 金建明, 叶军, 等. 神经胶质瘤患者血浆中TF、TFPI-1及TFPI-2的表达及意义[J]. 肿瘤学杂志, 2018, 24(2): 168-170. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XHON201802021.htm

    ZHOU R F, JIN J M, YE J, et al. Expression of detection of plasma TF, TFPI-1 and TFPI-2 and their significance in patients with glioma[J]. Journal of Chinese Oncology, 2018, 24(2): 168-170. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XHON201802021.htm
    [2] LOUIS D N, PERRY A, REIFENBERGER G, et al. The 2016 World Health Organization classification of tumors of the central nervous system: A summary[J]. Acta Neuropathol, 2016, 131(6): 803-820. doi: 10.1007/s00401-016-1545-1
    [3] 王佳, 梁奕, 范文辉, 等. 联合1H-MRS及DTI在脑胶质瘤级别的应用[J]. 医学影像学杂志, 2018, 28(3): 362-365. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XYXZ201803005.htm

    WANG J, LIAN Y, FAN W H, et al. Combination use of 1H-MRS and DTI in the grading of cerebral gliomas[J]. Journal of Medical Imaging, 2018, 28(3): 362-365. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XYXZ201803005.htm
    [4] PARK M J, KIM H S, JAHNG G H, et al. Semiquantitative assessment of intratumoral susceptibility signals using non-contrast-enhanced high-field high-resolution susceptibility-weighted imaging in patients with gliomas: Comparison with MR perfusion imaging[J]. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2009, 30(7): 1402-1408. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A1593
    [5] 杨晓彤, 吴元华, 熊爱华, 等. 单发性胶质瘤的MRI征象特征及对肿瘤病理级别的判断[J]. 中国现代医生, 2019, 57(5): 106-109. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZDYS201905032.htm

    YANG X T, WU Y H, XIONG A H, et al. MRI features of single glioma and the judgment of tumor pathological grade[J]. China Modern Doctor, 2019, 57(5): 106-109. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZDYS201905032.htm
    [6] 闫凤全, 刘丽, 姬士军, 等. 脑胶质瘤的MRI诊断及鉴别诊断与诊断成功率观察[J]. 现代医用影像学, 2019, 28(3): 546-547. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XDYY201903027.htm

    YAN F Q, LIU L, JI S J, et al. MRI diagnosis, differential diagnosis and success rate of glioma[J]. Modern Medical Imageology, 2019, 28(3): 546-547. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XDYY201903027.htm
    [7] LAMBIN P, LEIJENAAR R T H, DEIST T M, et al. Radiomics: The bridge between medical imaging and personalized medicine[J]. Nat Rev Clin Oncol, 2017, 14(12): 749-762. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2017.141
    [8] 刘铁军, 郑英杰. 氢质子磁共振波谱联合弥散加权成像在鉴别脑胶质瘤术后复发及放射性损伤中的应用价值[J]. 广西医学, 2016, 38(5): 711-714. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GYYX201605036.htm

    LIU T J, ZHENG Y J. Application value of hydrogen proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy combined with diffusion weighted imaging in differentiating recurrence and radiation injury of glioma after surgery[J]. Guangxi Medical Journal, 2016, 38(5): 711-714. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GYYX201605036.htm
    [9] 张玉琴, 徐海东, 董海波, 等. 3.0T氢质子磁共振波谱成像在胶质瘤术前分级及术后随访中的应用[J]. 医学影像学杂志, 2016, 26(2): 194-197. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XYXZ201602003.htm

    ZHANG Y Q, XU H D, DONG H B, et al. The advantages and disadvantages of 3. 0 T spectroscopic imaging in the preoperative grading and postoperative followup of glioma[J]. Journal of Medical Imaging, 2016, 26(2): 194-197. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XYXZ201602003.htm
    [10] SHI W, LI F, LI H, et al. Evaluation of human glioma using in-vivo proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy combined with expression of cyclooxygenase-2: A preliminary clinical trial[J]. Neuroreport, 2017, 28(7): 414-420.
    [11] DONNERS R, BLACKLEDGE M, TUNARIU N, et al. Quantitative whole-body diffusion-weighted MR imaging[J]. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am, 2018, 26(4): 479-494.
    [12] CARAVAN I, CIORTEA C A, CONTIS A, et al. Diagnostic value of apparent diffusion coefficient in differentiating between high-grade gliomas and brain metastases[J]. Acta Radiol, 2018, 59(5): 599-605.
    [13] 冯贵堂, 韩东明, 岳巍, 等. 多参数MRI在诊断脑胶质瘤中的价值及其与Ki-67的相关性分析[J]. 放射学实践, 2017, 32(5): 483-487. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FSXS201705015.htm

    FENG G T, HAN D M, YUE W, et al. Multi-parameter magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of glioma and its correlation with Ki-67[J]. Radiologic Practice, 2017, 32(5): 483-487. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FSXS201705015.htm
    [14] 尹子铭, 石建军, 续秋艳, 等. DWI联合MRS对病毒性脑炎和脑低级别胶质瘤的诊断价值[J]. 中国CT和MRI杂志, 2018, 16(1): 15-18. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CTMR201801005.htm

    YIN Z M, SHI J J, XU Q Y, et al. Diagnostic value of diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) and hydrogen proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS)for virus encephalitits and low-grade glioma[J]. Chinese Journal of CT and MRI, 2018, 16(1): 15-18. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CTMR201801005.htm
    [15] LI X, ZHU Y, KANG H, et al. Glioma grading by microvascular permeability parameters derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and intratumoral susceptibility signal on susceptibility weighted imaging[J]. Cancer Imaging, 2015, 15(1): 4.
    [16] 杜常月, 苗娜, 齐旭红, 等. 磁敏感加权成像及体素内不相干运动成像在脑胶质瘤术前分级中的应用研究[J]. 肿瘤影像学, 2019, 28(3): 139-144. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YXYX201903003.htm

    DU C Y, MIAO N, QI X H, et al. Study on susceptibility weighted imaging and intravoxel incoherent motion in the preoperative grading of gliomas[J]. Oncoradiology, 2019, 28(3): 139-144. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YXYX201903003.htm
    [17] 李章宇, 钱海峰, 孙胜杰, 等. 磁共振灌注加权成像与扩散张量成像在脑胶质瘤分级诊断中的应用[J]. 中华全科医学, 2017, 15(6): 1013-1015. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.2017.06.032

    LI Z Y, QIAN H F, SUN S J, et al. Magnetic resonance diffusion tensor and perfusion-weighted imaging for grading of cerebral gliomas[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2017, 15(6): 1013-1015. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.2017.06.032
  • 加载中
图(2) / 表(2)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  190
  • HTML全文浏览量:  82
  • PDF下载量:  3
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2020-05-06
  • 网络出版日期:  2022-11-29

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回