留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

经皮颈椎间盘射频消融术联合银质针治疗颈性眩晕临床疗效观察

皮铎波 鲍骏侃 陈龙 张颖

皮铎波, 鲍骏侃, 陈龙, 张颖. 经皮颈椎间盘射频消融术联合银质针治疗颈性眩晕临床疗效观察[J]. 中华全科医学, 2022, 20(10): 1685-1687. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002679
引用本文: 皮铎波, 鲍骏侃, 陈龙, 张颖. 经皮颈椎间盘射频消融术联合银质针治疗颈性眩晕临床疗效观察[J]. 中华全科医学, 2022, 20(10): 1685-1687. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002679
PI Duo-bo, BAO Jun-kan, CHEN Long, ZHANG Ying. Clinical observation of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of cervical intervertebral disc combined with silver needle in the treatment of cervical vertigo[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2022, 20(10): 1685-1687. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002679
Citation: PI Duo-bo, BAO Jun-kan, CHEN Long, ZHANG Ying. Clinical observation of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of cervical intervertebral disc combined with silver needle in the treatment of cervical vertigo[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2022, 20(10): 1685-1687. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002679

经皮颈椎间盘射频消融术联合银质针治疗颈性眩晕临床疗效观察

doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002679
基金项目: 

浙江省医药卫生科技计划项目 2019KY728

详细信息
    通讯作者:

    皮铎波, E-mail: sx19881988@126.com

  • 中图分类号: R441.2R454.1R653

Clinical observation of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of cervical intervertebral disc combined with silver needle in the treatment of cervical vertigo

  • 摘要:   目的  观察经皮颈椎间盘射频消融术联合银质针治疗颈性眩晕患者的临床疗效。  方法  选择2019年6月—2021年6月绍兴文理学院附属医院确诊为颈性眩晕患者119例作为研究对象,使用随机数字表法将患者分为A组(射频+银质针组,41例)、B组(射频组,39例)、C组(银质针组,39例)。A组患者用颈椎间盘射频联合银质针治疗,B组患者仅用颈椎间盘射频治疗,C组单用银质针治疗。采用颅彩色多普勒超声(TCD)血流检测3组患者干预前及治疗1周、1个月后、3个月后左侧椎动脉(LVA)、右侧椎动脉(RVA)和基底动脉(BA)收缩期最大血流速度(Vmax),并应用眩晕残障程度评定量表评估患者眩晕程度。  结果  干预后3组患者椎动脉血流动力学均有所改善,干预3个月后,A组LVA-Vmax为(45.51±4.73)cm/s、RVA-Vmax为(45.48±4.70)cm/s、BA-Vmax为(45.54±4.76)cm/s, 高于B组[(43.11±4.82)cm/s、(43.01±4.79)cm/s、(43.62±3.95)cm/s]和C组[(43.06±4.98)cm/s、(43.08±4.81)cm/s、(43.11±3.06)cm/s], 差异有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。干预后,3组患者眩晕残障程度评分各项指标均有所降低,干预1个月后3组各项指标水平最低,3组间比较差异有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。  结论  采用颈椎间盘射频联合银质针治疗颈性眩晕,疗效明显优于单用颈椎间盘射频治疗及银质针治疗。

     

  • 表  1  3组颈性眩晕患者干预前后椎动脉血流动力学比较(x±s,cm/s)

    Table  1.   Comparison of vertebral artery hemodynamics before and after intervention among three groups of patients with cervical vertigo(x±s, cm/s)

    组别 例数 LVA-Vmax RVA-Vmax BA-Vmax
    干预前 干预3个月后 干预前 干预3个月后 干预前 干预3个月后
    A组 41 38.57±4.36 45.51±4.73a 38.45±4.31 45.48±4.70a 40.27±3.92 45.54±4.76a
    B组 39 38.49±4.69 43.11±4.82ab 38.56±4.51 43.01±4.79ab 40.17±3.95 43.62±3.95ab
    C组 39 38.51±4.66 43.06±4.98ab 38.59±4.65 43.08±4.81ab 40.21±4.06 43.11±3.06ab
    F 0.003 3.371 0.011 3.510 0.006 4.134
    P 0.997 0.038 0.989 0.033 0.994 0.018
    注:与同组干预前比较,aP < 0.05;与同时间点A组比较,bP < 0.05。
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  3组颈性眩晕患者DHI评分比较(x±s,分)

    Table  2.   Comparison of DHI scores among three groups of patients with cervical vertigo(x±s, points)

    组别 例数 功能 躯体
    干预前 干预1周后 干预1个月后 干预3个月后 干预前 干预1周后 干预1个月后 干预3个月后
    A组 41 20.05±2.16 10.06±2.56a 8.84±2.86a 10.02±1.96a 12.12±2.23 9.17±2.36a 9.05±1.16a 9.19±2.53a
    B组 39 20.35±2.06 11.56±2.56ab 11.59±2.93ab 11.96±2.87ab 12.21±2.21 10.57±2.56ab 9.89±2.16ab 11.13±2.32ab
    C组 39 20.13±2.07 11.60±2.16ab 10.11±2.06abc 11.65±2.78ab 12.15±2.38 10.36±2.33ab 9.14±1.16abc 11.17±2.39ab
    F 0.217 5.233 10.771 6.675 0.016 3.928 3.448 8.839
    P 0.805 0.007 < 0.001 0.002 0.984 0.022 0.035 < 0.001
    组别 例数 情感 总分
    干预前 干预1周后 干预1个月后 干预3个月后 干预前 干预1周后 干预1个月后 干预3个月后
    A组 41 15.51±2.52 9.15±2.56a 8.95±1.96a 8.74±2.76a 47.23±2.17 22.16±3.61a 20.16±2.19a 22.56±2.69a
    B组 39 15.89±2.50 10.55±2.36ab 9.96±2.56ab 10.12±2.85ab 48.13±2.07 24.16±3.79ab 23.74±2.66ab 24.53±3.65ab
    C组 39 15.79±2.35 10.45±2.43ab 9.92±1.56abc 10.15±2.79ab 47.91±2.63 23.98±2.95ab 22.66±2.19abc 23.66±3.63ab
    F 0.258 4.085 3.089 3.337 1.673 4.094 24.455 3.493
    P 0.773 0.019 0.049 0.039 0.192 0.019 < 0.001 0.034
    注:组内各时间点两两比较, 差异均有统计学意义;与同组干预前比较,aP < 0.05;与同时间点A组相比,bP < 0.05;与同时间点B组相比,cP < 0.05。
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] 辛荣超, 党建军, 郑勇, 等. 颈性眩晕患者颈椎动力位X线及椎动脉彩超检查的影像学特点分析[J]. 临床医学研究与实践, 2021, 6(35): 108-110. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YLYS202135034.htm

    XIN R C, DANG J J, ZHENG Y, et al. Analysis of imaging characteristics of cervical dynamic X-ray and vertebral artery color Doppler examination in patients with cervical vertigo[J]. Clinical medicine research and practice, 2021, 6(35): 108-110. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YLYS202135034.htm
    [2] 郝军, 常虎飞, 盛旻, 等. 刺五加对颈性眩晕患者多巴胺D2受体基因CpG岛甲基化及体外小胶质细胞的M1/M2极性的影响[J]. 实用药物与临床, 2022, 25(1): 26-31. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LYLC202201003.htm

    HAO J, CHANG H F, SHENG M, et al. Effects of Acanthopanax senticosus on CpG island methylation of dopamine D2 receptor gene in patients with cervical vertigo and M1/M2 polarity of microglia in vitro[J]. Practical drugs and clinic, 2022, 25(1): 26-31. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LYLC202201003.htm
    [3] 刘道龙, 褚雪菲, 萨仁, 等. 阴阳调和针法治疗颈性眩晕120例临床观察[J]. 中国中医基础医学杂志, 2021, 27(9): 1430-1432. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZYJC202109022.htm

    LIU D H, CHU X F, SA R, et al. Clinical observation on 120 cases of cervical vertigo treated by Yin Yang harmonizing acupuncture[J]. Chinese Journal of basic Chinese medicine, 2021, 27(9): 1430-1432. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZYJC202109022.htm
    [4] 史帆, 宋文慧, 刘昌文, 等. 前庭诱发肌源电位评价颈性眩晕与前庭功能的相关性[J]. 中国骨伤, 2022, 35(2): 148-152. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGGU202202011.htm

    SHI F, SONG W H, LIU C W, et al. Vestibular evoked myogenic potential to evaluate the correlation between cervical vertigo and vestibular function[J]. China bone injury, 2022, 35(2): 148-152. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGGU202202011.htm
    [5] 林雪维. 补气养血健脾汤联合针灸治疗气血亏虚型颈性眩晕的临床观察[J]. 中国中医药科技, 2022, 29(1): 142-143. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TJYY202201067.htm

    LIN X W. Clinical observation of Buqi Yangxue Jianpi Decoction combined with acupuncture in the treatment of cervical vertigo of Qi and blood deficiency type[J]. China Science and technology of traditional Chinese medicine, 2022, 29(1): 142-143. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TJYY202201067.htm
    [6] 中华医学会神经病学分会. 眩晕诊治专家共识[J]. 中华神经科杂志, 2010, 43(5): 369-374. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XDJB201802001.htm

    Neurology branch of Chinese Medical Association. Expert consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of vertigo[J]. Chinese Journal of Neurology, 2010, 43(5): 369-374. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XDJB201802001.htm
    [7] 刘晓卫, 李雪芬, 徐建珍, 等. 眩晕残障程度评定量表在眩晕患者跌倒风险预测中的应用研究[J]. 护士进修杂志, 2019, 34(13): 1184-1187. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FSJX201913008.htm

    LIU X W, LI X F, XU J Z, et al. Study on the application of vertigo disability rating scale in the prediction of fall risk of vertigo patients[J]. Journal of nurse training, 2019, 34(13): 1184-1187. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FSJX201913008.htm
    [8] 赵海玲, 李建强, 庄靖卿, 等. 中医特色护理在颈源性眩晕伴焦虑、抑郁病人中的应用[J]. 护理研究, 2017, 31(2): 221-223. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SXHZ201702028.htm

    ZHAO H L, LI J Q, ZHUANG J Q, et al. Application of traditional Chinese medicine characteristic nursing in patients with cervical vertigo with anxiety and depression[J]. Nursing research, 2017, 31(2): 221-223. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SXHZ201702028.htm
    [9] 金丽华, 楼航芳, 连建伟, 等. 天麻钩藤饮联合倍他司汀治疗眩晕症患者疗效的临床研究[J]. 中华全科医学, 2020, 18(3): 480-483. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.001278

    JIN L H, LOU H F, LIAN J W, et al. Clinical study on the efficacy of Tianma goutengyin combined with betahistine in the treatment of vertigo[J]. Chinese general practice, 2020, 18(3): 480-483. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.001278
    [10] 潘文莉, 蒙锦霞. 观察中医护理联合健康教育护理模式对颈椎病患者的临床护理分析[J]. 饮食保健, 2019, 6(7): 262-263. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YXSL202008029.htm

    PAN W L, MENG J X. To observe the clinical nursing analysis of traditional Chinese medicine nursing combined with health education nursing model for patients with cervical spondylosis[J]. Diet health care, 2019, 6(7): 262-263. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YXSL202008029.htm
    [11] YOGANANDAN N, UMALE S, STEMPER B, et al. Fatigue responses of the human cervical spine intervertebral discs[J]. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater, 2017, 69: 30-38.
    [12] 张阳, 李放, 孙天胜. 颈性眩晕发病机制新进展[J]. 中国骨与关节杂志, 2018, 7(5): 373-376. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GZGL201805015.htm

    ZHANG Y, LI F, SUN T S. New progress in the pathogenesis of cervical vertigo[J]. Chinese Journal of Bone and Joint, 2018, 7(5): 373-376. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GZGL201805015.htm
    [13] 彭宝淦, 杨亮. 颈性头晕的发病机制[J]. 武警医学, 2017, 28(5): 433-436. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-WJYX201705002.htm

    PENG B G, YANG L. Pathogenesis of cervical dizziness[J]. Armed police medicine, 2017, 28(5): 433-436. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-WJYX201705002.htm
    [14] 王福根. 银质针导热治疗颈腰背痛[M]. 郑州: 河南科学技术出版社, 2020: 74.

    WANG F G. Silver needle heat conduction treatment of neck, waist and back pain[M]. Zhengzhou: Henan science and Technology Press, 2020: 74.
    [15] 王瑞军, 高春华, 姜昊, 等. 颈椎间盘神经分布的研究进展[J]. 中华灾害救援医学, 2017, 5(4): 230-234. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JYZH201704017.htm

    WANG R J, GAO C H, JIANG H, et al. Research progress of nerve distribution in cervical intervertebral disc[J]. China disaster rescue medicine, 2017, 5(4): 230-234. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JYZH201704017.htm
    [16] 李利斌, 孙菊光, 史江峰. Epley法结合针刺快速治疗后半规管原发性良性阵发性位置性眩晕临床分析[J]. 中华全科医学, 2018, 16(12): 2085-2087. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.000568

    LI L B, SUN J G, SHI J F. Clinical analysis of Epley method combined with acupuncture for rapid treatment of primary benign paroxysmal positional vertigo in the posterior semicircular canal[J]. Chinese general practice, 2018, 16(12): 2085-2087. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.000568
  • 加载中
表(2)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  166
  • HTML全文浏览量:  51
  • PDF下载量:  4
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2022-03-18
  • 网络出版日期:  2022-11-30

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回