高龄妊娠糖尿病危险因素及其母婴结局分析

龚莉; 赵晶; 陈曙新; 崔焕焕; 刘靖

doi:10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002771

高龄妊娠糖尿病危险因素及其母婴结局分析

doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002771

无锡市惠山区人民医院内分泌科, 江苏无锡 214100

基金项目:

国家重点研发计划重大慢性非传染性疾病防控研究项目 2017YFC1309800

详细信息

通讯作者:
龚莉, E-mail: 18168895012@163.com

中图分类号: R714.256
计量
- 文章访问数: 142
- HTML全文浏览量: 58
- PDF下载量: 8
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2021-12-01
- 网络出版日期: 2023-02-07

Risk factors of gestational diabetes mellitus in advanced age and analysis of maternal and infant outcomes

Department of Endocrinology, Huishan District People' s Hospital, Wuxi City, Wuxi, Jiangsu 214100, China

摘要

摘要: 目的探究本地区高龄妊娠糖尿病(GDM)发生的相关危险因素及母婴结局。方法本研究共收集2017年9月—2020年12月在无锡市惠山区人民医院就诊的938例孕妇资料，依据口服葡萄糖耐量试验结果分为4组, A组: 高龄(≥35岁)GDM组64例；B组: 非高龄GDM组188例；C组: 高龄非GDM组112例；D组: 非高龄非GDM组574例。比较4组孕妇的基线资料；以是否发生GDM为因变量，进一步行logistic回归分析研究高龄妊娠糖尿病的独立危险因素并进行对比分析；采用χ²检验比较4组间母婴结局的差异。结果 GDM中高龄占比25.40%(64/252)。高龄GDM组的BMI(27.89±8.74)、1胎次以上妊娠比例(87.50%)、巨大儿分娩史比例(25.00%)、有DM家族史的比例(12.50%)分别显著高于高龄非GDM组(25.59±2.56、53.57%、8.93%、3.57%)。高龄GDM组的25(OH)D₃[17.76(14.71，20.00)ng/mL]显著低于高龄非GDM组[21.34(15.10, 30.13)ng/mL]，多因素分析结果显示，血清25(OH)D₃水平(OR=0.901, 95% CI: 0.815~0.996)和1胎次以上妊娠(OR=6.412, 95% CI: 1.559~26.380)是高龄产妇人群发生GDM的独立影响因素，其中低25(OH)D₃为危险因素。高龄GDM组的剖宫产率(15.63%)、羊水过多率(12.50%)、巨大儿分娩率(9.38%)分别显著高于高龄非GDM组的3.57%、3.57%、1.79%。结论孕晚期低25(OH)D₃和1胎次以上妊娠是高龄孕妇人群发生GDM的独立危险因素，高龄孕妇患GDM有较高的母婴不良妊娠结局风险，临床应多关注。
- 高龄 /
- 妊娠糖尿病 /
- 危险因素 /
- 母婴结局
Abstract: Objective To explore the risk factors and maternal and infant outcomes of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) in this area. Methods Data of 938 pregnant women who were treated in Huishan District People' s Hospital of Wuxi City from September 2017 to December 2020 were collected in this study. Based on the oral glucose tolerance fest results, they were divided into four groups: group A [advanced age (≥ 35 years) GDM group, 64 cases], group B (non-advanced age GDM group, 188 cases), group C (advanced age non-GDM group, 112 cases), and group D (non- advanced age non-GDM group, 574 cases). The baseline data of four groups of pregnant women were compared. Taking the occurrence of GDM as the dependent variable, the independent risk factors of advanced age GDM were further analysed by logistic factors and a comparative analysis was carried out. The chi-square test was used to compare the differences in maternal and infant outcomes among the four groups. Results The elderly accounted for 25.40% (64/252) of all GDMs. The BMI (27.89±8.74), the proportion of pregnancies with more than one parity (87.5%), the proportion of macrosomia (25.00%) and the proportion of family history of DM (12.50%) in the elderly GDM group were significantly higher than those in the elderly non-GDM group (25.59±2.56, 53.57%, 8.93% and 3.57%). 25(OH)D₃ in the elderly GDM group [17.76 (14.71, 20.00) ng/mL] was significantly lower than that in the elderly non GDM group [21.34 (15.10, 30.13) ng/mL]. Multivariate analysis showed that serum 25(OH)D₃ level (OR=0.901, 95% CI: 0.815-0.996) and pregnancy of more than one parity (OR=6.412, 95% CI: 1.559-26.380) were independent influencing factors for the occurrence of GDM in the elderly parturient population, of which 25(OH)D₃ was negatively related. The caesarean section rate (15.63%), polyhydramnios rate (12.50%) and macrosomia delivery rate (9.38%) of the elderly GDM group were significantly higher than those in the of the elderly non-GDM group (3.57%, 3.57% and 1.79%). Conclusion The detection rate of gestational diabetes in elderly pregnant women is high. The 25(OH)D₃ in the third trimester and pregnancies over one parity are independent influencing factors for the occurrence of GDM in the population of elderly pregnant women. Hence, the higher maternal and infant pregnancy outcomes of elderly pregnant women with GDM deserve more clinical attention.
- Advanced age /
- Gestational diabetes mellitus /
- Risk factors /
- Maternal and infant outcomes

HTML全文

表 1 4组孕妇基线资料比较

Table 1. Comparison of baseline data of 4 groups of pregnant women

组别	例数	年龄 (x±s，岁)	BMI (x±s)	FPG (x±s，mmol/L)	1hPG (x±s，mmol/L)	2hPG (x±s，mmol/L)	HbA1C (x±s，%)	HOMA-IR [M(P₂₅, P₇₅)]
A组	64	37.44±2.69	27.89±8.74	5.01±0.50	9.79±1.67	8.80±1.48	5.02±0.34	1.51(1.16, 1.74)
B组	188	27.94±3.71^a	26.32±3.94	5.22±0.89^a	9.21±2.00	8.74±3.17	5.10±0.49	2.28(1.36, 3.14)^a
C组	112	37.36±1.80^b	25.59±2.56^a	4.75±0.23^ab	8.04±1.42^ab	7.12±1.29^ab	4.90±0.33	1.48(1.21, 1.93)^b
D组	574	27.92±3.89^ac	24.36±3.56^abc	4.59±0.27^abc	7.20±1.34^abc	6.67±1.08^ab	5.12±3.64	1.36(1.01, 1.91)^b
统计量		330.609 ^d	22.157^d	88.853^d	119.349^d	82.985^d	0.197^d	83.549^f
P值		< 0.001	< 0.001	< 0.001	< 0.001	< 0.001	0.898	< 0.001

组别	例数	25(OH)D₃ [M(P₂₅, P₇₅)，mmol/L]	孕期体重增长 [M(P₂₅, P₇₅)，kg]		DM家族史 [例(%)]	1胎次以上妊娠 [例(%)]	中专及以上学历 [例(%)]	巨大儿分娩史 [例(%)]
A组	64	17.76(14.71，20.00)	7.50(5.23, 10.00)		8(12.50)	56(87.50)	8(12.50)	16(25.00)
B组	188	18.65(15.60, 24.70)	6.00(4.50, 10.00)		20(10.64)	100(53.19)^a	16(8.51)	12(6.38)^a
C组	112	21.34(15.10, 30.13)^ab	7.5(5.00, 10.00)		4(3.57)^ab	60(53.57)^a	16(14.29)	10(8.93)^a
D组	574	21.30(15.50, 28.20)^ab	7.00(5.00, 9.00)		24(4.18)^ab	238(41.46)^ab	54(9.41)	22(3.83)^a
统计量		18.187^f	4.679^f		16.579^e	53.164^e	3.410^e	44.494^e
P值		0.142	0.156		< 0.001	< 0.001	0.333	< 0.001
注：与A组比较，^aP < 0.05；与B组比较，^bP < 0.05；与C组比较，^cP < 0.05。^d为F值，^e为χ²值，^f为H值。

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 高龄孕妇发生GDM的logistic多因素分析

Table 2. Logistic multivariate analysis of GDM in elderly pregnant women

变量	B	SE	Wald χ²	P值	OR值	95% CI
25(OH)D₃	-0.105	0.051	4.161	0.041	0.901	0.815~0.996
1胎次以上妊娠	1.858	0.722	6.631	0.010	6.412	1.559~26.380

下载: 导出CSV

表 3 4组间母婴结局比较[例(%)]

Table 3. Comparison of maternal and infant outcomes among the 4 groups [cases (%)]

组别	例数	早产	剖宫产	羊水过多	新生儿窒息	巨大儿分娩
A组	64	2(3.13)	10(15.63)	8(12.50)	2(3.13)	6(9.38)
B组	188	6(3.19)	16(8.51)	20(10.64)	6(3.19)	14(7.45)
C组	112	2(1.79)	4(3.57)^a	4(3.57)^ab	2(1.79)	2(1.79)^ab
D组	574	3(0.52)^ab	22(3.83)^ab	6(1.05)^abc	3(0.52)^ab	6(1.05)^ab
χ²值		9.162	19.623	46.148	9.162	29.961
P值		0.027	0.001	< 0.001	0.027	< 0.001
注：与A组比较，^aP < 0.05;与B组比较，^bP < 0.05，与C组比较，^cP < 0.05。

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(21)

[1]	郭广丽, 李晓慧, 周钦, 等. 2015-2017年河北省妊娠期糖尿病患病率及危险因素分析[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2019, 35(18): 2844-2847. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2019.18.003 GUO G L, LI X H, ZHOU Q, et al. Analysis of the prevalence and risk factors of gestational diabetes mellitus in Hebei Province from 2015 to 2017[J]. The Journal of Practical Medicine, 2019, 35(18): 2844-2847. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2019.18.003
[2]	王燕, 罗碧如. 基于IADPSG标准分析妊娠期糖尿病的危险因素[J]. 南方医科大学学报, 2019, 39(5): 572-578. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DYJD201905013.htm WANG Y, LUO B R. Risk factors analysis of gestational diabetes mellitus based on International Associationof Diabetes Pregnancy Study Groups criteria[J]. J South Med Univ, 2019, 39(5): 572-578. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DYJD201905013.htm
[3]	张启迪, 苏日娜, 秦胜堂, 等. 葡萄糖对HTR8/SVneo细胞Akt2基因甲基化的影响及妊娠早期外周血Akt2 mRNA水平与妊娠前BMI和GDM的关系[J]. 中华妇产科杂志, 2021, 56(1): 52-57. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112141-20200924-00733 ZHANG Q D, SU R N, QIN S T, et al. Effect of glucose on Akt2 mRNA and methylation level and the association between early-pregnancy Akt2 mRNA level in peripheral blood and pre-pregnancy BMI and GDM[J]. Chin J Obstet Gynecol, 2021, 56(1): 52-57. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112141-20200924-00733
[4]	刘烨, 王海宁, 魏瑗, 等. 妊娠期糖尿病妇女产后糖代谢转归相关因素的前瞻性队列研究[J]. 中华糖尿病杂志, 2020, 12(10): 814-818. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115791-20200120-00029 LIU Y, WANG H N, WEI Y, et al. Risk factors for glucose metabolism disorder at postpartum among women with gestational diabetes mellitus: a prospective Cohort study[J]. Chin J Diabetes Mellitus, 2020, 12(10): 814-818. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115791-20200120-00029
[5]	中华医学会糖尿病学分会. 中国2型糖尿病防治指南(2020年版)[J]. 中华糖尿病杂志, 2021, 13(4): 315-409. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYNK202108007.htm Diabetes Branch of Chinese Medical Association. Guidelines for the Prevention and Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes in China (2020 Edition)[J]. Chin J Diabetes Mellitus, 2021, 13(4): 315-409. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYNK202108007.htm
[6]	KAHVECI B, MELEKOGLU R, EVRUKE I C, et al. The effect of advanced maternal age on perinatal outcomes in nulliparous singleton pregnancies[J]. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 2018, 18(1): 343. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-1984-x
[7]	AYDIN H, ÇELIK Ö, YAZICID, et al. Prevalence and predictors of gestational diabetes mellitus: A nationwide multicentre prospective study[J]. Diabet Med, 2019, 36(2): 221-227. doi: 10.1111/dme.13857
[8]	BUBLITZ M H, MONTEIRO J F, CARAGANIS A, et al. Obstructive sleep apnea in gestational diabetes: A pilot study of the role of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis[J]. J Clin Sleep Med, 2018, 14(1): 87-93. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.6888
[9]	王雁秋, 毛宁, 陈思思. 血清FABP-4、ADP、RBP4、Nesfatin-1与妊娠期糖尿病患者胰岛素抵抗及诊断[J]. 中国计划生育学杂志, 2021, 29(8): 1718-1721, 1726. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JHSY202108051.htm WANG Y Q, MAO N, CHEN S S, et al. The correlation between the serum FABP-4, ADP, RBP4, Nesfatin-1 levels and insulin resistance in women with gestational diabebes mellitus and their diagnostic value[J]. Chin J Diffic and Compl Cas, 2021, 29(8): 1718-1721, 1726. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JHSY202108051.htm
[10]	NAJAFI F, HASANI J, IZADI N, et al. The effect of prepregnancy body mass index on the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis[J]. Obes Rev, 2019, 20(3): 472-486. doi: 10.1111/obr.12803
[11]	HO Y R, WANG P, LU M C, et al. Associations of mid-pregnancy HbA1c with gestational diabetes and risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes in high-risk Taiwanese women[J]. PLoS One, 2017, 12(5): e0177563. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177563.
[12]	LAI Y, CHEN H X, DU Z, et al. The diagnostic accuracy of HbA1c in detecting gestational diabetes mellitus among Chinese pregnant individuals[J]. Ann Transl Med, 2020, 8(16): 1014. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-5464
[13]	马富兵, 许婧, 佟媛媛, 等. 新疆伊犁地区妊娠期糖尿病发病危险因素及妊娠结局[J]. 中国计划生育学杂志, 2019, 27(12): 1656-1660, 1663. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JHSY201912024.htm MA F B, XU J, TONG Y Y, et al. Analysis of risk factors and pregnancy outcomes of women with gestational diabetes mellitus in YiIi region of Xinjiang[J]. Chin J Fam Plann, 2019, 27(12): 1656-1660, 1663. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JHSY201912024.htm
[14]	王连英, 姬秀明, 岳颖, 等. 北京平谷地区妊娠糖尿病发病危险因素及生产结局分析[J]. 中国糖尿病杂志, 2021, 29(8): 571-576. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6187.2021.08.002 WANG L Y, JI X M, YUE Y, et al. Risk factors and outcomes of gestational diabetes mellitus in Pinggu district in Beijing[J]. Chinese Journal of Diabetes, 2021, 29(8): 571-576. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6187.2021.08.002
[15]	王晓梅, 王晓伶, 卜淑娜, 等. 高龄孕产妇孕早期妊娠糖尿病的危险因素分析[J]. 中国糖尿病杂志, 2018, 26(6): 455-458. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6187.2018.06.004 WANG X M, WANG X L, BU S N, et al. Risk factors for gestational diabetes mellitus in advanced maternal age at the early stage of pregnancy[J]. Chinese Journal of Diabetes, 2018, 26(6): 455-458. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6187.2018.06.004
[16]	薛晓霞, 郭书爱, 刘智宏, 等. 妊娠期糖尿病高龄孕妇血糖异常与分娩结局及新生儿神经发育关系[J]. 中国计划生育学杂志, 2021, 29(4): 823-826. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JHSY202104047.htm XUE X X, GUO S A, LIU Z H, et al. Analysis of the relationship of the abnormal blood glucose level of elderly pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus and their delivery outcomes and neonatal neurodevelopment[J]. Chinese Journal of Family Planning, 2021, 29(4): 823-826. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JHSY202104047.htm
[17]	HU L M, ZHANG Y, WANG X, et al. Maternal vitamin D status and risk of gestational diabetes: A meta analysis[J]. Cell Physiol Biochem, 2018, 45(1): 291-300.
[18]	叶瑛瑛, 王金辉, 王丽君, 等. 孕妇血维生素D水平与妊娠期糖尿病相关性研究[J]. 中华全科医学, 2021, 19(1): 77-79. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.001735 YE Y Y, WANG J H, WANG L J, et al. Study on the correlation between serum vitamin d levels of pregnant women and gestational diabetes mellitus[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2021, 19(1): 77-79. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.001735
[19]	AL-AJLAN A, AL-MUSHARAF S, FOUDA M A, et al. Lower vitamin D levels in Saudi pregnant women are associated with higher risk of developing GDM[J]. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 2018, 18(1): 86.
[20]	陈玉荣, 段小凯, 刘春凡, 等. 2014-2018年郑州市某医院妊娠期糖尿病巨大儿发生影响因素和妊娠结局分析[J]. 中华全科医学, 2021, 19(6): 959-963. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.001960 CHEN Y R, DUAN X K, LIU C F, et al. Analysis of influencing factors and pregnancy outcomes of macrosomia among pregnant women with diabetes in a hospital in Zhengzhou City from 2014 to 2018[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2021, 19(6): 959-963. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.001960
[21]	陈海天, 李珠玉, 刘培培, 等. 广州地区妊娠期糖尿病发病情况调查及妊娠结局分析[J]. 中国慢性病预防与控制, 2017, 25(1): 38-41. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZMXB201701010.htm CHEN H T, LI Z Y, LIU P P, et al. Investigation on the incidence of gestational diabetes in Guangzhou and analysis of pregnancy outcomes[J]. Chinese Journal of Prevention and Control of Chronic Diseases, 2017, 25(1): 38-41. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZMXB201701010.htm