留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

内科胸腔镜多部位活检联合快速现场评价技术对不明原因胸腔积液的诊断价值

徐炜 李优 房宇坤 李玉 陈清勇 王剑 陈彧

徐炜, 李优, 房宇坤, 李玉, 陈清勇, 王剑, 陈彧. 内科胸腔镜多部位活检联合快速现场评价技术对不明原因胸腔积液的诊断价值[J]. 中华全科医学, 2023, 21(2): 225-230. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002851
引用本文: 徐炜, 李优, 房宇坤, 李玉, 陈清勇, 王剑, 陈彧. 内科胸腔镜多部位活检联合快速现场评价技术对不明原因胸腔积液的诊断价值[J]. 中华全科医学, 2023, 21(2): 225-230. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002851
XU Wei, LI You, FANG Yu-kun, LI Yu, CHEN Qing-yong, WANG Jian, CHEN Yu. Diagnostic value of rapid on-site evaluation of biopsy specimens during medical thoracoscopy for undiagnosed pleural effusion[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2023, 21(2): 225-230. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002851
Citation: XU Wei, LI You, FANG Yu-kun, LI Yu, CHEN Qing-yong, WANG Jian, CHEN Yu. Diagnostic value of rapid on-site evaluation of biopsy specimens during medical thoracoscopy for undiagnosed pleural effusion[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2023, 21(2): 225-230. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002851

内科胸腔镜多部位活检联合快速现场评价技术对不明原因胸腔积液的诊断价值

doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002851
基金项目: 

浙江省公益技术研究项目 LGF19H010002

浙江省公益技术研究项目 LGF20H010007

详细信息
    通讯作者:

    陈清勇,E-mail:CQYong117@163.com

  • 中图分类号: R561.3  R446.8

Diagnostic value of rapid on-site evaluation of biopsy specimens during medical thoracoscopy for undiagnosed pleural effusion

  • 摘要:   目的  探讨内科胸腔镜检查中镜下表现及多部位活检结合快速现场评价技术(简称ROSE技术)对不明原因胸腔积液的诊断价值。  方法  回顾性分析解放军第903医院2016年6月—2017年12月因不明原因胸腔积液行内科胸腔镜检查的124例患者的临床资料,通过观察胸腔镜下胸膜变化,术中活检组织的快速现场细胞学表现,并对照最终的病理诊断,对内科胸腔镜检查联合ROSE技术在临床应用中的安全性、有效性及准确性进行系统分析和评价。  结果  124例行胸腔镜检查的患者中良性病变77例,恶性病变41例,诊断不明确者6例。胸腔镜镜下诊断恶性病变的阳性预测值为73.81%,阴性预测值为86.84%,灵敏度为75.60%,特异度为85.71%,与病理诊断符合率为82.2%。胸腔镜联合ROSE技术诊断恶性胸腔积液的阳性预测值为82.98%,阴性预测值为97.18%,灵敏度为95.12%,特异度为89.61%,胸腔镜联合ROSE技术与最终病理结果的一致性较好(Kappa值为0.825,P<0.001)。  结论  内科胸腔镜在胸腔积液中具有检出率高、准确性高的特点, 而ROSE技术与最终病理结果具有较好的一致性,二者联合进一步提高了不明原因胸腔积液的诊断效率,值得在临床推广应用。

     

  • 图  1  胸腔镜诊断恶性胸腔积液的ROC曲线

    Figure  1.  ROC curve of thoracoscopic diagnosis of malignant pleural effusion

    图  2  胸腔镜联合ROSE技术诊断恶性胸腔积液的ROC曲线

    Figure  2.  ROC curve of thoracoscopic combined with ROSE technique in diagnosis of malignant pleural effusion

    图  3  单用胸腔镜与胸腔镜联合ROSE技术诊断恶性胸腔积液的ROC曲线比较

    Figure  3.  Comparison of ROC curve between thoracoscopic and thoracoscopic combined with ROSE in diagnosis of malignant pleural effusion

    图  4  转移性肺癌的胸腔镜下表现、ROSE镜下表现和病理结果

    注:A示胸腔镜下见多个大小不等的结节样隆起;B示ROSE镜下见大量异型细胞(×400);C示HE染色病理证实为腺癌(×200)。

    Figure  4.  Thoracoscopic presentation, ROSE microscopic presentation, and pathological findings of metastatic lung cancer

    图  5  脓胸的胸腔镜下表现、ROSE镜下表现和病理结果

    注:A示胸腔镜下可见少量淡黄色浑浊液体,粘连明显伴胸膜水肿增厚;B示ROSE镜下见大量中性粒细胞、淋巴细胞浸润(×400);C示HE染色病理结果提示胸膜炎(×40)。

    Figure  5.  Thoracoscopic, ROSE-scopic and pathological findings of empyema

    图  6  结核性胸膜炎的胸腔镜下表现、ROSE镜下表现和病理结果

    注:A示胸腔镜下表现为胸膜表面弥漫性分布的粟粒样小结节;B示ROSE镜下见典型的肉芽肿及大量淋巴细胞分布(×400);C示HE染色病理结果提示肉芽肿及大量淋巴细胞(×200)。

    Figure  6.  Thoracoscopic findings, ROSE microscopic findings, and pathological findings of tuberculous pleurisy

    表  1  胸腔积液的特征胸腔镜下主要特点

    Table  1.   Features of pleural effusion main features of thoracoscopy

    项目 良性疾病(77例) 恶性疾病(41例) 统计量 P
    胸腔积液特征[例(%)]
      单侧 69(89.61) 35(85.37) 0.461a 0.498
      双侧 8(10.39) 6(14.63)
      黄色 65(84.42) 10(24.39) 41.619a < 0.001
      血性 12(15.58) 31(75.61)
      包裹性 20(25.97) 3(7.32) 5.935a 0.015
    镜下主要表现[例(%)]
      胸膜增厚 10(12.99) 23(56.10) 24.683a < 0.001
      胸膜充血、水肿 31(40.26) 11(26.83) 2.105a < 0.001
      黏膜粗糙 11(14.29) 1(2.44) 4.110a 0.042
      多发结节 41(53.25) 32(78.05) 6.976a 0.008
      广泛粘连 68(88.31) 4(9.76) 69.410a < 0.001
      纤维素渗出 37(48.05) 2(4.88) 22.538a < 0.001
      肺不张 38(49.35) 20(48.78) 0.003a 0.956
    总活检个数(x±s, 个) 6.99±1.78 6.04±2.03 2.524b 0.326
    ROSE标本个数(x±s, 个) 2.04±1.77 2.28±1.45 0.791b 0.774
    相关实验室检查(x±s)
      CRP(mg/L) 82.88±4.38 39.04±4.38 51.772b 0.002
      ADA(U/L) 32.15±4.38 25.89±2.88 9.317b 0.239
      LDH(U/L) 485.85±146.15 362.67±40.01 6.925b 0.224
      胸水CEA(ng/mL) 137.27±80.72 142.18±73.17 0.335b 0.923
    胸腔镜下初步诊断[例(%)]
      恶性 11(14.29) 37(90.24) 63.969a < 0.001
      良性 66(85.71) 4(9.76)
    注:a为χ2值,bt值。
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  胸腔镜与病理检查对良恶性胸腔积液的诊断结果(例)

    Table  2.   Diagnosis of benign and malignant pleural effusion by thoracoscopy and pathology (cases)

    胸腔镜 病理检查 合计
    恶性 良性
    恶性 31 11 42
    良性 10 66 76
    合计 41 77 118
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  3  胸腔镜联合ROSE技术诊断与病理检查对良恶性胸腔积液的诊断结果(例)

    Table  3.   Diagnosis of benign and malignant pleural effusion by thoracoscopy combined with ROSE technique and pathological examination (cases)

    胸腔镜联合ROSE技术 病理检查 合计
    恶性 良性
    恶性 39 8 47
    良性 2 69 71
    合计 41 77 118
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  4  单用胸腔镜与胸腔镜联合ROSE技术诊断恶性胸腔积液的诊断价值比较

    Table  4.   Comparison of the diagnostic value of thoracoscopy and thoracoscopy combined with ROSE in the diagnosis of malignant pleural effusion

    诊断方法 灵敏度(%) 特异度(%) 阳性预测值(%) 阴性预测值(%) AUC P 95% CI
    胸腔镜 75.60 85.71 73.81 86.84 0.807 <0.001 0.717~0.896
    胸腔镜联合ROSE技术 95.12 89.61 82.98 97.18 0.924 <0.001 0.868~0.979
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] DUYSINX B, HEINEN V, CORHAY J L, et al. Medicalthoracoscopy in respiratory medicine: the liège university hospital experience[J]. Rev Mal Respir, 2019, 36(6): 688-696. doi: 10.1016/j.rmr.2019.02.007
    [2] LIN O, RUDOMINA D, FERATOVIC R, et al. Rapid on-site evaluation using telecytology: a major cancer center experience[J]. Diagn Cytopathol, 2019, 47(1): 15-19. doi: 10.1002/dc.23925
    [3] LI C, XIE W, CAO J, et al. Detailed procedureand clinical application overview of rapid on site evaluation in diagnostic interventional pulmonology[J]. J Res Med Sci, 2020, 25: 35. doi: 10.4103/jrms.JRMS_21_18
    [4] GUPTA N, KLEIN M, CHAU K, et al. Adequate at rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE), but inadequate on final cytologic diagnosis: analysis of 606 cases of endobronchial ultrasound-guided trans bronchial needle aspirations (EBUS-TBNA)[J]. Diagn Cytopathol, 2019, 47(5): 367-373. doi: 10.1002/dc.24121
    [5] GUARINO C, MOLLICA M, CESARO C, et al. Diagnostic yield of rapid on-site evaluation transbronchial needle aspiration versus conventional transbronchial needle aspiration: a single center experience[J]. Monaldi Arch Chest Dis, 2020, 90(1): 73-77.
    [6] UMEDA Y, OTSUKA M, NISHIKIORI H, et al. Feasibility of rapid on-site cytological evaluation of lung cancer by a trained pulmonologist during bronchoscopy examination[J]. Cytopathology, 2019, 30(6): 628-633. doi: 10.1111/cyt.12771
    [7] 李真, 孟婕, 胡成平, 等. 412例胸膜疾病胸腔镜下的表现与诊断分析[J]. 中国内镜杂志, 2015, 21(9): 897-900. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGNJ201509002.htm

    LI Z, MENG J, HU C P, et al. Manifestations and diagnostic analysis of 412 cases of thoracoscopic pleural disease[J]. China Journal of Endoscopy, 2015, 21(9): 897-900. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGNJ201509002.htm
    [8] ANEVLAVIS S, FROUDARAKIS M E. Advances in pleuroscopy[J]. Clin Respir J, 2018, 12(3): 839-847. doi: 10.1111/crj.12597
    [9] LEE P, FOLCH E. Thoracoscopy: advances and increasing role for interventional pulmonologists[J]. Semin Respir Crit Care Med, 2018, 39(6): 693-703. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1676978
    [10] 熊洁, 任小平, 魏声泓, 等. 内科胸腔镜对老年患者渗出性胸腔积液的诊断价值及安全性[J]. 临床肺科杂志, 2017, 22(1): 11-14. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LCFK201701005.htm

    XIONG J, REN X P, WEI S H, et al. Diagnostic value and safety of medical thoracoscopy in elderly patients with exudative pleural effusion[J]. Journal of Clinical Pulmonary Medicine, 2017, 22(1): 11-14. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LCFK201701005.htm
    [11] 朱新程, 王炯. 内科胸腔镜对不明原因胸腔积液诊断价值及恶性胸腔积液镜下表型特征[J]. 临床肺科杂志, 2019, 24(3): 491-494. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6663.2019.03.027

    ZHU X C, WANG J. Diagnostic value and morphological features for unexplained and malignant pleural effusion under medical thoracoscopy examination[J]. Journal of Clinical Pulmonary Medicine, 2019, 24(3): 491-494. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6663.2019.03.027
    [12] SHAIKH F, LENTZ R J, FELLER-KOPMAN D, et al. Medical thoracoscopy in the diagnosis of pleural disease: a guide for the clinician[J]. Expert Rev Respir Med, 2020, 14(10): 987-1000. doi: 10.1080/17476348.2020.1788940
    [13] 吕彦天, 陈颖, 徐莉, 等. 内科胸腔镜在不同原因胸腔积液诊断中的作用[J]. 临床肺科杂志, 2019, 24(2): 234-238. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6663.2019.02.010

    LYU Y T, CHEN Y, XU L, et al. Role of medical thoracoscopy in diagnosis of pleural effusion in different causes[J]. Journal of Clinical Pulmonary Medicine, 2019, 24(2): 234-238. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6663.2019.02.010
    [14] 舒媚, 吴振兴, 朱振亮, 等. 血清肿瘤标志物联合检测在肺癌诊断中的价值[J]. 中华全科医学, 2016, 14(6): 1019-1021. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.2016.06.045

    SHU M, WU Z X, ZHU Z L, et al. Value of combined detection of serum tumor markers in the diagnosis of lung cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2016, 14(6): 1019-1021. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.2016.06.045
    [15] 国家卫计委海峡两岸医药卫生交流协会呼吸病学专业委员会, 中华医学会结核病学分会呼吸内镜专业委员会, 中国医师协会儿科学分会内镜专业委员会(筹), 等. 诊断性介入肺脏病学快速现场评价临床实施指南[J]. 天津医药, 2017, 45(4): 441-448. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TJYZ201704025.htm

    National Health and Family Planning Commission Cross-Straits Medical and Health Exchange Association Respiratory professional Committee, Professional Committee of Respiratory endoscopy of Tuberculosis Branch of Chinese Medical Association, Endoscopy Professional Committee of Pediatrics Branch of Chinese Medical Doctor Association (preparation), et al. Clinical Practice Guidelines for rapid Field Evaluation in diagnostic interventional pulmonary medicine[J]. Tianjin Medical Journal, 2017, 45(4): 441-448. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TJYZ201704025.htm
    [16] GUARINO C, MOLLICA M, CESARO C, et al. Diagnostic yield of rapid on-site evaluation transbronchial needle aspiration versus conventional transbronchial needle aspiration: a single center experience[J]. Monaldi Arch Chest Dis, 2020, 90(1144): 73-77.
    [17] WAN T, LI Y, HU Q F, et al. Diagnostic value of rapid on-site evaluation during endobronchial ultrasound with a guide sheath for peripheral pulmonary lesions[J]. Cytopathology, 2020, 31(1): 16-21.
    [18] LIN C K, JAN I S, YU K L, et al. Rapid on-site cytologic evaluation by pulmonologist improved diagnostic accuracy of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial biopsy[J]. J Formos Med Assoc, 2021, 120(6): 1414-1415.
    [19] GLINSKI L, SHETTY D, ILES S, et al. Single slide assessment: a highly effective cytological rapid on-site evaluation technique for endobronchial and endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration[J]. Cytopathology, 2019, 30(2): 164-172.
    [20] WANG H S, REN T, WANG X, et al. Rapid on-site evaluation of touch imprints of biopsies improves the diagnostic yield of transbronchial biopsy for endoscopically nonvisible malignancy: a retrospective study[J]. Jpn J Clin Oncol, 2021, 51(4): 622-629.
    [21] 胡旭钢, 王剑, 宋嘉, 等. 结核性胸膜炎的内科胸腔镜表现及快速现场评价特点分析[J]. 中国内镜杂志, 2019, 25(12): 65-70. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGNJ201912013.htm

    HU X G, WANG J, SONG J, et al. Performance and diagnostic value of medical thoracoscopy and rapid on-site evaluation for tuberculous pleurisy[J]. China Journal of Endoscopy, 2019, 25(12): 65-70. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGNJ201912013.htm
    [22] 朱萌, 黄礼年. 内科胸腔镜在不明原因胸腔积液诊治中的应用价值分析[J]. 中国现代医药杂志, 2020, 22(3): 36-40. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZHTY202003018.htm

    ZHU M, HUANG L N. The application value of medical thoracoscopy in unexplained pleural effusion[J]. Modern Medicine Journal of China, 2020, 22(3): 36-40. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZHTY202003018.htm
    [23] MCDONALD C M, PIERRE C, DE PERROT M, et al. Efficacy and cost of awake thoracoscopy and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in the undiagnosed pleural effusion[J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2018, 106(2): 361-367.
  • 加载中
图(6) / 表(4)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  219
  • HTML全文浏览量:  65
  • PDF下载量:  4
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2022-02-07
  • 网络出版日期:  2023-04-20

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回