Efficacy and safety of flexible ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy in the treatment of ureteral calculi with hydronephrosis
-
摘要:
目的 输尿管软镜钬激光碎石术(FUHLL)为一种利用自然解剖通道到达病灶的微创手术,该术式可迅速解除梗阻,本研究探讨FUHLL治疗输尿管结石伴肾积水的有效性及安全性。 方法 选取2020年1月—2021年12月于上海瑞金医院舟山分院接受治疗的280例输尿管结石伴肾积水患者,使用随机数表法将患者分为观察组(140例)和对照组(140例),观察组进行FUHLL治疗,对照组进行输尿管硬镜钬激光碎石术(UHLL)治疗。治疗前及治疗后3 d检测2组肾功能指标及血清炎性因子水平,于术后1、2、3 d应用VAS量表评价患者疼痛程度,比较2组结石清除情况及手术相关指标。 结果 与对照组比较,观察组治疗后血清IL-10、IL-6、PCT及CRP水平明显较低[(17.59±4.35)ng/L vs.(20.16±5.08)ng/L、(12.52±3.17)ng/L vs. (16.97±5.29)ng/L、(19.76±4.13)ng/L vs. (22.53±4.91)ng/L、(11.76±2.24)mg/L vs. (16.31±3.19)mg/L,均P < 0.05];与对照组比较,观察组治疗后血清促肾上腺皮质激素明显较低(P < 0.05)。2组治疗后尿素氮及血肌酐水平比较差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。与对照组比较,观察组术后1、2、3 d的VAS评分较低(P < 0.05)。2组术中出血量、手术时间、住院时间比较差异有统计学意义(均P < 0.05),住院费用、结石一次清除成功率比较差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05);观察组术后并发症发生率低于对照组(P < 0.05)。 结论 FUHLL与UHLL均可有效治疗输尿管结石伴肾积水,但FUHLL治疗的手术创伤较小,更利于患者术后炎性反应与疼痛程度的减轻,保护肾功能,减少术后并发症。 Abstract:Objective Flexible ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy (FUHLL) was a minimally invasive operation that uses natural anatomical channels to reach the lesion, and can quickly relieve the obstruction. This study aims to explore the efficacy and safety of FUHLL in the treatment of ureteral calculi with hydronephrosis. Methods A total of 280 cases of ureteral calculi with hydronephrosis treated in Zhoushan Branch of Shanghai Ruijin Hospital from January 2020 to December 2021 were randomly divided into observation group (140 cases) and control group (140 cases). The observation group was treated with FUHLL, and the control group was treated with ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy (UHLL). The renal function indexes and serum inflammatory factor levels of the two groups were measured before and 3 days after treatment. The pain degree was evaluated with visual analogue scale (VAS) scale on the first, second and third days after operation. The stone clearance and operation related indexes were compared between the two groups. Results Compared with the control group, the serum levels of IL-10, IL-6, PCT and CRP in the observation group were significantly lower after treatment [(17.59±4.35) ng/L vs. (20.16±5.08) ng/L, (12.52±3.17) ng/L vs. (16.97±5.29) ng/L, (19.76±4.13) ng/L vs. (22.53±4.91) ng/L, (11.76±2.24) mg/L vs. (16.31±3.19) mg/L, all P < 0.05]. Compared with the control group, the serum adrenocorticotrophin (ACTH) in the observation group were significantly lower after treatment (P < 0.05). While there was no significant difference in serum urea nitrogen and blood creatinine levels between the two groups after treatment (all P>0.05). Compared with the control group, the VAS scale scores after surgery were lower in the observation group at 1 d, 2 d and 3 d after operation (P < 0.05). The amount of intraoperative bleeding, duration of surgery and length of hospital stay between the two groups were significantly different (all P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in hospitalization costs and successful rate of one-time stone removal between the two groups (all P>0.05). Compared with the control group, the incidence of postoperative complications in the observation group was lower (P < 0.05). Conclusion Both FUHLL and UHLL can effectively treat ureteral calculi with hydronephrosis. However, the surgical trauma of FUHLL is less, which can reduce the postoperative inflammatory response and pain, and it is beneficial to protect renal function and reduce postoperative complications. -
Key words:
- Flexible ureteroscopy /
- Holmium laser lithotripsy /
- Ureteral calculi /
- Hydronephrosis
-
表 1 2组输尿管结石伴肾积水患者一般资料比较
Table 1. Comparison of general data between the two groups of patients with ureteral calculi and hydronephrosis
组别 例数 性别(例) 年龄
(x±s,岁)结石直径
(x±s,cm)结石部位(例) 男性 女性 左侧 右侧 观察组 140 81 59 42.18±3.46 1.43±0.27 66 74 对照组 140 77 63 41.62±4.05 1.41±0.22 73 67 统计量 0.232a 1.244b 0.679b 0.700a P值 0.630 0.215 0.497 0.403 注:a为χ2值,b为t值。 表 2 2组输尿管结石伴肾积水患者血清炎性因子水平比较(x±s)
Table 2. Comparison of serum inflammatory factor levels between the two groups of patients with ureteral calculi and hydronephrosis(x±s)
组别 例数 IL-10(ng/L) IL-6(ng/L) PCT(ng/L) CRP(mg/L) 治疗前 治疗后 治疗前 治疗后 治疗前 治疗后 治疗前 治疗后 观察组 140 9.15±2.26 17.59±4.35a 3.15±1.06 12.52±3.17a 13.91±2.72 19.76±4.13a 4.61±0.56 11.76±2.24a 对照组 140 9.34±2.17 20.16±5.08a 3.22±0.97 16.97±5.29a 14.03±2.85 22.53±4.91a 4.57±0.63 16.31±3.19a t值 0.718 4.547 0.576 8.538 0.360 5.108 0.561 13.445 P值 0.474 < 0.001 0.565 < 0.001 0.719 < 0.001 0.575 < 0.001 注:与同组治疗前比较,aP < 0.05。 表 3 2组输尿管结石伴肾积水患者肾功能相关指标比较(x±s)
Table 3. Comparison of renal function related indicators between the two groups of patients with ureteral calculi and hydronephrosis(x±s)
组别 例数 BUN(mmol/L) ACTH(ng/mL) SCr(μmol/L) 治疗前 治疗后 治疗前 治疗后 治疗前 治疗后 观察组 140 6.43±1.35 6.85±1.17 21.78±2.45 29.41±4.36a 74.65±10.34 79.27±12.26 对照组 140 6.40±1.41 6.92±1.35 22.43±3.31 34.77±5.49a 75.13±9.81 80.54±13.22 t值 0.182 0.464 1.868 9.046 0.398 0.833 P值 0.856 0.643 0.063 < 0.001 0.691 0.405 注:与同组治疗前比较,aP < 0.05。 表 4 2组输尿管结石伴肾积水患者VAS量表评分比较(x±s,分)
Table 4. Comparison of VAS scores between the two groups of patients with ureteral calculi and hydronephrosis(x±s, points)
组别 例数 术后1 d 术后2 d 术后3 d F值 P值 观察组 140 5.12±1.65 4.37±1.13 2.27±0.83 3.079 0.016 对照组 140 6.03±1.48 5.25±1.32 4.03±1.09 2.764 0.035 t值 4.858 5.992 15.200 P值 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 表 5 2组输尿管结石伴肾积水患者手术相关指标比较
Table 5. Comparison of surgical related indicators between the two groups of patients with ureteral calculi and hydronephrosis
组别 例数 术中出血量
(x±s,mL)手术时间
(x±s,min)住院时间
(x±s,d)住院费用
(x±s,元)结石一次清除
成功[例(%)]观察组 140 13.64±2.25 41.73±5.38 4.49±1.13 13 319.65±274.13 137(97.86) 对照组 140 22.19±4.16 56.24±7.23 7.81±1.42 13 284.71±255.49 135(96.43) 统计量 21.390a 19.051a 21.646a 1.103a 0.129b P值 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 0.271 0.720 注:a为t值,b为χ2值。 -
[1] 俞慧琴, 李瑞鹏, 诸靖宇. 输尿管结石患者经输尿管软镜取石术后发生院内感染的危险因素及预防措施[J]. 中华全科医学, 2019, 17(2): 303-305, 320. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.000667YU H Q, LI R P, ZHU J Y. Risk factors and preventive measures for nosocomial infection in patients with ureteral stones after flexible ureteroscopic lithotomy[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2019, 17(2): 303-305, 320. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.000667 [2] 魏鹏华, 赵银轩. 组合式输尿管软镜与经皮肾镜碎石术治疗老年肾结石的疗效比较[J]. 贵州医药, 2021, 45(1): 77-78. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-744X.2021.01.035WEI P H, ZHAO Y X. Efficacy of combined flexible ureteroscopy and percutaneous nephrolithotripsy in the treatment of elderly kidney stones[J]. Guizhou Medical Journal, 2021, 45(1): 77-78. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-744X.2021.01.035 [3] 顾鑫, 王岸迪, 景立伟, 等. 输尿管软镜碎石术与微通道经皮肾镜碎石术治疗1.5~3.0 cm肾下盏结石比较研究[J]. 临床军医杂志, 2021, 49(7): 799-800, 803. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JYGZ202107034.htmGU X, WANG A D, JING L W, et al. Comparative study of flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy and microchannel percutaneous nephrolithotripsy in the treatment of 1.5-3.0 cm hyporenal calculi[J]. Journal of Clinical Military Medicine, 2021, 49(7): 799-800, 803. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JYGZ202107034.htm [4] 陈爽, 李守燕, 彭继超. 微通道经皮肾镜碎石取石术和逆行输尿管软镜碎石取石术治疗2~4 cm肾下盏结石的临床疗效观察[J]. 实用医院临床杂志, 2021, 18(6): 125-128. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-6170.2021.06.035CHEN S, LI S Y, PENG J C. Clinical efficacy of microchannel percutaneous nephrolithotripsy and retrograde ureteroscopic lithotripsy in the treatment of 2-4 cm subrenal calculi[J]. Clinical Journal of Practical Hospital, 2021, 18(6): 125-128. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-6170.2021.06.035 [5] 陈孝平, 汪建平, 赵继宗. 外科学[M]. 9版. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2018: 350-352.CHEN X P, WANG J P, ZHAO J Z. Surgery[M]. Version 9. Beijing: People's Medical Publishing House, 2018: 350-352. [6] 魏汉平, 史红雷, 焦志敏, 等. 输尿管软镜钬激光碎石治疗上尿路感染性结石的临床疗效分析(附28例报告)[J]. 国际泌尿系统杂志, 2022, 42(1): 98-101. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn431460-20200515-00024WEI H P, SHI H L, JIAO Z M, et al. Clinical efficacy analysis of flexible ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy in the treatment of upper urinary tract infectious stones (with 28 case reports)[J]. International Journal of Urology, 2022, 42(1): 98-101. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn431460-20200515-00024 [7] 吴文斌, 钟金森, 党瑞锋, 等. 一种改良的输尿管硬镜技术在输尿管上段结石治疗中的应用[J]. 中华全科医学, 2019, 17(8): 1257-1260. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.000915WU W B, ZHONG J S, DANG R F, et al. Application of a modified rigid ureteroscopy technique in the treatment of upper ureteral stones[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2019, 17(8): 1257-1260. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.000915 [8] 周哲, 杨冰, 晋连超, 等. 1 074例经尿道输尿管软镜钬激光碎石术治疗患者的临床分析[J]. 国际泌尿系统杂志, 2021, 41(3): 462-465. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn431460-20191220-00021ZHOU Z, YANG B, JIN L C, et al. Clinical analysis of 1074 patients treated with transurethral flexible holmium laser lithotripsy[J]. International Journal of Urology, 2021, 41(3): 462-465. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn431460-20191220-00021 [9] 王伟强, 楼正达, 郑军政, 等. 输尿管软镜钬激光碎石与硬镜气压弹道碎石治疗输尿管结石伴肾积水的疗效比较[J]. 中国现代医学杂志, 2020, 30(24): 57-60. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZXDY202024012.htmWANG W Q, LOU Z D, ZHENG J Z, et al. Efficacy of flexible ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy and rigid pneumatic ballistic lithotripsy in the treatment of ureteral stones with hydronephrosis[J]. China Journal of Modern Medicine, 2020, 30(24): 57-60. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZXDY202024012.htm [10] 刘庆辉, 张志超, 姚丽, 等. 软性输尿管镜钬激光碎石术治疗单侧上尿路结石的疗效及对外周血T淋巴细胞亚群、肾功能和氧化应激因子的影响[J]. 国际泌尿系统杂志, 2021, 41(1): 1-5.LIU Q H, ZHANG Z C, YAO L, et al. Efficacy of flexible ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy in the treatment of unilateral upper urinary tract stones and its effect on peripheral blood T lymphocyte subsets, renal function and oxidative stress factors[J]. International Journal of Urology, 2021, 41(1): 1-5. [11] 王雪强, 曾显奎, 吴齐, 等. 输尿管软镜与输尿管硬镜下钬激光碎石术治疗老年输尿管上段结石对比[J]. 中国老年学杂志, 2021, 41(1): 76-78. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZLXZ202101024.htmWANG X Q, ZENG X K, WU Q, et al. Comparison of flexible ureteroscopy and holmium laser lithotripsy under hard ureteroscopy in the treatment of upper ureteral stones in the elderly[J]. Chinese Journal of Gerontology, 2021, 41(1): 76-78. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZLXZ202101024.htm [12] 刘彦军, 景治安, 毛长青, 等. 软性与硬性输尿管镜钬激光碎石术治疗输尿管结石伴输尿管狭窄疗效比较[J]. 新乡医学院学报, 2020, 37(10): 976-979. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XXYX202010018.htmLIU Y J, JING Z A, MAO C Q, et al. Efficacy of soft and rigid ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy in the treatment of ureteral stones and ureteral strictures[J]. Journal of Xinxiang Medical College, 2020, 37(10): 976-979. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XXYX202010018.htm [13] 廖鑫鑫. 输尿管软镜与输尿管硬镜下钬激光碎石术治疗老年输尿管上段结石的效果观察[J]. 中国现代医生, 2021, 59(35): 62-65. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZDYS202135020.htmLIAO X X. Effect of flexible ureteroscopy and holmium laser lithotripsy under hard ureteroscopy in the treatment of upper ureteral stones in the elderly[J]. Modern Chinese Doctor, 2021, 59(35): 62-65. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZDYS202135020.htm [14] 秦刚, 谢英金. 输尿管软镜下钬激光碎石术对复杂性上尿路结石患者疗效及术后复发的影响[J]. 实用医院临床杂志, 2021, 18(5): 166-169. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YYLC202105045.htmQIN G, XIE Y J. Effect of flexible ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy on efficacy and postoperative recurrence in patients with complicated upper urinary tract stones[J]. Clinical Journal of Practical Hospital, 2021, 18(5): 166-169. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YYLC202105045.htm [15] 徐杰. 输尿管软镜下钬激光碎石术在复杂性上尿路结石患者治疗中的临床疗效观察[J]. 山西医药杂志, 2021, 50(7): 1084-1086. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SXYY202107015.htmXU J. Clinical efficacy of flexible ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy in the treatment of patients with complicated urinary tract stones[J]. Shanxi Medical Journal, 2021, 50(7): 1084-1086. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SXYY202107015.htm
计量
- 文章访问数: 322
- HTML全文浏览量: 75
- PDF下载量: 9
- 被引次数: 0