复杂创伤患者手术治疗中浅表大血管保温技术联合保温护理的效果研究

陈肖; 鲍映雪; 周月琴; 汪立刚

doi:10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.003227

复杂创伤患者手术治疗中浅表大血管保温技术联合保温护理的效果研究

doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.003227

1.
杭州市萧山区中医院(浙江中医药大学附属江南医院)外科，浙江杭州 311200
2.
浙江省人民医院手术室，浙江杭州 310014

基金项目:

浙江省医药卫生科技计划项目 2022KY496

详细信息

通讯作者:
鲍映雪，E-mail：wai344cazan@163.com

中图分类号: R473.6 R472
计量
- 文章访问数: 72
- HTML全文浏览量: 32
- PDF下载量: 10
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2023-06-12
- 网络出版日期: 2023-11-23

The effect of superficial large vessel warming technology combined with warming care in the surgical management of patients with complex trauma

1.
Surgery Department of Xiaoshan District Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine (Jiangnan Hospital Affiliated to Zhejiang Chinese Medical University), Hangzhou, Zhejiang 311200, China

摘要

摘要: 目的探究对复杂创伤手术患者行浅表大血管保温技术联合保温护理的临床效果，为手术中保温方案的选择提供参考。方法选取2018年4月—2023年3月于杭州市萧山区中医院接受复杂创伤手术治疗的患者84例，采用随机数字表法将其分为对照组和观察组，每组42例。围手术期给予对照组传统充气式温毯仪加温，观察组采用浅表大血管保温联合保温护理策略。比较2组不同时点的体温变化，观察患者麻醉苏醒质量等情况。结果观察组患者手术结束时和入麻醉室时与入手术室时体温差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)，而对照组患者手术过程中和入麻醉室时与入手术室时体温差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。2组患者入室时体温差异无统计学意义，手术开始时至入麻醉室时观察组体温高于对照组(P < 0.05)。观察组低体温[14.29%(6/42)]，热损伤(0)，寒战[4.76%(2/42)]发生率均低于对照组[35.71%(15/42)、16.67%(7/42)、21.43%(9/42), 均P < 0.05]。观察组手术时间、清醒时间、拔管时间及呼吸恢复时间均短于对照组(均P < 0.05)，术中出血量、输注液量低于对照组(均P < 0.05)。2组拔管时血压和心率差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05)，拔管后10 min时观察组血压和心率均低于对照组(均P < 0.05)。结论浅表大血管保温技术联合保温护理能够有效提高复杂创伤手术患者术中体温，减少体温波动，提高麻醉苏醒质量，保障拔管后生命体征恢复正常。
- 复杂创伤 /
- 浅表大血管保温技术 /
- 保温护理
Abstract: Objective To investigate the clinical effect of combined warming technology and warming care for complex trauma patients undergoing surgery, in order to provide a reference for the selection of the warming scheme during surgery. Methods Eighty-four patients who underwent complicated trauma surgery in Xiaoshan District Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine from April 2018 to March 2023 were selected. They were randomly divided into the control group and the observation group with 42 cases each. During the perioperative period, the control group was heated by the traditional inflatable warming blanket. The study group was treated with the combination of superficial large vessel heat preservation and warming care. The changes in body temperature and the quality of anesthesia recovery between the two groups were compared at different time points. Results There was no statistically significant difference in body temperature between patients in the observation group at the end of surgery and when entering the anesthesia room and the operating room (P>0.05), while there was a statistically significant difference in body temperature between patients in the control group during surgery and when entering the anesthesia room and the operating room (P < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in body temperature between the two groups when entering the operating room. The body temperature of the observation group was higher than that of the control group from the start of surgery to the time of entering the anesthesia room (P < 0.05). The incidence of hypothermia in the observation group was 14.29% (6/42), the incidence of heat injury was 0, and the incidence of shivering was 4.76% (2/42), all of which were lower than the 35.71% (15/42), 16.67% (7/42), and 21.43% (9/42) of the control group (all P < 0.05). The observation group had shorter surgical time, wakefulness time, extubation time, and respiratory recovery time than the control group (all P < 0.05), and less intraoperative bleeding and infusion volume than the control group (all P < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in blood pressure and heart rate between the two groups during extubation (all P>0.05). At 10 minutes after extubation, blood pressure and heart rate were lower in the observation group than in the control group (all P < 0.05). Conclusion Superficial large vessels heat preservation technology combined with warming care can effectively improve the intraoperative temperature of patients with complex trauma, reduce temperature fluctuations, improve the quality of anesthesia recovery, ensure the recovery of vital signs after extubation.
- Complex trauma /
- Superficial large vessels heat preservation technology /
- Thermal insulation care

HTML全文

表 1 2组复杂创伤手术患者一般资料比较

Table 1. Comparison of general information between two groups of patients undergoing complex trauma surgery

项目	对照组(n=42)	观察组(n=42)	统计量	P值
年龄(x±s，岁)	51.93±14.35	49.16±13.26	0.919^a	0.361
性别(例)			0.283^b	0.595
男性	32	34
女性	10	8
BMI(x±s)	23.82±2.67	23.49±2.59	0.575^a	0.567
ASA分级[例(%)]			0.091^b	0.763
Ⅱ级	35(83.33)	36(85.71)
Ⅲ级	7(16.67)	6(14.29)
创伤类型[例(%)]			0.229^b	0.973
交通事故	18(42.86)	19(45.24)
机器损伤	9(21.43)	8(19.05)
坠落伤	9(21.43)	10(23.81)
其他	6(14.29)	5(11.90)
注：^a为t值，^b为χ²值。

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 2组复杂创伤手术患者体温变化比较(x±s，℃)

Table 2. Comparison of temperature changes between two groups of patients undergoing complex trauma surgery (x±s, ℃)

组别	例数	T1	T2	T3	T4	T5	T6
对照组	42	36.63±0.44	36.25±0.32^a	36.27±0.31^a	36.23±0.45^a	36.26±0.43^a	36.29±0.45^a
观察组	42	36.59±0.41	36.39±0.29^a	36.41±0.33^a	36.42±0.34^a	36.44±0.38	36.54±0.43
t值		0.431	2.101	2.004	2.183	2.033	2.603
P值		0.668	0.039	0.048	0.032	0.045	0.011
注：与T1时比较，^aP < 0.05。

下载: 导出CSV

表 3 2组复杂创伤手术患者麻醉苏醒质量比较(x±s，min)

Table 3. Comparison of the quality of anesthesia recovery between two groups of patients undergoing complex trauma surgery (x±s, min)

组别	例数	清醒时间	拔管时间	呼吸恢复时间
对照组	42	16.31±3.12	18.38±3.61	16.01±3.43
观察组	42	12.83±3.74	13.49±3.20	14.12±3.35
t值		4.631	6.569	2.554
P值		< 0.001	< 0.001	0.013

下载: 导出CSV

表 4 2组复杂创伤手术患者血压和心率比较(x±s)

Table 4. Comparison of blood pressure and heart rate between two groups of patients undergoing complex trauma surgery (x±s)

组别	例数	收缩压(mmHg)		舒张压(mmHg)		心率(次/min)
组别	例数	拔管时	拔管后10 min	拔管时	拔管后10 min	拔管时	拔管后10 min
对照组	42	127.68±12.03	124.36±11.22	74.86±8.12	72.01±5.93	96.36±7.82	85.49±8.09
观察组	42	125.16±13.11	117.13±11.51	75.89±7.93	65.12±6.35	95.63±8.14	80.36±8.37
t值		0.918	2.915	0.588	5.139	0.419	2.856
P值		0.361	0.005	0.558	< 0.001	0.676	0.005
注：1 mmHg=0.133 kPa。

下载: 导出CSV

表 5 2组复杂创伤手术患者手术情况比较(x±s)

Table 5. Comparison of surgical conditions between two groups of patients undergoing complex trauma surgery (x±s)

组别	例数	手术时间 (min)	术中出血量 (mL)	术中输注液量 (mL)
对照组	42	189.59±27.45	132.98±13.97	1 171.46±96.35
观察组	42	171.85±24.44	113.74±10.12	1 081.51±85.52
t值		3.128	7.228	4.525
P值		0.002	< 0.001	< 0.001

下载: 导出CSV

表 6 2组复杂创伤手术患者寒战发生率比较[例(%)]

Table 6. Comparison of the incidence of shivering between two groups of patients undergoing complex trauma surgery [cases (%)]

组别	例数	0级	1级	2级	3级	发生寒战
对照组	42	33(78.57)	4(9.52)	3(7.14)	2(4.76)	9(21.43)
观察组	42	40(95.24)	1(2.38)	1(2.38)	0	2(4.76)
统计量		2.267^a				5.126^b
P值		0.023				0.024
注：^a为U值，^b为χ²值。

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(20)

[1]	陈颖, 王莹, 张越伦, 等. 全麻患者围手术期低体温风险预测模型的前瞻性、多中心研究[J]. 中国医学科学院学报, 2022, 44(6): 1028-1032. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZYKX202206012.htm CHEN Y, WANG Y, ZHANG Y L, et al. A prediction model for estimating risk of intraoperative hypothermia in patients undergoing general anesthesia: a prospective multicenter study[J]. Acta Academiae Medicinae Sinicae, 2022, 44(6): 1028-1032. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZYKX202206012.htm
[2]	代子一, 黄宇光. 围术期低体温有效预防策略的研究进展[J]. 临床麻醉学杂志, 2021, 37(5): 539-542. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LCMZ202105023.htm DAI Z Y, HUANG Y G. Research progress on effective preventive strategies for perioperative hypothermia[J]. Journal of Clinical Anesthesiology, 2021, 37(5): 539-542. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LCMZ202105023.htm
[3]	SIMEGN G D, BAYABLE S D, FETENE M B. Prevention and management of perioperative hypothermia in adult elective surgical patients: a systematic review[J]. Ann Med Surg (Lond), 2021, 72: 103059. DOI: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.103059.
[4]	张董瑜, 冯琪, 邵长会, 等. 围术期全程闭环体温管理系统预防老年股骨颈骨折患者低体温的效果[J]. 中华创伤杂志, 2021, 37(12): 1119-1125. ZHANG D Y, FENG Q, SHAO C H, et al. Effect of perioperative whole-course closed-loop temperature management system in the prevention of hypothermia in elderly patients with femoral neck fracture[J]. Chinese Journal of Trauma, 2021, 37(12): 1119-1125.
[5]	千冬维, 罗伟利. 围手术期全程复合保温策略对急诊创伤性血气胸手术患者凝血指标及并发症的影响[J]. 血栓与止血学, 2022, 28(3): 677-678. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XSZX202203144.htm QIAN D W, LUO W L. Effect of perioperative whole process compound thermal insulation strategy on coagulation indexes and complications in patients undergoing emergency traumatic hemopneumothorax surgery[J]. Chinese Journal of Thrombosis and Hemostasis, 2022, 28(3): 677-678. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XSZX202203144.htm
[6]	GROTE R, WETZ A, BRǍUER A, et al. Short interruptions between pre-warming and intraoperative warming are associated with low intraoperative hypothermia rates[J]. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand, 2020, 64(4): 489-493. doi: 10.1111/aas.13521
[7]	杨曦仑, 孙雪晨, 孔繁一, 等. 老年全身麻醉非心脏手术后发生低体温的独立危险因素筛选及预测模型构建[J]. 中国老年学杂志, 2022, 42(16): 3953-3955. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZLXZ202216024.htm YANG X L, SUN X C, KONG F Y, et al. Screening of independent risk factors and construction of predictive models for hypothermia after non cardiac surgery under general anesthesia in the elderly[J]. Chinese Journal of Gerontology, 2022, 42(16): 3953-3955. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZLXZ202216024.htm
[8]	胡翠纹, 郭轩, 张琪, 等. 美国麻醉医师协会体质分级对老年手术患者心脏自主神经功能的评价意义[J]. 中华老年心脑血管病杂志, 2021, 23(5): 491-494. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LNXG202105014.htm HU C W, GUO X, ZHANG Q, et al. Significance of ASA-PS classification for assessing perioperative cardiac autonomic nerve function in elderly patients[J]. Chinese Journal of Geriatric Heart Brain and Vessel Diseases, 2021, 23(5): 491-494. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LNXG202105014.htm
[9]	张晨, 陈利海, 孙蓓, 等. 右美托咪定对剖宫产围术期体温及并发寒颤的影响[J]. 临床麻醉学杂志, 2019, 35(10): 973-976. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LCMZ201910009.htm ZHANG C, CHEN L H, SUN B, et al. Effect of dexmedetomidine for body temperature and shivering during cesarean section[J]. Journal of Clinical Anesthesiology, 2019, 35(10): 973-976. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LCMZ201910009.htm
[10]	LAURONEN S L, MǍKINEN M T, ANNILA P, et al. Thermal suit connected to a forced-air warming unit for preventing intraoperative hypothermia: a randomised controlled trial[J]. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand, 2020, 65(2): 176-181.
[11]	李新悦, 季加富, 苏帆. 中西医防治围术期低体温的研究进展[J]. 临床麻醉学杂志, 2022, 38(8): 874-877. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LCMZ202208019.htm LI X Y, JI J F, SU F. Research progress of prevention and treatment of inadvertent perioperative hypothermia with traditional Chinese medicine and western medicine[J]. Journal of Clinical Anesthesiology, 2022, 38(8): 874-877. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LCMZ202208019.htm
[12]	孙亮, 高倩, 王广, 等. 麻醉后恢复室期间全身麻醉患者发生低体温的影响因素[J]. 中华医学杂志, 2021, 101(1): 52-56. SUN L, GAO Q, WANG G, et al. Risk factors for hypothermia in patients undergoing general anesthesia in the postanesthesia care unit[J]. National Medical Journal of China, 2021, 101(1): 52-56.
[13]	SU P Y, PAQUET C, O' DELL K, et al. Trends in operative complex middle and upper maxillofacial trauma: a 17-Year Study[J]. Laryngoscope, 2021, 131(9): 1985-1989.
[14]	苏琴, 姜在龙, 潘道霞, 等. 足部穴位热熨对肿瘤患者全麻术后低体温恢复的干预研究[J]. 中华全科医学, 2019, 17(2): 325-328. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.000673 SU Q, JIANG Z L, PAN D X, et al. Study on the intervention of hot point of foot acupuncture on hypothermia recovery after general anesthesia in patients with cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2019, 17(2): 325-328. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.000673
[15]	林宇, 蒋珏, 吕翔. 不同保温措施对头颈肿瘤手术后麻醉复苏的影响[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2020, 18(1): 48-50. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGKQ202001014.htm LIN Y, JIANG J, LYU X. Effect of different thermal insulation measures on the recovery from general anesthesia in patients with head and neck tumor[J]. China Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 2020, 18(1): 48-50. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGKQ202001014.htm
[16]	刘佳佳, 邱晨, 赵晶. 全维保温预防老年男性非体外循环下冠状动脉旁路移植术围术期低体温的效果观察[J]. 中华老年心脑血管病杂志, 2021, 23(2): 164-167. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LNXG202102015.htm LIU J J, QIU C, ZHAO J. Role of full-dimensional heat preservation in preventing hypothermia in elderly male CHD patients during perioperative OPCABG[J]. Chinese Journal of Geriatric Heart Brain and Vessel Diseases, 2021, 23(2): 164-167. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LNXG202102015.htm
[17]	王丽敏, 喻晓芬. 复杂腔镜手术患者浅表大血管保温效果观察[J]. 护理学杂志, 2018, 33(17): 44-47. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HLXZ201817015.htm WANG L M, YU X F. Effectiveness of heating superficial tissues with large blood vessels in complicated laparoscopic surgeries[J]. Journal of Nursing Science, 2018, 33(17): 44-47. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HLXZ201817015.htm
[18]	彭翠. 探究术中低体温对患者麻醉恢复期的影响及护理干预[J]. 临床医药文献电子杂志, 2020, 7(54): 99-100. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LCWX202054071.htm PENG C. Exploring the impact of intraoperative hypothermia on patients' anesthesia recovery period and nursing interventions[J]. Electronic Journal of Clinical Medical Literature, 2020, 7(54): 99-100. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LCWX202054071.htm
[19]	李霖, 沈晓琴, 胡洁, 等. 手术室干预结合术中保温干预对腹腔镜全子宫切除术患者术中低体温及术后复苏期的影响[J]. 中国妇幼保健, 2023, 38(8): 1382-1385. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZFYB202308006.htm LI L, SHEN X Q, HU J, et al. The effect of operating room intervention combined with intraoperative insulation intervention on intraoperative hypothermia and postoperative recovery in patients undergoing laparoscopic total Hysterectomy[J]. Maternal and Child Health Care of China, 2023, 38(8): 1382-1385. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZFYB202308006.htm
[20]	郁慧婷, 贺艳, 马黎红, 等. 预保温护理措施在普外科开腹手术患者围手术期低体温防护中的应用[J]. 医疗装备, 2020, 33(7): 153-155. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YLZB202007090.htm YU H T, HE Y, MA L H, et al. Application of pre insulation nursing measures in perioperative hypothermia protection for patients undergoing open surgery in general surgery[J]. Medical Equipmentt, 2020, 33(7): 153-155. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YLZB202007090.htm