留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

不同浓度异丙肾上腺素对兔灌注模型中肾盂压力的影响

周先明 夏伟 黄俊 董平 朱天昌 汪逢成 朱锐 殷通 黄后宝

周先明, 夏伟, 黄俊, 董平, 朱天昌, 汪逢成, 朱锐, 殷通, 黄后宝. 不同浓度异丙肾上腺素对兔灌注模型中肾盂压力的影响[J]. 中华全科医学, 2024, 22(3): 433-436. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.003419
引用本文: 周先明, 夏伟, 黄俊, 董平, 朱天昌, 汪逢成, 朱锐, 殷通, 黄后宝. 不同浓度异丙肾上腺素对兔灌注模型中肾盂压力的影响[J]. 中华全科医学, 2024, 22(3): 433-436. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.003419
ZHOU Xianming, XIA Wei, HUANG Jun, DONG Ping, ZHU Tianchang, WANG Fengcheng, ZHU Rui, YIN Tong, HUANG Houbao. Effects of different concentrations of isoproterenol on renal pelvic pressure in rabbit perfusion model[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2024, 22(3): 433-436. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.003419
Citation: ZHOU Xianming, XIA Wei, HUANG Jun, DONG Ping, ZHU Tianchang, WANG Fengcheng, ZHU Rui, YIN Tong, HUANG Houbao. Effects of different concentrations of isoproterenol on renal pelvic pressure in rabbit perfusion model[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2024, 22(3): 433-436. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.003419

不同浓度异丙肾上腺素对兔灌注模型中肾盂压力的影响

doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.003419
基金项目: 

安徽省卫健委科研项目 AHWJ2021b131

详细信息
    通讯作者:

    黄后宝,E-mail: drhuanghoubao@163.com

  • 中图分类号: R971.93  R334.1

Effects of different concentrations of isoproterenol on renal pelvic pressure in rabbit perfusion model

  • 摘要:   目的  采用不同浓度异丙肾上腺素对兔肾脏进行灌注,监测其对兔肾盂压力和生命体征的影响,以探索最佳灌注浓度。  方法  将60只新西兰雄性大白兔采用随机抽签方法分成A、B、C、D四组,每组15只,其中A组、B组、C组为实验组,D组为对照组,实验组分别使用浓度为1.0、0.9、0.8 μg/mL的异丙肾上腺素溶液进行肾盂灌注,D组使用生理盐水进行肾盂灌注。记录灌注0、4、8、16、25 min时各组大白兔的肾盂压、平均动脉压、心率及血药浓度。  结果  3只大白兔因麻醉过深死亡,在A组、B组及D组各1只,得出57只有效实验数据。4组大白兔肾盂灌注后,肾盂压均升高,实验组与对照组比较,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05);A、B、C三组灌注至4 min后各组肾盂压力开始下降,D组灌注后肾盂压持续升高,在4、8、16、25 min时4组肾盂压力差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05);在16、25 min时,A、B、C三组间差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。实验组大白兔肾盂灌注4 min时,平均动脉压、心率、血药浓度数值均高于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。  结论  异丙肾上腺素作为灌注液灌注兔肾脏时可降低肾盂压力,浓度为1.0 μg/mL时降低肾盂压力更明显,但影响兔的血压和心率,而在1.0 μg/mL以下均为安全浓度。

     

  • 图  1  实验兔(B组)左侧股动脉置管

    Figure  1.  Catheterization of the left femoral artery in experimental rabbit (Group B)

    图  2  实验兔(C组)左侧输尿管、膀胱、输尿(备注:图 2中文图题中“输尿”疑似不完整,请核对中文图题)

    Figure  2.  Ureter, bladder, and ureteral orifices of the left side in experimental rabbit (Group C)

    图  3  实验兔(D组)左肾

    Figure  3.  Left kidney of the experimental rabbit (Group D)

    图  4  1.0 μg/mL异丙肾上腺素灌注后肾盂压力变化

    Figure  4.  Changes in renal pelvis pressure following infusion of 1 μg/mL isoproterenol

    表  1  4组大白兔不同时间点肾盂内压的比较(x±s, mmHg)

    Table  1.   Comparison of renal pelvis pressure in four groups of white rabbits at different time points (x±s, mmHg)

    组别 只数 0 min 4 min 8 min 16 min 25 min
    A组 14 2.19±0.65 86.46±4.49a 72.52±7.60ab 44.64±8.71ab 21.72±4.67abcd
    B组 14 2.65±0.79 91.51±7.15a 84.39±8.50a 58.58±10.51a 42.61±10.64a
    C组 15 2.09±0.53 88.36±8.64a 75.95±8.10a 65.73±9.50a 50.26±4.29a
    D组 14 2.64±0.69 96.21±7.61 97.47±7.24 98.49±7.14 99.86±6.44
    F 2.761 4.961 28.072 88.959 318.602
    P 0.053 0.002 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001
    注:与灌注0 min比较,aP < 0.01;与同时间点D组比较,bP < 0.01;与同时间点C组比较, cP < 0.01;与同时间点B组比较, dP < 0.01。
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  4组大白兔不同时间点心率的比较(x±s,次/min)

    Table  2.   Comparison of heart rate in four groups of white rabbits at different time points (x±s, times/min)

    组别 只数 0 min 4 min 8 min 16 min 25 min
    A组 14 268.1±10.5 275.9±14.8 288.5±15.2a 294.8±10.7a 309.0±15.3a
    B组 14 269.9±10.4 274.1±9.6 283.0±7.3 290.6±14.0 296.8±9.5
    C组 15 269.5±10.2 273.0±21.3 275.4±22.0 279.7±25.4 282.5±16.2
    D组 14 271.3±28.2 271.3±22.2 269.2±19.9 273.1±19.7 272.5±19.0
    F 0.161 0.228 3.665 4.063 15.960
    P 0.923 0.876 0.017 0. 007 < 0.001
    注:与同时间点D组比较,aP < 0.01。
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  3  4组大白兔不同时间点平均动脉压的比较(x±s, mmHg)

    Table  3.   Comparison of mean arterial pressure in four groups of white rabbits at different time points (x±s, mmHg)

    组别 只数 0 min 4 min 8 min 16 min 25 min
    A组 14 59.09±5.83 65.77±5.13 73.31±12.26a 80.66±8.55a 88.94±9.11a
    B组 14 60.99±3.74 66.41±8.41 70.30±8.04 74.99±8.07 81.56±7.45
    C组 15 60.98±6.23 67.69±5.61 70.85±7.40 74.34±8.34 78.57±9.39
    D组 14 59.01±3.20 60.85±2.20 60.68±2.88 61.86±2.33 61.27±2.43
    F 1.301 3.842 6.287 16.423 32.768
    P 0.263 0.023 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001
    注:与同时间点D组比较,aP < 0.01。
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  4  4组大白兔不同时间点血药浓度的比较(x±s, pg/mL)

    Table  4.   Comparison of blood drug concentration in four groups of white rabbits at different time points (x±s, pg/mL)

    组别 只数 0 min 4 min 8 min 16 min 25 min
    A组 14 3.42±0.51 45.11±8.28a 106.60±10.70a 169.73±12.25a 192.57±25.45a
    B组 14 3.57±0.41 34.20±8.20 83.06±8.50 101.68±11.26 106.82±18.69
    C组 15 3.51±0.43 33.33±6.22 69.97±8.89 78.59±9.61 98.92±9.15
    D组 14 3.48±0.46 3.57±0.36 3.53±0.44 3.49±0.42 3.47±0.48
    F 0.261 102.213 409.673 712.923 313.812
    P 0.857 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001
    注:与同时间点D组比较,aP < 0.01。
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] KARNAK I, BINGÖL-KOLOGLU M, BVYVKPAMUKÇU N, et al. The length and collapsibility of the ureter play roles in the augmented reflection of intraabdominal pressure into the renal pelvis[J]. J Pediatr Surg, 2004, 39(10): 1558-1561. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2004.06.010
    [2] JAKOBSEN J S, JUNG H U, GRAMSBERGEN J B, et al. Endoluminal isoproterenol reduces renal pelvic pressure during semirigid ureterorenoscopy: a porcine model[J]. BJU Int, 2010, 105(1): 121-124. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08678.x
    [3] 黄健, 张旭. 中国泌尿外科疾病诊断治疗指南[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2022: 389.

    HUANG J, ZHANG X. Guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of urological diseases in China[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2022: 389.
    [4] 郭应禄, 那彦群, 叶章群. 中国泌尿外科疾病和男科诊断治疗指南[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2019: 237.

    GUO Y L, NA Y Q, YE Z Q. Guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of urological diseases in China[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2019: 237.
    [5] 高宏伟. 泌尿系结石治疗的方法及最新进展[J]. 天津医科大学学报, 2021, 27(1): 103-105. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TJYK202101029.htm

    GAO H W. Methods and latest progress in the treatment of urinary calculi[J]. Journal of Tianjin Medical University, 2021, 27(1): 103-105. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TJYK202101029.htm
    [6] 郭营利, 俞健, 沈俊文. 输尿管软镜钬激光碎石术治疗输尿管结石伴肾积水的有效性及安全性分析[J]. 中华全科医学, 2023, 21(3): 420-462. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002898

    GUO Y L, YU J, SHEN J W. Efficacy and safety of flexible ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy in the treatment of ureteral calculi with hydronephrosis[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2023, 21(3): 420-462. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002898
    [7] 苏博兴, 肖博, 胡卫国, 等. 输尿管软镜一期上鞘失败率及相关临床因素分析[J]. 现代泌尿外科杂志, 2022, 27(11): 912-916. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-MNWK202211005.htm

    SU B X, XIAO B, HU W G, et al. Failure rate fureteral accesssheath insertion during retrograde intrarenal surgery and analysis of associated clinic alfactors[J]. J Mod Urol, 2022, 27(11): 912-916. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-MNWK202211005.htm
    [8] 俞慧琴, 李瑞鹏, 诸靖宇. 输尿管结石患者经输尿管软镜取石术后发生院内感染的危险因素及预防措施[J]. 中华全科医学, 2019, 17(2): 303-320. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.000667

    YU H Q, LI R P, ZHU J Y. Risk factors and preventive measures of nosocomial infection in patients with ureteral calculi after flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2019, 17(2): 303-320. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.000667
    [9] XU Y, MIN Z, WAN S P, et al. Complications of retrograde intrarenal surgery classified by the modified Clavien grading system[J]. Urolithiasis, 2018, 46(2): 197-202. doi: 10.1007/s00240-017-0961-6
    [10] ZHONG W, WEN J, PENG L, et al. Enhanced super-mini-PCNL: low renal pelvic pressure and high stone removal efficiency in a prospective randomized controlled trial[J]. World J Urol, 2021, 39(3): 929-934. doi: 10.1007/s00345-020-03263-3
    [11] 陈亮, 张仁涛, 丁银满, 等. 输尿管软镜鞘扩张法治疗输尿管狭窄合并结石初步体会[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志, 2021, 15(3): 226-228. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3253.2021.03.010

    CHEN L, ZHANG R T, DING Y M, et al. Clinical experiences of ureteral stricture with calculi treated by flexible ureteroscope sheath dilatation[J]. Chin J Endourol(Electronic Edition), 2021, 15(3): 226-228. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3253.2021.03.010
    [12] 黄倩, 柳懿鹏. 不同压力灌注下上尿路梗阻大鼠的肾损伤程度[J]. 郑州大学学报(医学版), 2018, 53(1): 117-121. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HNYK201801029.htm

    HUANG Q, LIU Y P. Acute nephron injury degree in rats with upper urinary tract obstruction and different pressure perfusion[J]. Journal of Zhengzhou University(Medical Sciences), 2018, 53(1): 117-121. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HNYK201801029.htm
    [13] JUNG H, NORBY B, FRIMODT-MOLLER P C, et al. Endoluminal isoproterenol irrigation decreases renal pelvic pressure during flexible ureterorenoscopy: a clinical randomized, controlled study[J]. Eur urol, 2008, 54(6): 1404-1413. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.03.092
    [14] DANUSER H, WEISS R, ABEL D, et al. Systemic and topical drug administration in the pig ureter: effect of phosphodiesterase inhibitors alpha1, beta and beta2-adrenergic receptor agonists and antagonists on the frequency and amplitude of ureteral contractions[J]. J Urol, 2001, 166(2): 714-720. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)66049-1
    [15] JAKOBSEN J S, HOLST U, JAKOBSEN P, et al. Local and systemic effects of endoluminal pelvic perfusion of isoproterenol: a dose response investigation in pigs[J]. J Urol, 2007, 177(5): 1934-1938. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.01.020
  • 加载中
图(4) / 表(4)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  106
  • HTML全文浏览量:  50
  • PDF下载量:  4
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2023-05-08
  • 网络出版日期:  2024-05-27

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回