Value of multidimensional tibial tuberosity parameters in predicting patellar instability
-
摘要:
目的 本研究旨在通过测量多维度胫骨结节(TT)参数,评估多项TT参数在预测患者髌骨不稳的诊断效能。 方法 选择2020年1月—2023年1月在宁波市杭州湾医院骨科门诊接受膝关节CT并确诊为髌骨不稳的患者为观察组,同时随机选取同期接受膝关节CT但排除髌骨不稳的患者作为对照组,各45例。统计患者资料并通过logistic回归及ROC曲线分析各项TT参数的临床诊断效能。 结果 共纳入符合标准的患者90例,其中男性33例,女性57例。2组性别比较差异无统计学意义,观察组年龄相对较轻,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.001)。Logistic回归分析显示,TT-TG、TT-RA、TT-TG/PL、TT-TG/PTL相关TT参数是预测髌骨不稳的有效指标。同时ROC曲线分析表明各项TT参数的诊断效能,其中TT-TG/PL的AUC值为0.826,TT-TG的AUC为0.816,TT-RA的AUC为0.761,TT-TG/PTL的AUC为0.769。 结论 多维度TT参数如TT-TG、TT-RA、TT-TG/PL、TT-TG/PTL,在预测髌骨不稳方面具有良好的临床应用价值。鉴于单一量化指标可能无法全面评估髌骨不稳,结合多个维度的TT参数可以提供更全面和精确的评估,从而为患者的早期诊断与治疗决策提供科学依据。 Abstract:Objective To analyze the diagnostic efficiency of various multidimensional tibial tuberosity (TT) parameters in patellar instability, revealing their clinical applicability. Methods Patients diagnosed with patellar instability who underwent knee joint CT scans at Ningbo Hangzhou Bay Hospital from January 2020 to January 2023 were included as the observation group. A control group was randomly selected from patients who underwent knee joint CT scans during the same period but were excluded for patellar instability. Each group comprised 45 cases. Patient data were collected, and the clinical diagnostic efficiency of various TT parameters was analyzed through logistic regression and ROC curve analysis. Results A total of 90 eligible patients were included, with 33 males and 57 females. There was no significant difference in gender distribution between the two groups, but the observation group had a significantly younger age with statistical significance (P < 0.001). Logistic regression analysis showed that TT-TG, TT-RA, TT-TG/PL, and TT-TG/PTL related TT parameters were effective indicators for predicting patellar instability. At the same time, ROC curve analysis indicated the diagnostic efficacy of the related TT parameters, with the AUC value of TT-TG/PL being 0.826, TT-TG 0.816, TT-RA 0.761, and TT-TG/PTL 0.769. Conclusion Multidimensional TT parameters, such as TT-TG, TT-RA, TT-TG/PL, and TT-TG/PTL, have good clinical value in predicting patellar instability. Given that a single quantitative indicator may not fully assess patellar instability, combining multiple dimensional TT parameters can provide a more comprehensive and precise evaluation, thereby offering early guidance for the diagnosis and treatment of patellar instability. -
Key words:
- Patellar instability /
- TT-TG /
- TT-TG/PL /
- TT-RA /
- Predictive value
-
表 1 2组行膝关节CT检查者临床资料比较
Table 1. Comparison of clinical data of 2 groups who underwent knee joint CT examination
组别 例数 年龄
(x±s,岁)性别[例(%)] TT-TG
(x±s,mm)TT-TE
(x±s,mm)TT-RA
(x±s,mm)TT-TG/PL
(x±s)TT-TG/PTL
(x±s)女性 男性 观察组 45 18.63±4.7 27(60.00) 18(40.00) 25.18±6.86 62.77±5.45 18.24±5.56 0.87±0.24 0.61±0.16 对照组 45 28.55±5.6 30(66.67) 15(33.34) 12.75±5.42 63.89±6.21 12.59±3.16 0.33±0.12 0.40±0.17 统计量 0.779a 0.431b 7.763a 4.345a 5.428a 8.014a 7.245a P值 < 0.001 0.512 < 0.001 0.786 0.024 < 0.001 0.015 注:a为t值,b为χ2值。 表 2 行膝关节CT检查者髌骨稳定性影响因素logistic回归分析
Table 2. Logistic regression analysis of influencing factors of patellar stability in patients undergoing knee CT
变量 B SE Waldχ2 P值 OR值 95% CI TT-TG 2.267 0.890 8.034 0.005 9.647 2.012~46.245 TT-RA 1.241 0.653 4.901 0.027 3.461 1.153~10.388 TT-TG/PL 0.175 0.177 9.397 0.002 1.191 1.065~1.332 TT-TG/PTL 0.138 0.736 4.309 0.038 1.148 1.008~1.307 表 3 行膝关节CT检查者各项测量指标诊断效能比较
Table 3. Comparison of diagnostic efficacy of various measurement indexes in patients undergoing knee joint CT examination
变量 AUC P值 95% CI 灵敏度
(%)特异度
(%)截断值 TT-TG 0.816 < 0.001 0.716~0.893 78.05 80.49 21.03 mm TT-RA 0.761 < 0.001 0.655~0.849 80.50 63.40 23.12 mm TT-TG/PL 0.826 < 0.001 0.726~0.901 78.00 80.50 0.564 TT-TG/PTL 0.769 < 0.001 0.662~0.855 68.30 80.50 0.298 -
[1] 侯俊鹏, 张旭辉. 髌骨不稳的诊断及治疗现状[J]. 实用医药杂志, 2018, 35(5): 467-470. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QEYY201805030.htmHOU J P, ZHANG X H. Current diagnosis and treatment of patellar instability[J]. Practical Journal of Medicine & Pharmacy, 2018, 35(5): 467-470. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QEYY201805030.htm [2] 郑挺, 徐俊杰, 赵金忠. 髌骨不稳危险因素及治疗策略[J]. 国际骨科学杂志, 2023, 44(2): 67-71. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-7083.2023.02.001ZHENG T, XU J J, ZHAO J Z. Risk factors and treatment strategies of patellar instability[J]. International Journal of Orthopaedics, 2023, 44(2): 67-71. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-7083.2023.02.001 [3] QI Y, LIU J, SUN M, et al. Correlation analysis between tibial tuberosity-trochlear groove distance and other patellar stability parameters in Young and middle-aged populations[J]. Orthop Surg, 2022, 14(8): 1817-1826. doi: 10.1111/os.13370 [4] 马五艳, 李辉, 王改梅, 等. MRI图像定量测量在髌股关节不稳中的诊断价值[J]. 中国骨与关节损伤杂志, 2023, 38(2): 186-188. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GGJS202302020.htmMA W Y, LI H, WANG G M, et al. Diagnostic value of quantitative measurement of MRI images in patellofemoral joint instability[J]. Chinese Journal of Bone and Joint Injury, 2023, 38(2): 186-188. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GGJS202302020.htm [5] ZHANG L, TIAN M, WU S, et al. Tibial tubercle-trochlear groove distance has better diagnostic reliability than tubercle-posterior cruciate ligament distance for predicting patellar instability: a systematic review[J]. Orthop Surg, 2023, 15(9): 2225-2234. doi: 10.1111/os.13819 [6] 郭宗磊, 王业华, 刘广銮. 膝关节旋转与髌骨不稳[J]. 中国组织工程研究, 2023, 27(13): 2099-2103. doi: 10.12307/2023.281GUO Z L, WANG Y H, LIU G L. Knee rotation and patellar instability[J]. Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research, 2023, 27(13): 2099-2103. doi: 10.12307/2023.281 [7] 牟迪. 高场强MRI对髌股关节不稳生物力学指标效能评价[D]. 沈阳: 沈阳医学院, 2023.MOU D. Evaluation of biomechanical indicators of patellofemoral joint instability using high-field MRI[D]. Shenyang: Shenyang Medical College, 2023. [8] 袁硕, 徐永胜, 齐岩松, 等. 复发性髌骨脱位危险因素的研究进展[J]. 内蒙古医学杂志, 2021, 53(6): 705-708, 711. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NMYZ202106018.htmYUAN S, XU Y S, QI Y S, et al. Research progress on risk factors for recurrent patellar dislocation[J]. Inner Mongolia Medical Journal, 2021, 53(6): 705-708, 711. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NMYZ202106018.htm [9] 陈琰琰, 吕畅, 刘晓莉, 等. 影响前交叉韧带重建术后运动恐惧心理的危险因素分析及相关干预措施[J]. 中华全科医学, 2022, 20(12): 2147-2150. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002790CHEN Y Y, LYU C, LIU X L, et al. Analysis of risk factors affecting fear of exercise after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and related intervention measures[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2022, 20(12): 2147-2150. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002790 [10] 陈黎明, 许根荣, 陈兆军, 等. 髌骨不稳的诊疗现状[J]. 中国中医骨伤科杂志, 2021, 29(2): 83-88. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGZG202102022.htmCHEN L M, XU G R, CHEN Z J, et al. Current status of diagnosis and treatment of patellar instability[J]. Chinese Journal of Traditional Medical Traumatology & Orthopedics, 2021, 29(2): 83-88. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGZG202102022.htm [11] LI Z, LIU G, TIAN R, et al. The patellofemoral morphology and the normal predicted value of tibial tuberosity-trochlear groove distance in the Chinese population[J]. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 2021, 22(1): 575. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04454-8 [12] 张合, 赵洪波, 兰志恒, 等. 胫骨结节-股骨滑车沟间距和胫骨平台最大轴径比值在髌骨不稳中的应用价值[J]. 河北医科大学学报, 2021, 42(4): 401-405. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-3205.2021.04.007ZHANG H, ZHAO H B, LAN Z H, et al. Application value of the ratio of the tibial tubercle-trochlear groove distance to maximumaxis diameter of the tibial plateauin patellar instability[J]. Journal of Hebei Medical University, 2021, 42(4): 401-405. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-3205.2021.04.007 [13] XU Z, ZHAO P, SONG Y, et al. Reliability of the tibial tubercle-roman arch distance for evaluating tibial tubercle malposition and predicting patellar dislocation via magnetic resonance imaging[J]. Orthop J Sports Med, 2022, 10(8): 23259671221118561. DOI: 10.1177/23259671221118561. [14] PEDOWITZ J M, EDMONDS E W, CHAMBERS H G, et al. Recurrence of patellar instability in adolescents undergoing surgery for osteochondral defects without concomitant ligament reconstruction[J]. Am J Sports Med, 2019, 47(1): 66-70. doi: 10.1177/0363546518808486 [15] XU Z, SONG Y, DENG R, et al. CT and MRI measurements of tibial tubercle lateralization in patients with patellar dislocation were not equivalent but could be interchangeable[J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2023, 31(1): 349-357. doi: 10.1007/s00167-022-07119-8 [16] CHEN J, LI X, XU Z, et al. Tibial tubercle-Roman arch (TT-RA) distance is superior to tibial tubercle-trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance when evaluating coronal malalignment in patients with knee osteoarthritis[J]. Eur Radiol, 2022, 32(12): 8404-8413. doi: 10.1007/s00330-022-08924-y [17] CHEN J, LI Q, LIU S, et al. Prediction of subsequent contralateral patellar dislocation after first-time dislocation based on patellofemoral morphologies[J]. J Clin Med, 2022, 12(1): 180. doi: 10.3390/jcm12010180 [18] 沈邦伟, 陈伟, 李子豪, 等. MRI测量的TT-RA和TT-TG在髌骨脱位诊疗中的作用[J]. 中国实验诊断学, 2021, 25(10): 1515-1517. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-4287.2021.10.027SHEN B W, CHEN W, LI Z H, et al. The role of MRI-measured TT-RA and TT-TG in the diagnosis and treatment of patellar dislocation[J]. Chinese Journal of Laboratory Diagnosis, 2021, 25(10): 1515-1517. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-4287.2021.10.027 [19] ESSA A, LINDNER D, KHATIB S, et al. Individualized tibial tubercle-trochlear groove distance-to-patellar length ratio (TT-TG/PL) is a more reliable measurement than TT-TG alone for evaluating patellar instability[J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2022, 30(11): 3644-3650. doi: 10.1007/s00167-022-06979-4 [20] HEIDENREICH M J, SANDERS T L, HEVESI M, et al. Individualizing the tibial tubercle to trochlear groove distance to patient specific anatomy improves sensitivity for recurrent instability[J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2018, 26(9): 2858-2864. doi: 10.1007/s00167-017-4752-y -