留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

多维度胫骨结节参数预测髌骨不稳的临床价值研究

罗文礼 张嗣晓 应吕方 吴鸯鸯

罗文礼, 张嗣晓, 应吕方, 吴鸯鸯. 多维度胫骨结节参数预测髌骨不稳的临床价值研究[J]. 中华全科医学, 2024, 22(4): 582-585. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.003455
引用本文: 罗文礼, 张嗣晓, 应吕方, 吴鸯鸯. 多维度胫骨结节参数预测髌骨不稳的临床价值研究[J]. 中华全科医学, 2024, 22(4): 582-585. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.003455
LUO Wenli, ZHANG Sixiao, YING Lyufang, WU Yangyang. Value of multidimensional tibial tuberosity parameters in predicting patellar instability[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2024, 22(4): 582-585. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.003455
Citation: LUO Wenli, ZHANG Sixiao, YING Lyufang, WU Yangyang. Value of multidimensional tibial tuberosity parameters in predicting patellar instability[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2024, 22(4): 582-585. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.003455

多维度胫骨结节参数预测髌骨不稳的临床价值研究

doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.003455
基金项目: 

浙江省中医药科技计划项目 2020ZB231

宁波市医学科技计划项目 2020Y86

详细信息
    通讯作者:

    罗文礼,E-mail:luowenli0617@163.com

  • 中图分类号: R682.6

Value of multidimensional tibial tuberosity parameters in predicting patellar instability

  • 摘要:   目的  本研究旨在通过测量多维度胫骨结节(TT)参数,评估多项TT参数在预测患者髌骨不稳的诊断效能。  方法  选择2020年1月—2023年1月在宁波市杭州湾医院骨科门诊接受膝关节CT并确诊为髌骨不稳的患者为观察组,同时随机选取同期接受膝关节CT但排除髌骨不稳的患者作为对照组,各45例。统计患者资料并通过logistic回归及ROC曲线分析各项TT参数的临床诊断效能。  结果  共纳入符合标准的患者90例,其中男性33例,女性57例。2组性别比较差异无统计学意义,观察组年龄相对较轻,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.001)。Logistic回归分析显示,TT-TG、TT-RA、TT-TG/PL、TT-TG/PTL相关TT参数是预测髌骨不稳的有效指标。同时ROC曲线分析表明各项TT参数的诊断效能,其中TT-TG/PL的AUC值为0.826,TT-TG的AUC为0.816,TT-RA的AUC为0.761,TT-TG/PTL的AUC为0.769。  结论  多维度TT参数如TT-TG、TT-RA、TT-TG/PL、TT-TG/PTL,在预测髌骨不稳方面具有良好的临床应用价值。鉴于单一量化指标可能无法全面评估髌骨不稳,结合多个维度的TT参数可以提供更全面和精确的评估,从而为患者的早期诊断与治疗决策提供科学依据。

     

  • 图  1  行膝关节CT检查者各项测量指标的ROC曲线

    Figure  1.  ROC curves of various measurements in patients undergoing CT examination of knee joint

    表  1  2组行膝关节CT检查者临床资料比较

    Table  1.   Comparison of clinical data of 2 groups who underwent knee joint CT examination

    组别 例数 年龄
    (x±s,岁)
    性别[例(%)] TT-TG
    (x±s,mm)
    TT-TE
    (x±s,mm)
    TT-RA
    (x±s,mm)
    TT-TG/PL
    (x±s)
    TT-TG/PTL
    (x±s)
    女性 男性
    观察组 45 18.63±4.7 27(60.00) 18(40.00) 25.18±6.86 62.77±5.45 18.24±5.56 0.87±0.24 0.61±0.16
    对照组 45 28.55±5.6 30(66.67) 15(33.34) 12.75±5.42 63.89±6.21 12.59±3.16 0.33±0.12 0.40±0.17
    统计量 0.779a 0.431b 7.763a 4.345a 5.428a 8.014a 7.245a
    P < 0.001 0.512 < 0.001 0.786 0.024 < 0.001 0.015
    注:at值,b为χ2值。
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  行膝关节CT检查者髌骨稳定性影响因素logistic回归分析

    Table  2.   Logistic regression analysis of influencing factors of patellar stability in patients undergoing knee CT

    变量 B SE Waldχ2 P OR 95% CI
    TT-TG 2.267 0.890 8.034 0.005 9.647 2.012~46.245
    TT-RA 1.241 0.653 4.901 0.027 3.461 1.153~10.388
    TT-TG/PL 0.175 0.177 9.397 0.002 1.191 1.065~1.332
    TT-TG/PTL 0.138 0.736 4.309 0.038 1.148 1.008~1.307
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  3  行膝关节CT检查者各项测量指标诊断效能比较

    Table  3.   Comparison of diagnostic efficacy of various measurement indexes in patients undergoing knee joint CT examination

    变量 AUC P 95% CI 灵敏度
    (%)
    特异度
    (%)
    截断值
    TT-TG 0.816 < 0.001 0.716~0.893 78.05 80.49 21.03 mm
    TT-RA 0.761 < 0.001 0.655~0.849 80.50 63.40 23.12 mm
    TT-TG/PL 0.826 < 0.001 0.726~0.901 78.00 80.50 0.564
    TT-TG/PTL 0.769 < 0.001 0.662~0.855 68.30 80.50 0.298
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] 侯俊鹏, 张旭辉. 髌骨不稳的诊断及治疗现状[J]. 实用医药杂志, 2018, 35(5): 467-470. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QEYY201805030.htm

    HOU J P, ZHANG X H. Current diagnosis and treatment of patellar instability[J]. Practical Journal of Medicine & Pharmacy, 2018, 35(5): 467-470. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QEYY201805030.htm
    [2] 郑挺, 徐俊杰, 赵金忠. 髌骨不稳危险因素及治疗策略[J]. 国际骨科学杂志, 2023, 44(2): 67-71. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-7083.2023.02.001

    ZHENG T, XU J J, ZHAO J Z. Risk factors and treatment strategies of patellar instability[J]. International Journal of Orthopaedics, 2023, 44(2): 67-71. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-7083.2023.02.001
    [3] QI Y, LIU J, SUN M, et al. Correlation analysis between tibial tuberosity-trochlear groove distance and other patellar stability parameters in Young and middle-aged populations[J]. Orthop Surg, 2022, 14(8): 1817-1826. doi: 10.1111/os.13370
    [4] 马五艳, 李辉, 王改梅, 等. MRI图像定量测量在髌股关节不稳中的诊断价值[J]. 中国骨与关节损伤杂志, 2023, 38(2): 186-188. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GGJS202302020.htm

    MA W Y, LI H, WANG G M, et al. Diagnostic value of quantitative measurement of MRI images in patellofemoral joint instability[J]. Chinese Journal of Bone and Joint Injury, 2023, 38(2): 186-188. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GGJS202302020.htm
    [5] ZHANG L, TIAN M, WU S, et al. Tibial tubercle-trochlear groove distance has better diagnostic reliability than tubercle-posterior cruciate ligament distance for predicting patellar instability: a systematic review[J]. Orthop Surg, 2023, 15(9): 2225-2234. doi: 10.1111/os.13819
    [6] 郭宗磊, 王业华, 刘广銮. 膝关节旋转与髌骨不稳[J]. 中国组织工程研究, 2023, 27(13): 2099-2103. doi: 10.12307/2023.281

    GUO Z L, WANG Y H, LIU G L. Knee rotation and patellar instability[J]. Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research, 2023, 27(13): 2099-2103. doi: 10.12307/2023.281
    [7] 牟迪. 高场强MRI对髌股关节不稳生物力学指标效能评价[D]. 沈阳: 沈阳医学院, 2023.

    MOU D. Evaluation of biomechanical indicators of patellofemoral joint instability using high-field MRI[D]. Shenyang: Shenyang Medical College, 2023.
    [8] 袁硕, 徐永胜, 齐岩松, 等. 复发性髌骨脱位危险因素的研究进展[J]. 内蒙古医学杂志, 2021, 53(6): 705-708, 711. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NMYZ202106018.htm

    YUAN S, XU Y S, QI Y S, et al. Research progress on risk factors for recurrent patellar dislocation[J]. Inner Mongolia Medical Journal, 2021, 53(6): 705-708, 711. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NMYZ202106018.htm
    [9] 陈琰琰, 吕畅, 刘晓莉, 等. 影响前交叉韧带重建术后运动恐惧心理的危险因素分析及相关干预措施[J]. 中华全科医学, 2022, 20(12): 2147-2150. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002790

    CHEN Y Y, LYU C, LIU X L, et al. Analysis of risk factors affecting fear of exercise after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and related intervention measures[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2022, 20(12): 2147-2150. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002790
    [10] 陈黎明, 许根荣, 陈兆军, 等. 髌骨不稳的诊疗现状[J]. 中国中医骨伤科杂志, 2021, 29(2): 83-88. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGZG202102022.htm

    CHEN L M, XU G R, CHEN Z J, et al. Current status of diagnosis and treatment of patellar instability[J]. Chinese Journal of Traditional Medical Traumatology & Orthopedics, 2021, 29(2): 83-88. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGZG202102022.htm
    [11] LI Z, LIU G, TIAN R, et al. The patellofemoral morphology and the normal predicted value of tibial tuberosity-trochlear groove distance in the Chinese population[J]. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 2021, 22(1): 575. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04454-8
    [12] 张合, 赵洪波, 兰志恒, 等. 胫骨结节-股骨滑车沟间距和胫骨平台最大轴径比值在髌骨不稳中的应用价值[J]. 河北医科大学学报, 2021, 42(4): 401-405. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-3205.2021.04.007

    ZHANG H, ZHAO H B, LAN Z H, et al. Application value of the ratio of the tibial tubercle-trochlear groove distance to maximumaxis diameter of the tibial plateauin patellar instability[J]. Journal of Hebei Medical University, 2021, 42(4): 401-405. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-3205.2021.04.007
    [13] XU Z, ZHAO P, SONG Y, et al. Reliability of the tibial tubercle-roman arch distance for evaluating tibial tubercle malposition and predicting patellar dislocation via magnetic resonance imaging[J]. Orthop J Sports Med, 2022, 10(8): 23259671221118561. DOI: 10.1177/23259671221118561.
    [14] PEDOWITZ J M, EDMONDS E W, CHAMBERS H G, et al. Recurrence of patellar instability in adolescents undergoing surgery for osteochondral defects without concomitant ligament reconstruction[J]. Am J Sports Med, 2019, 47(1): 66-70. doi: 10.1177/0363546518808486
    [15] XU Z, SONG Y, DENG R, et al. CT and MRI measurements of tibial tubercle lateralization in patients with patellar dislocation were not equivalent but could be interchangeable[J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2023, 31(1): 349-357. doi: 10.1007/s00167-022-07119-8
    [16] CHEN J, LI X, XU Z, et al. Tibial tubercle-Roman arch (TT-RA) distance is superior to tibial tubercle-trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance when evaluating coronal malalignment in patients with knee osteoarthritis[J]. Eur Radiol, 2022, 32(12): 8404-8413. doi: 10.1007/s00330-022-08924-y
    [17] CHEN J, LI Q, LIU S, et al. Prediction of subsequent contralateral patellar dislocation after first-time dislocation based on patellofemoral morphologies[J]. J Clin Med, 2022, 12(1): 180. doi: 10.3390/jcm12010180
    [18] 沈邦伟, 陈伟, 李子豪, 等. MRI测量的TT-RA和TT-TG在髌骨脱位诊疗中的作用[J]. 中国实验诊断学, 2021, 25(10): 1515-1517. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-4287.2021.10.027

    SHEN B W, CHEN W, LI Z H, et al. The role of MRI-measured TT-RA and TT-TG in the diagnosis and treatment of patellar dislocation[J]. Chinese Journal of Laboratory Diagnosis, 2021, 25(10): 1515-1517. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-4287.2021.10.027
    [19] ESSA A, LINDNER D, KHATIB S, et al. Individualized tibial tubercle-trochlear groove distance-to-patellar length ratio (TT-TG/PL) is a more reliable measurement than TT-TG alone for evaluating patellar instability[J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2022, 30(11): 3644-3650. doi: 10.1007/s00167-022-06979-4
    [20] HEIDENREICH M J, SANDERS T L, HEVESI M, et al. Individualizing the tibial tubercle to trochlear groove distance to patient specific anatomy improves sensitivity for recurrent instability[J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2018, 26(9): 2858-2864. doi: 10.1007/s00167-017-4752-y
  • 加载中
图(1) / 表(3)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  57
  • HTML全文浏览量:  16
  • PDF下载量:  1
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2023-12-08
  • 网络出版日期:  2024-05-29

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回