脑卒中后吞咽障碍患者PG-SGA评分与不良预后风险的相关性

余文娟; 郑红建; 余双娟; 董锦疆

doi:10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.003456

脑卒中后吞咽障碍患者PG-SGA评分与不良预后风险的相关性

doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.003456

浙江省人民医院淳安分院神经外科，浙江杭州 311700

基金项目:

浙江省教育厅一般科研项目 Y202146057

详细信息

通讯作者:
董锦疆，E-mail：312141727@qq.com

中图分类号: R743.3
计量
- 文章访问数: 66
- HTML全文浏览量: 26
- PDF下载量: 5
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2023-11-28
- 网络出版日期: 2024-05-29

Association between PG-SGA scores and the risk of poor outcomes in stroke patients with dysphagia

Department of Neurosurgery, Chun'an Branch of Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 311700, China

摘要

摘要: 目的脑卒中患者常伴有吞咽障碍，这种伴随症状会影响机体营养状态，本研究探讨脑卒中后吞咽障碍患者主观整体营养评估法(PG-SGA)评分与不良预后风险的相关性。方法选取浙江省人民医院淳安分院2021年10月—2022年10月收治的116例脑卒中后吞咽障碍患者作为研究对象。根据改良Rankin量表(mRS)评分分为预后良好组(mRS≤2分)和预后不良组(mRS评分3~5分)。应用多因素logistic回归分析及限制性立方样条探讨患者营养状态与不良预后风险间的相关性。结果随访观察90 d，88例(75.86%)患者mRS≤2分归为预后良好组，其余28例(24.14%)为预后不良组。预后不良组患者年龄较预后良好组大，入院时美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)、PG-SGA评分较预后良好组高，血清白蛋白水平、肱三头肌皮褶厚度较预后良好组低(P＜0.05)。多因素logistic回归分析显示，年龄大(OR=1.179，95% CI：1.059~1.314)、入院时NIHSS评分高(OR=1.775，95% CI：1.161~2.713)、PG-SGA评分高(OR=1.741，95% CI：1.069~2.834)为不良预后的危险因素，血清白蛋白高(OR=0.883，95% CI：0.804~0.970)为不良预后的保护因素(P < 0.05)。限制性立方样条显示，脑卒中后吞咽障碍患者PG-SGA评分与不良预后间存在剂量-反应关系(χ²=0.029，P < 0.05)。结论脑卒中后吞咽障碍患者营养状态与不良预后风险有关，临床需引起重视，及时根据情况行营养支持。
- 脑卒中 /
- 吞咽障碍 /
- 营养状态 /
- 预后 /
- 相关性
Abstract: Objective Dysphagia is commonly observed in stroke patients and can have an impact on their nutritional status. This study aims to investigate the correlation between the patient-generated subjective global assessment (PG-SGA) score and the risk of poor prognosis in stroke patients with dysphagia. Methods A total of 116 patients with post-stroke dysphagia from Chun'an Branch of Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital between October 2021 and October 2022 were selected as the study objects. According to the modified Rankin scale (mRS), the patients were divided into a good prognosis group (mRS≤2 points) and a poor prognosis group (mRS 3-5 points). Multivariate logistic regression analysis and restricted cubic spline were used to investigate the association between nutritional status and the risk of poor prognosis. Results After a 90-day follow-up observation, 88 cases (75.86%) with mRS≤2 scores were classified as the good prognosis group, while the remaining 28 cases (24.14%) were categorized as the poor prognosis group. The admission National Institutes of Health stroke scale (NIHSS) and PG-SGA scores were higher in the poor prognosis group compared to the good prognosis group, whereas the serum albumin level and triceps skin fold thickness were lower (P < 0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that older age (OR=1.179, 95% CI: 1.059-1.314), high NIHSS score on admission (OR=1.775, 95% CI: 1.161-2.713), and high PG-SGA score (OR=1.741, 95% CI: 1.069-2.834) were risk factors for poor prognosis. Conversely, high serum albumin (OR=0.883, 95% CI: 0.804-0.970) was identified as a protective factor for poor prognosis (P < 0.05). The restricted cubic spline analysis showed a dose-response relationship between PG-SGA score and poor prognosis in stroke patients with dysphagia (χ²=0.029, P < 0.05). Conclusion The nutritional status of stroke patients with dysphagia is related to the risk of poor prognosis, highlighting the importance of timely clinical attention and nutritional support based on individual needs.
- Stroke /
- Dysphagia /
- Nutritional status /
- Prognosis /
- Correlation

HTML全文

图 1 脑卒中后吞咽障碍患者PG-SGA评分与不良预后间的限制性立方样条图

Figure 1. Restricted cubic spline plots of PG-SGA scores and poor outcomes in patients with dysphagia after stroke

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 2组脑卒中吞咽障碍患者一般资料比较

Table 1. Comparison of general data of stroke patients with dysphagia between the two groups

项目	预后良好组 (n=88)	预后不良组 (n=28)	统计量	P值
年龄(x±s，岁)	53.58±6.61	59.07±3.90	5.384^a	< 0.001
性别[例(%)]			0.119^b	0.730
女性	41(46.59)	12(42.86)
男性	47(53.41)	16(57.14)
吸烟史[例(%)]	43(48.86)	14(50.00)	0.011^b	0.917
合并疾病[例(%)]
高血压	26(29.55)	9(32.14)	0.068^b	0.794
糖尿病	16(18.18)	6(21.43)	0.146^b	0.703
高脂血症	19(21.59)	8(28.57)	0.580^b	0.446
冠心病	24(27.27)	8(28.57)	0.018^b	0.893
脑卒中类型[例(%)]			0.142^b	0.706
缺血性脑卒中	69(78.41)	21(75.00)
出血性脑卒中	19(21.59)	7(25.00)
收缩压(x±s，mmHg)	148.26±10.24	149.65±10.68	0.606^a	0.548
舒张压(x±s，mmHg)	86.69±9.35	87.65±8.97	0.488^a	0.628
血糖(x±s，mmol/L)	7.12±1.61	7.22±1.64	0.282^a	0.779
NIHSS评分(x±s，分)	7.95±1.37	9.21±1.57	3.810^a	< 0.001
注：^a为t值，^b为χ²值。1 mmHg=0.133 kPa。

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 2组脑卒中吞咽障碍患者营养状态比较(x ± s)

Table 2. Comparison of nutritional status between the two groups of stroke patients with dysphagia(x ± s)

组别	例数	BMI	肱三头肌皮褶厚度(cm)	上臂中段围 (cm)	血清白蛋白 (g/L)	血清前蛋白 (g/L)	血红蛋白 (g/L)	PG-SGA (分)
预后良好组	88	22.14±1.65	1.46±0.21	26.31±2.34	40.10±6.42	168.26±18.23	115.65±14.21	3.52±1.12
预后不良组	28	22.10±1.61	1.37±0.18	25.98±2.18	37.02±5.56	165.8±19.11	112.67±15.27	4.18±1.34
t值		0.114	2.210	0.685	2.456	0.600	0.914	2.357
P值		0.910	0.032	0.497	0.017	0.552	0.366	0.024

下载: 导出CSV

表 3 脑卒中后吞咽障碍患者预后的多因素logistic回归分析

Table 3. Multivariate logistic regression analysis of prognosis of patients with dysphagia after stroke

变量	B	SE	Waldχ²	P值	OR值	95% CI
年龄	0.165	0.055	8.961	0.003	1.179	1.059~1.314
入院时NIHSS评分	0.574	0.216	7.026	0.008	1.775	1.161~2.713
血清白蛋白	-0.125	0.048	6.776	0.009	0.883	0.804~0.970
肱三头肌皮褶厚度	-3.015	1.549	3.787	0.052	0.049	0.002~1.022
PG-SGA评分	0.554	0.249	4.968	0.026	1.741	1.069~2.834

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(23)

[1]	巢宝华, 刘建民, 王伊龙, 等. 中国脑卒中防治: 成就、挑战和应对[J]. 中国循环杂志, 2019, 34(7): 625-631. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3614.2019.07.001 CHAO B H, LIU J M, WANG Y L, et al. Stroke Prevention and Control in China: Achievements, Challenges and Responses[J]. Chinese Circulation Journal, 2019, 34(7): 625-631. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3614.2019.07.001
[2]	SHARMA D, SPRING K J, BHASKAR S. Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio in acute ischemic stroke: immunopathology, management, and prognosis[J]. Acta Neurol Scand, 2021, 144(5): 486-499. doi: 10.1111/ane.13493
[3]	JONES C A, COLLETTI C M, DING M C. Post-stroke dysphagia: recent insights and unanswered questions[J]. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep, 2020, 20(12): 61. doi: 10.1007/s11910-020-01081-z
[4]	冯晓瑜, 黎静雯, 张咏军, 等. 脑卒中吞咽障碍患者安全进食行为及影响因素研究[J]. 中华全科医学, 2023, 21(2): 333-336. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002876 FENG X Y, LI J W, ZHANG Y J, et al. Safe eating behaviour and influencing factors in patients with dysphagia after stroke[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2023, 21(2): 333-336. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002876
[5]	BANDA K J, CHU H, KANG X L, et al. Prevalence of dysphagia and risk of pneumonia and mortality in acute stroke patients: a meta-analysis[J]. BMC Geriatr, 2022, 22(1): 420. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-02960-5
[6]	BURGOS R, BRETÓN I, CEREDA E, et al. ESPEN guideline clinical nutrition in neurology[J]. Clin Nutr, 2018, 37(1): 354-396. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2017.09.003
[7]	金怡, 宗丽春, 唐红, 等. GUSS联合NRS-2002筛查在亚急性脑卒中吞咽障碍患者营养干预中的应用[J]. 护理与康复, 2018, 17(11): 65-67. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HLKF201811020.htm JIN Y, ZONG L C, TANG H, et al. Application of GUSS combined with NRS-2002 screening in nutritional intervention of subacute stroke patients with dysphagia[J]. Journal of Nursing and Rehabilitation, 2018, 17(11): 65-67. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HLKF201811020.htm
[8]	中华医学会神经病学分会, 中华医学会神经病学分会脑血管病学组. 中国急性缺血性脑卒中诊治指南2018[J]. 中华神经科杂志, 2018, 51(9): 666-682. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1006-7876.2018.09.004 Chinese Society of Neurology, Cerebrovascular Group, Chinese Society of Neurology. Chinese Guidelines for Diagnosis and Treatment of acute ischemic Stroke 2018[J]. Chinese Journal of Neurology, 2018, 51(9): 666-682. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1006-7876.2018.09.004
[9]	高燕芬. GUSS吞咽功能评估量表和洼田饮水试验在脑卒中吞咽评估中的应用比较[J]. 实用临床护理学电子杂志, 2020, 5(27): 42. GAO Y F. Comparison of GUSS swallowing function assessment Scale and Watian drinking water test in swallowing assessment of stroke[J]. Electronic Journal of Practical Clinical Nursing Science, 2020, 5(27): 42.
[10]	姚倩, 冯长艳, 杨祖安. 营养风险筛查和患者主观整体评估在非手术肿瘤患者中的临床运用及意义[J]. 重庆医学, 2016, 45(11): 1567-1568. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-8348.2016.11.040 YAO Q, FENG C Y, YANG Z. Clinical application and significance of nutritional risk screening and patient subjective holistic assessment in patients with nonoperative tumors[J]. Chongqing Medicine, 2016, 45(11): 1567-1568. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-8348.2016.11.040
[11]	孙冲, 徐迪荣, 李碧磊. 改良Rankin量表在急性大面积脑梗死长期生存的预后价值[J]. 医学研究杂志, 2012, 41(12): 179-182. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YXYZ201212056.htm SUN C, XU D R, LI B L. Prognostic Value of Modified Rankin Scale in the Long-term Survival in Acute Massive Cerebral Infarction[J]. Journal of Medical Research, 2012, 41(12): 179-182. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YXYZ201212056.htm
[12]	房芳芳, 王孝文, 鞠学红. 脑卒中后吞咽障碍的发生机制及康复治疗研究进展[J]. 山东医药, 2019, 59(31): 103-106. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SDYY201931030.htm FANF F F, WANG X W, JU X H. Progress in the pathogenesis and rehabilitation treatment of dysphagia after stroke[J]. Shandong Medical Journal, 2019, 59(31): 103-106. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SDYY201931030.htm
[13]	LIU X M, ZHANG Y S, CHU J H, et al. Effect of probiotics on the nutritional status of severe stroke patients with nasal feeding that receive enteral nutrition: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2021, 100(17): e25657. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000025657.
[14]	马珂珂, 郭园丽, 董小方, 等. 住院脑卒中患者营养管理的最佳证据总结[J]. 中华护理教育, 2021, 18(5): 456-463. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZHHU202105021.htm MA K K, GUO Y L, DING X F, et al. A summary of best evidence on management of nutrition in stroke patients[J]. Chinese Journal of Nursing Education, 2021, 18(5): 456-463. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZHHU202105021.htm
[15]	LIU Z Y, HAN G S, WU J J, et al. Comparing characteristics and outcomes of in-hospital stroke and community-onset stroke[J]. J Neurol, 2022, 269(10): 5617-5627.
[16]	XU Z Q, GU Y Q, LI J X, et al. Dysphagia and aspiration pneumonia in elderly hospitalization stroke patients: risk factors, cerebral infarction area comparison[J]. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil, 2019, 32(1): 85-91.
[17]	QIN H Q, WANG A X, ZUO Y T, et al. Malnutrition could predict 3-month functional prognosis in mild stroke patients: findings from a nationwide stroke registry[J]. Curr Neurovasc Res, 2021, 18(5): 489-496.
[18]	ZIELIŃSKA-NOWAK E, CICHON N, SALUK-BIJAK J, et al. Nutritional supplements and neuroprotective diets and their potential clinical significance in post-stroke rehabilitation[J]. Nutrients, 2021, 13(8): 2704. DOI: 10.3390/nu13082704.
[19]	ZHANG G T, PAN Y S, ZHANG R H, et al. Prevalence and prognostic significance of malnutrition risk in patients with acute ischemic stroke: results from the third china national stroke registry[J]. Stroke, 2022, 53(1): 111-119.
[20]	GONG L Y, WANG Y, SHI J. Enteral nutrition management in stroke patients: a narrative review[J]. Ann Palliat Med, 2021, 10(10): 11191-11202.
[21]	WANG Y, XIANG L J, LUO Y S, et al. Evidence summary on nutrition management for post-stroke dysphagia[J]. Am J Transl Res, 2022, 14(11): 8252-8262.
[22]	LU H Y, HO U C, KUO L T. Impact of nutritional status on outcomes of stroke survivors: a post hoc analysis of the NHANES[J]. Nutrients, 2023, 15(2): 294. DOI: 10.3390/nu15020294.
[23]	KAMIMOTO T, SHINDO K, SHIMOMURA T, et al. Relationship between initial nutritional status and functional independence measures at discharge in subacute stroke[J]. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis, 2022, 31(11): 106754. DOI: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2022.106754.