输尿管软镜联合负压吸引鞘术后无管化对上尿路结石患者应激及炎症反应的影响

郑枫; 田文俊

doi:10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.003465

输尿管软镜联合负压吸引鞘术后无管化对上尿路结石患者应激及炎症反应的影响

doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.003465

郑枫^,,
田文俊

浦江县人民医院泌尿外科，浙江金华 322200

基金项目:

浙江省医药卫生科技计划项目 2023XY070

详细信息

通讯作者:
郑枫，E-mail: 464908270@qq.com

中图分类号: R691.4
计量
- 文章访问数: 53
- HTML全文浏览量: 18
- PDF下载量: 3
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2023-12-04
- 网络出版日期: 2024-05-29

Effects of tubeless management following ureteroscopy combined with negative pressure suction sheath on stress and inflammation in patient with upper urinary tract calculi

ZHENG Feng^,,
TIAN Wenjun

Department of Urology, Pujiang People' s Hospital, Jinhua, Zhejiang 322200, China

摘要

摘要: 目的分析输尿管软镜联合负压吸引鞘术后无管化对上尿路结石患者应激及炎症反应的影响，为临床上尿路结石患者术后无管化应用提供参考依据。方法选取浦江县人民医院泌尿外科2022年7月—2023年7月收治的上尿路结石患者98例为研究对象，并以术后是否进行无管化处置将研究对象分为对照组(47例)和观察组(51例)。观察比较2组患者术后结石清除率及并发症发生情况，检测并比较2组患者应激、炎性指标水平。结果与对照组比较，无管化处置患者术后结石清除率无明显变化[95.7%(45/47) vs. 96.1%(49/51)，P＞0.05]。2组患者术前应激反应指标差异均无统计学意义(P＞0.05)，术后，观察组患者应激反应指标均低于对照组(P＜0.001)。2组患者术前炎性反应指标差异均无统计学意义(P＞0.05)，术后，观察组患者炎性反应指标均低于对照组(P＜0.001)。2组患者术后并发症发生情况比较，观察组患者较对照组术后并发症发生情况明显改善(P＜0.01)。结论输尿管软镜联合负压吸引鞘术后无管化可以减轻上尿路结石患者的应激和炎性反应，减少术后并发症，值得临床推广应用。
- 输尿管软镜 /
- 负压吸引鞘术 /
- 无管化 /
- 上尿路结石 /
- 炎症反应
Abstract: Objective This study aims to analyze the effects of tubeless management following ureteroscopy combined with negative pressure suction sheath on stress and inflammation in patients with upper urinary tract calculi, proving valuable insights for the clinical application of tubeless management in patients with urinary tract calculi. Methods A total of 98 patients with upper urinary tract calculi admitted to the Department of Urology of Pujiang People ' s Hospital from July 2022 to July 2023 were selected. They were divided into two groups based on whether tubeless treatment was performed after surgery: the control group (47 cases) and the observation group (51 cases). Stone clearance rate, complications, as well as stress and inflammatory indexes were observed, compared, and analyzed between the two groups. Results No significant difference was found in postoperative stone clearance between the patients with tubeless treatment compared to the control group [95.7% (45/47) vs. 96.1% (49/51), P>0.05]. Preoperative stress response indexes showed no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05). However, after surgery, the patients with tubeless treatment exhibited lower stress levels compared to the control group (P < 0.001). Similarly, there was no significant difference in preoperative inflammatory response indicators between the two groups (P>0.05), but the observation group showed lower inflammation levels than the control group after surgery (P < 0.001). Furthermore, postoperative complications were compared between the two groups, and the patients with tubeless treatment demonstrated significantly improved outcomes compared to the control group (P < 0.01). Conclusion Tubeless management following ureteroscopy combined with negative pressure suction sheath can effectively alleviate the stress, inflammation, and postoperative complications in patients with upper urinary tract stones, making it a valuable clinical approach.
- Ureteroscope /
- Negative pressure suction sheath /
- Tubeless /
- Upper urinary tract calculi /
- Inflammatory response

HTML全文

表 1 2组上尿路结石患者应激反应指标比较(x±s)

Table 1. Comparison of stress response indexes in two between the two groups of patients with upper urinary tract calculi(x±s)

组别	例数	Cor(μg/L)		NE(ng/L)		ACTH(pg/L)
组别	例数	术前	术后	术前	术后	术前	术后
对照组	47	121.04±21.43	246.19±34.57^b	193.39±29.23	318.42±36.82^b	26.34±5.24	54.68±9.34^b
观察组	51	122.86±22.14	201.69±30.76^b	196.11±29.35	269.96±32.19^b	26.41±5.18	43.72±8.63^b
统计量		0.413^a	1 923.513^c	0.459^a	165.348^c	0.066^a	3 218.634^c
P值		0.681	< 0.001	0.647	< 0.001	0.947	< 0.001
注：^a为t值，^c为F值。与同组术前比较，^bP＜0.05。

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 2组上尿路结石患者炎性反应指标比较(x±s)

Table 2. Comparison of inflammatory response indexes in 2 between the two groups of patients with upper urinary tract calculi(x±s)

组别	例数	PCT(ng/L)		IL-6(ng/mL)		CRP(mg/L)		TNF-α(ng/mL)
组别	例数	术前	术后	术前	术后	术前	术后	术前	术后
对照组	47	0.46±0.12	1.07±0.25^b	35.61±8.34	51.23±14.43^b	9.86±2.28	21.34±3.17^b	1.41±0.22	3.55±0.43^b
观察组	51	0.44±0.13	0.82±0.21^b	35.12±8.25	44.87±13.18^b	9.78±2.15	15.96±2.85^b	1.39±0.21	2.23±0.34^b
统计量		0.789^a	3 435.610^c	0.292^a	82.256^c	0.179^a	658.847^c	0.460^a	2 035.273^c
P值		0.432	< 0.001	0.771	0.025	0.858	< 0.001	0.646	< 0.001
注：^a为t值，^b为F值。与同组术前比较，^bP＜0.05。

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(21)

[1]	王树声, 李源, 邹乾明, 等. 上尿路结石中西医结合排石治疗中国专家共识[J]. 中国中西医结合外科杂志, 2022, 28(2): 158-161. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGZX202202002.htm WANG S S, LI Y, ZHOU Q M, et al. Consensus of Chinese experts on the treatment of upper urinary tract calculi by combination of traditional Chinese and Western medicine[J]. Chinese Journal of Surgery of Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine, 2022, 28(2): 158-161. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGZX202202002.htm
[2]	ZHANG X, ZHAO X M, ZHENG J R, et al. Bilateral simultaneous percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus staged approach for bilateral upper urinary tract calculi: a meta-analysis[J]. Asian J Surg, 2023, 46(1): 553-555. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2022.06.167
[3]	郭营利, 俞健, 沈俊文. 输尿管软镜钬激光碎石术治疗输尿管结石伴肾积水的有效性及安全性分析[J]. 中华全科医学, 2023, 21(3): 420-422, 462. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002898 GUO Y L, YU J, SHEN J W. Efficacy and safety of flexible ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy in the treatment of ureteral calculi with hydronephrosis[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2023, 21(3): 420-422, 462. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002898
[4]	CHEN Y J, LI C, GAO L, et al. Novel flexible vacuum-assisted ureteral access sheath can actively control intrarenal pressure and obtain a complete stone-free status[J]. J Endourol, 2022, 36(9): 1143-1148. doi: 10.1089/end.2022.0004
[5]	冼杰, 朱世佳, 王君勇. 输尿管镜钬激光碎石术后留置不同长度双J型输尿管支架管效果分析[J]. 中外医学研究, 2020, 18(13): 33-35. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YJZY202013014.htm XIAN J, ZHU S J, WANG J Y. Effect of Different Length of Double J Ureteral Stent after Ureteroscopic Holmium Laser Lithotripsy[J]. Chinese and Foreign Medical Research, 2020, 18(13): 33-35. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YJZY202013014.htm
[6]	何祥彪, 刘杨洋, 杜丹, 等. 部分无管化与标准经皮肾镜取石术治疗上尿路结石的有效性及安全性[J]. 现代泌尿外科杂志, 2023, 28(6): 516-518, 528. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-MNWK202306012.htm HE X B, LIU Y Y, DU D, et al. Efficacy and safety of partial tubeless versus standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the treatment of upper urinary tract calculi[J]. Journal of Modern Urology, 2023, 28(6): 516-518, 528. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-MNWK202306012.htm
[7]	WILHELM K, HEIN S, KUNATH F, et al. Totally tubeless, tubeless, and tubed percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treating kidney stones[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2023, 7(7): CD012607. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD012607.
[8]	黄健, 王建业, 孔垂泽, 等. 中国泌尿外科和男科疾病诊断治疗指南[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2019: 237-259. HUANG J, WANG J Y, KONG C Z, et al. Guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of urology and andrology diseases in China[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2019: 237-259.
[9]	杨嗣星, 叶章群. 再谈尿路结石治疗中需重视的几个关键问题[J]. 中华泌尿外科杂志, 2018, 39(9): 644-646. YANG S X, YE Z Q. Reconsiderations of several key issues in the treatment of urolithiasis[J]. Chinese Journal of Urology, 2018, 39(9): 644-646.
[10]	YANG Z S, LIN D, HONG Y, et al. The effect of preoperative urine culture and bacterial species on infection after percutaneous nephrolithotomy for patients with upper urinary tract stones[J]. Sci Rep, 2022, 12(1): 4833. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-08913-7
[11]	罗钦瑞, 陈洪波. 上尿路结石微创治疗的研究现状及展望[J]. 中外医学研究, 2021, 19(4): 190-193. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YJZY202104070.htm LUO Q R, CHEN H B. Research Status and Prospect on Upper Urinary Calculi by Minimally Invasive Treatment[J]. Chinese and Foreign Medical Research, 2021, 19(4): 190-193. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YJZY202104070.htm
[12]	刘绍辉, 王青杰, 王海, 等. 不同体位下输尿管硬镜对输尿管上段结石患者的疗效及安全性分析[J]. 现代生物医学进展, 2022, 22(8): 1480-1483, 1465. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SWCX202208016.htm LIU S H, WANG Q J, WANG H, et al. Efficacy and Safety Analysis of Rigid Ureteroscope in Different Positions for Patients with Upper Ureteral Calculi[J]. Progress in Modern Biomedicine, 2022, 22(8): 1480-1483, 1465. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SWCX202208016.htm
[13]	孙阳, 刘莹, 巫嘉文, 等. 双重双J管置入联合N-trap网篮对嵌顿性输尿管结石钬激光碎石术后狭窄的预防作用[J]. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2022, 47(9): 1241-1245. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BANG202209022.htm SUN Y, LIU Y, WU J W, et al. Protective effect of two double-J stents placement combined with N-trap stone basket agains postoperative ureteral stricture after ureteroscopic Ho: YAG lithotripsy[J]. Journal of Bengbu Medical College, 2022, 47(9): 1241-1245. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BANG202209022.htm
[14]	平秦榕, 李健, 张宏景, 等. 输尿管软镜治疗中上盏肾结石术后无管化的临床研究[J]. 中华泌尿外科杂志, 2019, 40(2): 100-104. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YLYS202107028.htm PING Q R, LI J, ZHANG H J, et al. Clinical study of flexible ureteroscope with tubeless in the treatment of middle or upper calyx renal calculi[J]. Chinese Journal of Urology, 2019, 40(2): 100-104. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YLYS202107028.htm
[15]	LANG J, GUO Z Z, XING S S, et al. Evaluation of bronchoscopic direct vision glottis anesthesia method in bronchoscopy[J]. World J Clin Cases, 2023, 11(21): 5108-5114. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i21.5108
[16]	蔡昀方, 刘春喜, 刘信毅, 等. 奥施康定联合氟比洛芬酯治疗中重度肿瘤骨转移患者疼痛的临床观察[J]. 中华全科医学, 2020, 18(7): 1122-1124, 1146. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.001444 CAI J F, LIU C X, LIU X Y, et al. Observe on the clinical effect of oxycontin combined with flurbiprofen axetil in the treatment of pain of bone metastasis from moderate to severe tumors[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2020, 18(7): 1122-1124, 1146. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.001444
[17]	CHEN X, CHEN X, YANG Y X, et al. Protective role of the novel cytokine Metrnl/interleukin-41 in host immunity defense during sepsis by promoting macrophage recruitment and modulating Treg/Th17 immune cell balance[J]. Clin Immunol, 2023, 254: 109690. DOI: 10.1016/j.clim.2023.109690.
[18]	牛凯旋, 吴淑璐, 刘成, 等. 血清淀粉样蛋白A和白细胞介素-6对脓毒症诊断及病情严重程度评估的临床价值[J]. 中华全科医学, 2022, 20(9): 1484-1487. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002629 NIU K X, WU S L, LIU C, et al. Clinical value of serum amyloid A and interleukin-6 in the diagnosis and severity evaluation of sepsis[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2022, 20(9): 1484-1487. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002629
[19]	ASTROZA G, CATALÁN M, CONSIGLIERE L, et al. Is a ureteral stent required after use of ureteral access sheath in presented patients who undergo flexible ureteroscopy?[J]. Cent European J Urol, 2017, 70(1): 88-92.
[20]	虞逸松, 章伟, 陈静, 等. 输尿管软镜钬激光碎石术后无管化的可行性临床研究[J]. 全科医学临床与教育, 2023, 21(5): 403-406. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QKYL202305006.htm YU Y S, ZHANG W, CHEN J, et al. Clinical study on the feasibility of tubeless after ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy[J]. Clinical Education of General Practice, 2023, 21(5): 403-406. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QKYL202305006.htm
[21]	赵永录, 张兴盛, 宋广智, 等. 多根双J管置入在输尿管狭窄腔内钬激光切开中的应用体会[J]. 中国微创外科杂志, 2022, 22(6): 467-471. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZWWK202206005.htm ZHAO Y L, ZHANG X S, SONG G Z, et al. Clinical Experience of Multiple Double-J Tubes Placement in Intraluminal Holmium Laser Incision of Ureteral Stricture[J]. Chinese Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery, 2022, 22(6): 467-471. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZWWK202206005.htm