引导式教育训练对青少年1型糖尿病患者自我管理能力的影响

王素; 张丽; 裘金绿

doi:10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.003506

引导式教育训练对青少年1型糖尿病患者自我管理能力的影响

doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.003506

杭州市儿童医院内分泌科，浙江杭州 310005

基金项目:

浙江省中医药科技计划项目 2023ZL125

详细信息

通讯作者:
张丽，E-mail：wszl830115@163.com

中图分类号: R587.1 R163
计量
- 文章访问数: 25
- HTML全文浏览量: 16
- PDF下载量: 4
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2024-02-05
- 网络出版日期: 2024-07-20

Influence of guided education and training on self-management ability of adolescents with type 1 diabetes

Cardiovascular Department of Hangzhou Children' s Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310005, China

摘要

摘要: 目的分析引导式教育训练在青少年1型糖尿病患者中的应用效果，探讨其对患者自我管理能力的影响，为临床青少年1型糖尿病患者自我管理提供新思路。方法选取2021年1月—2023年10月杭州市儿童医院收治的116例青少年1型糖尿病患者，采用随机数字表法将其分为对照组(58例)和观察组(58例)。对照组患者应用常规教育，观察组在对照组基础上应用引导式教育训练。比较2组患者血糖水平、自我管理能力及心理韧性。结果干预后，观察组空腹血糖、餐后2 h血糖及糖化血红蛋白水平分别为(6.65±0.84)mmol/L、(7.58±0.67)mmol/L、(6.50±0.67)%，均低于对照组[(7.12±1.33)mmol/L、(9.66±1.14)mmol/L、(7.82±1.03)%，P<0.05]。干预后，观察组青少年1型糖尿病自我管理量表(SMOD-A)各分量表得分均高于对照组(P<0.05)。干预后，观察组患者青少年糖尿病优势与韧性量表(DSTAR-Teen)总分为(48.90±5.72)分，高于对照组[(36.52±6.46)分，P<0.05]。结论引导式教育训练有利于控制青少年1型糖尿病患者血糖水平，提高自我管理能力及心理韧性，值得推广应用。
- 青少年1型糖尿病 /
- 引导式教育训练 /
- 自我管理能力 /
- 心理韧性
Abstract: Objective To analyze the application effect of guided education and training in adolescents with type 1 diabetes, explore its impact on patients ' self-management ability, and provide new ideas for clinical adolescents with type 1 diabetes in self-management. Methods A total of 116 adolescents with type 1 diabetes who were admitted to Hangzhou Children ' s Hospital from 2021 to October 2023 were selected, and they were randomly divided into control team and by random number table method. The control team received routine education, while the observation team received guided education and training on the basis of the control team. Blood glucose levels, self-management abilities, and psychological resilience of patients were compared between the two teams. Results After the intervention, the fasting blood glucose, 2-hour postprandial blood glucose, and glycated hemoglobin levels in the observation team were (6.65±0.84) mmol/L, (7.58±0.67) mmol/L, and (6.50±0.67)%, respectively, which were lower than those in the control team [(7.12±1.33) mmol/L, (9.66±1.14) mmol/L, and (7.82±1.03)%, respectively], with statistical differences (P<0.05). Furthermore, the scores of self-report measure of self-management of type 1 diabetes for adolescents (SMOD-A) in the observation team were higher than those in the control team (P<0.05). Additionally, the total score of diabetes strengths and resilience measure for adolescents (DSTAR-Teen) in the observation team was (48.90±5.72) scores, higher than that of the control team [(36.52±6.46) scores, P<0.05]. Conclusion Guided education and training is beneficial to control the blood sugar level of adolescents with type 1 diabetes, improve their self-management ability and psychological resilience, and is worth popularizing.
- Adolescents with type 1 diabetes /
- Guided education and training /
- Self management ability /
- Psychological resilience

HTML全文

表 1 2组T1DM患者及家长一般资料比较

Table 1. Comparison of general information between two groups of T1DM patients and their parents

项目	对照组(n=58)	观察组(n=58)	统计量	P值
性别(例)			0.139^a	0.711
男	28	26
女	30	32
年龄(x±s，岁)	13.22±2.13	13.51±1.87	0.779^b	0.437
身高(x±s，cm)	158.72±13.96	158.14±12.17	0.239^b	0.812
体重(x±s，kg)	51.52±6.77	50.98±7.20	0.416^b	0.678
文化程度(例)			0.337^a	0.562
小学	22	19
中学	36	39
病程时间(x±s，月)	6.77±1.54	6.61±1.49	0.569^b	0.571
胰岛素治疗方案(例)			0.439^a	0.803
三速一长	31	30
短中比	23	22
三短一长	4	6
家长年龄(x±s，岁)	40.88±4.65	41.50±4.83	0.704^b	0.483
与患者关系(例)			0.837^a	0.658
父亲	16	20
母亲	35	33
其他	7	5
文化程度(例)			0.685^a	0.408
中学及以下	18	14
大专及以上	40	44
注：^a为χ²值，^b为t值。

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 2组T1DM患者血糖水平比较(x±s)

Table 2. Comparison of blood glucose levels in two groups of T1DM patients (x±s)

组别	例数	FBG(mmol/L)		2hPBG(mmol/L)		HbA1c(%)
组别	例数	干预前	干预后	干预前	干预后	干预前	干预后
对照组	58	10.77±1.86	7.12±1.33	14.28±3.26	9.66±1.14	13.77±1.81	7.82±1.03
观察组	58	11.04±2.25	6.65±0.84	14.65±3.31	7.58±0.67	13.54±1.66	6.50±0.67
统计量		0.704^a	2.486^b	0.607^a	9.731^b	0.713^a	7.973^b
P值		0.483	0.025	0.545	<0.001	0.477	<0.001
注：^a为t值，^b为F值。

下载: 导出CSV

表 3 2组T1DM患者自我管理能力比较(x±s，分)

Table 3. Comparison of self-management abilities in two groups of T1DM patients (x±s, points)

组别	例数	青少年与父母在糖尿病管理上的协作		糖尿病日常照护行为		与糖尿病相关问题的解决		与糖尿病相关的沟通		糖尿病管理目标
组别	例数	干预前	干预后	干预前	干预后	干预前	干预后	干预前	干预后	干预前	干预后
对照组	58	20.11±3.18	23.81±3.38	24.35±3.24	27.42±3.67	14.37±1.61	15.82±2.10	18.72±2.15	20.33±2.44	13.35±1.42	14.78±1.37
观察组	58	20.23±2.96	30.17±3.59	25.18±3.73	33.55±3.86	13.95±1.58	17.52±2.41	18.04±2.44	24.03±2.65	13.42±1.50	16.87±1.54
统计量		0.210^a	7.506^b	1.279^a	6.832^b	1.418^a	3.562^b	1.592^a	7.300^b	0.256^a	5.898^b
P值		0.834	<0.001	0.213	<0.001	0.158	<0.001	0.114	<0.001	0.798	<0.001
注：^a为t值，^b为F值。

下载: 导出CSV

表 4 2组T1DM患者心理韧性比较(x±s，分)

Table 4. Comparison of psychological resilience between two groups of T1DM patients (x±s, points)

组别	例数	寻求帮助		自我照护信心		外部资源		总分
组别	例数	干预前	干预后	干预前	干预后	干预前	干预后	干预前	干预后
对照组	58	10.82±2.11	12.43±2.74	9.64±1.58	12.11±2.30	9.15±1.01	10.67±1.85	31.77±5.11	36.52±6.46
观察组	58	11.36±1.89	15.67±1.06	9.21±1.24	16.78±0.72	8.97±0.83	14.53±2.46	30.89±4.58	48.90±5.72
统计量		1.452^a	7.137^b	1.630^a	11.285^b	1.049^a	7.356^b	0.977^a	8.972^b
P值		0.149	<0.001	0.106	<0.001	0.297	<0.001	0.311	<0.001
注：^a为t值，^b为F值。

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(19)

[1]	李香丽, 王俊秀. 针对性健康教育对儿童1型糖尿病复诊再住院患儿血糖水平及护理满意度的影响分析[J]. 中国药物与临床, 2021, 21(10): 1826-1828. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YWLC202110096.htm LI X L, WANG J X. Analysis of the impact of targeted health education on blood glucose level and nursing satisfaction of children with type 1 diabetes who are re hospitalized[J]. Chinese Remedies and Clinics, 2021, 21(10): 1826-1828. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YWLC202110096.htm
[2]	张然, 金瑞华, 淮盼盼. 基于社会生态系统理论的家庭管理改善1型糖尿病患儿血糖及家庭管理水平的效果[J]. 护理研究, 2021, 35(11): 2001-2005. doi: 10.12102/j.issn.1009-6493.2021.11.027 ZHANG R, JIN R H, HUAI P P. Effect of family management based on social ecosystem theory on improving blood glucose and family management level of children with type 1 diabetes[J]. Nursing Research, 2021, 35(11): 2001-2005. doi: 10.12102/j.issn.1009-6493.2021.11.027
[3]	FORLENZA G P, MCVEAN J, BECK R W, et al. Effect of verapamil on pancreatic beta cell function in newly diagnosed pediatric type 1 diabetes: a randomized clinical trial[J]. JAMA, 2023, 329(12): 990-999. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.2064
[4]	LEE T T M, COLLETT C, BERGFORD S, et al. Automated insulin delivery in women with pregnancy complicated by type 1 diabetes[J]. N Engl J Med, 2023, 389(17): 1566-1578. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2303911
[5]	张玲, 吴浪龙, 康怀鑫, 等. 口部定位疗法联合引导式教育治疗言语语言障碍儿童的疗效观察[J]. 听力学及言语疾病杂志, 2023, 31(1): 26-30. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7299.2023.01.006 ZHANG L, WU L L, KANG H X, et al. Observation of the therapeutic effect of oral localization therapy combined with guided education on children with speech and language disorders[J]. Journal of Audiology and Speech Disorders, 2023, 31(1): 26-30. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7299.2023.01.006
[6]	王燕, 吴利平, 林琴, 等. 以家庭为中心儿童1型糖尿病个案管理照护方案的构建[J]. 中国护理管理, 2020, 20(1): 145-150. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-1756.2020.01.030 WANG Y, WU L P, LIN Q, et al. Construction of family centered case management care program for children with type 1 diabetes[J]. Chinese Nursing Management, 2020, 20(1): 145-150. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-1756.2020.01.030
[7]	赵莎, 马向华, 倪娟. 儿童及青少年2型糖尿病的诊断和治疗[J]. 国际内分泌代谢杂志, 2013, 33(6): 402-405. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4157.2013.06.013 ZHAO S, MA X H, NI J. Diagnosis and treatment of type 2 diabetes in children and adolescents[J]. International Journal of Endocrine Metabolism, 2013, 33(6): 402-405. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4157.2013.06.013
[8]	王燕, 吴利平, 林琴, 等. 以家庭为中心的个案管理在1型糖尿病患儿中的应用研究[J]. 解放军护理杂志, 2021, 38(5): 78-81. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-9993.2021.05.021 WANG Y, WU L P, LIN Q, et al. The application of family centered case management in children with type 1 diabetes[J]. Journal of PLA Nursing, 2021, 38(5): 78-81. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-9993.2021.05.021
[9]	HILLIARD M E, ITURRALDE E, WEISSBERG-BENCHELL J, et al. The diabetes strengths and resilience measure for adolescents with type 1 diabetes (DSTAR-Teen): validation of a new, brief self-report measure[J]. J Pediatr Psychol, 2017, 42(9): 995-1005. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsx086
[10]	WARE J, ALLEN J M, BOUGHTON C K, et al. Randomized trial of closed-loop control in very young children with type 1 diabetes[J]. N Engl J Med, 2022, 386(3): 209-219. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2111673
[11]	CARRERA P, MARZINOTTO I, BONFANTI R, et al. Genetic determinants of type 1 diabetes in individuals with weak evidence of islet autoimmunity at disease onset[J]. Diabetologia, 2023, 66(4): 695-708. doi: 10.1007/s00125-022-05865-5
[12]	史海燕, 雒韵韵, 张超, 等. 引导式教育理念下的作业疗法小组治疗对脑卒中患者康复疗效的观察[J]. 中国康复医学杂志, 2022, 37(11): 1558-1561. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1242.2022.11.019 SHI H Y, LUO Y Y, ZHANG C, et al. Observation of the therapeutic effect of occupational therapy group therapy under the concept of guided education on the rehabilitation of stroke patients[J]. Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 2022, 37(11): 1558-1561. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1242.2022.11.019
[13]	刘晶莲. 引导式健康教育对溃疡性结肠炎患者疾病认知及自我管理能力的影响[J]. 山西医药杂志, 2021, 50(3): 462-463. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-9926.2021.03.049 LIU J L. The impact of guided health education on disease cognition and self-management ability of patients with ulcerative colitis[J]. Shanxi Med J, 2021, 50(3): 462-463. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-9926.2021.03.049
[14]	徐少君, 童毓华, 周梦玲, 等. 基于互动达标理论的延续性护理在糖尿病视网膜病变患者中的应用[J]. 中华全科医学, 2023, 21(3): 526-529. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002923 XU S J, TONG Y H, ZHOU M L, et al. The application of continuous nursing based on the interactive reaching theory in patients with diabetes retinopathy[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2023, 21(3): 526-529. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002923
[15]	彭兴云, 唐流泉. 运动对儿童青少年1型糖尿病患者骨骼的影响[J]. 现代预防医学, 2022, 49(9): 1604-1608, 1663. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XDYF202209014.htm PANG X Y, TANG L Q. Effects of exercise on the bones of children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes[J]. Modern Preventive Medicine, 2022, 49(9): 1604-1608, 1663. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XDYF202209014.htm
[16]	张琰, 王红霞, 席玉红, 等. 基于行为阶段-交谈方式对应的心理引导改善2型糖尿病患者认知水平、心理韧性、健康行为的效果观察[J]. 中国健康心理学杂志, 2022, 30(6): 862-867. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JKXL202206015.htm ZHANG Y, WANG H X, XI Y H, et al. Observation on the effect of psychological guidance based on the corresponding behavior stage conversation mode to improve the cognitive level, psychological resilience and healthy behavior of type 2 diabetes patients[J]. Chinese Journal of Health Psychology, 2022, 30(6): 862-867. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JKXL202206015.htm
[17]	李彤, 张芬, 张会聪, 等. 引导式教育用于脑卒中患者康复训练效果观察[J]. 护理学杂志, 2022, 37(17): 1-4, 17. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HLXZ202217001.htm LI T, ZHANG F, ZHANG H C, et al. Observation of the effect of guided education on rehabilitation training for stroke patients[J]. Journal of Nursing, 2022, 37(17): 1-4, 17. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HLXZ202217001.htm
[18]	杨柳, 王晓云, 闫慧楠. 八段锦联合认知训练对老年糖尿病患者认知衰弱干预的临床研究[J]. 中国全科医学, 2023, 26(23): 2848-2853. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QKYX202323004.htm YANG L, WANG X Y, YAN H N. Clinical research on the intervention of Baduanjin combined cognitive training on cognitive weakness of elderly diabetes patients[J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(23): 2848-2853. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QKYX202323004.htm
[19]	胡国敏, 赵杨, 符雪如, 等. 引导式教育对脑瘫患儿粗大运动功能康复效果的meta分析[J]. 郑州大学学报(医学版), 2023, 58(2): 273-279. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HNYK202302027.htm HU G M, ZHAO Y, FU X R, et al. Meta analysis of the effect of guided education on the rehabilitation of gross motor function in children with cerebral palsy[J]. Journal of Zhengzhou University (Medical Edition), 2023, 58(2): 273-279. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HNYK202302027.htm