AIDET沟通联合体位护理对初次无痛胃镜检查患者焦虑和胃镜检查质量的影响

徐艳; 黄晓林; 庄肇朦

doi:10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.003514

AIDET沟通联合体位护理对初次无痛胃镜检查患者焦虑和胃镜检查质量的影响

doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.003514

徐艳^{1, 2, ,},
黄晓林²,
庄肇朦³

1.
温州市中西医结合医院门诊手术室，浙江温州 325000
2.
温州市中西医结合医院内镜中心
3.
温州市中西医结合医院消化内科

基金项目:

浙江省温州市科研项目 Y20220623

浙江省医药卫生计划项目 2023KY1162

浙江省中医药科技计划项目 2024ZR030

详细信息

通讯作者:
徐艳，E-mail：18969766116@163.com

中图分类号: R573 R473.57
计量
- 文章访问数: 32
- HTML全文浏览量: 13
- PDF下载量: 3
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2024-02-16
- 网络出版日期: 2024-07-20

Effect of AIDET communication complex nursing on anxiety and gastroscopy quality in patients undergoing initial painless gastroscopy

1.
Outpatient Operating Room, Wenzhou Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Wenzhou, Zhejiang 325000, China

摘要

摘要: 目的无痛胃镜检查的广泛开展对临床护理服务提出了更高要求，本研究构建问候-介绍-过程-解释-感谢(AIDET)沟通模式联合体位干预的护理方案，并探讨对初检者的应用效果。方法采用随机数字表法将2021年6月—2023年6月在温州市中西医结合医院拟进行无痛胃镜检查的98例门诊患者分为对照组(49例，传统沟通模式+口服链酶蛋白酶后左侧卧)和试验组(49例，AIDET沟通模式+口服链酶蛋白酶后体位护理)，比较2组干预效果。结果试验组检查日汉密顿焦虑量表(HAMA)评分低于对照组(P＜0.05)；检查配合的意识、体位活动的配合评分均高于对照组(P＜0.05)；胃底的视野清晰度为(2.45±0.46)分、胃体为(2.55±0.41)分、胃窦为(2.67±0.31)分、全胃为(2.65±0.32)分，均高于对照组的(1.96±0.34)分、(2.03±0.34)分、(1.90±0.45)分和(1.97±0.47)分(t=5.996、6.834、9.864、8.372，P＜0.05)；术中冲洗≥1次有6例，少于对照组的15例(χ²=4.909，P＜0.05)；胃镜检查时间为(7.46±2.10)min，短于对照组的(12.89±2.34)min(t=11.354，P＜0.05)。微小病灶检出率为93.88%(46/49)，略高于对照组的85.71%(42/49)，P＞0.05。结论 AIDET沟通联合口服链酶蛋白酶后体位护理的应用可显著改善初次无痛胃镜检查患者焦虑，提高检查配合度和胃镜检查质量和效率。
- 无痛胃镜检查 /
- AIDET沟通模式 /
- 体位护理
Abstract: Objective The extensive development of painless gastroscopy has put forward higher requirements for clinical nursing services. This study constructed a nursing scheme of acknowledge introduce duration explanation and thank you (AIDET) communication mode combined intervention and discussed the application effect on the initial patients. Methods A total of 98 outpatients who planned to undergo painless gastroscopy in Wenzhou Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine from June 2021 to June 2023 were divided into control group (49 cases, traditional communication mode + lying on the left side after oral strepase protease) and experimental group (49 cases, AIDET communication mode+postural care after oral strepase protease) by random number table method. The intervention effect of the two groups was compared. Results The Hamilton anxiety scale (HAMA) score was lower than that of the control group (P < 0.05). The coordination score of awareness and position activity of the examination was higher than that of the control group (P < 0.05). The visual field resolution of the fundus of the stomach (2.45±0.46), the body of the stomach (2.55±0.41), the antrum (2.67±0.31), and the whole stomach (2.65±0.32) were higher than those of control group (1.96±0.34), (2.03±0.34), (1.90±0.45) and (1.97±0.47) score (t=5.996, 6.834, 9.864, 8.372, P < 0.05). Intraoperative irrigation ≥1 time in 6 cases was less than that in the control group in 15 cases (χ²=4.909, P < 0.05). The time of gastroscopy (7.46±2.10 min) was shorter than that of the control group (12.89±2.34 min), t=11.354, P < 0.05. The detection rate of microlesion was 93.88% (46/49), which was slightly higher than that of the control group 85.71% (42/49), P>0.05. Conclusion The application of AIDET communication combined with oral streptase protease postural care can significantly relieve the anxiety of patients undergoing initial painless gastroscopy, and improve the cooperation of the examination and the quality and efficiency of the gastroscopy.
- Painless gastroscopy /
- AIDET communication mode /
- Postural care

HTML全文

表 1 2组无痛胃镜检查患者一般资料比较(n_i=49)

Table 1. Comparison of general information between two groups of patients undergoing painless gastroscopy

资料	对照组	试验组	统计量	P值
男/女(例)	27/22	23/26	0.653^a	0.419
年龄(x±s，岁)	46.78±7.09	47.89±8.24	0.715^b	0.477
BMI(x±s，kg/m²)	22.34±2.19	22.56±3.10	0.406^b	0.686
受教育年限(x±s，年)	13.45±2.14	13.21±3.09	0.447^b	0.656
麻醉分级(ASA)			1.027^a	0.311
I级	24	29
Ⅱ级	25	20
入院时脉搏(次/min)	80.23±7.34	81.56±8.09	0.852^b	0.396
血氧饱和度(%)	98.45±1.01	98.23±1.11	1.026^b	0.307
舒张压(mmHg)	80.45±5.12	81.04±6.24	0.512^b	0.610
收缩压(mmHg)	121.45±7.89	122.63±10.32	0.636^b	0.526
注：^a为χ²值, ^b为t值。

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 2组无痛胃镜检查患者HAMA评分比较(x±s，分)

Table 2. Comparison of HAMA scores in two groups of patients undergoing painless gastroscopy (x±s, points)

组别	例数	预约无痛胃镜检查当日	检查日
对照组	49	13.84±2.55	9.15±1.27^b
试验组	49	14.01±2.45	6.34±1.20^b
统计量		0.337^a	13.567^c
P值		0.737	＜0.001
注：^a为t值，^c为F值；组内比较，^bP＜0.05。

下载: 导出CSV

表 3 2组无痛胃镜检查患者干预后配合度比较(x±s，分)

Table 3. Comparison of patient compliance between two groups undergoing painless gastroscopy after intervention (x±s, points)

组别	例数	检查配合的意识	体位活动的配合
对照组	49	1.01±0.27	1.03±0.37
试验组	49	1.56±0.35	1.77±0.20
t值		8.709	12.316
P值		＜0.001	＜0.001

下载: 导出CSV

表 4 2组无痛胃镜检查患者胃镜视野清晰度比较(x±s，分)

Table 4. Comparison of gastric endoscopic clarity in two groups undergoing painless gastroscopy (x±s, points)

组别	例数	胃底	胃体	胃窦	全胃
对照组	49	1.96±0.34	2.03±0.34	1.90±0.45	1.97±0.47
试验组	49	2.45±0.46	2.55±0.41	2.67±0.31	2.65±0.32
t值		5.996	6.834	9.864	8.372
P值		＜0.001	＜0.001	＜0.001	＜0.001

下载: 导出CSV

表 5 2组无痛胃镜检查患者术中冲洗次数、微小病灶检出率和胃镜检查时间比较

Table 5. Comparison of rinsing frequency, detection rate of small lesions, and examination time during painless gastroscopy between two groups of patients

组别	例数	术中冲洗≥1次[例(%)]	微小病灶检出[处(%)]	胃镜检查时间(x±s，min)
对照组	49	15(30.61)	42(85.71)	12.89±2.34
试验组	49	6(12.24)	46(93.88)	7.46±2.10
统计量		4.909^a	1.782^a	11.354^b
P值		0.027	0.182	＜0.001
注：^a为χ²值, ^b为t值。

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(17)

[1]	齐军, 韩怡, 武静. 胃镜前应用链霉蛋白酶联合常规药物对老年患者胃黏膜微小病变检出率的影响[J]. 中国老年学杂志, 2023, 43(15): 3664-3667. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-9202.2023.15.024 QI J, HAN Y, WU J. Effect of Streptomyces protease combined with conventional drugs before gastroscopy on the detection rate of gastric mucosal minor lesions in elderly patients[J]. Chinese Journal of Gerontology, 2023, 43(15): 3664-3667. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-9202.2023.15.024
[2]	吴小配, 于智慧, 房晓文. 链霉蛋白酶联合不同剂量西甲硅油对电子胃镜检查中视野清晰度及麻醉药用量的影响[J]. 医学临床研究, 2023, 40(2): 245-247, 251. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-7171.2023.02.024 WU X P, YU Z H, FANG X W. Effects of streptomycin combined with different doses of simethicone oil on visual field clarity and anesthetic dosage in electronic gastroscopy[J]. Journal of Clinical Research, 2023, 40(2): 245-247, 251. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-7171.2023.02.024
[3]	蔡丽华, 何利平, 王丽珍. 标准化体位联合胃黏膜祛泡剂对无痛胃镜检查质量的影响[J]. 当代护士(下旬刊), 2022, 29(5): 8-11. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DDHZ202205003.htm CAI L H, HE L P, WANG L Z. Effect of standardized body position combined with gastric mucosal defoamer on the quality of painless gastroscopy[J]. Modern Nurse, 2022, 29(5): 8-11. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DDHZ202205003.htm
[4]	余晓帆, 马志杰, 陈宁. 体位翻转对胃镜检查病人服用黏膜清洁剂后的胃黏膜清洁度的影响[J]. 全科护理, 2023, 21(33): 4707-4709. doi: 10.12104/j.issn.1674-4748.2023.33.024 YU X F, MA Z J, CHEN N. Effect of position turnover on the cleanliness of patients after taking mucosal cleaners on gastroscopy[J]. Chinese General Practice Nursing, 2023, 21(33): 4707-4709. doi: 10.12104/j.issn.1674-4748.2023.33.024
[5]	王海燕, 朱亚珍, 潘友让, 等. 治疗性沟通联合常规护理对阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停综合征患者睡眠质量和心理状况的影响[J]. 中华全科医学, 2023, 21(12): 2160-2164. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.003313 WANG H Y, ZHU Y Z, PAN Y R, et al. The effect of therapeutic communication combined with routine care on sleep quality and psychological status of patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2023, 21(12): 2160-2164. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.003313
[6]	PANCHUAY W, SOONTORN T, SONGWATHANA P. Exploring nurses ' experiences in applying AIDET framework to improve communication skills in the emergency department: a qualitative study[J]. Belitung Nurs J, 2023, 9(5): 464-470. doi: 10.33546/bnj.2789
[7]	KUO C H, SHEU B S, KAO A W, et al. A defoaming agent should be used with pronase premedication to improve visibility in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy[J]. Endoscopy, 2002, 34(7): 531-534. doi: 10.1055/s-2002-33220
[8]	张海斌, 徐勤伟, 陈涛, 等. 链霉蛋白酶与二甲硅油对胃镜检查微小病变检出率影响的比较[J]. 中华消化内镜杂志, 2023, 40(11): 921-924. ZHANG H B, XU Q W, CHEN T, et al. Comparison of effects of streptavidin and dimethylsilicone oil on the detection rate of microscopic lesions under gastroscopy[J]. Chinese Journal of Digestive Endoscopy, 2023, 40(11): 921-924.
[9]	LI Y P, ZHOU Y. Differential dosing of oxycodone in combination with propofol in diagnostic painless gastroscopy in elderly patients: a prospective randomized controlled trial[J]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2022, 101(51): e32427. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000032427.
[10]	罗明华, 余孝君. AIDET沟通模式对前庭性偏头痛患者心理状态、自护能力的影响[J]. 护理实践与研究, 2023, 20(7): 1042-1046. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HLSJ202307017.htm LUO M H, YU X J. Effect of AIDET communication model on the psychological state and self-care ability of vestibular migraine patients[J]. Nursing Practice and Research, 2023, 20(7): 1042-1046. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HLSJ202307017.htm
[11]	YANG H, LUO W, DU X, et al. The implementation and effect evaluation of AIDET standard communication health education mode under the King theory of goal attainment: a randomized control study[J]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2023, 102(48): e36083. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000036083.
[12]	王琼, 李汶雨, 李佩, 等. AIDET沟通模式在复诊脑卒中患者中的应用[J]. 中华现代护理杂志, 2021, 27(1): 103-107. WANG Q, LI W Y, LI P, et al. Application of AIDET communication model in return visit of stroke patients[J]. Chinese Journal of Modern Nursing, 2021, 27(1): 103-107.
[13]	王少平. AIDET沟通模式护理对急性白血病化疗患者心理状态、依从性及行为方式的影响[J]. 国际护理学杂志, 2022, 41(10): 1778-1781. WANG S P. Effect of AIDET communication mode nursing on mental state, compliance and behavior of acute leukemia patients undergoing chemotherapy[J]. International Journal of Nursing, 2022, 41(10): 1778-1781.
[14]	赵校含, 马亚楠, 刘瑞云, 等. AIDET沟通模式在临床护理中的应用研究进展[J]. 护理研究, 2023, 37(6): 1026-1030. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SXHZ202306016.htm ZHAO X H, MA Y N, LIU R Y, et al. Application progress of AIDET communication mode in clinical nursing[J]. Nursing Research, 2023, 37(6): 1026-1030. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SXHZ202306016.htm
[15]	张慧, 庞秋萍, 苏淑芬, 等. 纸巾联合360°水平翻身法在胃镜检查术前准备中的应用[J]. 中国实用护理杂志, 2022, 38(6): 456-460. ZHAO X H, MA Y N, LIU R Y, et al. Application progress of AIDET communication mode in clinical nursing[J]. Chinese Nursing Research, 2022, 38(6): 456-460.
[16]	吴冰冰, 陈泽鑫, 李祥云, 等. 体位干预对胃镜检查中胃内黏膜清晰度影响的网状Meta分析[J]. 护理与康复, 2023, 22(11): 14-23. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HLKF202311003.htm WU B B, CHEN Z X, LI X Y, et al. The effect of posture intervention on intragastric mucosal clarity in gastroscopy: a network meta-analysis[J]. Journal of Nursing and Rehabilitation, 2023, 22(11): 14-23. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HLKF202311003.htm
[17]	陈光毅, 曾培培, 李秀梅, 等. 两种体位活动改善患者胃镜检查效果的比较研究[J]. 护理管理杂志, 2022, 22(4): 285-289. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HLGL202204017.htm CHEN G Y, ZENG P P, LI X M, et al. A comparative study of two postural activities in improving gastroscopy effect of patients[J]. Journal of Nursing Administration, 2022, 22(4): 285-289. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HLGL202204017.htm