基于格林模式的团队合作护理在胆囊手术中的应用效果

姜寒嫣; 吴可人

doi:10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.003527

基于格林模式的团队合作护理在胆囊手术中的应用效果

doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.003527

姜寒嫣^,,
吴可人

浙江中医药大学附属第一医院(浙江省中医院)手术室，浙江杭州 310018

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目 82074195

浙江省医药卫生科技计划项目 2018KY558

详细信息

通讯作者:
姜寒嫣，E-mail：jianghanyan11@126.com

中图分类号: R473.6 R657.4
计量
- 文章访问数: 30
- HTML全文浏览量: 12
- PDF下载量: 2
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2023-07-31
- 网络出版日期: 2024-07-20

Effect of teamwork nursing based on the Green model in gallbladder surgery

JIANG Hanyan^,,
WU Keren

Operating Room, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University (Zhejiang Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinses Medicine), Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310018, China

摘要

摘要: 目的探究格林模式的团队合作护理在胆囊手术中的应用价值，以期为临床胆囊手术护理方案选择提供理论指导。方法纳入浙江中医药大学附属第一医院2021年1月—2023年7月收治的胆囊疾病患者90例，其中8例为胆囊癌患者，所有患者均行胆囊手术治疗。根据随机数字表法将患者分为对照组(45例)与研究组(45例)，分别采用常规护理、常规护理+格林模式的团队合作护理。比较2组护理前后自我护理能力量表(ESCA)评分、营养指标水平[血清白蛋白(ALB)、转铁蛋白(TRF)与血清总蛋白(TSP)]与心理状态评分[焦虑自评量表(SAS)、抑郁自评量表(SDS)]。结果护理前，2组ESCA各维度评分比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)；护理后，2组ESCA各维度评分均较护理前升高(P＜0.05)，且研究组ESCA各维度评分均高于对照组(P＜0.05)。护理前，2组ALB、TSP、TRF比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)；护理后，研究组ALB、TSP、TRF均高于对照组(P＜0.05)。护理前，2组SAS、SDS评分比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)；护理后, 研究组SAS[(20.98±5.27)分]、SDS[(23.67±4.75)分] 低于对照组SAS、SDS[(33.04±6.94)分、(35.35±6.64)分, P＜0.05]。结论格林模式的团队合作护理能提升患者知信行水平，改善患者营养指标水平及负性心理状态，综合应用价值更高，建议临床推广使用。
- 格林模式 /
- 团队合作护理 /
- 胆囊手术 /
- 围手术期
Abstract: Objective To explore the application value of team collaboration nursing based on the Green model in gallbladder surgery, in order to provide theoretical guidance for the selecting clinical nursing plans for clinical gallbladder surgery. Methods A total of 90 patients with gallbladder diseases admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University of Traditional Chinese Medicine from January 2021 to July 2023 were included in the study. Among them, 8 patients were diagnosed with gallbladder cancer, and all patients underwent gallbladder surgery. The patients were randomly divided into a control group (45 cases) and a study group (45 cases) using a random number table method. They received routine nursing in the control group, and routine nursing combined with team cooperation nursing following the Green model in the study group. The exercise of self-care agency scale (ESCA) scores, nutritional index levels serum albumin (ALB), transferrin (TRF), total serum protein (TSP), psychological state scores self-rating anxiety scale (SAS), and self-rating depression scale (SDS), were compared between the two groups before and after nursing. Results Before nursing, there was no statistically significant difference in the ESCA scores in all dimensions between the two groups (P>0.05). After nursing, both groups showed increased ESCA scores in all dimensions compared to before nursing (P<0.05), with the study group demonstrating higher scores than the control group (P<0.05). Before nursing, there was no statistically significant difference in ALB, TSP and TRF between the two groups (P>0.05). After nursing, the ALB, TSP and TRF in the study group were higher than those in the control group (P<0.05). Before nursing, there was no statistically significant difference in SAS and SDS scores between the two groups (P>0.05). After nursing, the study group had lower SAS [(20.98 ±5.27) points] and SDS [(23.67±4.75) points] compared to the control group SAS, SDS [(33.04±6.94) points, (35.35±6.64) points, P<0.05]. Conclusion The team collaboration nursing of the Green model can enhance the patient' s knowledge, belief and practice levels, improve their nutritional index levels and negative psychological states. It possesses significant comprehensive application value and is recommended for clinical promotion.
- Green' s model /
- Teamwork nursing /
- Gallbladder surgery /
- Perioperative period

HTML全文

表 1 2组胆囊疾病患者基线资料比较

Table 1. Comparison of baseline characteristics between two groups of patients with gallbladder diseases

组别	研究组(n=45)	对照组(n=45)	统计量	P值
年龄(x±s，岁)	56.67±5.16	57.68±4.22	1.016^a	0.312
性别[例(%)]
女性	22(48.89)	23(51.11)	0.044^b	0.833
男性	23(51.11)	22(48.89)
BMI(x±s)	24.16±2.07	24.31±2.09	0.342^a	0.733
胆囊疾病类型[例(%)]
胆囊癌	4(8.89)	4(8.89)	0.194^b	0.660
胆囊结石	30(66.67)	28(62.22)
胆囊息肉	11(24.44)	13(28.89)
胆囊癌临床病理分期[例(%)]
Ⅱ期	1(25.00)	0	1.143^b	0.285
Ⅲa期	1(25.00)	2(50.00)
Ⅲb期	1(25.00)	1(25.00)
Ⅳ期	1(25.00)	1(25.00)
注：^a为t值，^b为χ²值。

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 2组胆囊疾病患者护理前后ESCA评分比较(x±s，分)

Table 2. Comparison of ESCA scores before and after nursing care in two groups of patients with gallbladder disease (x±s, points)

组别	例数	自我责任感		t值	P值	自我概念		t值	P值	健康知识		t值	P值	自我护理技能		t值	P值
组别	例数	护理前	护理后	t值	P值	护理前	护理后	t值	P值	护理前	护理后	t值	P值	护理前	护理后	t值	P值
研究组	45	25.43±5.54	40.12±1.93	16.631	＜0.001	22.92±6.51	40.14±1.69	15.034	＜0.001	29.34±7.74	39.47±2.91	11.639	＜0.001	21.01±3.89	39.43±2.24	16.634	＜0.001
对照组	45	25.97±5.62	35.68±1.43	12.089	＜0.001	22.46±6.38	34.61±2.12	13.171	＜0.001	29.47±8.64	34.63±2.16	6.627	＜0.001	21.92±4.02	34.27±2.87	9.631	＜0.001
统计量		0.282^a	21.631^b			0.097^a	13.363^b			0.108^a	9.631^b			0.338^a	10.063^b
P值		0.702	＜0.001			0.857	＜0.001			0.823	＜0.001			0.671	＜0.001
注：^a为t值，^b为F值。

下载: 导出CSV

表 3 2组胆囊疾病患者护理前后营养指标水平比较(x±s，g/L)

Table 3. Comparison of nutritional indicators in two groups of patients with gallbladder disease before and after nursing care (x±s, g/L)

组别	例数	ALB		t值	P值	TSP		t值	P值	TRF		t值	P值
组别	例数	护理前	护理后	t值	P值	护理前	护理后	t值	P值	护理前	护理后	t值	P值
研究组	45	22.63±5.13	35.61±3.68	13.022	＜0.001	41.36±5.63	58.63±6.70	9.634	＜0.001	1.02±0.30	2.49±0.23	10.098	＜0.001
对照组	45	22.46±5.30	33.09±4.21	11.967	＜0.001	41.66±5.27	55.31±6.69	6.634	＜0.001	1.03±0.27	1.93±0.26	9.671	＜0.001
统计量		0.155^a	6.631^b			0.088^a	4.036^b			0.091^a	22.639^b
P值		0.878	＜0.001			0.991	＜0.001			0.987	＜0.001
注：^a为t值，^b为F值。

下载: 导出CSV

表 4 2组胆囊疾病患者护理前后SAS、SDS评分比较(x±s，分)

Table 4. Comparison of SAS and SDS scores before and after nursing care in two groups of patients with gallbladder disease (x±s, points)

组别	例数	SDS		t值	P值	SAS		t值	P值
组别	例数	护理前	护理后	t值	P值	护理前	护理后	t值	P值
研究组	45	51.31±5.34	23.67±4.75	12.634	＜0.001	57.57±6.08	20.98±5.27	17.634	＜0.001
对照组	45	50.87±6.18	35.35±6.64	9.582	＜0.001	58.01±6.57	33.04±6.94	12.034	＜0.001
统计量		0.361^a	16.631^b			0.330^a	14.631^b
P值		0.719	＜0.001			0.742	＜0.001
注：^a为t值，^b为F值。

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(22)

[1]	薄乃超, 李景春. 以护理结局为导向的多学科合作延续护理在胆囊癌根治手术患者中的应用效果[J]. 中国肿瘤临床与康复, 2019, 26(8): 1008-1011. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGZK201908049.htm BAO N C, LI J C. Nursing outcome oriented multi-disciplinary cooperation continuing nursing by in patients undergoing radical operation for gallbladder cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Oncology and Rehabilitation, 2019, 26(8): 1008-1011. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGZK201908049.htm
[2]	TAN Z J, LI M L, WU W G, et al. NLK is a key regulator of proliferation and migration in gallbladder carcinoma cells[J]. Mol Cell Biochem, 2012, 369(1-2): 27-33. doi: 10.1007/s11010-012-1365-0
[3]	陈铁炯, 郑军. 腹腔镜联合胆道镜与传统开腹手术治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石临床对比分析[J]. 中华全科医学, 2018, 16(2): 226-228. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.000063 CHEN T J, ZHENG J. Clinical comparative analysis of laparoscopic combined choledochoscope and traditional open surgery in the treatment of cholecystolithiasis complicated with choledocholithiasis[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2018, 16(2): 226-228. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.000063
[4]	白鸿菲. 优质护理活动在腔镜下胆囊癌根治术围手术期护理中的应用价值探讨[J]. 中国医药指南, 2020, 18(9): 220-221. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YYXK202009172.htm BAI H F. Exploring the application value of quality nursing activity in perioperative nursing of radical gallbladder cancer[J]. Chinese Medicine Guide, 2020, 18(9): 220-221. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YYXK202009172.htm
[5]	毛雅楠. 以格林模式为理论基础预防手术室护士血源性职业暴露的价值[J]. 国际护理学杂志, 2020, 39(10): 1743-1746. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn221370-20190222-00539 MAO Y N. The value of preventing blood-borne occupational exposure in operating room nurses based on the Green model[J]. International Journal of Nursing, 2020, 39(10): 1743-1746. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn221370-20190222-00539
[6]	黄玉琪, 王晓辉. 格林模式的健康教育在糖尿病患者术后留置导尿管并发尿路感染护理中的应用[J]. 护理实践与研究, 2021, 18(24): 3729-3732. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9676.2021.24.024 HUANG Y Q, WANG X H. Application of Green model health education in the nursing care of urinary tract infection after indwelling urinary catheter in diabetic patients[J]. Nursing Practice and Research, 2021, 18(24): 3729-3732. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9676.2021.24.024
[7]	邱小丹, 王乐洁, 张敏, 等. 基于格林模式的手术烟雾干预策略在手术室医护人员中的应用效果[J]. 中华全科医学, 2022, 20(11): 1960-1964. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002746 QIU X D, WANG L J, CHANG M, et al. Effect of surgical smoke intervention strategy based on Green model on medical staff in operating room[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2022, 20(11): 1960-1964. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002746
[8]	中华医学会外科学分会胆道外科学组. 胆囊癌诊断和治疗指南(2015版)[J]. 临床肝胆病杂志, 2016, 14(11): 411-419. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LCGD201603004.htm Biliary Surgery Group, Surgery Branch of Chinese Medical Association. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of gall bladder cancer (2015 edition)[J]. Journal of Clinical Hepatobiliary Diseases, 2016, 14(11): 411-419. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LCGD201603004.htm
[9]	王月宾, 许禄云, 杨林顺, 等. 自我护理能力实施量表中文版在精神分裂症患者中的信效度[J]. 临床精神医学杂志, 2014, 24(2): 104-107. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LCJS201402013.htm WANG Y B, XU L Y, YANG L S, et al. Reliability and validity of Chinese version of the exercise of self-care agency scale in schizophrenia patients[J]. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 2014, 24(2): 104-107. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LCJS201402013.htm
[10]	孙振晓, 刘化学, 焦林瑛, 等. 医院焦虑抑郁量表的信度及效度研究[J]. 中华临床医师杂志: 电子版, 2017, 11(2): 198-201. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0785.2017.02.005 SUN Z X, LIU H X, JIAO L Y, et al. Reliability and validity of hospital anxiety and depression scale[J]. Reliability and validity of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, 2017, 11(2): 198-201. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0785.2017.02.005
[11]	DI M D, AMIRA O, AYE M, et al. TP6.2.7 Routine examination of gallbladder specimens after cholecystectomy: a single-centre analysis of the incidence, clinical and histopathological aspects of incidental gallbladder carcinoma[J]. BJS, 2021, 108(Supplement_7): 137-141.
[12]	RAMEZANI M, SADAFI S, BAYAT M, et al. Adenocarcinoma of gall bladder, imitator in clinical manifestations, radiological and histopathological findings[J]. AJMCR, 2021, 9(12): 683-685. doi: 10.12691/ajmcr-9-12-5
[13]	赵文艳, 李沛璠. 优质护理活动在腔镜下胆囊癌根治术围手术期护理中的应用效果[J]. 贵州医药, 2019, 43(12): 1981-1983. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-744X.2019.12.067 CHAO W Y, LI P F. The effect of quality nursing activity in perioperative care for radical gallbladder cancer[J]. Guizhou Medical Journal, 2019, 43(12): 1981-1983. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-744X.2019.12.067
[14]	沈旻静, 孙琳, 丁玉珍, 等. 基于格林模式的智能延续护理在改善直肠癌预防性肠造口患者生活质量中的价值[J]. 安徽医学, 2023, 44(4): 469-473. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0399.2023.04.023 SHEN W J, SUN L, DING Y Z, et al. The value of intelligent continuation care based on the Green model in improving the quality of life of patients with rectal cancer preventive enterstomy[J]. Anhui Medical Journal, 2023, 44(4): 469-473. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0399.2023.04.023
[15]	唐音, 李平. 多学科团队协作的手术流程优化在腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者中应用[J]. 辽宁医学杂志, 2023, 37(1): 66-68. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LNYX202301024.htm TANG Y, LI P. Application of multidisciplinary team collaboration in the optimization of surgical procedures in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy[J]. Medical Journal of Liaoning, 2023, 37(1): 66-68. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LNYX202301024.htm
[16]	曹昕昕. 格林护理模式对冠状动脉支架植入术后健康促进行为及心脏康复的影响[J]. 临床与病理杂志, 2021, 41(9): 2119-2124. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-WYSB202109024.htm CAO X X. Effect of Green nursing model on health promotion behavior and cardiac rehabilitation after coronary stent implantation[J]. Journal of Clinical and Pathological Research, 2021, 41(9): 2119-2124. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-WYSB202109024.htm
[17]	LEE J M, KANG S, KIM B W, et al. The effect of adjuvant radiotherapy in patients undergoing complete resection for gallbladder cancer with lymph node metastasis[J]. KJH-B-PS, 2021, 15(1): 35-41.
[18]	郑甜甜, 李丽. 以干预结果为导向的多学科延续模式在胆囊癌根治术患者中的应用效果[J]. 癌症进展, 2022, 20(15): 1555-1558. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-AZJZ202215005.htm ZHENG T T, LI L. Application effect of intervention result-oriented multidisciplinary continuation model in patients after radical cholecystectomy[J]. Cancer Progression, 2022, 20(15): 1555-1558. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-AZJZ202215005.htm
[19]	王敏, 李亚楠, 李亚东, 等. 格林健康促进模式对青光眼手术患者健康认知、遵医行为及并发症发生率的影响[J]. 国际护理学杂志, 2021, 40(9): 1603-1605. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn221370-20190729-00466 WANG M, LI Y N, LI Y D, et al. Effects of Green's health promotion model on health cognition, compliance behavior and complication rate of patients undergoing glaucoma surgery[J]. International Journal of Nursing, 2021, 40(9): 1603-1605. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn221370-20190729-00466
[20]	李琳, 崔雪鹏, 马兴东. 手术室护理人员应用格林模式干预后护理人员对于电外科烟雾的认知及防护情况变化[J]. 中国保健营养, 2021, 31(23): 191. LI L, CUI X P, MA X D. Changes of awareness and protection of electrosurgical smoke after Green mode intervention by operating room nurses[J]. China Health Care & Nutrition, 2021, 31(23): 191.
[21]	张鹏娟, 崔大鹏, 张星月, 等. 快速康复外科学护理联合延续性护理对胆囊癌患者预后及CA125蛋白、miR-196a的影响[J]. 河北医药, 2021, 43(5): 784-787. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-7386.2021.05.035 ZHENG P J, CUI D P, ZHENG X Y, et al. Effects of rapid rehabilitation surgical nursing on CA125 protein, miR-196a and the prognosis of patients with gallbladder cancer[J]. Hebei Medical Journal, 2021, 43(5): 784-787. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-7386.2021.05.035
[22]	王海霞, 郭东旭, 王玉华. 加速康复外科理念联合多学科团队合作在腰椎间盘突出症患者围术期护理中的应用[J]. 齐鲁护理杂志, 2021, 27(8): 126-128. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7256.2021.08.050 WANG H X, GUO D X, WANG Y H. Application of accelerated rehabilitation surgery concept combined with multidisciplinary team cooperation in perioperative nursing of patients with lumbar disc herniation[J]. Journal of Qilu Nursing, 2021, 27(8): 126-128. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7256.2021.08.050