Evaluation of the effect of a new intelligent management model in community follow-up management of patients with atrial fibrillation
-
摘要:
目的 探讨对心房颤动(简称“房颤”)患者开展基于互联网+医联体的新型智慧化管理模式的建设,分析其对社区房颤患者的管理效果,科学规范管理房颤患者。 方法 于花木社区卫生服务中心选取2021年5月—2022年5月“仁济-花木”房颤医联体现有房颤患者60例为研究对象,采用随机数字法分为对照组和观察组各30例,对照组进行常规随访管理,观察组在常规随访基础上增加智慧化随访管理。比较2组不良事件发生率,采用房颤患者生活质量量表(AFEQT)、医院焦虑抑郁自评量表(HADs,包括焦虑评分A值、抑郁评分D值)、Morisky服药依从性量表(MMAS-8)对管理效果进行评价。 结果 随访12个月时,观察组与对照组AFEQT评分(Z=-2.972)、HADs评分(ZA值=-5.255,ZD值=-5.105)、MMAS-8评分(Z=-5.353)比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。2组缺血性卒中/短暂性脑缺血发作率、小出血事件发生率、心血管原因住院或二三级医院就诊率、术后复发率差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。 结论 新型智慧化管理模式有利于改善房颤患者生活质量,提高用药依从性,减少焦虑抑郁。 Abstract:Objective To explore the construction of a new intelligent management model based on the Internet + medical combination for patients with atrial fibrillation, analyze its management effect on community patients with atrial fibrillation, and scientifically and standardized management of patients with atrial fibrillation. Methods In Huamu Community Health Service Center, 60 patients with atrial fibrillation in Renji-Huamu Medical Union from May 2021 to May 2022 were selected as the research objects, and 30 patients were divided into control group and observation group by random number method. Routine follow-up management was performed in the control group, and intelligent follow-up management was added to the observation group based on routine follow-up. The incidence of adverse events was compared between the two groups. The management effect was evaluated by the atrial fibrillation effect on quality-of-life (AFEQT), the hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADs, including anxiety score A and depression score D), and the Morisky medication adherence scale-8 (MMAS-8). Results After 12 months of follow-up, AFEQT score (Z=-2.972), HADs score (ZA value=-5.255, ZD value=-5.105) and MMAS-8 score (Z=-5.353) between the two groups were statistically significant (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the rates of ischemic stroke/transient ischemic attack, small bleeding events, hospitalization for cardiovascular reasons or visits to secondary or tertiary hospitals, and postoperative recurrence rates between the two groups (P>0.05). Conclusion The new intelligent management model is beneficial for improving the quality of life of atrial fibrillation patients, enhancing medication compliance, and reducing anxiety and depression. -
表 1 2组房颤患者基线资料比较[例(%)]
Table 1. Comparison of baseline data of patients with atrial fibrillation between the two groups[cases (%)]
项目 对照组(n=30) 观察组(n=30) 统计量 P值 项目 对照组(n=30) 观察组(n=30) 统计量 P值 性别 < 0.001a 0.999 CHA2DS2-VASc评分 5.694b 0.458 男性 15(50.0) 15(50.0) 0分 1(3.3) 0 女性 15(50.0) 15(50.0) 1分 2(6.7) 4(13.3) 文化程度 2.705b 0.608 2分 3(10.0) 6(20.0) 文盲 4(13.3) 2(6.7) 3分 9(30.0) 5(16.7) 小学 4(13.3) 7(23.3) 4分 8(26.7) 7(23.3) 初中 6(20.0) 9(30.0) 5分 4(13.3) 7(23.3) 高中 6(20.0) 5(16.7) 6分 3(10.0) 1(3.3) 大学及以上 10(33.3) 7(23.3) HAS-BLED评分 0.357b 0.837 房颤类型 3.082a 0.544 0分 1(3.3) 2(6.7) 首诊房颤 0 2(6.7) 1分 22(73.3) 21(70.0) 阵发性房颤 10(33.3) 11(36.7) 2分 7(23.3) 7(23.3) 持续性房颤 3(10.0) 1(3.3) 血脂 长程持续性房颤 15(50.0) 14(46.7) 正常 29(96.7) 27(90.0) 1.071a 0.301 永久性房颤 2(6.7) 2(6.7) 异常 1(3.3) 3(10.0) 房颤病程 2.497b 0.476 血糖 0.351a 0.554 ≤1年 4(13.3) 8(26.7) 正常 29(96.7) 28(93.3) 2~5年 14(46.7) 9(30.0) 异常 1(3.3) 2(6.7) 6~10年 6(20.0) 7(23.3) 血肌酐 3.158a 0.076 10年以上 6(20.0) 6(20.0) 正常 30(100.0) 27(90.0) 是否消融 0.300a 0.584 异常 0 3(10.0) 无 19(63.3) 21(70.0) 肝功能 0.351a 0.554 有 11(36.7) 9(30.0) 正常 28(93.3) 29(96.7) 若消融,消融情况 0.087a 0.769 异常 2(6.7) 1(3.3) 首次消融 8(72.7) 6(66.7) 尿酸 0.162a 0.688 重复消融 3(27.3) 3(33.3) 正常 27(90.0) 26(86.7) EHRA症状评分 8.723b 0.033 异常 3(10.0) 4(13.3) 1级 11(36.7) 7(23.3) 心房钠尿肽 0.162a 0.688 2a级 8(26.7) 8(26.7) 正常 26(86.7) 27(90.0) 2b级 5(16.7) 14(46.7) 异常 4(13.3) 3(10.0) 3级 6(20.0) 1(3.3) 注:a为χ2值,b为Z值。 表 2 2组房颤患者生活质量评分、焦虑抑郁评分、依从性评分比较[M(P25, P75), 分]
Table 2. Quality of life scores, anxiety and depression scores, and compliance scores of patients with atrial fibrillation in two groups[M(P25, P75), points]
组别 例数 第0个月评分 生活质量评分 焦虑抑郁评分A 焦虑抑郁评分D 依从性评分 观察组 30 55.50(48.25, 65.00) 4.00(3.00, 5.00) 3.00(1.00, 4.25) 5.00(4.00, 6.00) 对照组 30 57.00(47.75, 66.25) 4.00(3.00, 6.00) 4.00(2.00, 5.25) 4.38(4.00, 5.00) Z值 -0.489 -0.600 -1.890 -2.110 P值 0.625 0.548 0.059 0.035 组别 例数 第6个月评分 生活质量评分 焦虑抑郁评分A 焦虑抑郁评分D 依从性评分 观察组 30 61.00(47.75, 78.00) 2.00(2.00, 4.00) 1.50(0.00, 3.00) 7.00(7.00, 8.00) 对照组 30 62.00(52.75, 70.25) 6.50(4.50, 8.00) 5.00(3.75, 7.00) 7.00(6.00, 7.90) Z值 -0.436 -3.953 -4.685 -4.167 P值 0.662 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 组别 例数 第12个月评分 生活质量评分 焦虑抑郁评分A 焦虑抑郁评分D 依从性评分 观察组 30 70.00(55.00, 78.50) 2.00(1.00, 3.00) 3.00(1.50, 4.00) 7.00(7.00, 8.00) 对照组 30 58.00(50.00, 66.25) 7.00(4.00, 9.00) 7.00(5.00, 9.90) 5.38(4.75, 6.00) Z值 -2.972 -5.255 -5.105 -5.353 P值 0.003 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 表 3 2组房颤患者不良事件发生率比较[例(%)]
Table 3. Comparison of incidence of adverse events between the two groups[cases (%)]
组别 例数 缺血卒中/TIA 小出血事件 心血管原因住院或二三级医院就诊 术后复发 对照组 30 2(6.7) 7(23.3) 8(26.7) 8(26.7) 观察组 30 1(3.3) 1(3.3) 5(16.7) 2(6.7) χ2值 < 0.001 3.606 0.884 3.000 P值 0.999 0.058 0.532 0.083 -
[1] SHI S B, TANG Y H, ZHAO Q Y, et al. Prevalence and risk of atrial fibrillation in China: a national cross-sectional epidemiological study[J]. Lancet Reg Health West Pac, 2022, 23(4): 100439. DOI: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2022.100439. [2] 马丽媛, 王增武, 樊静, 等. 《中国心血管健康与疾病报告2021》概要[J]. 中国介入心脏病学杂志, 2022, 30(7): 481-496. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-8812.2022.07.001MA L Y, WANG Z W, FAN J, et al. Summary of China cardiovascular health and disease report 2021[J]. Cin J Intervent Cardiol, 2022, 30(7): 481-496. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-8812.2022.07.001 [3] SANG S W, CHU C, ZHANG T C, et al. The global burden of disease attributable to ambient fine particulate matter in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019[J]. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf, 2022, 238(52): 113588. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2022.113588. [4] 刘露, 刘晓宇. 全科医生在心房颤动综合管理中的作用[J]. 中华全科医学, 2021, 19(9): 1553-1556. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002110LIU L, LIU X Y. Role of general practitioners in the integrated management of atrial fibrillation[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2021, 19(9): 1553-1556. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002110 [5] 黄柳. 规范系统联动房颤分级诊疗出技术方案[J]. 中国医院院长, 2019(22): 23-25. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YYYZ201922017.htmHUANG L. Standardized system linkage atrial fibrillation classification diagnosis and treatment technology[J]. China Hospital CEO, 2019(22): 23-25. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YYYZ201922017.htm [6] 茹雪颖, 朱兰, 潘志刚, 等. 我国基层医疗心房颤动抗凝管理的现状与展望[J]. 中华全科医师杂志, 2022, 21(11): 1095-1100. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn114798-20220516-00499LU X Y, LI X R, YU J B, et al. Primary care for atrial fibrillation patients with anticoagulation therapy in China: status quo and future perspective[J]. Chin J Gen Pract, 2022, 21(11): 1095-1100. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn114798-20220516-00499 [7] 俞娅娅, 李小荣, 余金波, 等. 心房颤动综合管理ABC方案[J]. 中国心脏起搏与心电生理杂志, 2020, 34(1): 7-10. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGXZ202001004.htmYU Y Y, LI X R, YU J B, et al. ABC scheme for the integrated management of atrial fibrillation[J]. Chinese Journal of Cardiac Pacing and Electrophysiology, 2020, 34(1): 7-10. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGXZ202001004.htm [8] 林春忠, 赵亮, 王朝昕, 等. 基于数据挖掘的县级医院房颤患者抗凝治疗现状及影响因素研究[J]. 中华全科医学, 2021, 19(11): 1951-1955. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002209LIN C Z, ZHAO L, WANG C X, et al. Current situation and influencing factors of anticoagulant therapy for patients with atrial fibrillation in county hospitals based on data mining[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2021, 19(11): 1951-1955. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002209 [9] CHUNG M K, ECKHARDT L L, CHEN L Y, et al. Lifestyle and risk factor modification for reduction of atrial fibrillation: a scientific statement from the american heart association[J]. Circulation, 2020, 141(16): e750-e772. [10] 沈慧, 李峥, 王新华, 等. 基于互联网+医联体平台的社区心房颤动智慧化管理新模式[J]. 中华全科医师杂志, 2021, 20(10): 1100-1104. https://xuewen.cnki.net/CCND-RMZX202404190023.htmlSHEN H, LI Z, WANG X H, et al. A plateform for management of atrial fibrillation based on internet and medical concortium[J]. Chin J Gen Pract, 2021, 20(10): 1100-1104. https://xuewen.cnki.net/CCND-RMZX202404190023.html [11] 周鹏, 李剑. 远程心电监测对于心房颤动筛查与监测的应用[J]. 中国心脏起搏与心电生理杂志, 2019, 33(4): 295-297. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGXZ201904002.htmZHOU P, LI J. Application of remote ECG monitoring in screening and monitoring of atrial fibrillation[J]. Chinese Journal of Cardiac Pacing and Electrophysiology, 2019, 33(4): 295-297. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGXZ201904002.htm [12] 张尹红, 张小红, 戴喜花, 等. 穿戴式心电监测在房颤术后患者微信随访中的应用[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2019, 35(16): 2654-2657. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYZ201916033.htmZHANG Y H, ZHANG X H, DAI X H, et al. The application of WeChat-based integrated health management platform with wearable ECG monitor in follow-up of patients after atrial fibrillation[J]. The Journal of Practical Medicine, 2019, 35(16): 2654-2657. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYZ201916033.htm [13] INFELD M, WAHLBERG K, CICERO J, et al. Effect of personalized accelerated pacing on quality of life, physical activity, and atrial fibrillation in patients with preclinical and overt heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: the myPACE randomized clinical trial[J]. JAMA Cardiol, 2023, 8(3): 213-221. [14] 胡光玲, 乔昕悦, 张林虹, 等. 心房颤动患者睡眠质量与生活质量的相关性分析[J]. 中华全科医学, 2021, 19(1): 24-26, 41. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.001720HU G L, QIAO X Y, ZHANG L H, et al. Correlation analysis of sleep quality and life quality in patients with atrial fibrillation[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2021, 19(1): 24-26, 41. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.001720 [15] 杨静. 患者教育和体育锻炼对阵发性或持续性房颤患者生活质量和运动能力的影响[J]. 黑龙江中医药, 2021, 50(5): 159-160. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HLZY202105118.htmYANG J. Effects of patient education and physical exercise on quality of life and exercise capacity in patients with paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation[J]. Heilongjiang Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 2021, 50(5): 159-160. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HLZY202105118.htm [16] VOLGMAN A S, NAIR G, LYUBAROVA R, et al. Management of atrial fibrillation in patients 75 years and older: JACC state-of-the-art review[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2022, 79(2): 166-179. [17] LANGHEIM E. Rehabilitation for atrial fibrillation: impact on arrhythmia and cumulative risk factors[J]. Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol, 2023, 34(1): 33-38. [18] 刘梅颜, 陶淑慧, 任学群. 心房颤动合并抑郁药物治疗新认识[J]. 中华医学杂志, 2021, 101(9): 679-682.LIU M Y, TAO S H, REN X Q. New understanding of drug therapy for atrial fibrillation combined with depression[J]. Natl Med J China, 2021, 101(9): 679-682. [19] 马继芳, 宋卫锋, 陈珂, 等. 典型心房扑动患者行三尖瓣峡部消融术后新发心房颤动的危险因素分析[J]. 中华实用诊断与治疗杂志, 2023, 37(10): 1036-1041. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HNZD202310014.htmMA J F, SONG W F, CHEN K, et al. Risk factors of newly-onset atrial fibrillation in patients with typical atrial flutter after cavotricuspid isthmus ablation[J]. J Chin Pract Diagn Ther, 2023, 37(10): 1036-1041. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HNZD202310014.htm [20] 莫雁飞, 黄磊. 华法林在心房颤动患者中的应用研究[J]. 现代医药卫生, 2022, 38(9): 1567-1570. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XYWS202209033.htmMO Y F, HUANG L. Application of warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation[J]. J Mod Med Health, 2022, 38(9): 1567-1570. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XYWS202209033.htm [21] 郭雪原, 王震, 李思彤, 等. 心房颤动患者及家属焦虑的相关因素分析[J]. 中华医学杂志, 2023, 103(28): 2151-2156.GUO X Y, WANG Z, LI S T, et al. Analysis of related factors of anxiety in patients with atrial fibrillation and their families[J]. Natl Med J China, 2023, 103(28): 2151-2156. [22] KASSAVOU A, A' COURT C E, CHAUHAN J, et al. Assessing the acceptability of a text messaging service and smartphone app to support patient adherence to medications prescribed for high blood pressure: a pilot study[J]. Pilot Feasibility Stud, 2020, 6(11): 134. -
下载: