留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

MRI-DWI-IVIM多参数成像对浸润性乳腺癌新辅助化疗后浸润淋巴细胞水平的预测价值

边桂风 李晓东 贺松 张斌 李娇娇

边桂风, 李晓东, 贺松, 张斌, 李娇娇. MRI-DWI-IVIM多参数成像对浸润性乳腺癌新辅助化疗后浸润淋巴细胞水平的预测价值[J]. 中华全科医学, 2024, 22(10): 1746-1749. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.003725
引用本文: 边桂风, 李晓东, 贺松, 张斌, 李娇娇. MRI-DWI-IVIM多参数成像对浸润性乳腺癌新辅助化疗后浸润淋巴细胞水平的预测价值[J]. 中华全科医学, 2024, 22(10): 1746-1749. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.003725
BIAN Guifeng, LI Xiaodong, HE Song, ZHANG Bin, LI Jiaojiao. The predictive value of MRI-DWI-IVIM multiparameter imaging in tumor infiltrating lymphocyte levels after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for invasive breast cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2024, 22(10): 1746-1749. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.003725
Citation: BIAN Guifeng, LI Xiaodong, HE Song, ZHANG Bin, LI Jiaojiao. The predictive value of MRI-DWI-IVIM multiparameter imaging in tumor infiltrating lymphocyte levels after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for invasive breast cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2024, 22(10): 1746-1749. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.003725

MRI-DWI-IVIM多参数成像对浸润性乳腺癌新辅助化疗后浸润淋巴细胞水平的预测价值

doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.003725
基金项目: 

河北省医学科学研究课题 20210136

详细信息
    通讯作者:

    李晓东,E-mail: 949438679@qq.com

  • 中图分类号: R445 R737.9

The predictive value of MRI-DWI-IVIM multiparameter imaging in tumor infiltrating lymphocyte levels after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for invasive breast cancer

  • 摘要:   目的   探究浸润性乳腺癌新辅助化疗中采用磁共振(MRI)-扩散加权成像(DWI)-体素内不相干运动(IVIM)多参数成像对患者治疗后浸润淋巴细胞(TILs)水平的预测价值。   方法   选择2021年12月—2022年12月河北北方学院附属第一医院收治的140例浸润性乳腺癌患者作为研究对象,均行MRI-DWI-IVIM检查,患者给予新辅助化疗,治疗后评估TILs。分析MRI-DWI-IVIM多参数成像对TILs水平的预测价值。   结果   治疗后患者TILs阳性率(80.71%)显著高于治疗前(63.57%,χ2=10.236,P<0.05);TILs阳性与TILs阴性患者边界、T2WI信号、DWI信号比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);TILs阳性患者伪扩散系数(D*)低于TILs阴性,而单纯扩散系数(D)、微血管内容量分数(f)等参数高于TILs阴性(P<0.05);ROC曲线显示,边界、T2WI信号、DWI信号、D*、D、f预测TILs水平的AUC分别为0.640、0.610、0.640、0.866、0.720、0.674,各指标联合预测的AUC为0.948。   结论   浸润性乳腺癌新辅助化疗后TILs水平上升,采用MRI-DWI-IVIM多参数成像可以评估患者化疗后TILs水平,各指标联合可以提高对于TILs水平的预测价值。

     

  • 图  1  MRI-DWI-IVIM多参数成像预测TILs水平的ROC曲线

    Figure  1.  ROC curves for predicting TILs levels with MRI-DWI-IVIM multiparametric imaging

    表  1  治疗后不同TILs水平浸润性乳腺癌患者MRI表现比较

    Table  1.   Comparison of MRI findings in patients with invasive breast cancer with different TILs levels after treatment

    组别 例数 肿瘤最大直径
    (x±s, cm)
    肿瘤形状 边界[例(%)] T2WI信号强度[例(%)] T2WI信号均匀度[例(%)]
    圆形或者卵圆形 不规则 光滑 粗糙 较高 稍高 等信号 不均匀 均匀
    TILs阳性 113 2.12±0.52 29(25.66) 84(74.34) 37(32.74) 76(67.26) 14(13.59) 64(62.14) 25(24.27) 68(60.18) 45(39.82)
    TILs阴性 27 2.26±0.49 5(18.52) 22(81.48) 2(7.41) 25(92.59) 6(22.22) 18(66.67) 3(11.11) 23(85.19) 4(14.81)
    统计量 1.270a 0.605b 6.961b 2.826b 5.991b
    P 0.506 0.437 0.008 0.244 0.014
    注:at值,b为χ2值。
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  治疗后不同TILs水平浸润性乳腺癌患者DWI表现比较

    Table  2.   Comparison of DWI performance in invasive breast cancer patients with different TILs levels after treatment

    组别 例数 DWI信号[例(%)] ADC值(x±s,×10-3mm2)
    低信号 等信号 高信号 b=500 s/mm2 b=1 000 s/mm2
    TILs阳性 113 20(17.70) 72(63.72) 21(18.58) 1.02±0.23 0.88±0.15
    TILs阴性 27 3(11.11) 10(37.04) 14(51.85) 1.04±0.19 0.89±0.14
    统计量 12.872a 0.419b 0.315b
    P <0.001 0.676 0.753
    注:a为χ2值,bt值。
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  3  治疗后不同TILs水平浸润性乳腺癌患者IVIM表现比较(x±s)

    Table  3.   Comparison of IVIM performance in invasive breast cancer patients with different TILs levels after treatment(x±s)

    组别 例数 D*
    (×10-3mm2/s)
    D
    (×10-3mm2/s)
    f(%)
    TILs阳性 113 3.16±0.92 1.17±0.26 59.26±13.51
    TILs阴性 27 5.53±1.67 0.97±0.24 51.09±15.24
    t 4.512 5.663 7.214
    P <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  4  MRI-DWI-IVIM多参数成像对TILs水平的预测价值分析

    Table  4.   Predictive value of MRI-DWI-IVIM multi-parameter imaging on TILs level

    项目 截断值 AUC 95% CI 灵敏度(%) 特异度(%) P
    边界 0.640 0.535~0.745 32.71 92.89 0.022
    T2WI信号均匀度 0.610 0.500~0.720 39.83 82.07 0.073
    DWI信号 0.640 0.513~0.767 81.37 50.72 0.022
    D* 4.62 ×10-3mm2/s 0.866 0.790~0.942 78.67 82.06 <0.001
    D 1.06 ×10-3mm2/s 0.720 0.624~0.815 50.36 85.66 <0.001
    f 56.00% 0.674 0.558~0.790 86.67 46.37 0.004
    各指标联合 0.948 0.898~0.999 91.17 89.28 <0.001
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] TAURIN S, ALKHALIFA H. Breast cancers, mammary stem cells, and cancer stem cells, characteristics, and hypotheses[J]. Neoplasia, 2020, 22(12): 663-678. doi: 10.1016/j.neo.2020.09.009
    [2] CHEN W, WEI W, YU L, et al. Mammary development and breast cancer: a notch perspective[J]. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia, 2021, 26(3): 309-320. doi: 10.1007/s10911-021-09496-1
    [3] IWAMOTO T, KAJIWARA Y, ZHU Y, et al. Biomarkers of neoadjuvant/adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer[J]. Chin Clin Oncol, 2020, 9(3): 27-38. doi: 10.21037/cco.2020.01.06
    [4] FERNANDES I, SCORSATO A, KALIKS R, et al. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in HER2-Low breast cancer[J]. Clin Breast Cancer, 2023, 23(7): 470-479. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2023.07.007
    [5] SU GH, XIAO Y, JIANG L, et al. Radiomics features for assessing tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes correlate with molecular traits of triple-negative breast cancer[J]. J Transl Med, 2022, 20(1): 471-483. doi: 10.1186/s12967-022-03688-x
    [6] 韩佳雯, 苏婷婷, 徐元兵, 等. 肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞在三阴性乳腺癌新辅助化疗预测价值中的研究进展[J]. 中国肿瘤临床, 2023, 50(19): 1011-1016. doi: 10.12354/j.issn.1000-8179.2023.20230567

    HAN J W, SU T T, XU Y B, et al. Research progress of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes in predicting the efficacy of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy for triple negative breast cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2023, 50(19): 1011-1016. doi: 10.12354/j.issn.1000-8179.2023.20230567
    [7] 李崇, 杨勇, 徐成春, 等. DCE-MRI在乳腺良性病变与乳腺癌诊断中的应用价值[J]. 保健医学研究与实践, 2024, 21(3): 82-88.

    LI C, YANG Y, XU C C, et al. The value of DCE-MRI in the diagnosis of benign breast lesions and breast cancer[J]. Health Medicine Research and Practice, 2024, 21(3): 82-88.
    [8] DIECI M V, RADOSEVIC-ROBIN N, FINEBERG S, et al. Update on tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in breast cancer, including recommendations to assess TILs in residual disease after neoadjuvant therapy and in carcinoma in situ: a report of the International Immuno-Oncology Biomarker Working Group on Breast Cancer[J]. Semin Cancer Biol, 2018, 52(Pt 2): 16-25.
    [9] CHEN Y, KLINGEN T A, AAS H, et al. CD47 and CD68 expression in breast cancer is associated with tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, blood vessel invasion, detection mode, and prognosis[J]. J Pathol Clin Res, 2023, 9(3): 151-164. doi: 10.1002/cjp2.309
    [10] 王希梅, 蒲倩, 耿文文, 等. 肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞比例与乳腺癌临床病理特征和预后的关系[J]. 中国现代普通外科进展, 2022, 25(10): 782-785, 789.

    WANG XM, PU Q, GENG WW, et al. Relationship between tumor infiltrating lymphocytes and clinicopathological features and prognosis in patients with breast cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Current Advances in General Surgery, 2022, 25(10): 782-785, 789.
    [11] 贺松, 李娇娇, 张斌, 等. 分析NAC治疗乳腺癌的MRI成像变化及其参数对预测浸润性乳腺癌TILs水平的效能[J]. 中国CT和MRI杂志, 2023, 21(7): 87-89, 92.

    HE S, LI JJ, ZHANG B, et al. To Analyze the MRI Changes of NAC in Breast Cancer Treatment and the Efficacy of Its Parameters in Predicting TILs Level in Invasive Breast Cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of CT and MRI, 2023, 21(7): 87-89, 92.
    [12] 陈翠, 金叶, 王琳, 等. 30例乳腺化生性癌的多种影像学对比分析[J]. 上海交通大学学报(医学版), 2022, 42(1): 70-76.

    CHEN C, JIN Y, WANG L, et al. Comparative analysis of 30 cases of metaplastic carcinoma of the breast[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University(Medical Science), 2022, 42(1): 70-76.
    [13] 康锋, 代凤霞. 乳腺癌组织中孕激素受体、人表皮生长因子受体-2检测联合动态增强磁共振成像对乳腺癌术后复发时间的预测价值[J]. 陕西医学杂志, 2022, 51(11): 1437-1440, 1452.

    KANG F, DAI F X. Prediction value of progesterone receptor and human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 detection combined with dynamic enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for postoperative recurrence of breast cancer[J]. Shaanxi Medical Journal, 2022, 51(11): 1437-1440, 1452.
    [14] KANG H S, KIM J Y, KIM J J, et al. Diffusion kurtosis MR imaging of invasive breast cancer: correlations with prognostic factors and molecular subtypes[J]. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2022, 56(1): 110-120. doi: 10.1002/jmri.27999
    [15] 孟庆涛, 李军, 蒋会东, 等. VI-RADS联合IVIM序列在膀胱癌肌层侵犯评估中的价值[J]. 中华全科医学, 2022, 20(12): 2096-2100. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002778

    MENG QT, LI J, JIANG HD, et al. Value of vesical imaging reporting and data system combined with intravoxel incoherent motion sequences in the evaluation of muscle invasion in bladder cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2022, 20(12): 2096-2100. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002778
    [16] HONDA M, IIMA M, KATAOKA M, et al. Biomarkers predictive of distant disease-free survival derived from diffusion-weighted imaging of breast cancer[J]. Magn Reson Med Sci, 2023, 22(4): 469-476.
    [17] LIU Y, LUO H, WANG C, et al. Diagnostic performance of T2-weighted imaging and intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted MRI for predicting metastatic axillary lymph nodes in T1 and T2 stage breast cancer[J]. Acta Radiol, 2022, 63(4): 447-457.
    [18] JIN Y N, ZHANG Y, CHENG J L, et al. The role of histogram analysis in diffusion-weighted imaging in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant breast lesions[J]. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak, 2020, 20(1): 239-249.
    [19] 蒋伟, 邓虹, 张翔, 等. 体素内不相干运动扩散加权成像在乳腺癌腋窝转移性小淋巴结中的研究价值[J]. 磁共振成像, 2023, 14(9): 70-75, 80.

    JIANG W, DENG H, ZHANG X, et al. Clinical value of intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging in the diagnosis of small metastatic axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 2023, 14(9): 70-75, 80.
  • 加载中
图(1) / 表(4)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  17
  • HTML全文浏览量:  10
  • PDF下载量:  2
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2024-02-03
  • 网络出版日期:  2024-12-28

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回