Study on the prognostic value of PAR combined with NRS 2002 in elderly patients with pulmonary infection under the combined mode of medical care and nursing
-
摘要:
目的 分析医养结合模式下肺部感染老年人的危险因素,探讨降钙素原与白蛋白比值联合营养状态对其预后的影响,以便于早期干预,减少不良预后的发生。 方法 回顾性分析2017年4月—2021年8月山东大学第二医院医养结合机构内146例肺部感染老年人的临床资料,根据发病后28 d预后将老年人分为生存组(99例)和死亡组(47例)。采用logistic回归分析研究影响肺部感染老年人28 d预后的相关因素,绘制ROC曲线分析相关因素对预后的预测价值。 结果 死亡组降钙素原与白蛋白比值(PAR)及营养风险筛查(NRS 2002)显著高于生存组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。PAR(OR=1.938, 95% CI: 1.033~3.638)、NRS 2002(OR=2.443,95% CI: 1.280~4.663), 均为肺部感染老年人28 d预后的独立影响因素。PAR、NRS 2002预测肺部感染老年人预后的ROC曲线下面积分别为0.719、0.613,PAR最佳截断点为0.031,灵敏度为46.8%,特异度为87.9%,NRS 2002最佳截断点为5.5分,灵敏度为74.5%,特异度为47.5%,两者联合预测的AUC为0.732,灵敏度为61.7%,特异度为83.7%,优于单一指标的预测能力。 结论 PCT、ALB及PAR、NRS 2002均可预测肺部感染老年人的病情严重程度,其中PAR与NRS 2002均为肺部感染老年人28 d预后的独立影响因素,且二者联合预测预后具有较高的临床价值。 -
关键词:
- 医养结合模式 /
- 肺部感染 /
- 老年 /
- 营养风险筛查 /
- 降钙素原与白蛋白比值
Abstract:Objective To analyze the risk factors of pulmonary infection in the elderly under the combined mode of medical and nursing care, and explore the influence of the ratio of procalcitonin to albumin combined with nutritional status on the prognosis of the elderly, so as to facilitate early intervention and reduce the occurrence of adverse prognosis. Methods The clinical data of 146 elderly patients with pulmonary infection from April 2017 to August 2021 in the Second Hospital of Shandong University were retrospectively analyzed. The elderly were divided into survival group (n=99) and death group (n=47) according to their prognosis at 28 days. SPSS 22.0 statistical software was used for data analysis. Logistics regression analysis was performed on the related factors affecting the prognosis of the elderly with pulmonary infection at 28 d, and an ROC curve was drawn to analyze the predictive value of the related factors on the prognosis. Results Procalcitonin to albumin ratio (PAR) and nutritional risk screening 2002 (NRS 2002) in the death group were significantly higher than those in the survival group (P < 0.05). PAR (OR=1.938, 95% CI: 1.033-3.638), NRS 2002 (OR=2.443, 95% CI: 1.280-4.663) were independent influencing factors affecting the prognosis of lung infection at 28 days. The area under the ROC curve for PAR and NRS 2002 to predict the prognosis of elderly patients with pulmonary infection were 0.719 and 0.613, respectively. PAR ' s optimal cut-off point was 0.031, with a sensitivity of 46.8% and a specificity of 87.9%, and NRS 2002 ' s optimal cut-off point was 5.5, with a sensitivity of 74.5% and a specificity of 47.5%. The combined AUC was 0.732, the sensitivity was 61.7%, and the specificity was 83.7%, which was better than the prediction ability of a single index. Conclusion PCT, ALB, PAR, and NRS 2002 can predict the severity of lung infection in the elderly. PAR and NRS 2002 are independent risk factors for the prognosis of the elderly with lung infection at 28 days, and their combination has high clinical value in predicting the prognosis. -
表 1 2组肺部感染老年人基线资料比较
Table 1. Comparison of baseline data between the two groups of elderly patients with pulmonary infection
项目 死亡组(n=47) 生存组(n=99) 统计量 P值 年龄(x ±s, 岁) 83.53±6.19 82.31±7.81 0.939a 0.349 性别(男/女, 例) 21/26 72/27 10.841b 0.001 既往疾病史[例(%)] 冠心病 38(26.03) 62(42.46) 4.905b 0.027 糖尿病 15(10.27) 40(27.40) 0.978b 0.323 高血压 32(21.92) 61(41.78) 0.577b 0.448 脑血管病 37(25.34) 85(58.22) 1.181b 0.277 自主咳嗽[例(%)] 22(15.07) 65(44.52) 4.702b 0.030 吸烟史[例(%)] 6(4.11) 29(19.86) 4.776b 0.029 白细胞计数[M(P25, P75), ×109/L] 9.44(6.47, 16.51) 9.05(6.55, 13.36) 143.709c 0.985 中性粒细胞计数[M(P25, P75), ×109/L] 8.05(4.88, 14.36) 7.71(4.74, 11.01) 136.074c 0.802 血小板计数[M(P25, P75), ×109/L] 233.00(154.00, 318.00) 195.50(129.50, 286.50) 126.912c 0.021 血红蛋白(x ±s, g/L) 96.94±24.11 94.33±24.51 0.603a 0.548 D-二聚体[M(P25, P75), mg/L] 3.70(2.06, 6.42) 2.20(1.49, 3.77) 129.203c 0.007 肌酐[M(P25, P75), μmol/L] 56.00(35.00, 88.00) 55.00(40.00, 75.00) 79.955c 0.277 C反应蛋白[M(P25, P75), mg/mL] 64.97(21.69, 126.09) 63.71(20.90, 118.10) 141.419c 0.196 降钙素原[M(P25, P75), ng/mL] 0.77(0.31, 1.76) 0.35(0.16, 0.69) 126.148c 0.001 白蛋白(x ±s, g/L) 28.47±4.46 30.92±4.58 3.038a 0.003 PAR[M(P25, P75)] 0.02(0.01, 0.07) 0.01(0.01, 0.02) 146.000c 0.001 NRS 2002(x ±s, 分) 5.87±0.61 5.53±0.86 2.480a 0.014 注:a为t值,b为χ2值,c为Z值。 表 2 变量赋值情况
Table 2. Variable assignment
变量 赋值方法 性别 女性=1,男性=0 冠心病 有=1,无=0 自主咳嗽 有=1,无=0 吸烟史 有=1,无=0 28 d预后 死亡=1,生存=0 表 3 肺部感染老年人28 d预后的多因素logistic回归分析
Table 3. Multivariate logistic regression analysis of 28-day prognosis in elderly patients with pulmonary infection
变量 B SE Waldχ2 P值 OR(95% CI) NRS 2002 0.893 0.330 7.342 0.007 2.443(1.280~4.663) PLT 0.007 0.002 8.449 0.001 1.007(1.003~1.011) PAR 0.662 0.321 4.243 0.039 1.938(1.033~3.638) 表 4 PAR、NRS 2002及两者联合对肺部感染老年人预后的预测价值
Table 4. Prognostic value of PAR, NRS2002, and their combination in elderly patients with pulmonary infection
项目 AUC 95% CI P值 临界值 灵敏度(%) 特异度(%) 约登指数 PAR 0.719 0.629~0.809 < 0.001 0.031 46.8 87.9 0.347 NRS 2002 0.613 0.521~0.706 0.027 5.5 74.5 47.5 0.220 PAR+NRS 2002 0.732 0.647~0.817 < 0.001 61.7 83.7 0.354 -
[1] 国家统计局, 国务院第七次全国人口普查领导小组办公室. 第七次全国人口普查公报(第五号)-人口年龄构成情况[J]. 中国统计, 2021(5): 10-11.National Bureau of Statistics, Office of the Seventh National Census Leading Group of The State Council. Bulletin of the seventh national population census (No. 5): age composition of the population[J]. China Statistics, 2021(5): 10-11. [2] 胡筱蕾, 王皓翔, 王家骥. 新形势下以全科医学理念为基础的老年人群医养结合的思考[J]. 中华全科医学, 2020, 18(11): 1797-1800, 1896. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.001622HU X L, WANG H X, WANG J J. Thoughts on the combination of medicine and nursing for the elderly based on the concept of general practice in the new situation[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2020, 18(11): 1797-1800, 1896. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.001622 [3] 中华医学会呼吸病学分会. 中国成人社区获得性肺炎诊断和治疗指南(2016年版)[J]. 中华结核和呼吸杂志, 2016, 39(4): 253-279.Chinese Medical Association Respiratory Branch. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of community-acquired pneumonia in adults in China (2016 edition)[J]. Chinese Journal of Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases, 2016, 39(4): 253-279. [4] 季金芳, 孟海艳, 施金梅, 等. 血清CRP、PCT和乳酸对老年肺部感染患者预后的临床价值[J]. 中华医院感染学杂志, 2020, 30(17): 2628-2631.JI J F, MENG H Y, SHI J M, et al. Clinical value of serum CRP, PCT and lactic acid in diagnosis of prognosis of elderly patients with pulmonary infection[J]. Chinese Journal of Nosocomiology, 2020, 30(17): 2628-2631. [5] 贺丽玲, 温继兰, 马天龙, 等. 血清降钙素原与白蛋白比值联合序贯器官衰竭评估对脓毒症患者预后的预测价值[J]. 中华老年多器官疾病杂志, 2021, 20(11): 844-847. doi: 10.11915/j.issn.1671-5403.2021.11.176HE L L, WEN J L, MA T L, et al. Prognostic value of serum procalcitonin/a lbumin ratio combined with sequential organ failure assessment in septic patients[J]. Chinese Journal of Multiple Organ Diseases in the Elderly, 2021, 20(11): 844-847. doi: 10.11915/j.issn.1671-5403.2021.11.176 [6] 王小燕, 李胜彦. 血液细菌培养联合降钙素原检测对菌血症的诊断价值[J]. 贵州医药, 2022, 46(1): 136-137.WANG X Y, LI S Y. Diagnostic value of blood bacterial culture combined with procalcitonin detection in bacteremia[J]. Guizhou Medical Journal, 2022, 46(1): 136-137. [7] 王玉, 黄栋, 梁宗安. 降钙素原与白蛋白比值对急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者预后的预测价值[J]. 中国呼吸与危重监护杂志, 2020, 19(3): 240-245.WANG Y, HUANG D, LIANG Z A. Procalcitonin-to-albumin ratio as a prognostic marker in acute respiratory distress syndrome patients: a retrospective cohort study[J]. Chinese Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 2020, 19(3): 240-245. [8] 马丽娜, 吉彤, 李海龙, 等. 老年人营养不良多学科决策模式中国专家共识(2023)[J]. 中国临床保健杂志, 2023, 26(4): 433-445.MA L N, JI T, LI H L, et al. Chinese expert consensus on multidisciplinary decision models for the elderly with malnutrition (2023)[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Healthcare, 2023, 26(4): 433-445. [9] 程炜凌, 王磊, 林乐清. 重症肺部感染患者血清相关指标水平变化及意义[J]. 中华全科医学, 2020, 18(11): 1838-1841. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.001632CHENG W L, WANG L, LIN L Q. Changes and significance of related serum indices levels in patients with severe pulmonary infection[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2020, 18(11): 1838-1841. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.001632 [10] 赵晓秋, 陶赟臻, 刘晓倩, 等. PCT及CRP联合序贯器官衰竭评分在肺部感染致脓毒症老年患者治疗中的应用价值[J]. 河北医药, 2020, 42(17): 2671-2673.ZHAO X Q, TAO Y Z, LIU X Q, et al. Clinical application of procalcitonin and C-reactive protein combined with sequential organ failure score in elderly patients with sepsis caused by pulmonary infection[J]. Hebei Medical Journal, 2020, 42(17): 2671-2673. [11] 黄红铭, 陈旭, 陈良春. 重症肺炎血清脑钠肽、降钙素原、C反应蛋白水平与病情变化的关系及其在临床预后中的价值[J]. 实用医院临床杂志, 2022, 19(2): 140-143.HUANG H M, CHEN X, CHEN L C. The levels of serum brain natriuretic peptide, procalcitonin and C-reactive protein in severe pneumonia and their relationship with disease changes and their value in clinical prognosis[J]. Practical Journal of Clinical Medicine, 2022, 19(2): 140-143. [12] WU C Y, HU H Y, HUANG N, et al. Albumin levels and cause-specific mortality in community-dwelling older adults[J]. Prev Med, 2018, 112: 145-151. [13] HOEBOER S H, OUDEMANS-VAN STRAATEN H M, GROENEVELD A B. Albumin rather than C-reactive protein may be valuable in predicting and monitoring the severity and course of acute respiratory distress syndrome in critically ill patients with or at risk for the syndrome after new onset fever[J]. BMC Pulm Med, 2015, 15: 22. DOI: 10.1186/s12890-015-0015-1. [14] AMAN J, VAN DER HEIJDEN M, VAN LINGEN A, et al. Plasma protein levels are markers of pulmonary vascular permeability and degree of lung injury in critically ill patients with or at risk for acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome[J]. Crit Care Med, 2011, 39(1): 89-97. [15] ZHAO Y, XIA W, LU Y, et al. Predictive value of the C-reactive protein/albumin ratio in severity and prognosis of acute pancreatitis[J]. Front Surg, 2023, 9: 1026604. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1026604. [16] LUO X, YANG X, LI J, et al. The procalcitonin/albumin ratio as an early diagnostic predictor in discriminating urosepsis from patients with febrile urinary tract infection[J]. Medicine(Baltimore), 2018, 97(28): e11078. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000011078. [17] DENG S, GAO J, ZHAO Z, et al. Albumin/procalcitonin ratio is a sensitive early marker of nosocomial blood stream infection in patients with intra-cerebral hemorrhage[J]. Surg Infect(Larchmt), 2019, 20(8): 643-649. [18] ZHANG X, ZHANG X, ZHU Y, et al. Predictive value of nutritional risk screening 2002 and mini nutritional assessment short form in mortality in Chinese hospitalized geriatric patients[J]. Clin Interv Aging, 2020, 15: 441-449. [19] 郁阿翠, 陈喜, 杨萌娜, 等. 老年人营养不良状况及影响因素分析[J]. 实用老年医学, 2022, 36(8): 822-826, 832.YU A C, CHEN X, YANG M N, et al. Nutrition status and the risk factors in the elderly[J]. Practical Geriatrics, 2022, 36(8): 822-826, 832. [20] MATHESON E M, NELSON J L, BAGGS G E, et al. Specialized oral nutritional supplement (ONS) improves handgrip strength in hospitalized, malnourished older patients with cardiovascular and pulmonary disease: a randomized clinical trial[J]. Clin Nutr, 2021, 40(3): 844-849. [21] MIAO J P, QUAN X Q, ZHANG C T, et al. Comparison of two malnutrition risk screening tools with nutritional biochemical parameters, BMI and length of stay in Chinese geriatric inpatients: a multicenter, cross-sectional study[J]. BMJ Open, 2019, 9(2): e022993. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022993. [22] CUI J, WAN Q, WU X, et al. Nutritional risk screening 2002 as a predictor of outcome during general ward-based noninvasive ventilation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with respiratory failure[J]. Med Sci Monit, 2015, 21: 2786-2793. [23] NORMAN K, HAB U, PIRLICH M. Malnutrition in older adults-recent advances and remaining challenges[J]. Nutrients, 2021, 13(8): 2764. DOI: 10.3390/nu13082764. [24] 李月茹, 赵晓秋, 严晓妹. 基于老年综合评估的康复方案对老年肺部感染患者社会功能及心理状态的影响[J]. 河北医药, 2022, 44(22): 3458-3461.LI Y R, ZHAO X Q, YAN X M. Effects of rehabilitation scheme based on comprehensive evaluation on the social function and psychological state of elderly patients with pulmonary infection[J]. Hebei Medical Journal, 2022, 44(22): 3458-3461. [25] 亢凤兵, 白娜娜, 窦微微, 等. 早期束集化肺康复干预策略在老年重症肺部感染患者中的应用价值[J]. 中外医学研究, 2023, 21(16): 177-181.KANG F B, BAI N N, DOU W W, et al. Application value of early bunching pulmonary rehabilitation intervention strategy in elderly patients with severe pulmonary infection[J]. Chinese and Foreign Medical Research, 2023, 21(16): 177-181.