留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

社区居民与全科医生对家庭医生签约服务的选择偏好

程连 张勇 李媛媛 黄燕飞 李卿慧

程连, 张勇, 李媛媛, 黄燕飞, 李卿慧. 社区居民与全科医生对家庭医生签约服务的选择偏好[J]. 中华全科医学, 2024, 22(12): 2084-2087. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.003803
引用本文: 程连, 张勇, 李媛媛, 黄燕飞, 李卿慧. 社区居民与全科医生对家庭医生签约服务的选择偏好[J]. 中华全科医学, 2024, 22(12): 2084-2087. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.003803
CHENG Lian, ZHANG Yong, LI Yuanyuan, HUANG Yanfei, LI Qinghui. The choice preferences of community residents and general practitioners for the selection of family doctor contracted services[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2024, 22(12): 2084-2087. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.003803
Citation: CHENG Lian, ZHANG Yong, LI Yuanyuan, HUANG Yanfei, LI Qinghui. The choice preferences of community residents and general practitioners for the selection of family doctor contracted services[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2024, 22(12): 2084-2087. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.003803

社区居民与全科医生对家庭医生签约服务的选择偏好

doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.003803
基金项目: 

宁夏回族自治区重点研发计划重大专项 2021BEG01001

详细信息
    通讯作者:

    黄燕飞,E-mail: lovelylily820327@163.com

  • 中图分类号: R499 R197.61

The choice preferences of community residents and general practitioners for the selection of family doctor contracted services

  • 摘要: 家庭医生签约服务是落实医改政策的体现,是现阶段基层服务的主要模式,是实现健康中国的重要抓手。旨以全科医生为核心,家庭医生团队为支柱,通过签约的方式,促使全科医生与签约居民或家庭建立一种长期、稳定的服务关系,为签约者提供全方位、高质量、便捷化的健康服务,打造家门口的健康服务体系,实现全生命周期的健康管理。尽管家庭医生签约服务总体签约率、知晓率、履约率逐年上升,但由于存在很大的经济、社会、文化、政治等地域差异性,我国部分地区仍处于低知晓率、低签约率、低履约率,另外,由于社区居民与全科医生在家庭医生签约服务中选择偏好的不匹配,导致供需双方对签约服务满意度不高,这可能是目前“为签而签”“签而不约”“伪签约”“服务项目无法落实”等现象的主要原因之一,严重影响服务质量。为更好落实家庭医生签约服务、提高签约服务质量,本文综合分析了社区居民与全科医生对家庭医生签约服务选择偏好的相关研究,探讨了影响供需双方家庭医生签约服务的潜在因素,并提出了相应提升其质量与数量的策略。主要从供需双方的不同视角提供家庭医生签约服务的偏好依据,为进一步推进有效签约及规范履约、提升签约双方满意度、强化签约服务内涵提供参考,以促进家庭医生签约服务高质量发展。

     

  • 表  1  全科医生对家庭医生签约服务供给偏好的研究

    Table  1.   Studies on the general practitioners ' preferences for the supply of family doctor contracted services

    发表年份 第一作者 国家/地区 研究对象 样本量 抽样方法 研究方法 偏好排序(高-低)
    2012 CARLSEN B[7] 挪威 全科医生 571 随机抽样 DCE 治疗效果-医疗总成本-考虑患者偏好
    2016 BERCHI C[8] 法国 全科医生 106 方便抽样 DCE 患者医疗费用成本-治疗效果-风险评估-患者接受程度
    2020 张晗[9] 武汉市研口区 全科医生 411 随机抽样 DCE 中西医结合-预期疗效-患者信任度-纳入医保-提高收入
    2019 MOHEBBIFAR R[10] 伊朗 全科医生 150 随机抽样 DCE 与医务委员会签约-分配医学专业课程入学名额-人头支付+15%奖金
    2016 RIISE J[11] 苏格兰/英国/挪威 全科医生 1 127 随机抽样 DCE 患者选择偏好-医疗成本-收入情况
    注:DCE为离散选择实验(discrete choice experiment)。
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  社区居民对家庭医生签约服务偏好的研究

    Table  2.   Studies on the community residents ' preferences for family doctor contracted services

    发表年份(年) 第一作者 国家/地区 研究对象 样本量(n) 抽样方法 偏好排序(高-低)
    2020 贺焜[12-13] 北京、上海、杭州、厦门 各区(市)社区居民 400 方便抽样 慢性病长处方-面对面健康咨询-疾病治疗-上门服务、预约专家号-用药指导-健康管理及免费健康体检
    2012 刘登[14] 上海市闸北区 社区居民 300 多阶段抽样 常见病、慢性病的诊疗-健康咨询-慢性病管理及预约服务
    2019 ZHU J R[16] 浙江省杭州 社区居民 704 方便抽样 药品供应可及性-减少等待时间-提供专家优先就诊权-增加医疗保险报销额
    2015 RYAN M[17] 英格兰 社区居民 1 706 方便抽样 签约服务连续性及电话咨询服务-上门服务-全科医生执业时间
    2008 CHERAGHI-SOHI S[21] 英国 家庭诊所 1 193 方便抽样 服务可及性-预约灵活性-连续性-技术质量-沟通能力
    2013 MENGONI A[22] 意大利 社区居民 6 970 方便抽样 获得更多信息-参与决策-就诊等待时间
    2022 WANG C L[23] 安徽省 社区居民 545 方便抽样 家医的能力和态度-年度合同成本费(低)-服务包选项
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] 吴姝德, 刘智勇, 洪阳, 等. 我国全科医生制度试点中签约服务包比较研究[J]. 中国卫生经济, 2014, 33(11): 5-7.

    WU Z D, LIU Z Y, HONG Y, et al. Comparison study on pilot service package of general practice contracted servicein China[J]. Chinese Health Economics, 2014, 33(11): 5-7.
    [2] 国家卫生健康委财政部人力资源社会保障部国家医保局国家中医药局国家疾控局关于推进家庭医生签约服务高质量发展的指导意见[EB/OL]. (2022-03-15)[2024-01-15]. http://www.nhc.gov.cn/jws/s7882/202203/060ecf9a84af443aa349d447c4dfdd31.shtml.

    National Health Commission, Ministry of Finance, Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security, et al. Guiding opinions on promoting high-quality development of contracted services for family doctors[EB/OL]. (2022-03-15)[2024-01-15]. http://www.nhc.gov.cn/jws/s7882/202203/060ecf9a84af443aa349d447c4dfdd31.shtml.
    [3] 龚静. 我国家庭医生签约服务模式研究[D]. 合肥: 安徽医科大学, 2018.

    GONG J. Study on the contract service models of family doctor in China[D]. Hefei: Anhui Medical University, 2018.
    [4] LI L L, HE X T, ZHANG C H. The impact of public policy of family doctor contracting on medical expenses from the perspective of residents at community level in China[J]. Front Psychol, 2023, 13: 972904. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.972904.
    [5] 季晖. 基于倾向性评分的"1+1+1"医疗机构组合签约效果研究[J]. 中华全科医学, 2023, 21(3): 449-453. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002905

    JI H. Effect of contracting contracts of "1+1+1" medical institutions based on propensity core[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2023, 21(3): 449-453. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002905
    [6] 张晓俊, 鲍勇. 上海市社区就诊人群"1+1+1"医疗机构组合签约现况及影响因素研究[J]. 中华全科医学, 2018, 16(8): 1227-1230, 1382. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.000337

    ZHANG X J, BAO Y. Current status of "1+1+1" medical institution combination signing project and its influencing factors among the outpatients of community health care center in Shanghai[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2018, 16(8): 1227-1230, 1382. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.000337
    [7] CARLSEN B, HOLE A R, KOLSTAD J R, et al. When you can ' t have the cake and eat it too: a study of medical doctors ' priorities in complex choice situations[J]. Soc Sci Med, 2012, 75(11): 1964-1973. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.08.005
    [8] BERCHI C, DEGIEUX P, HALHOL H, et al. Impact of falling reimbursement rates on physician preferences regarding drug therapy for osteoarthritis using a discrete choice experiment[J]. Int J Pharm Pract, 2016, 24(2): 114-122. doi: 10.1111/ijpp.12220
    [9] 张晗. 基层全科医生服务提供偏好及影响因素分析[D]. 武汉: 华中科技大学, 2019.

    ZHANG H. Analysis general practitioners ' provide preferences and influencing facto[D]. Wuhan: Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 2019.
    [10] MOHEBBIFAR R, AKBARIRAD F, RANJBAR M, et al. What do Iranian general practitioners expect from family physician contracts?[J]. Fam Med Community Health, 2019, 7(3): e000038. DOI: 10.1136/fmch-2018-000038.
    [11] RIISE J, HOLE A R, GYRD-HANSEN D, et al. GPs ' implicit prioritization through clinical choices-evidence from three national health services[J]. J Health Econ, 2016, 49: 169-183. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2016.07.001
    [12] 贺焜, 方海. 中国居民对家庭医生签约服务内容的偏好研究: 基于离散选择实验[J]. 中国卫生政策研究, 2020, 13(2): 61-66.

    HE K, FANG H. Research on Chinese residents ' preference to family doctors ' contrsct services: discrete choice experiment[J]. Chinese Journal of Health Policy, 2020, 13(2): 61-66.
    [13] 贺焜, 方海. 慢性病患病情况对居民选择家庭医生服务内容的影响[J]. 中国卫生经济, 2020, 39(8): 54-57.

    HE K, FANG H. The impact of health status on residents ' taste of services for family doctors[J]. Chinese Health, 2020, 39(8): 54-57.
    [14] 刘登, 曹海涛, 潘毅慧, 等. 上海市闸北区居民对家庭医生服务需求的调查研究[J]. 中国全科医学, 2012, 15(10): 1148-1150.

    LIU D, CAO H T, PAN Y H, et al. Demends for family physician service among community residents in Zhabei district[J]. Chinese General Practice, 2012, 15(10): 1148-1150.
    [15] LV B, CUI C S, FENG X M, et al. What factors affect Beijing residents ' contracts with family doctors? A comparative study of Beijing ' s urban and suburban areas[J]. Front Public Health, 2023, 11: 1159592. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1159592.
    [16] ZHU J R, LI J L, ZHANG Z B, et al. Patients ' choice and preference for common disease diagnosis and diabetes care: a discrete choice experiment[J]. Int J Health Plann Manage, 2019, 34(4): e1544-e1555.
    [17] RYAN M, BATE A, EASTMOND C J, et al. Use of discrete choice experiments to elicit preferences[J]. Qual Health Care, 2001, 10 Suppl 1(Suppl 1): i55-i60.
    [18] WANG C, YAN S J, JIANG H, et al. Residents ' willingness to maintain contracts with family doctors: a cross sectional study in China[J]. J Gen Intern Med, 2021, 36(3): 622-631. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06306-y
    [19] 常海明, 陈静静, 彭迎春. 京郊山区家庭医生签约服务区级与内部考核结果的差异分析[J]. 中华全科医学, 2019, 17(3): 341-344. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.000677

    CHANG H M, CHEN J J, PENG Y C. Difference analysis of higher-level and internal assessment of family doctors ' contracted services in community health service institutions in suburban areas of Beijing[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2019, 17(3): 341-344. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.000677
    [20] 王荣英, 张金佳, 贺振银, 等. 医务人员对家庭医生签约服务的认知情况调查[J]. 中华全科医学, 2018, 16(1): 94-96, 138. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.000027

    WANG R Y, ZHANG J G, HE Z Y, et al. Investigation on medical staff ' cognition of family doctor signing service[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2018, 16(1): 94-96, 138. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.000027
    [21] CHERAGHI-SOHI S, HOLE A R, Mead N, et al. What patients want from primary care consultations: a discrete choice experiment to identify patients ' priorities[J]. Ann Fam Med, 2008, 6(2): 107-115. doi: 10.1370/afm.816
    [22] MENGONI A, SEGHIERI C, NUTI S, et al. Heterogeneity in preferences for primary care consultations: results from a discrete choice experiment[J]. Int J Stat Med Res, 2013. DOI: 10.6000/1929-6029.2013.02.01.08.
    [23] WANG C L, GU Y Y, ZHAO L H, et al. Stated preferences for family doctor contract services: a survey of the rural elderly in Anhui Province, China[J]. BMJ Open, 2022, 12(3): e053277. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053277.
    [24] 吴爽, 邓茜月, 曹志辉, 等. 居民对家庭医生签约服务的需求偏好研究: 基于离散选择实验[J]. 卫生经济研究, 2021, 38(5): 18-21.

    WU S, DENG X Y, CAO Z H, et al. Research on residents ' demand preference for contracted familydoctor services: based on discrete selection experiments[J]. Health Economics Research, 2021, 38(5): 18-21.
    [25] 刘仲琦, 郝春, 顾菁, 等. 离散选择试验中试验设计步骤的实现: 基于SAS宏程序的应用[J]. 中国卫生统计, 2018, 35(6): 949-952.

    LIU Z Q, HAO C, GU J, et al. Implementation of experimental design steps in discrete choice test-based on theapplication of SAS macro program[J]. China Health Statistics, 2018, 35(6): 949-952.
    [26] 陈妮娜, 吴浩, 于海洋, 等. 智慧家医结合家庭医生签约服务模式对社区中青年高血压患者的管理效果[J]. 中华高血压杂志, 2019, 27(6): 575-578.

    CHEN N N, WU H, YU H Y, et al. Effectiveness of smart family medicine combined with family doctor contracting service model in the management of young and middle-aged hypertensive patients in the community[J]. Chin J Hypertens, 2019, 27(6): 575-578.
    [27] 陈翔, 周敏. 5G+智慧健康管理在我院的应用[J]. 现代医院, 2022, 22(4): 620-621, 625.

    CHEN X, ZHOU M. The application of 5G+ intelligent health management in our hospital[J]. Modern Hospitals, 2022, 22(4): 620-621, 625.
    [28] 湖北省宜昌市卫生计生委. 运用"互联网+"推进家医签约服务[J]. 中国农村卫生, 2018, 10(21): 10-11.

    Yichang Health and Family Planning Commission of Hubei Province. Use "Internet+" to promote family doctor contract services[J]. China Rural Health, 2018, 10(21): 10-11.
    [29] 田惠敏. 远程"共享""牵"而有约: "互联网+"助力首诊点单签约服务[J]. 中国农村卫生, 2022, 14(1): 47-50.

    TIAN H M. Remote "sharing" "holding" and having an appointment: "internet+" helps the first diagnosis order signing service[J]. China Rural Health, 2022, 14(1): 47-50.
    [30] 陈静静, 王海利, 彭迎春. 基于"移动医院"的新农合即时结报模式在京北山区家庭医生巡诊服务中的应用[J]. 中华全科医学, 2018, 16(2): 167-170. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.000048

    CHEN J J, WANG H L, PENG Y C. The application of the new rural cooperative medical system clinic reportbasedon "Mobile Hospital" in the family doctor surveillance service in the mountain area of Beijing[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2018, 16(2): 167-170. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.000048
    [31] 宋锐, 郁敏杰, 马龙飞, 等. 上海某社区基于"互联网+"家庭医生签约服务实践研究[J]. 智慧健康, 2022, 8(9): 1-3, 46.

    SONG R, YU M J, MA L F, et al. Practice research of family doctor signing service based on internet plus in a community in Shanghai[J]. Intelligent Health, 2022, 8(9): 1-3, 46.
  • 加载中
表(2)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  16
  • HTML全文浏览量:  14
  • PDF下载量:  2
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2024-02-04
  • 网络出版日期:  2025-01-20

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回