Analysis on the factors influencing the loyalty of rural residents to family doctors' "contract first consultation"
-
摘要:
目的 运用服务营销中“顾客忠诚度”的理论,将“签约首诊服务”作为“重要产品”,调查和分析农村居民对家庭医生签约首诊服务忠诚度的影响因素,提高家庭医生签约服务的利用率。 方法 采用随机抽样方法,选取上海市浦东新区6家农村社区的1 000名居民为调查对象。于2021年5—9月,使用改良美国顾客满意度指数(ASCI)模型和SERVQUAL服务质量评价量表,运用半结构访谈法自行设计签约居民对家庭医生签约首诊服务忠诚度的问卷调查表。收集调查问卷分析差异和影响家庭医生签约首诊服务忠诚度的因素。 结果 家庭医生签约首诊服务忠诚度的8个维度期望值和实际值间差异均有统计学意义。家庭医生签约服务忠诚度的58个条目中期望值和实际值的均值差值在1.0以上的共6个,58个条目期望值与实际值差异均有统计学意义。回归模型发现各个维度的期望值均显著提高了签约居民的满意度,期望值比实际值更能影响满意度。 结论 浦东新区农村社区卫生服务中心在硬件设施、家庭医生服务态度、医患沟通等方面,签约居民认可程度比较高,在药品供给和医疗辅助技术方面存在短板。建议适度增加社区卫生服务中心自主管理权限,完善和综合医院“上下对接”药品使用制度,探索“全科+专科”综合性的人才培养模式,提高家庭医生签约服务的积极性和主动性。 Abstract:Objective Using the theory of "customer loyalty" in service marketing, taking "contracted first visit service" as an "important product", investigate and analyze the influencing factors of rural residents' loyalty to family doctor contracted first visit service, and improve the utilization rate of family doctor contracted service. Methods A random sampling method was employed to select 1 000 residents from six rural communities in the Pudong New Area of Shanghai as the subjects of the survey subjects. From May to September 2021, an enhanced American customer satisfaction index (ASCI) model and the SERVQUAL service quality evaluation scale were employed to develop a questionnaire survey on the loyalty of contracted residents to the initial visit service of family doctors using semi-structured interview approach. The survey questionnaires were collated for analysis of the discrepancies and factors influencing the loyalty of family doctors to register for initial visit services. Results A statistically significant discrepancy exists between the anticipated and observed values of the 8 dimensions that affect influence the loyalty of family doctors to the initial consultation service. A total of 58 items were identified as influencing the loyalty of family doctors to contract services. Of these, 6 items exhibited a mean difference of 1.0 or more between their expected and actual values. Furthermore, the differences between the expected and actual values were statistically significant for all 58 items. The regression model revealed that the anticipated values for each dimension had a notable influence on the satisfaction of contracted residents. Furthermore, the anticipated values exerted a more pronounced effect on satisfaction than the actual values. Conclusion The Pudong New Area Rural Community Health Service Center is perceived to have a relatively high level of recognition among contracted residents in terms of the availability of hardware facilities, the quality of family doctor services, and the communication between doctors and patients. Nevertheless, deficiencies exist in the provision of pharmaceuticals and medical technology. It is recommended that the self-management authority of community health service centers be moderately increased, that the drug use system with general hospitals be improved with a view to enhancing its "top-down coordination", that a comprehensive talent training model of "general practice+specialty" be explored, and that the enthusiasm and initiative of family doctors to sign contracts for services be enhanced. -
表 1 1 000名农村签约居民基本情况
Table 1. Baseline characteristics of 1 000 rural residents on contract
项目 例数(%) 项目 例数(%) 性别 职业 男性 460(46.00) 农民 356(35.60) 女性 540(54.00) 职工 241(24.10) 年龄(岁) 个体经营 61(6.10) <45 185(18.50) 退休 342(34.20) 45~59 272(27.20) 婚姻状态 ≥60 543(54.30) 未婚 24(2.40) 慢性病 已婚 853(85.30) 无 416(41.60) 离婚 38(3.80) 有, 不服药 50(5.00) 丧偶 85(8.50) 有, 偶尔服药 94(9.40) 是否签约 有, 长期服药 440(44.00) 是 994(99.40) 学历 不知道 6(0.60) 大学及以上 129(12.90) 了解家庭医生么 高中 131(13.10) 不了解 7(0.70) 初中 370(37.00) 了解 993(99.30) 小学及以下 370(37.00) 表 2 家庭医生签约首诊服务忠诚度8个维度期望值和实际值比较(x±s, 分)
Table 2. Comparison of expected value and actual value of 8 dimensions of family doctors' first-visit service loyalty (x±s, points)
项目 期望值 实际值 t值 P值 A 有形性 31.98±2.59 26.64±2.77 44.579 <0.001 B 可靠性 45.68±3.56 37.06±3.85 51.915 <0.001 C 响应性 32.08±3.13 25.61±2.78 48.914 <0.001 D 保证性 27.57±2.61 22.25±2.37 47.737 <0.001 E 移情性 36.76±3.15 29.72±3.36 48.436 <0.001 F 感知价值 32.10±2.78 25.81±2.95 49.091 <0.001 G 顾客满意 23.23±2.10 18.81±2.31 44.835 <0.001 H 顾客抱怨 36.47±3.50 28.72±3.48 49.691 <0.001 表 3 家庭医生签约首诊服务忠诚度的影响因素分析
Table 3. Analysis of influencing factors of family doctor's contract service loyalty
项目 维度 β β' SE t值 P值 期望值 有形性 0.359 0.331 0.029 12.446 <0.001 可靠性 0.241 0.206 0.021 11.340 <0.001 响应性 0.177 0.201 0.025 7.068 <0.001 保证性 0.260 0.236 0.030 8.726 <0.001 移情性 0.235 0.208 0.024 9.603 <0.001 感知价值 0.347 0.366 0.027 13.005 <0.001 顾客满意 0.363 0.314 0.037 9.922 <0.001 顾客抱怨 0.292 0.252 0.021 13.941 <0.001 实际值 有形性 0.047 0.042 0.029 1.610 0.108 可靠性 0.033 0.039 0.021 1.599 0.110 响应性 0.234 0.248 0.028 8.284 <0.001 保证性 0.203 0.233 0.033 6.059 <0.001 移情性 -0.009 -0.033 0.024 -0.367 0.714 感知价值 0.015 0.073 0.027 0.547 0.585 顾客满意 0.152 0.177 0.034 4.434 <0.001 顾客抱怨 -0.169 -0.130 0.334 -0.504 0.614 注:连续性变量,均以实际值赋值。 -
[1] 孙莉莉. 连云港市2017—2022年重点人群家庭医生签约率分析[J]. 中国乡村医药, 2024, 31(12): 76-78.SUN L L. Research and analysis on the rate of family doctors contracting of key population in Lianyungang city from 2017 to 2022[J]. Chinese Journal of Rural Medicine and Pharmacy, 2024, 31(12): 76-78. [2] 饶雅舒, 王俊舟, 杨义, 等. 基于社会网络分析法的社区居民家庭医生签约服务利用研究[J]. 中华全科医学, 2023, 21(4): 632-636. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002948RAO Y S, WANG J Z, YANG Y, et al. Utilization of community residents' family doctor contracted services based on social network analysis[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2023, 21(4): 632-636. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002948 [3] 白兰, 孙红, 肖雨龙. 南京市家庭医生签约服务现状及问题研究[J]. 卫生经济研究, 2024, 41(3): 32-35.BAI L, SUN H, XIAO Y L. Study on the current status and problems of family doctor contracted services in Nanjing city[J]. Journal Press of Health Economics Research, 2024, 41(3): 32-35. [4] 欧晏辰, 谢月英, 王振邦, 等. 基于供方感知视角的家庭医生签约服务质量评价及影响因素研究[J]. 中国全科医学, 2024, 27(22): 2773-2779.OU Y C, XIE Y Y, WANG Z B, et al. Family doctor teams' evaluation for contracted family doctor services and influencing factors[J]. Chinese General Practice, 2024, 27(22): 2773-2779. [5] 邓余华, 王超, 甘勇, 等. 我国家庭医生签约服务利用现状及影响因素分析: 基于全国31个省市的调查[J]. 中国卫生政策研究, 2020, 13(9): 47-54.DENG Y H, WANG C, GAN Y, et al. The current status of family doctors' contracting service utilization and its influencing factors: based on a survey of 31 provinces and cities in China[J]. Chinese Journal of Health Policy, 2020, 13(9): 47-54. [6] 路冬梅, 何玉兰, 周自琴, 等. 医联体内模式下的继续教育对提升基层医师临床能力的作用[J]. 广西医学, 2021, 43(12): 1522-1523, 1529.LU D M, HE Y L, ZHOU Z Q, et al. Role of continuing education in proving grass-roots doctors'clinical capability using medical consortium model[J]. Guangxi Medical Journal, 2021, 43(12): 1522-1523, 1529. [7] 李心怡, 张榕榕, 胡丹, 等. 我国家庭医生签约服务现状研究: 基于四省份的实地调研[J]. 中国卫生政策研究, 2020, 13(5): 39-44.LI X Y, ZHANG R R, HU D, et al. Research on the current situation of family doctor contract service in China: based on field research in 4 provinces[J]. Chinese Journal of Health Policy, 2020, 13(5): 39-44. [8] 郭红鑫, 于瑞, 王新陆, 等. 中医体质对心肌梗死患者再入院影响的前瞻性队列研究[J]. 中华中医药杂志, 2024, 39(5): 2230-2235.GUO H X, YU R, WANG X L, et al. Prospective cohort study on the impact of traditional Chinese medicine constitution on readmission of patients with myocardial infarction[J]. China Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine and Pharmacy, 2024, 39(5): 2230-2235. [9] 蒋皓, 黄建远. 基于ACSI模型的私人影院顾客满意度影响因素研究[J]. 江苏商论, 2022(3): 7-11, 15.JIANG H, HUANG J Y. Research on the influencing factors of customer satisfaction in private cinema based on ACSI model[J]. Jiangsu Commercial Forum, 2022(3): 7-11, 15. [10] 于竞新, 门建华. 基于SERVQUAL-IPA模型的职工食堂营养与健康服务精细化管理[J]. 中国卫生标准管理, 2023, 14(14): 28-33.YU J X, MEN J H. Effective management of workplace canteen service from a nutrition and health perspective via a SERVQUAL-IPA model[J]. China Health Standard Management, 2023, 14(14): 28-33. [11] 苏雅, 曹立春, 刘冬莹. 天津市重点人群家庭医生服务利用度与满意度现况调查分析[J]. 中国医疗管理科学, 2024, 14(1): 64-69.SU Y, CAO L C, LIU D Y. Survey on the utilization and satisfaction of family doctor contract services among targeted populations in Tianjin[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Management Sciences, 2024, 14(1): 64-69. [12] 胡翠玲, 黄晓光. 某市家庭医生签约服务居民满意度调查与影响因素分析[J]. 医学与社会, 2020, 33(11): 119-122.HU C L, HUANG X G. Research and analysis on the influencing factors and satisfaction of residents of family doctors contracting services in a city[J]. Medicine and Society, 2020, 33(11): 119-122. [13] 周晶, 吴颖敏. 基于结构方程模型的四川省少数民族地区居民对基层医疗卫生机构的忠诚度影响因素分析[J]. 医学与社会, 2021, 34(5): 1-4.ZHOU J, WU Y M. Analysis on influencing factors of residents' loyalty to grassroots medical and health institutions in minority areas of Sichuan province based on structural equation modeling[J]. Medicine and Society, 2021, 34(5): 1-4. [14] 李梦华, 徐凌忠, 秦文哲, 等. 泰安市居民对家庭医生信任度现状及影响因素研究[J]. 中国卫生事业管理, 2023, 40(1): 72-75.LI M H, XU L Z, QIN W Z, et al. Residents' trust studying on the status of the residents' trust in family doctors of Tai' an City and its influencing factors[J]. Chinese Health Service Management, 2023, 40(1): 72-75. [15] 蔡利强, 侯进. 60岁以上老年人对家庭医生签约服务期望值和实际值差异的调查分析[J]. 中华全科医学, 2020, 18(6): 980-983. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.001408CAI L Q, HOU J. Investigation and analysis of the difference between the expectation value and the actual value of the family doctor contract service of the elderly over 60 years old[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2020, 18(6): 980-983. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.001408 [16] 蔡利强, 李鑫. 基于供需方角度的家庭医生儿科业务能力培训效果评价[J]. 中国初级卫生保健, 2020, 34(9): 30-33.CAI L Q, LI X. The evaluation effects of the pediatric professional capacity training on family doctors from the perspective of supply and demand[J]. Chinese Primary Health Care, 2020, 34(9): 30-33. [17] 吴丹, 黄晓光. 南京市签约居民家庭医生服务资源利用状况及其影响因素[J]. 医学与社会, 2020, 33(8): 14-19.WU D, HUANG X G. Utilization of family doctor service resources of contracted residents in nanjing and its influencing factors[J]. Medicine and Society, 2020, 33(8): 14-19. [18] 杨卿, 陆有权, 罗学广, 等. 社区卫生服务机构配备一定比例非基本药物对社区医疗的积极影响[J]. 中国药物经济学, 2020, 15(1): 25-28.YANG Q, LU Y Q, LUO X G, et al. The positive impact of community health service institutions equipped with a certain proportion of non-basic drugs for community medical treatment[J]. China Journal of Pharmaceutical Economics, 2020, 15(1): 25-28.