基于不同人群心肺复苏培训效果研究及其影响因素分析

雷泠; 胡磊; 任菁菁

doi:10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.003812

基于不同人群心肺复苏培训效果研究及其影响因素分析

doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.003812

雷泠¹,
胡磊²,
任菁菁^3, ,

1.
杭州市临安区第一人民医院质量管理办公室，浙江杭州 311399
2.
杭州市临安区第一人民医院急诊科
3.
浙江大学医学院附属第一医院全科医学科，浙江杭州 310003

基金项目:

浙江省医药卫生科技计划项目 2024KY1456

详细信息

通讯作者:
任菁菁，E-mail：3204092@zju.edu.cn

中图分类号: R192.3 R541.78
计量
- 文章访问数: 74
- HTML全文浏览量: 33
- PDF下载量: 4
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2024-03-06
- 网络出版日期: 2025-01-20

Research on the effectiveness of cardiopulmonary resuscitation training cross different populations and analysis of its influencing factors

LEI Ling¹,
HU Lei²,
REN Jingjing^{3
, ,}

1.
Emergency Medicine, the First People's Hospital of Hangzhou Lin'an district, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 311399, China

摘要

摘要: 目的借助实施心肺复苏(CPR)教育和培训来提高公众CPR普及率和医务人员急救水平。方法以分层整群随机抽样的方式选取2020—2022年接受本区技能中心统一安排的美国心脏协会标准化CPR培训课程的4类人群共800名作为研究对象，最终纳入医疗组312人次，社区组168人次，住培医生组120人次，社会大众组200人次进行研究。收集各类人员的一般情况和培训结果，分析培训效果和影响培训通过率的相关因素。结果 4组人群在CPR关键操作环节普遍存在掌握不足，但培训后对CPR知识掌握、认知和实施意愿均有明显提高。单因素分析结果显示，影响人群CPR培训通过率的因素有年龄、学历、人群类别、培训经历、培训前知识掌握调查得分、培训前认知实施意愿调查得分(P＜0.05)。多因素logistic回归分析显示，CPR培训经历(OR=3.184，95% CI：1.893~5.357，P<0.001)、培训前知识掌握调查得分(OR=1.061，95% CI：1.037~1.086，P<0.001)、培训前认知实施意愿调查得分(OR=1.839，95% CI：1.484~2.279，P<0.001)为CPR培训通过率的独立影响因素。结论 (1) 4类人群普遍存在CPR关键操作环节掌握不足的问题，开展培训可有效提高人群知识和技能水平、认知和实施意愿。(2)有CPR培训经历、培训前有一定的CPR知识、认知和实施意愿的人群往往更容易通过培训。
- 心肺复苏 /
- 培训 /
- 医务人员 /
- 公众
Abstract: Objective By implementing cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) education and training, we aim to improve the prevalence of CPR and the level of emergency response among healthcare workers. Methods A total of 800 individuals from four categories who received American Heart Association-standardized CPR training courses between 2020 and 2022 were selected as the research subjects. Finally, 312 patients were included in the medical group, 168 in the community group, 120 in the resident training doctor group, and 200 in the public group. General information and training results were collected for each group to analyze the training effectiveness and related factors affecting the training pass rate. Results All four groups exhibited a general lack of mastery in key CPR operational steps. The results of univariate analysis showed that the factors affecting the pass rate of CPR training among the population include age, education level, population category, training experience, pre-training knowledge mastery survey score, and pre-training cognitive implementation intention survey score (P<0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that CPR training experience (OR=3.184, 95% CI: 1.893-5.357, P<0.001), pre-training knowledge mastery survey score (OR=1.061, 95% CI: 1.037-1.086, P<0.001), and pre-training cognitive implementation intention survey score (OR=1.839, 95% CI: 1.484-2.279, P<0.001) were independent factors influencing the CPR training pass rate. Conclusion (1) There is a widespread problem of insufficient mastery of the key CPR operational steps among the four groups. Conducting training effectively improve knowledge, skills, cognition, and willingness to perform CPR. (2) Individuals with prior CPR training experience, pre-training CPR knowledge, and higher cognitive awareness and willingness to implement CPR are more likely to pass the training.
- Cardiopulmonary resuscitation /
- Training /
- Medical staff /
- The public

HTML全文

表 1 各组人群培训前后认知、实施意愿得分比较

Table 1. Comparison of differences in cognitive and implementation willingness scores among different groups before and after training

组别	例数	时间	知识掌握调查得分 [M(P₂₅, P₇₅), 分]	知识掌握调查得分达标[例(%)]	认知、意愿调查得分 [M(P₂₅, P₇₅), 分]	认知、意愿调查得分达标[例(%)]
医疗组	312	培训前	70(70，80)	269(86.2)	21(20，22)	305(97.8)
		培训后	85(85，90)	298(95.5)	22(21，23)	311(99.7)
统计量			-18.503^c	16.238^e	-11.388^c	4.558^e
P值			< 0.001	< 0.001	< 0.001	0.033
社区组	168	培训前	60(60，70)	131(78.0)	20(19，21)	160(95.2)
		培训后	85(85，85)	152(90.5)	21(21，22)	167(99.4)
统计量			-15.876^c	9.879^e	-7.652^c	5.594^e
P值			< 0.001	0.002	< 0.001	0.018
住培医生组	120	培训前	70(60，70)	93(77.5)	20(20，21)	117(97.5)
		培训后	85(85，85)	111(92.5)	23(21，23)	120(100.0)
统计量			-13.808^c	10.588^e	-10.662^c	3.038^e
P值			< 0.001	0.001	< 0.001	0.081
社会大众组	200	培训前			18(18，18)	171(85.5)
		培训后			20(19，21)	197(98.5)
统计量					-12.113^c	22.962^e
P值					< 0.001	< 0.001
统计量^a			183.963^d	35.063^e	322.439^d	37.194^e
P值^a			< 0.001	< 0.001	< 0.001	< 0.001
统计量^b			262.018^d	35.041^e	290.796^d	26.765^e
P值^b			< 0.001	< 0.001	< 0.001	< 0.001
注: ^a为4组培训前总体比较，^b为4组培训后总体比较。^c为Z值，^d为H值, ^e为χ²值。

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 各组人群CPR操作培训中各项目考核结果比较[例(%)]

Table 2. Comparison of the assessment results of each item in CRP operation training of each group [cases (%)]

组别	例数	按压及时性	按压频率	按压深度	通气质量	按压中断时间	回弹充分率	AED使用
医疗组	312	292(93.6)	221(70.8)	168(53.8)	284(91.0)	234(75.0)	204(65.4)	309(99.0)
社区组	168	160(95.2)	89(53.3)	69(41.1)	141(83.9)	98(58.3)	106(63.1)	154(91.7)
住培医生组	120	111(92.5)	64(53.8)	52(43.3)	111(92.5)	61(50.8)	63(52.5)	112(93.3)
社会大众组	200	182(91.0)	101(50.5)	63(31.5)	168(84.0)	103(51.5)	114(57.0)	166(83.0)
χ²值		2.761	27.642	25.565	10.673	39.049	7.807	46.224
P值		0.430	< 0.001	< 0.001	0.014	< 0.001	0.050	< 0.001

下载: 导出CSV

表 3 变量赋值情况

Table 3. Variable assignment

变量	赋值方法
年龄	以实际值赋值
性别	男性=1，女性=0
学历	硕士及以上=0，本科=1，大专及以下=2
人群类别	医疗组=(1, 0, 0)，社区组=(0, 1, 0)，住培医生组=(0, 0, 1)，社会大众组=(0, 0, 0)
CPR培训经历	有培训经历者=1，无培训经历者=0
培训前认知、意愿调查得分	得分达标=1，得分不达标=0
培训前知识掌握调查得分	得分达标=1，得分不达标=0
培训是否通过	通过=1，未通过=0

下载: 导出CSV

表 4 影响人群培训通过率的单因素分析

Table 4. Single factor analysis on the impact of population training pass rate

变量	B	SE	Waldχ²	P值	OR值	95% CI
年龄	-0.057	0.013	18.430	< 0.001	0.945	0.920~0.970
性别	0.228	0.175	1.704	0.192	1.256	0.892~1.769
学历
本科	0.511	0.180	8.038	0.005	1.667	1.171~2.373
专科及以下	0.781	0.425	3.380	0.066	2.184	0.950~5.023
人群类别
社区组	-0.520	0.265	3.849	0.050	0.595	0.354~1.000
住培医生组	-0.396	0.301	1.733	0.188	0.673	0.373~1.214
社会大众组	-1.559	0.227	47.001	< 0.001	0.210	0.135~0.329
CPR培训经历	1.827	0.192	90.628	< 0.001	6.214	4.266~9.051
培训前认知、意愿调查得分	0.749	0.073	105.853	< 0.001	2.115	1.834~2.440
培训前知识掌握调查得分	0.098	0.010	94.146	< 0.001	1.103	1.081~1.125
注：学历以硕士及以上，人群类别以医疗组为参照。

下载: 导出CSV

表 5 影响人群培训通过率的多因素logistic回归分析

Table 5. Multivariate logistic regression analysis on the impact of population training pass rate

变量	B	SE	Waldχ²	P值	OR值	95% CI
年龄	-0.024	0.015	2.359	0.125	0.977	0.948~1.007
学历
本科	-0.491	0.235	4.357	0.037	0.612	0.386~0.970
专科及以下	-1.002	0.525	3.645	0.056	0.367	0.131~1.027
人群类别
社区组	0.399	0.345	1.337	0.248	1.490	0.758~2.928
住培医生组	0.099	0.366	0.074	0.786	1.104	0.539~2.261
社会大众组	0.988	0.371	7.110	0.008	2.687	1.299~5.555
CPR培训经历	1.158	0.265	19.046	< 0.001	3.184	1.893~5.357
培训前认知、意愿调查得分	0.609	0.109	31.050	< 0.001	1.839	1.484~2.279
培训前知识掌握调查得分	0.059	0.012	24.831	< 0.001	1.061	1.037~1.086
注：学历以硕士及以上为参照，人群类别以医疗组为参照。

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(20)

[1]	梁顺达, 方芳, 丁智颖, 等. 院内心搏骤停患者自主循环恢复影响因素分析[J]. 中华全科医学, 2023, 21(8): 1-6. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.003107 LIANG S D, FANG F, DING Z Y, et al. Analysis of the influence factors of recovery of spontaneous circulation in in-hospital cardiac arrest patients[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2023, 21(8): 1-6. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.003107
[2]	程晓青, 张晓华, 马青卉, 等. 全国红十字应急救护师资国际认证课程效果评价[J]. 中华灾害救援医学, 2022, 10(3): 127-131, 151. CHENG X Q, ZHANG X H, MA Q H, et al. Research on training effect of the international first aid attestation course for Red Cross trainers in China[J]. Chinese Journal of Disaster Medicine, 2022, 10(3): 127-131, 151.
[3]	HE Q, HUANG Y. A brief interpretation of 2020 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care (Part Ⅱ) -adult basic and advanced life support[J]. Adv Cardiovasc Dis, 2020, 41(12): 1333-1337.
[4]	HUANG Y, HE Q. A brief interpretation of 2020 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care (Part Ⅲ)-adult basic and advanced life support[J]. Adv Cardiovasc Dis, 2020, 41(12): 1338-1344.
[5]	HUANG Y, HE Q. A brief interpretation of 2020 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care (Part Ⅵ) -resuscitation education science and systems of care[J]. Adv Cardiovasc Dis, 2021, 42(2): 188-192.
[6]	庞爱华, 张西英, 艾莉, 等. 院外心肺复苏"第一目击者"自我效能感及影响因素分析[J]. 中国急救复苏与灾害医学杂志, 2022, 17(12): 1544-1547. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-6966.2022.12.002 PANG A H, ZHANG X Y, AI L, et al. Analysis of self-efficacy and influencing factors of "first witness" of out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation[J]. China Journal of Emergency Resuscitation and Disaster Medicine, 2022, 17(12): 1544-1547. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-6966.2022.12.002
[7]	索婷婷, 栗娟, 高凤琪, 等. 社会公众实施心肺复苏的意愿及影响因素分析[J]. 中国医科大学学报, 2022, 51(2): 145-150. SUO T T, LI J, GAO F Q, et al. Analysis of the willingness and influencing factors of the public to implement cardiopulmonary resuscitation[J]. Journal of China Medical University, 2022, 51(2): 145-150.
[8]	张天帅, 潘奕洁, 李凯跃, 等. 计划行为理论视角下公众实施心肺复苏行为意向的影响因素研究[J]. 中国急救复苏与灾害医学杂志, 2023, 18(4): 425-429, 453. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-6966.2023.04.002 ZHANG T S, PAN Y J, LI K Y, et al. A study on the influencing factors of public intention to implement cardiopulmonary resuscitation from the perspective of planned behavior theory[J]. China Journal of Emergency Resuscitation and Disaster Medicine, 2023, 18(4): 425-429, 453. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-6966.2023.04.002
[9]	张建中. 公众自救互救培训引入美国心脏协会拯救心脏课程对心肺复苏技能提升效果分析[J]. 中国急救复苏与灾害医学杂志, 2023, 18(4): 548-560. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-6966.2023.04.030 ZHANG J Z. Analysis of the effect of introducing the American Heart Association ' s heart rescue course into public self rescue and mutual rescue training on improving cardiopulmonary resuscitation skills[J]. China Journal of Emergency Resuscitation and Disaster Medicine, 2023, 18(4): 548-560. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-6966.2023.04.030
[10]	SINGLETARY E M, ZIDEMAN D A, BENDALL J C, et al. 2020 international consensus on first aid science with treatment recommendations[J]. Resuscitation, 2020, 156: A240-A282. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2020.09.016
[11]	杨露, 李斌, 曾艳, 等. CPR第一目击者施救体验的质性研究[J]. 中国急救复苏与灾害医学杂志, 2022, 17(4): 430-434. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-6966.2022.04.003 YANG L, LI B, ZENG Y, et al. Qualitative study on the rescue experience of the first responder of cardiopulmonary resuscitation[J]. China Journal of Emergency Resuscitation and Disaster Medicine, 2022, 17(4): 430-434. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-6966.2022.04.003
[12]	施辉, 蔡吉, 冯丽. 社区居民进行院外心肺复苏意愿及障碍因素分析[J]. 中国急救复苏与灾害医学杂志, 2021, 16(3): 231-235. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-6966.2021.03.005 SHI H, CAI J, FENG L. Analysis of willingness and obstacle factors for community residents to undergo extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation[J]. China Journal of Emergency Resuscitation and Disaster Medicine, 2021, 16(3): 231-235. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-6966.2021.03.005
[13]	何亚荣, 姚鹏, 向昕杰, 等. 2022年心肺复苏与心血管急救科学和治疗建议国际共识解读-成人心肺复苏[J]. 华西医学, 2023, 38(11): 1632-1639. HE Y R, YAO P, XIANG X J, et al. A brief interpretation of 2022 international consensus on scientific and therapeutic recommendations for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and cardiovascular emergency care: adult cardiopulmonary resuscitation[J]. West China Medical Journal, 2023, 38(1): 1632-1639.
[14]	祝益民, 晏锡泉, 陈芳, 等. 现场救护立法的紧迫感与时代需求[J]. 中华急诊医学杂志, 2021, 30(1): 3-5. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-0282.2021.01.003 ZHU Y M, YAN X Q, CHEN F, et al. The urgency and era demands of legislation on on-site rescue[J]. Chinese Journal of Emergency Medicine, 2021, 30(1): 3-5. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-0282.2021.01.003
[15]	刘萍, 张耀丹, 李阳, 等. 对602名社会公众进行院外心肺复苏培训的效果评价[J]. 卫生职业教育, 2020, 38(22): 113-115. LIU P, ZHANG Y D, LI Y, et al. Evaluation of the effectiveness of extracurricular cardiopulmonary resuscitation training for 602 members of the public[J]. Health Vocational Education, 2020, 38(22): 113-115.
[16]	郑康, 李辉, 马变青. 借鉴美国心脏协会基础生命支持课程推进我国医务人员的心肺复苏培训[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2021, 41(11): 1046-1049. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20210513-00633 ZHENG K, LI H, MA B Q. Learning from the basic life support course of American Heart Association to optimize the training of cardiopulmonary resuscitation for Chinese medical staffs[J]. Chin J Med Edu, 2021, 41(11): 1046-1049. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20210513-00633
[17]	刘金金. 某市社区医务人员心肺复苏掌握情况的现状调查分析[J]. 当代护士, 2021, 28(29): 146-148. LIU J J. A survey and analysis of the current situation of community medical staff ' s mastery of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in a certain city[J]. Contemporary Nurses, 2021, 28(29): 146-148.
[18]	王李云, 方力争, 朱文华. 心肺复苏技能普及培训的现状与策略[J]. 中华全科医师杂志, 2020, 19(1): 64-67. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-7368.2020.01.015 WANG L Y, FANG L Z, ZHU W H. The current situation and strategies of popularizing and training cardiopulmonary resuscitation skills[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practitioners, 2020, 19(1): 64-67. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-7368.2020.01.015
[19]	冯锡烜, 刘书雁, 卢丽锋, 等. 应用心肺复苏实时反馈系统开展心肺复苏培训的分析[J]. 中外医疗, 2020, 39(9): 76-78. FENG X H, LIU S Y, LU L F, et al. Analysis of using real-time feedback system for cardiopulmonary resuscitation training[J]. China Foreign Medical Treatment, 2020, 39(9): 76-78.
[20]	吴晓玲. 虚拟现实技术在全科医生CPR培训中的应用研究[D]. 重庆: 重庆医科大学, 2020. WU X L. Research on the application of virtual reality technology in general practitioner CPR training[D]. Chongqing: Chongqing Medical University, 2020.