养老机构老年痴呆患者照护者的负担情况及影响因素分析

于国强; 刘旭英; 孙婧妍; 尹瑞楠; 曹燚; 吴壮; 王婷; 刘杨月; 冯秋菊; 滕金艳

doi:10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.003814

养老机构老年痴呆患者照护者的负担情况及影响因素分析

doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.003814

于国强^{1, 2},
刘旭英¹,
孙婧妍¹,
尹瑞楠¹,
曹燚²,
吴壮²,
王婷²,
刘杨月²,
冯秋菊²,
滕金艳^3, ,

1.
黑龙江中医药大学第二临床医学院，黑龙江哈尔滨 150040
2.
黑龙江中医药大学附属第二医院针灸科，黑龙江哈尔滨 150001
3.
湖北省中医院(湖北中医药大学附属医院，湖北时珍实验室)针灸科，湖北武汉 430000

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金面上项目 82074539

黑龙江省卫生健康委科研项目 20211212010322

详细信息

通讯作者:
滕金艳，E-mail：503736143@qq.com

中图分类号: R749.16
计量
- 文章访问数: 15
- HTML全文浏览量: 9
- PDF下载量: 2
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2024-04-06
- 网络出版日期: 2025-01-20

Analysis of the burden and influencing factors affecting caregivers of elderly dementia patients in nursing homes

1.
The Second Clinical School of Heilongjiang University of TCM, Harbin, Heilongjiang 150040, China

摘要

摘要: 目的研究黑龙江省养老机构中老年痴呆患者照护者的负担情况，从患者与其照护者2个角度分析照护者负担的影响因素。方法采用整群便利随机抽样法，从哈尔滨市和绥化市两地4所养老机构筛选2023年3—9月入住符合纳入及排除标准的老年痴呆患者及其照护者各157人为研究对象。应用自制老年人一般情况调查量表、临床痴呆评定量表(CDR)、老年痴呆生活质量量表(QOL-AD)、简易老年抑郁量表(GDS-15)、Zarit照顾者负担量表(ZBI)展开调查，采用多元线性回归分析照护者负担的影响因素。结果 157名照护者ZBI得分为(28.25±12.55)分；照护者负担与QOL-AD评分呈负相关关系(r=-0.191，P＜0.05)；痴呆患者的睡眠时间、患者的痴呆程度、患者有无抑郁、照护者性别、照护者培训与否均为痴呆患者照护者负担的独立影响因素(P＜0.05)，其对照护者负担的总体贡献率为32.5%(F=12.541，P＜0.001)。结论养老机构痴呆照护者普遍存在照护负担，其中，中度负担占比最多(52.23%)，养老机构应多关注照护者的性别，给予女性照护者更多关怀，并积极组织提升照护者业务能力的培训，探索医养结合养老机构的新模式，增加痴呆患者的睡眠时间，改善痴呆患者病情程度和抑郁状态，有助于缓解其照护者的负担。
- 养老机构 /
- 痴呆 /
- 照护者 /
- 负担 /
- 影响因素
Abstract: Objective To investigate the caregiver burden of dementia patients in elderly care institutions in Heilongjiang Province and analyze the influencing factors on caregiver burden from the perspectives of patients and their caregivers. Methods Using the overall convenience random sampling method, a total of 157 dementia patients and their nursing staff were selected from 4 elderly care institutions in Harbin and Suihua from March to September 2023. The self-made elderly general reality survey scale, clinical dementia rating scale (CDR), quality of life-Alzheimer' s disease (QOL-AD), geriatric depression scale-15 (GDS-15), and Zarit caregiver burden interview (ZBI) were used for the survey, and meta regression analysis was conducted to identify influencing factors. Results The caregivers had a ZBI score of (28.25 ± 12.55) points. The caregiver burden is negatively correlated with QOL-AD score (r=-0.191, P<0.05) The sleep duration of dementia patients, the severity of dementia, the presence of depression, the gender of the caregivers, and whether caregivers received formal training are independent influencing factors of caregiver burden for dementia patients. These factors accounted for a total contribution rate of 32.5% to the control group (F=12.541, P<0.001). Conclusion Caregivers of dementia patients in elderly care institutions generally face protection burdens, with severe burdens accounting for the highest proportion (52.23%). Elderly care institutions should pay more attention to the caregiver gender, provide additional care to female caregivers, organize training to improve caregiving skills, explore new models of medical care and elder care, increase the sleep duration of dementia patients, and address the severity of their condition and depression to alleviate caregiver burden.
- Elderly care institutions /
- Dementia /
- Caregivers /
- Burden /
- Influencing factor

HTML全文

表 1 不同人口学特征痴呆患者的照护者负担比较(x±s，分)

Table 1. Comparison of caregiver burden of dementia patients with different demographic characteristics (x±s, points)

项目	例数	ZBI得分	统计量	P值
年龄			1.747^a	0.083
60~70岁	93	26.71±11.65
＞70岁	64	30.12±12.54
性别			-0.855^a	0.394
女性	69	27.54±12.02
男性	88	29.24±12.62
受教育程度			-1.017^a	0.311
初中以下	133	29.35±12.67
初中以上	24	26.32±11.77
婚姻状况			1.497^a	0.137
已婚	39	25.81±11.04
离婚/丧偶/未婚	118	29.51±12.82
睡眠时间			-4.022^a	＜0.001
＜6 h	105	32.02±14.65
≥6 h	52	22.83±10.68
自主二便			-5.492^a	＜0.001
否	41	40.05±16.02
是	116	26.95±11.96
伴随疾病(种)			1.793^a	0.075
＜3	95	27.36±12.02
≥3	62	31.20±14.65
痴呆程度			7.932^b	0.005
轻度	71	24.62±11.35
中度	50	29.21±13.12
重度	36	35.21±15.95
抑郁情况			3.700^a	0.003
无	122	25.62±10.95
有	35	34.24±15.69
注：^a为t值，^b为F值。

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 不同人口学特征照护者ZBI评分比较(x±s，分)

Table 2. Comparison of ZBI scores of caregivers with different demographic characteristics (x±s, points)

项目	例数	ZBI得分	t值	P值
年龄			3.795	0.002
＜60岁	92	25.98±11.68
≥60岁	65	32.65±14.65
性别			-2.493	0.014
女性	86	30.25±12.24
男性	71	27.65±12.35
受教育程度			-1.529	0.128
高中以下	112	29.65±12.99
高中以上	45	26.25±11.56
婚姻状况			-0.863	0.390
已婚	132	28.98±12.51
离婚/丧偶/未婚	25	26.65±11.66
经济收入			1.686	0.094
＜3 000元	36	31.21±14.02
≥3 000元	121	27.21±12.02
照护关系			-0.689	0.492
亲属	32	29.32±12.85
非亲属	125	27.62±12.35
照料时间			3.523	＜0.001
＜8 h/d	29	22.32±10.25
≥8 h/d	128	32.62±14.95
培训			2.971	0.003
否	133	25.62±11.21
是	24	33.51±15.65
基础疾病(冠心病/糖尿病/脑卒中/高血压)			1.503	0.135
无	76	26.68±11.68
有	81	29.65±12.99

下载: 导出CSV

表 3 养老机构痴呆患者照护者负担独立影响因素的多重线性回归分析

Table 3. Multiple linear regression analysis of independent influencing factors on caregiver burden of dementia patients in elderly care institutions

变量	B	SE	β	t值	P值
常量	22.812	5.129			＜0.001
照护者性别	-6.221	1.042	-0.074	2.511	0.039
照护者培训情况	-9.829	1.206	-0.656	-1.645	0.002
患者睡眠时间	-2.478	0.523	-0.625	-2.321	0.010
患者痴呆程度	3.931	0.915	0.021	2.102	＜0.001
患者抑郁情况	0.162	0.034	0.322	3.965	0.041
注：R²=0.325，调整后R²=0.268，F=12.541，P＜0.001。

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(31)

[1]	王安鸽, 陈晶, 李晗宇, 等. 浙江省内各级医院医务人员对老年营养的认识和实践情况研究[J]. 中华全科医学, 2023, 21(10): 1774-1777. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.003222 WANG A G, CHEN J, LI H Y, et al. Perception and practices of geriatric nutrition among medical staff of various levels in Zhejiang Province[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2023, 21(10): 1774-1777. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.003222
[2]	魏名萱, 何宏莲. 人口老龄化背景下黑龙江省基本养老服务高质量发展策略研究[J]. 齐齐哈尔大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2023, 3(3): 73-76. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-2638.2023.03.017 WEI M X, HE H L. A strategic studyon the high-quality development of basic pension services in heilongjiang province based on the aging of population[J]. Journal of Qiqihar University(Phi& Soc Sci), 2023, 3(3): 73-76. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-2638.2023.03.017
[3]	张欣, 韩平. 黑龙江省人口老龄化问题分析与对策研究[J]. 特区经济, 2021(9): 83-86. ZHANG X, HAN P. Analysis and countermeasures of population aging in Heilongjiang Province[J]. Special Zone Economy, 2021(9): 83-86.
[4]	JIA L, QUAN M, FU Y, et al. Dementia in China: epidemiology, clinical management, and research advances[J]. Lancet Neurol, 2020, 19(1): 81-92. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30290-X
[5]	黄小琼, 陈仰昆, 王凤, 等. 医养结合养老机构痴呆患者照顾者负担现状及其影响因素研究[J]. 中国医药指南, 2022, 20(22): 1-4. HUANG X Q, CHEN Y K, WANG F, et al. Research on the status quo and influencing factors of the care burden of dementia patients in the combination of medical and elderly care institutions[J]. Guide of China Medicine, 2022, 20(22): 1-4.
[6]	农青芳, 陈国英, 谢兴, 等. 老年痴呆非药物治疗研究进展[J]. 护理研究, 2020, 34(20): 3669-3673. doi: 10.12102/j.issn.1009-6493.2020.20.020 NONG Q F, CHEN G Y, XIE X, et al. Research progress on non-drug treatment of senile dementia[J]. Chinese Nursing Research, 2020, 34(20): 3669-3673. doi: 10.12102/j.issn.1009-6493.2020.20.020
[7]	朱培嘉, 张良文, 方亚. 失智症老年人长期照护及其预防干预研究进展[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2024, 40(1): 98-102. ZHU P J, ZHANG L W, FANG Y. Research progress on long-term care and preventive interventions forelderly people with dementia[J]. Chin J Public Health, 2024, 40(1): 98-102.
[8]	严飞, 柴栖晨, 吕晶, 等. 社区老年友好程度与老年人认知功能的相关性研究[J]. 中华全科医学, 2024, 22(2): 183-186. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.003360 YAN F, CHAI X C, LYU J, et al. Association between age-friendliness of communities and cognitive function among older adults[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2024, 22(2): 183-186. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.003360
[9]	RAWAT P, SEHAR U, BISHT J, et al. Alzheimer's disease and Alzheimer's disease-related dementias in Hispanics: identifying influential factors and supporting caregivers[J]. Ageing Res Rev, 2024, 93: 102178. DOI: 10.1016/j.arr.2023.102178.
[10]	GUO J, WANG J, DOVE A, et al. Body mass index trajectories preceding incident mild cognitive impairment and dementia[J]. JAMA Psychiatry, 2022, 79(12): 1180-1187. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2022.3446
[11]	SLAM N, HASHEM R, GAD M, et al. Accuracy of the Montreal cognitive assessment tool for detecting mild cognitive impairment: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Alzheimers Dement, 2023, 19(7): 3235-3243. doi: 10.1002/alz.13040
[12]	YU Y, ZHANG F L, YAN X L, et al. Visceral adiposity index and cervical arterial atherosclerosis in northeast China: a population based cross-sectional survey[J]. Eur J Neurol, 2021, 28(1): 161-171. doi: 10.1111/ene.14513
[13]	崔艳秋, 费丁家, 钱蝶蝶, 等. 正念干预对老年痴呆病人照顾者干预效果的Meta分析[J]. 全科护理, 2021, 19(30): 4251-4255. doi: 10.12104/j.issn.1674-4748.2021.30.020 CUI Y Q, FEI D J, QIAN D D, et al. Meta analysis of the effect of mindfulness intervention on caregivers of elderly dementia patients[J]. Chinese General Practice Nursing, 2021, 19(30): 4251-4255. doi: 10.12104/j.issn.1674-4748.2021.30.020
[14]	霍晓鹏, 赖小星, 朱宏伟, 等. 老年认知衰弱评估工具的研究进展[J]. 北京医学, 2022, 44(3): 257-260. HUO X P, LAI X X, ZHU H W, et al. Research progress on assessment tools for cognitive impairment in the elderly[J]. Beijing Medical Journal, 2022, 44(3): 257-260.
[15]	LOGSDON R G, GIBBONS L E, MCCURRY S M, et al. Quality of life in Alzheimer's disease: patient and caregiver reports[J]. Ment Health Aging, 1999, 5: 21-32.
[16]	孙晶, 郑秀利, 杨支兰, 等. 痴呆患者居家老年照顾者生活质量评估量表的汉化和信效度检验[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2021, 56(12): 1901-1906. SUN J, ZHENG X L, YANG Z L, et al. Sinicization of the dementia quality of life scale for older family carers of patients and the test of its reliability and validity[J]. Chin J Nurs, 2021, 56(12): 1901-1906.
[17]	SHEIKH J I, YESAVAGE J A. Geriatric depression scale (GDS): recent evidence and development of a shorter version[J]. Clinical Gerontologist, 1986, 5: 165-173. doi: 10.1300/J018v05n01_09
[18]	唐丹. 简版老年抑郁量表(GDS-15)在中国老年人中的使用[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2013, 21(3): 402-405. TANG D. Application of short form geriatric depression scale (GDS-15) in Chinese elderly[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 2013, 21(3): 402-405.
[19]	翁淑静, 宁丽, 李益民, 等. 沟通相关照护负担感量表的汉化及信度效度检验[J]. 中国护理管理, 2023, 23(9): 1312-1317. WENG S J, NING L, LI Y M, et al. Reliability and validity of Chinese version of Communication-Burden Scale for family caregivers of post-stroke aphasia patients[J]. Chinese Nursing Management, 2023, 23(9): 1312-1317.
[20]	DAUPHINOT V, POTASHMAN M, LEVITCHI-BENEA M, et al. Economic and caregiver impact of Alzheimer's disease across the disease spectrum: a cohort study[J]. Alzheimers Res Ther, 2022, 14(1): 34. doi: 10.1186/s13195-022-00969-x
[21]	杨美丽, 洪瑞芬. 厦门社区老年性痴呆患者其家庭照护负担的调查研究[J]. 中国卫生标准管理, 2019, 10(17): 4-6. YANG M L, HONG R F. Investigation on family care burden of senile dementia patients in Xiamen Community[J]. China Health Standard Management, 2019, 10(17): 4-6.
[22]	张妍, 夏宁宁, 吴婕, 等. 南京地区老年期痴呆患者照护负担研究[J]. 南京医科大学学报(社会科学版), 2021, 21(5): 490-495. ZHANG Y, XIA N N, WU J, et al. A study on the care burden of elderly dementia patients in Nanjing area[J]. Journal of Nanjing Medical University(Social Sciences), 2021, 21(5): 490-495.
[23]	艾宪英. 老年痴呆患者主要照护亲属的负担及生活质量相关调查研究[J]. 精神医学杂志, 2018, 31(1): 30-34. AI X Y. Investigationon the quality of life and the burden of caretaking relatives ofsenile dementia patients[J]. Journal of Psychiatry, 2018, 31(1): 30-34.
[24]	ORGETA V, LEUNG P, DEL-PINO-CASADO R, et al. Psychological treatments for depression and anxiety in dementia and mild cognitive impairment[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2022, 4(4): CD009125. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009125.pub3.
[25]	周路路, 陆媛, 高欣, 等. 轻度认知障碍患者家庭日常照料者的负担情况及影响因素分析[J]. 山东医药, 2022, 62(26): 52-55. ZHOU L L, LU Y, GAO X, et al. Analysis of the burden and influencing factors of daily caregivers in families of patients with mild cognitive impairment[J]. Shandong Medical Journal, 2022, 62(26): 52-55.
[26]	TAY R, TAN J Y S, HUM A Y M. Factors associated with family caregiver burden of home-dwelling patients with advanced dementia[J]. J Am Med Dir Assoc, 2022, 23(7): 1248-1256. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2021.09.012
[27]	SCHEIN J, HOULE C R, URGANUS A L, et al. The Impact of agitation in dementia on caregivers: a real-world survey[J]. J Alzheimers Dis, 2022, 88(2): 663-677. doi: 10.3233/JAD-215670
[28]	林利. 黑龙江省人口老龄化带来的挑战与思考[J]. 统计与咨询, 2023, 6(6): 2-6. LIN L. Challenges and reflections on population aging in Heilongjiang Province[J]. Statistics and Consultation, 2023, 6(6): 2-6.
[29]	SECINTI E, FISCHER IC, BRENNAN EA, et al. The efficacy of psychosocial interventions for cancer caregiver burden: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J]. Clin Psychol Rev, 2023, 99: 102237. DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2022.102237.
[30]	TAO P, SVETNIK V, BLIWISEL D L, et al. Comparison of polysomnography in people with Alzheimer's disease and insomnia versus non-demented elderly people with insomnia[J]. Sleep Med, 2023, 101: 515-521.
[31]	HUANG W C, CHANG M C, WANG W F, et al. A comparison of caregiver burden for different types of dementia: an 18-month retrospective cohort study[J]. Front Psychol, 2022, 12: 798315. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.798315.