留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

艾地苯醌联合舍曲林治疗老年脑卒中后抑郁的疗效及对认知功能和氧化应激的影响

潘飞 许彤 张景丹 赵峥 李亚迪 徐亚南 徐亚辉

潘飞, 许彤, 张景丹, 赵峥, 李亚迪, 徐亚南, 徐亚辉. 艾地苯醌联合舍曲林治疗老年脑卒中后抑郁的疗效及对认知功能和氧化应激的影响[J]. 中华全科医学, 2025, 23(2): 223-226. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.003872
引用本文: 潘飞, 许彤, 张景丹, 赵峥, 李亚迪, 徐亚南, 徐亚辉. 艾地苯醌联合舍曲林治疗老年脑卒中后抑郁的疗效及对认知功能和氧化应激的影响[J]. 中华全科医学, 2025, 23(2): 223-226. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.003872
PAN Fei, XU Tong, ZHANG Jingdan, ZHAO Zheng, LI Yadi, XU Yanan, XU Yahui. To investigate the efficacy of idebenone combined with sertraline in the treatment of elderly patients with post-stroke depression, and its effect on cognitive function and oxidative stress[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2025, 23(2): 223-226. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.003872
Citation: PAN Fei, XU Tong, ZHANG Jingdan, ZHAO Zheng, LI Yadi, XU Yanan, XU Yahui. To investigate the efficacy of idebenone combined with sertraline in the treatment of elderly patients with post-stroke depression, and its effect on cognitive function and oxidative stress[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2025, 23(2): 223-226. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.003872

艾地苯醌联合舍曲林治疗老年脑卒中后抑郁的疗效及对认知功能和氧化应激的影响

doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.003872
基金项目: 

河南省医学科技攻关计划(联合共建)项目 LHGJ20190481

详细信息
    通讯作者:

    潘飞,E-mail: jjoo3636@163.com

  • 中图分类号: R743 R749.4

To investigate the efficacy of idebenone combined with sertraline in the treatment of elderly patients with post-stroke depression, and its effect on cognitive function and oxidative stress

  • 摘要:   目的  探讨老年脑卒中后抑郁(PSD)患者采用艾地苯醌联合舍曲林治疗的效果, 并分析其对认知功能及氧化应激的影响。  方法  选取2021年6月-2023年6月新乡医学院第二附属医院收治的104例老年PSD患者, 采用随机数字表法分为对照组和研究组, 每组各52例, 分别接受舍曲林、艾地苯醌联合舍曲林治疗, 疗程为8周。观察2组治疗前和治疗4、8周的汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD)评分变化, 评估临床疗效及治疗前后的认知功能[简易智力状态检查量表(MMSE)、韦氏成人记忆量表(WMS-RC)]、氧化应激指标[超氧化物歧化酶(SOD)、丙二醛(MDA)、谷胱甘肽过氧化物酶(GSH-PX)]及安全性。  结果  2组HAMD评分比较组间效应、时间效应及交互效应均有统计学意义(P < 0.05), 治疗4、8周后研究组HAMD评分低于对照组, 且研究组HAMD评分随时间延长降低趋势更为明显; 研究组临床总有效率为96.15%(50例), 高于对照组的82.69%(43例, χ2=4.981, P=0.026);与治疗前比较, 2组治疗后MMSE评分、长时记忆、短时记忆、即刻记忆、记忆商数、血清SOD及GSH-PX活性均升高, 且研究组上述指标更高(P < 0.05);治疗后2组MDA水平与治疗前比较均降低, 且研究组更低(P < 0.05);研究组不良反应发生率为9.61%(5例), 与对照组(5.77%, 3例)比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。  结论  老年PSD患者应用艾地苯醌联合舍曲林有助于减轻抑郁症状, 提高临床疗效, 改善认知功能, 减轻氧化应激损伤, 安全可靠。

     

  • 表  1  2组老年PSD患者基线资料比较

    Table  1.   Comparison of baseline data of 2 groups of elderly patients with PSD

    组别 例数 年龄
    (x±s,岁)
    性别[例(%)] 脑卒中病程
    (x±s,周)
    脑卒中类型[例(%)]
    男性 女性 脑梗死 脑缺血
    研究组 52 68.83±3.25 29(55.77) 23(44.23) 13.23±2.17 19(36.54) 33(63.46)
    对照组 52 69.59±4.26 27(51.92) 25(48.08) 12.69±3.21 28(53.85) 24(46.15)
    统计量 1.830a 0.155b 1.005a 3.144b
    P 0.070 0.694 0.317 0.076
    注:at值,b为χ2值。
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  2组老年PSD患者HAMD评分比较(x±s,分)

    Table  2.   Comparison of HAMD scores in two groups of elderly patients with PSD(x±s, points)

    组别 例数 HAMD评分 F P
    治疗前 治疗4周 治疗8周
    研究组 52 21.75±6.23 13.91±3.62a 10.82±2.37ab 20.150 < 0.001
    对照组 52 21.69±6.84 15.69±3.71a 12.48±2.97ab 49.147 < 0.001
    F 0.047 2.476 3.150
    P 0.963 0.015 0.002
    注:与本组治疗前比较,aP<0.05;与同组治疗4周比较,bP<0.05。
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  3  2组老年PSD患者临床总有效率比较[例(%)]

    Table  3.   Comparison of the overall clinical effectiveness rate between two groups of elderly patients with PSD[cases (%)]

    组别 例数 痊愈 显效 有效 无效 总有效
    研究组 52 20(38.46) 17(32.69) 13(25.00) 2(3.85) 50(96.15)
    对照组 52 17(32.69) 12(23.08) 14(26.92) 9(17.31) 43(82.69)
    注:2组总有效率比较,χ2=4.981,P=0.026。
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  4  2组老年PSD患者MMSE评分比较(x±s,分)

    Table  4.   Comparison of MMSE scores in 2 groups of elderly PSD patients(x±s, points)

    组别 例数 MMSE评分 t P
    治疗前 治疗后
    研究组 52 15.63±4.13 28.56±5.23 13.991 < 0.001
    对照组 52 15.56±4.18 24.23±5.02 9.571 < 0.001
    统计量 0.086a 2.246b
    P 0.932 0.035
    注:at值,bF值。
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  5  2组老年PSD患者WMS-RC评分比较(x±s,分)

    Table  5.   Comparison of WMS-RC scores in 2 groups of elderly PSD patients(x±s, points)

    组别 例数 长时记忆 短时记忆 即刻记忆 记忆商数
    治疗前 治疗后 治疗前 治疗后 治疗前 治疗后 治疗前 治疗后
    研究组 52 15.52±2.12 30.58±2.13b 25.75±5.62 51.23±5.23b 3.35±1.23 10.26±1.28b 52.36±5.63 85.23±5.81b
    对照组 52 15.23±2.64 25.46±2.32b 25.79±5.57 41.62±3.89b 3.56±1.36 8.12±1.07b 52.89±5.13 72.56±5.49b
    统计量 0.021a 8.371c 0.036a 7.222c 0.826a 6.354c 0.502a 1.154c
    P 0.983 < 0.001 0.971 < 0.001 0.411 < 0.001 0.617 0.261
    注:at值,cF值。与同组治疗前比较,bP<0.05。
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  6  2组老年PSD患者血清SOD、MDA和GSH-PX水平比较(x±s)

    Table  6.   Comparison of serum levels of SOD, MDA and GSH-PX in 2 groups of elderly patients with PSD(x±s)

    组别 例数 SOD(U/mL) MDA(μmol/L) GSH-PX(U/mol)
    治疗前 治疗后 治疗前 治疗后 治疗前 治疗后
    研究组 52 71.86±9.42 87.57±10.22b 8.23±1.06 6.17±0.88b 76.59±9.27 93.65±11.87b
    对照组 52 72.16±8.66 81.13±10.56b 8.25±0.98 7.21±1.09b 76.73±9.28 86.43±11.28b
    统计量 0.169a 2.864c 0.100a 3.994c 0.077a 2.954c
    P 0.866 0.013 0.921 0.001 0.939 0.009
    注:at值,cF值。与同组治疗前比较,bP<0.05。
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  7  2组老年PSD患者不良反应发生率比较[例(%)]

    Table  7.   Comparison of the incidence of adverse reactions in two groups of elderly patients with PSD[cases (%)]

    组别 例数 恶心 嗜睡 失眠 便秘 总发生
    研究组 52 2(3.85) 1(1.92) 1(1.92) 1(1.92) 5(9.61)
    对照组 52 2(3.85) 1(1.92) 0 0 3(5.77)
    注:2组不良反应总发生率比较,χ2=0.542,P=0.462。
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] LIU Q, SHI K, WANG Y, et al. Neurovascular inflammation and complications of thrombolysis therapy in stroke[J]. Stroke, 2023, 54(10): 2688-2697.
    [2] LAM CHING W, LI H J, GUO J, et al. Acupuncture for post-stroke depression: a systematic review and network meta-analysis[J]. BMC Psychiatry, 2023, 23(1): 314.
    [3] LÖKK J, DELBARI A. Management of depression in elderly stroke patients[J]. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat, 2010, 6: 539-549.
    [4] 毛亚娣, 孙剑虹, 刘蓝冰, 等. 生物波穴位刺激联合中医情志护理对脑卒中后抑郁患者恢复效果的影响[J]. 中华全科医学, 2023, 21(3): 530-533. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002924

    MAO Y D, SUN J H, LIU L B, et al. Effect of bio-wave acupoint stimulation combined with emotional nursing of traditional Chinese medicine on recovery in patients with post-stroke depression[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2023, 21(3): 530-533. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002924
    [5] ALIABAD H A R, MAHDAVI B, AZADPARVAR M, et al. DFT study of sertraline hydrochloride antidepressant drug[J]. Mol Model, 2023, 29(5): 144.
    [6] 司玉红. 艾地苯醌联合尼莫地平治疗血管性痴呆的疗效及对TNF-α与CRP和IL-6水平的影响[J]. 医药论坛杂志, 2021, 42(21): 123-125.

    SI Y H. Efficacy of Idbenquinone combined with Nimodipine in the treatment of vascular dementia and its effect on TNF-α, CRP and IL-6 levels[J]. Journal of Medical Forum, 2021, 42(21): 123-125.
    [7] 冯国平, 黑雁. 艾地苯醌联合丁苯酞软胶囊治疗脑梗死的临床研究[J]. 检验医学与临床, 2022, 19(1): 1411-1414.

    FENG G P, HEI Y. Clinical study on the treatment of cerebral infarction with Idebenone combined with butylphthalide soft capsule[J]. Laboratory Medicine and Clinic, 2022, 19(1): 1411-1414.
    [8] 倪小佳, 陈耀龙, 蔡业峰. 中西医结合脑卒中循证实践指南(2019)[J]. 中国循证医学杂志, 2020, 20(8): 901-912.

    NI X J, CHEN Y L, CAI Y F. Evidence-based practice guideline on integrative medicine for stroke 2019[J]. Chinese Journal of Evidence-based Medicine, 2020, 20(8): 901-912.
    [9] 王少石, 周新雨, 朱春燕. 卒中后抑郁临床实践的中国专家共识[J]. 中国卒中杂志, 2016, 11(8): 685-693.

    WANG S S, ZHOU X Y, ZHU C Y. Chinese expert consensus on clinical practice of post-stroke depression[J]. Chinese journal of Stroke, 2016, 11(8): 685-693.
    [10] OBEID S, ABI ELIAS HALLIT C, HADDAD C, et al. Validation of the hamilton depression rating scale (HDRS) and sociodemographic factors associated with lebanese depressed patients[J]. Encephale, 2018, 44(5): 397-402.
    [11] FERNANDO I, CARTER G. A case report using the mental state examination scale (MSES): a tool for measuring change in mental state[J]. Australas Psychiatry, 2016, 24(1): 76-80.
    [12] KENT P L. Evolution of wechsler ' s memory scales: content and structural analysis[J]. Appl Neuropsychol Adult, 2017, 24(3): 232-251.
    [13] RICHARDS L G, CRAMER S C. Therapies targeting stroke recovery[J]. Stroke, 2023, 54(1): 265-269.
    [14] ZHOU H, WEI Y J, XIE G Y. Research progress on post-stroke depression[J]. Exp Neurol, 2023, 373: 114660. DOI: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2023.114660.
    [15] 李莎, 骆琼, 贾海珍. 舍曲林联合音乐治疗对产后抑郁的临床疗效分析[J]. 现代医药卫生, 2022, 38(2): 185-187, 191.

    LI S, LUO Q, JIA H Z. Clinical effect of sertraline combined with music therapy on postpartum depression[J]. Journal of Modern Medicine & Health, 2022, 38(2): 185-187, 191.
    [16] 周治贵, 张峰. 早期应用艾地苯醌对急性脑卒中患者NE, BDNF水平及抑郁症状的影响[J]. 贵州医药, 2022, 46(7): 1046-1047.

    ZHOU Z G, ZHANG F. Effects of early application of Idebenone on NE, BDNF levels and depressive symptoms in acute stroke patients[J]. Guizhou Medicine Journal, 2022, 46(7): 1046-1047.
    [17] 崔丽霞, 郭丽云, 刘红. 艾地苯醌联合倍他司汀治疗脑梗死后认知功能障碍的临床研究[J]. 现代药物与临床, 2023, 38(1): 85-90.

    CUI L X, GUO LY, LIU H. Clinical study on idebenone combined with betahistine in treatment of cognitive dysfunction after cerebral infarction[J]. Drugs & Clinic, 2023, 38(1): 85-90.
    [18] 李晶, 张妮. 艾地苯醌联合尼麦角林治疗慢性脑缺血头晕患者的疗效及对患者氧化应激的影响[J]. 医学临床研究, 2021, 38(4): 484-487.

    LI J, ZHANG N. Efficacy of Idebenone combined with Nicergoline in the treatment of patients with chronic cerebral ischaemia and dizziness and its effect on patients ' oxidative stress[J]. The Journal of Medical Theory and Practice, 2021, 38(4): 484-487.
    [19] GUEVEN N, RAVISHANKAR P, ERI R, et al. Idebenone: when an antioxidant is not an antioxidant[J]. Redox Biol, 2021, 38: 101812. DOI: 10.1016/j.redox.2020.101812.
    [20] 戴先飞, 崔瑶瑶, 王琪, 等. 艾地苯醌治疗遗忘型轻度认知功能障碍的有效性和安全性观察[J]. 山东医药, 2023, 63(3): 65-69.

    DAI X F, CUI Y Y, WANG Q, et al. Effectiveness and safety of Idebenone in the treatment of amnestic mild cognitive dysfunction[J]. Shandong Medical Journal, 2023, 63(3): 65-69.
  • 加载中
表(7)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  8
  • HTML全文浏览量:  5
  • PDF下载量:  1
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2024-08-11
  • 网络出版日期:  2025-03-27

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回