The effect of four handed operation combined with LEARNS model health education on disease cognition and cooperation in patients undergoing impacted tooth extraction surgery
-
摘要:
目的 随着阻生牙拔除术患者数量的增多,临床对于护理服务提出了更高要求,本研究应用四手操作配合LEARNS模式健康教育,分析其对阻生牙拔除术患者疾病认知水平及配合度的影响。 方法 选取2022年11月—2024年2月在温州医科大学附属口腔医院行阻生牙拔除术的113例患者作为研究对象,根据随机数字表法将其分为对照组(56例)和观察组(57例)。对照组患者应用常规护理联合四手操作,观察组在对照组基础上配合LEARNS模式进行健康教育。比较2组患者干预前后疾病认知水平及心理状态,统计2组患者治疗配合度及术后并发症发生情况。 结果 干预后,观察组患者疾病认知水平得分明显高于对照组(P < 0.05);干预后,观察组患者牙科畏惧量表(DFS)及牙科焦虑量表(DAS)得分均低于对照组(P < 0.05);观察组患者治疗配合度为98.2%(56/57),高于对照组[85.7%(48/56),P < 0.05];阻生牙拔除术后,观察组并发症发生率为3.5%(2/57),低于对照组[17.9%(10/56),χ2=6.127,P=0.013]。 结论 四手操作配合LEARNS模式健康教育有利于提高阻生牙拔除术患者疾病认知水平及配合度,能有效缓解患者牙科焦虑、恐惧等不良情绪,值得临床应用。 Abstract:Objective The increase in the number of patients undergoing impacted tooth extraction surgery has resulted in higher demands being placed on nursing services in clinical practice. The present study employs a combination of four-handed operation and the LEARNS model of health education to analyze its impact on the disease cognition level and cooperation of patients undergoing impacted tooth extraction surgery. Methods The present study selected 113 patients who underwent impacted tooth extraction surgery at the Affiliated Stomatological Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University from November 2022 to February 2024 as the subjects for its investigation study subjects. The subjects were randomly divided into two groups: a control group (56 cases) and an observation group (57 cases). The randomization was performed using a random number table method. The control group received routine nursing care in combination with four-handed handed operation, while the observation group received LEARNS model health education in addition to the control group. A comparison should be made of the cognitive level and psychological status from two groups of patients before and after intervention, and the treatment cooperation and postoperative complications in the two groups of patients should be calculated. Results Following the intervention, a statistically significant difference was observed in the disease cognitive level score of the observation group in comparison to the control group (P < 0.05). Furthermore, post-intervention, the observation group demonstrated lower scores on both the dental fear scale (DFS) and the dental anxiety scale (DAS) when compared to the control group (P < 0.05); The treatment cooperation rate of patients in the observation group was 98.2% (56/57), which was higher than 85.7% (48/56) in the control group (P < 0.05); Following the extraction of impacted teeth, the incidence of complications in the observation group was 3.5% (2/57), which was lower than that in the control group [17.9% (10/56), χ2=6.127, P=0.013]. Conclusion The findings of this study demonstrate that a four-handed operation in combination with the LEARNS model health education program is beneficial for improving the disease awareness and cooperation level of patients undergoing impacted tooth extraction surgery. The results of this study indicate that this combination effectively alleviates dental anxiety and fear and is worthy of clinical application. -
表 1 2组行阻生牙拔除术患者一般情况比较
Table 1. Comparison of general conditions between two groups of patients undergoing impacted tooth extraction
组别 例数 性别(例) 年龄(x±s,岁) BMI(x±s) 阻生类型(例) 男性 女性 近中阻生 舌向阻生 倒置阻生 远中阻生 对照组 56 27 29 32.78±3.16 21.51±2.88 18 22 10 6 观察组 57 30 27 33.33±4.07 21.24±3.10 16 23 11 7 统计量 0.220a 0.801b 0.479b 0.256a P值 0.639 0.425 0.633 0.968 注:a为χ2值,b为t值。 表 2 2组行阻生牙拔除术患者干预前后疾病认知水平比较(x±s,分)
Table 2. Comparison of disease cognition levels between 2 groups of patients undergoing impacted tooth extraction before and after intervention(x±s, points)
组别 例数 治疗过程 术后注意事项 口腔护理 总分 干预前 干预后 干预前 干预后 干预前 干预后 干预前 干预后 对照组 56 5.44±1.45 6.24±1.51b 4.28±1.77 7.02±1.24b 4.96±1.80 6.68±1.29b 14.92±3.68 21.02±3.16b 观察组 57 5.16±1.27 8.10±1.13b 4.76±1.45 8.35±0.61b 4.88±1.73 8.33±0.48b 14.76±3.55 26.33±2.28b 统计量 1.092a 5.935c 1.578a 6.472c 0.241a 7.622c 0.235a 8.731c P值 0.277 < 0.001 0.117 < 0.001 0.810 < 0.001 0.814 < 0.001 注:a为t值,c为F值。与同组内干预前比较,bP < 0.05。 表 3 2组行阻生牙拔除术患者干预前后心理状态比较(x±s,分)
Table 3. Comparison of psychological states of the two groups of patients undergoing impacted tooth extraction before and after intervention(x±s, points)
组别 例数 DFS DAS 干预前 干预后 干预前 干预后 对照组 56 65.87±12.56 50.08±8.55 15.24±2.83 10.81±2.73 观察组 57 66.13±10.24 32.55±6.37 14.97±3.02 6.23±1.14 统计量 0.121a 9.853b 0.490a 9.024b P值 0.924 < 0.001 0.625 < 0.001 注:a为t值,b为F值。 表 4 2组行阻生牙拔除术患者治疗配合度比较[例(%)]
Table 4. Comparison of treatment cooperation between 2 groups of patients undergoing impacted tooth extraction[cases (%)]
组别 例数 良好 一般 较差 治疗配合度 对照组 56 31(55.4) 17(30.4) 8(14.3) 48(85.7) 观察组 57 44(77.2) 12(21.1) 1(1.8) 56(98.2) 统计量 7.397a 4.463b P值 0.025 0.035 注:a为Z值,b为χ2值。 表 5 2组行阻生牙拔除术患者术后并发症发生率比较[例(%)]
Table 5. Comparison of postoperative complications between two groups of patients undergoing impacted tooth extraction[cases (%)]
组别 例数 活动性出血 炎症反应 干槽症 术后张口受限 总发生 对照组 56 4(7.1) 3(5.4) 1(1.8) 2(3.6) 10(17.9) 观察组 57 1(1.8) 1(1.8) 0 0 2(3.5) 注:2组患者术后并发症总发生率比较,χ2=6.127,P=0.013。 -
[1] SEEHRA J, MORTAJA K, WAZWAZ F, et al. Interventions to facilitate the successful eruption of impacted maxillary incisor teeth due to the presence of a supernumerary: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2023, 163(5): 594-608. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2023.01.004 [2] GHAEMINIA H, NIENHUJJS M E, TOEDTLING V, et al. Surgical removal versus retention for the management of asymptomatic disease-free impacted wisdom teeth[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2020, 5(5): CD003879. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003879. [3] 冯丽嫦, 林丽珊, 周小彤, 等. 多种形式的口腔健康宣教在阻生牙拔除术后患者中的应用效果[J]. 护理实践与研究, 2019, 16(5): 95-96.FENG L C, LIN L S, ZHOU X T, et al. The application effect of various forms of oral health education in patients after impacted tooth extraction surgery[J]. Nursing Practice and Research, 2019, 16(5): 95-96. [4] 丁婧, 程春, 张洋洋, 等. 四手操作配合"知信行"健康宣教在根管治疗中的应用及效果评价[J]. 中华全科医学, 2022, 20(5): 886-889. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002479DING Q, CHENG C, ZHANG Y Y, et al. Application and Effect Evaluation of Four Hand Operation Combined with "Knowledge, Faith and Action" Health Education in Root Canal Treatment[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2022, 20(5): 886-889. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002479 [5] 赵佳妮, 吕婧, 张月英. LEARNS模式在冠状动脉CT血管成像检查患者健康教育中的应用[J]. 中国实用护理杂志, 2024, 40(16): 1207-1213.ZHAO J N, LV Q, ZHANG Y Y. Application of LEARNS mode in health education for patients undergoing coronary CT angiography[J]. Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing, 2024, 40(16): 1207-1213. [6] 刘红春, 范旭, 胡德渝, 等. 德阳市成年人的口腔健康知识、态度及行为调查[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2005, 23(1): 46-48.LIU H C, FAN X, HU D Y, et al. Survey on Oral Health Knowledge, Attitude, and Behavior of Adults in Deyang City[J]. West China Journal of Stomatology, 2005, 23(1): 46-48. [7] 梁焕友, 彭助力, 潘集阳, 等. 牙科畏惧调查(DFS)量表中文版的研制与评价[J]. 中山大学学报(医学科学版), 2006, 27(2): 236-240.LIANG H Y, PENG Z L, PAN J Y, et al. Development and Evaluation of the Chinese Version of the Dental Fear Survey (DFS) Scale[J]. Journal of Sun Yat sen University (Medical Science Edition), 2006, 27(2): 236-240. [8] 蒋银杨, 胡颖, 何克新. 口腔门诊成人患者牙科焦虑症调查及相关因素分析[J]. 实用口腔医学杂志, 2009, 25(5): 725-727.JIANG Y Y, HU Y, HE K S. Investigation of Dental Anxiety Disorder in Adult Patients in Oral Outpatient Department and Analysis of Related Factors[J]. Journal of Practical Oral Medicine, 2009, 25(5): 725-727. [9] 刘湘艳, 肖莉, 程晓卉, 等. 规范循证护理联合四手操作在下颌智齿牙胚拔除患者中的价值[J]. 国际护理学杂志, 2024, 43(11): 2035-2038.LIU X Y, XIAO L, CHENG X H, et al. The value of standardized evidence-based nursing combined with four handed operation in patients undergoing mandibular wisdom tooth germ extraction[J]. International Journal of Nursing, 2024, 43(11): 2035-2038. [10] PETRONIS Ž, ZIGMANTAVIČIUS J, GERVICKAS A. Various wound closure ways after impacted lower wisdom teeth removal: a review[J]. Stomatologija, 2020, 22(4): 107-115. http://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33847282/ [11] GRISAR K, LUYTEN J, PREDA F, et al. Interventions for impacted maxillary canines: a systematic review of the relationship between initial canine position and treatment outcome[J]. Orthod Craniofac Res, 2021, 24(2): 180-193. [12] 王蕾, 胡成文, 许芳, 等. LEARNS模式健康教育对初产妇育儿胜任感及母乳喂养的影响[J]. 军事护理, 2024, 41(5): 51-54.WANG L, HU C W, XU F, et al. The impact of LEARNS health education on the parenting competence and breastfeeding of primiparous women[J]. Military Nursing, 2024, 41(5): 51-54. [13] 高苗苗, 金瑞华, 淮盼盼, 等. 基于LEARNS模式的健康教育对慢性肾脏病病人的影响[J]. 护理研究, 2023, 37(16): 2983-2987.GAO M M, JIN R H, HUAI P P, et al. The impact of health education based on LEARNS model on patients with chronic kidney disease[J]. Nursing Research, 2023, 37(16): 2983-2987. [14] 赵琳琳, 梁燕桃, 詹凯琼. 六手操作与四手操作护理在乳牙预成冠修复术中的应用效果[J]. 国际护理学杂志, 2023, 42(13): 2377-2380.ZHAO L L, LIANG Y T, ZHAN K Q. The application effect of six hand operation and four hand operation nursing in pre crown restoration of deciduous teeth[J]. International Journal of Nursing, 2023, 42(13): 2377-2380. [15] 王荣, 张爽爽, 丰花, 等. 基于LEARNS模式的康复训练对髋部骨折患者术后功能恢复的影响[J]. 川北医学院学报, 2023, 38(3): 417-420.WANG R, ZHANG S S, FENG H, et al. The impact of LEARNS based rehabilitation training on postoperative functional recovery in patients with hip fractures[J]. Journal of Chuanbei Medical College, 2023, 38(3): 417-420. [16] 钟阳, 杨华. 下颌阻生第三磨牙手术瓣设计的研究进展[J]. 中国基层医药, 2023, 30(3): 478-480.ZHONG Y, YANG H. Research progress on the design of surgical flaps for mandibular obstructive third molars[J]. Chinese Journal of Primary Medicine and Pharmacy, 2023, 30(3): 478-480. [17] 刘珊珊, 张冰, 李晶, 等. LEARNS模式在老年高血压患者健康教育中的应用[J]. 护理学杂志, 2022, 37(8): 76-79.LIU S S, ZHANG B, LI J, et al. Application of LEARNS model in health education for elderly patients with hypertension[J]. Journal of Nursing, 2022, 37(8): 76-79. -

计量
- 文章访问数: 11
- HTML全文浏览量: 8
- PDF下载量: 2
- 被引次数: 0