留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

“互联网+医疗健康”智慧化医联体模式在儿童青少年糖尿病患儿管理中的应用

王晓艳 张满燕

王晓艳, 张满燕. “互联网+医疗健康”智慧化医联体模式在儿童青少年糖尿病患儿管理中的应用[J]. 中华全科医学, 2025, 23(9): 1522-1525. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.004169
引用本文: 王晓艳, 张满燕. “互联网+医疗健康”智慧化医联体模式在儿童青少年糖尿病患儿管理中的应用[J]. 中华全科医学, 2025, 23(9): 1522-1525. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.004169
WANG Xiaoyan, ZHANG Manyan. Application of 'Internet+ Healthcare' smart medical consortium model model in the management of children and adolescents with diabetes mellitus[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2025, 23(9): 1522-1525. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.004169
Citation: WANG Xiaoyan, ZHANG Manyan. Application of "Internet+ Healthcare" smart medical consortium model model in the management of children and adolescents with diabetes mellitus[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2025, 23(9): 1522-1525. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.004169

“互联网+医疗健康”智慧化医联体模式在儿童青少年糖尿病患儿管理中的应用

doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.004169
基金项目: 

浙江省医药卫生科技计划项目 2020ZH59

详细信息
    通讯作者:

    张满燕,E-mail:13567548189@163.com

  • 中图分类号: R587.1

Application of "Internet+ Healthcare" smart medical consortium model model in the management of children and adolescents with diabetes mellitus

  • 摘要:   目的   “互联网+医疗健康”智慧化医联体模式是“互联网+医疗健康”与医联体的有机融合。儿童青少年糖尿病(DM)患儿的家属照顾负担重,关于“互联网+医疗健康”智慧化医联体模式在儿童青少年DM患儿中的应用效果尚缺乏报道,本研究对此进行探讨,旨在为优化儿童青少年DM患儿管理措施提供参考。   方法   选取2021年8月—2024年7月绍兴文理学院附属医院收治的80例儿童青少年DM患儿,采用随机数字表法分为观察组和对照组,每组各40例。对照组实施常规管理模式,观察组实施“互联网+医疗健康”智慧化医联体管理模式。2组均在6个月后评估血糖指标、治疗依从性等。   结果   管理后观察组空腹血糖(FPG)、餐后2 h血糖(2hPG)、糖化血糖蛋白(HbA1c)均低于对照组[(7.16±1.05)mmol/L vs. (7.69±1.02)mmol/L,(8.94±1.33)mmol/L vs. (9.62±1.40)mmol/L,(8.95±1.08)% vs. (9.49±1.15)%,P<0.05]。观察组日胰岛素剂量、住院时间、平均每月医疗费用、低血糖发生率均少于对照组(P<0.05)。管理后观察组照顾者负担低于对照组,治疗依从性、家属满意度高于对照组(P<0.05)。   结论   “互联网+医疗健康”智慧化医联体模式应用于儿童青少年DM患儿管理能有效降低血糖水平,改善治疗依从性,减少日胰岛素剂量、住院时间、平均每月医疗费用及低血糖发生率,降低照顾者负担,提高家属满意度。

     

  • 表  1  2组儿童青少年DM患儿一般资料比较

    Table  1.   Comparison of baseline characteristics between the two groups of children and adolescents with DM

    项目 观察组(n=40) 对照组(n=40) 统计量 P
    性别[例(%)] 0.050a 0.823
      男 22(55.00) 21(52.50)
      女 18(45.00) 19(52.50)
    年龄(x±s, 岁) 9.91±2.06 9.49±1.95 0.937b 0.352
    病程[例(%)] 0.145c 0.885
      <1年 12(30.00) 10(25.00)
      1~5年 17(42.50) 20(50.00)
      >5年 11(27.50) 10(25.00)
    所处教育阶段[例(%)] 0.508c 0.611
      学龄前 3(7.50) 2(5.00)
      小学 28(70.00) 27(67.50)
      初中及以上 9(22.50) 11(27.50)
    居住地[例(%)] 0.922a 0.631
      城市 12(30.00) 10(25.00)
      城镇 17(42.50) 15(37.50)
      农村 11(27.50) 15(37.50)
    主要照顾者[例(%)] 0.507a 0.776
      父母 26(65.00) 25(62.50)
      祖父母或外祖父母 12(30.00) 14(35.00)
      其他 2(5.00) 1(2.50)
    注:a为χ2值,bt值,cU值。
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  2组儿童青少年DM患儿血糖指标比较(x ±s)

    Table  2.   Comparison of blood glucose indexes between the two groups of children and adolescents with DM(x ±s)

    组别 例数 FPG(mmol/L) 2hPG(mmol/L) HbA1c(%)
    管理前 管理后 管理前 管理后 管理前 管理后
    观察组 40 10.65±1.83 7.16±1.05 13.56±2.04 8.94±1.33 10.29±1.48 8.95±1.08
    对照组 40 10.17±1.74 7.69±1.02 12.99±2.17 9.62±1.40 10.53±1.55 9.49±1.15
    统计量 1.202a 12.369b 1.210a 11.674b 0.708a 11.985b
    P 0.233 <0.001 0.230 <0.001 0.481 <0.001
    注:at值,bF值。
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  3  2组儿童青少年DM患儿治疗依从性比较[例(%)]

    Table  3.   Comparison of treatment compliance between the two groups of children and adolescents with DM[cases(%)]

    组别 例数 FPG监测处方执行 其他时间点血糖监测处方执行 正确使用胰岛素 合理饮食 适当运动 定期复诊
    观察组 40 38(95.00) 36(90.00) 37(92.50) 33(82.50) 33(82.50) 37(92.50)
    对照组 40 30(75.00) 27(67.50) 30(75.00) 25(62.50) 24(60.00) 29(72.50)
    χ2 6.275 6.050 4.501 4.013 4.943 5.541
    P 0.012 0.014 0.034 0.045 0.026 0.019
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  4  2组儿童青少年DM患儿日胰岛素剂量、住院时间、平均每月医疗费用、低血糖发生率比较

    Table  4.   Comparison of daily insulin dose, length of hospital stay, average monthly medical expenses and incidence of hypoglycemia between the two groups of children and adolescents with DM

    组别 例数 日胰岛素剂量(x±s,U/kg) 总住院时间(x±s,d) 平均每月医疗费用(x±s,元) 低血糖[例(%)]
    观察组 40 33.69±3.67 13.30±3.26 896.37±105.34 0
    对照组 40 35.49±3.51 15.20±3.41 979.19±112.40 6(15.00)
    统计量 2.242a 2.547a 3.400a 4.505b
    P 0.028 0.013 0.001 0.034
    注:at值,b为χ2值。
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  5  2组儿童青少年DM患儿照顾者负担比较[例(%)]

    Table  5.   Comparison of caregiver burden between the two groups of children and adolescents with DM[cases(%)]

    组别 例数 管理前 管理后
    轻度 中度 重度 轻度 中度 重度
    观察组 40 8(20.00) 21(52.50) 11(27.50) 26(65.00) 12(30.00) 2(5.00)
    对照组 40 7(17.50) 20(50.00) 13(32.50) 15(37.50) 18(45.00) 7(17.50)
    Z 0.450 2.363
    P 0.653 0.018
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  6  2组儿童青少年DM患儿家属满意度比较[例(%)]

    Table  6.   Comparison of family satisfaction between the two groups of children and adolescents with DM[cases(%)]

    组别 例数 不满意 满意 非常满意
    观察组 40 2(5.00) 13(32.50) 25(62.50)
    对照组 40 9(22.50) 14(35.00) 17(42.50)
    注:2组满意度比较,Z=1.980,P=0.048。
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] SAWYER A, SOBCZAK M, FORLENZA G P, et al. Glycemic control in relation to technology use in a single-center cohort of children with type 1 diabetes[J]. Diabetes Technol Ther, 2022, 24(6): 409-415. doi: 10.1089/dia.2021.0471
    [2] 中华医学会儿科学分会内分泌遗传代谢学组, 中华儿科杂志编辑委员会. 中国儿童1型糖尿病标准化诊断与治疗专家共识(2020版)[J]. 中华儿科杂志, 2020, 58(6): 447-454.

    Endocrinology, Genetic and Metabolic Group, Pediatric Branch, Chinese Medical Association; Editorial Board, Chinese Journal of Pediatrics. Expert consensus on the standardized diagnosis and management of type 1 diabetes mellitus in Chinese children(2020)[J]. Chinese Journal of Pediatrics, 2020, 58(6): 447-454.
    [3] 陈顺, 林雪梅, 袁乔英, 等. 1990—2019年中国儿童青少年1型糖尿病负担分析与模型预测[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2024, 32(7): 746-751, 784.

    CHEN S, LIN X M, YUAN Q Y, et al. Burden analysis and model prediction of type 1 diabetes mellitus in Chinese children and adolescents from 1990 to 2019[J]. Chinese Journal of Child Health Care, 2024, 32(7): 746-751, 784.
    [4] DEMETERCO-BERGGREN C, EBEKOZIEN O, NOOR N, et al. Factors associated with achieving target alc in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes: findings from the t1d exchange quality improvement collaborative[J]. Clin Diabetes, 2022, 41(1): 68-75.
    [5] HOLDER M, KAPELLEN T, ZIEGLER R, BÜRGER-BÜSING J, et al. Diagnosis, therapy and follow-up of diabetes mellitus in children and adolescents[J]. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes, 2022, 130(S01): S49-S79.
    [6] 国家卫生计生委, 国家中医药管理局. 关于印发进一步改善医疗服务行动计划(2018—2020年)[EB/OL]. (2017-12-29)[2023-05-04]. http//www.nhc.gov.cn/cms-search/xxgk/getManuscriptXxgk.htm?id=9df87fced4da47b0a9f8e1ce9fbc7520.
    [7] 喻杉, 彭倩, 陈靓, 等. 基于"互联网+专科医联体"的甘孜藏区膝骨关节炎阶梯化防治管理模式临床观察[J]. 四川中医, 2024, 42(1): 206-209.

    YU S, PENG Q, CHEN L, et al. Clinical Observation of a Stepwise Prevention and Management Model for Knee Osteoarthritis in Ganzi Tibetan Area Based on "Internet + Specialist Medical Consortium"[J]. Journal of Sichuan of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 2024, 42(1): 206-209.
    [8] ZHAO Y, WANG X. Effect of integrated nursing care based on medical alliance mode on the prevention and treatment of complications and self-efficacy of patients with coronary heart disease after PCI[J]. J Healthc Eng, 2022, 2022(1): 7727953. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2018.02.002.
    [9] 李红, 邓兰兰, 白琴, 等. 基于三级预防的"互联网+专科医联体"管理对痛风患者的影响[J]. 东南国防医药, 2020, 22(1): 88-90.

    LI H, DENG L L, BAI Q, et al. The Impact of "Internet + Specialist Medical Consortium" Management Based on Tertiary Prevention on Gout Patients[J]. Military Medical Journal of Southeast China, 2020, 22(1): 88-90.
    [10] 巩纯秀. 儿童青少年糖尿病管理指南[M]. 2版. 北京: 科学出版社, 2019.

    GONG C X. Guidelines for the Management of Diabetes in Children and Adolescents (2nd Edition)[M]. 2nd Edition. Beijing: Science Press, 2019.
    [11] PINYOPORNPANISH K, PINYOPORNPANISH M, WONGPAKARAN N, et al. Investigating psychometric properties of the Thai version of the Zarit burden interview using rasch model and confirmatory factor analysis[J]. BMC Res Notes, 2020, 13(1): 120. DOI: 10.1186/s13104-020-04967-w.
    [12] HARVENGT A, MAURE A, BECKERS M, et al. Evaluation of severe hypoglycemia management in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes in a Belgian tertiary pediatric care center: impact of intranasal glucagon and cost analysis[J]. Eur J Pediatr, 2025, 184(2): 162. DOI: 10.1007/s00431-025-05992-2.
    [13] ZIMMERMANN A T, LANZINGER S, KUMMERNES S J, et al. Treatment regimens and glycaemic outcomes in more than 100 000 children with type 1 diabetes (2013-22): a longitudinal analysis of data from paediatric diabetes registries[J]. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol, 2025, 13(1): 47-56. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(24)00279-1
    [14] 张雪梅, 龙坤兰, 陈骏, 等. 采用"互联网+医疗"建立中医重症医联体"共生模式"的初步探究[J]. 中国中西医结合急救杂志, 2023, 30(1): 10-12.

    ZHANG X M, LONG K L, CHEN J, et al. Preliminary study on the establishment of a "symbiotic model" of the intensive care medicine consortium of traditional Chinese medicine by "internet+medical treatment"[J]. Chinese Journal of Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine in Intensive and Critical Care, 2023, 30(1): 10-12.
    [15] FENG C, ZHU J, CHEN Y. The evolution and inter-sectoral interaction mechanism of China' s national medical alliance: an analysis based on complex systems theory[J]. Int J Health Plann Manage, 2022, 37(3): 1454-1476. doi: 10.1002/hpm.3413
    [16] ZHANG Q, LU Z, JING S, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of the implementation of close-type county medical alliance in Shandong Province using entropy weight TOPSIS method and non-integer rank sum ratio method[J]. BMC Health Serv Res, 2024, 24(1): 1193. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-11659-9.
    [17] 闫珊, 沈慧, 顾智淳, 等. 新型智慧化管理模式在心房颤动患者社区随访管理中的效果评价[J]. 中华全科医学, 2024, 22(6): 1008-1012. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.003555

    YAN S, SHEN H, GU Z C, et al. Evaluation of the effect of a new intelligent management model in community follow-up management of patients with atrial fibrillation[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2024, 22(6): 1008-1012. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.003555
    [18] 武全莹, 郭立新, 孙超, 等. 医联体信息管理平台在社区2型糖尿病患者血糖自我监测管理中的应用[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2023, 58(24): 2949-2956.

    WU Q Y, GUO L X, SUN C, et al. Application of self-monitoring of blood glucose information management platform based on medical consortium in community patients with type 2 diabetes[J]. Chinese Journal of Nursing, 2023, 58(24): 2949-2956.
    [19] 王婷婷, 顾威, 王玉冰. 儿童1型糖尿病照顾者负担现状与照顾者身心状况及患儿血糖控制效果的相关性研究[J]. 现代医学, 2022, 50(6): 764-768.

    WANG T T, GU W, WANG Y B. Correlation Study on the Current Status of Caregiver Burden, Caregivers' Physical and Mental Status, and Glycemic Control Outcomes in Children with Type 1 Diabetes[J]. Modern Medical Journal, 2022, 50(6): 764-768.
    [20] 董海燕, 黄晓磊, 梁辉, 等. 安徽省紧密型城市医联体核心医院医务人员对双向转诊运行现状的认知及满意度研究[J]. 安徽医学, 2024, 45(1): 100-105.

    DONG H Y, HUANG X L, LIANG H, et al. A Study on the cognition and satisfaction of medical staff on the current situation of two-way referral in the core hospitals of compact urban medical associations in Anhui Province[J]. Anhui Medical Journal, 2024, 45(1): 100-105.
  • 加载中
表(6)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  4
  • HTML全文浏览量:  3
  • PDF下载量:  0
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2025-02-19
  • 网络出版日期:  2025-11-17

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回