Volume 17 Issue 9
Aug.  2022
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
HUANG Guo-qiang, HUANG Yi-bo, ZHANG Hai-qiang, XU Guo-fu. Expression level and prognostic significance of receptor tyrosine kinase in gastric cancer patients[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2019, 17(9): 1458-1462. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.000969
Citation: HUANG Guo-qiang, HUANG Yi-bo, ZHANG Hai-qiang, XU Guo-fu. Expression level and prognostic significance of receptor tyrosine kinase in gastric cancer patients[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2019, 17(9): 1458-1462. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.000969

Expression level and prognostic significance of receptor tyrosine kinase in gastric cancer patients

doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.000969
  • Received Date: 2018-12-15
    Available Online: 2022-08-05
  • Objective To explore the expression of EGFR, c-Met, PDGFR and VEGFR in gastric cancer tissues and its prognostic significance. Methods One hundred and eighteen cases gastnic cancer patients in our hospital between January 2012 to August 2015 were selected. The levels of EGFR, c-Met, PDGFR and VEGFR in gastric cancer tissues were tested. The clinical and pathological differences among the patients with different levels of receptor tyrosine kinase were studied. The influence of the levels of receptor tyrosine kinase was evaluated. Results No significant difference in tumor location, diameter and pT stage were found between EGFR positive and negative group (all P>0.05), while the differentiated degree of cells was significantly lower and pN stage was significantly high in EGFR positive group (all P<0.05). No significant difference in tumor location and tumor diameter were found between c-Met positive and negative group (all P>0.05), while differentiated degree of cells was significantly lower, pT and pN stag were significantly higher in c-Met positive group (all P<0.05). No significant difference in tumor location, differentiated degree, tumor diameter and pT stage were found between PDGFR positive and negative group (all P>0.05), while pN stage was significantly higher in PDGFR positive group (P<0.05). No significant difference in tumor location, differentiated degree and diameter were found among VEGFR positive and negative group (all P>0.05), while pT and pN stage were significantly higher in VEGFR positive group (all P<0.05). The death risk of negative group of these four index were significantly lower than the matching positive group (all P<0.05). pT stage and pN stage were risk factors for bad prognosis of gastric cancer. Conclusion The positive expression of EGFR, c-Met, PDGFR and VEGFR may result in a bad prognosis. pT stage and pN stage are the risk factors for bad prognosis of gastric cancer.

     

  • loading
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (191) PDF downloads(0) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return