Volume 19 Issue 1
Jan.  2021
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
YANG Yan-ru, WANG Lin, WU An-qi. Clinical effect and value of laparoscopic guided secondary spleen pedicle transection in patients with traumatic spleen injury[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2021, 19(1): 35-37, 58. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.001723
Citation: YANG Yan-ru, WANG Lin, WU An-qi. Clinical effect and value of laparoscopic guided secondary spleen pedicle transection in patients with traumatic spleen injury[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2021, 19(1): 35-37, 58. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.001723

Clinical effect and value of laparoscopic guided secondary spleen pedicle transection in patients with traumatic spleen injury

doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.001723
Funds:

 2018ZDXM-SF-061

  • Received Date: 2020-07-11
    Available Online: 2022-02-19
  •   Objective  To explore the clinical effect and value of laparoscopic guided secondary spleen pedicle transection in patients with traumatic spleen injury and to provide reference for clinical treatment of this kind of disease.   Methods  A total of 54 cases of traumatic splenic rupture in our hospital from May 2016 to May 2019 were selected as subjects and divided into the observation group and control group on the basis of the operation mode (27 cases in each group). The control group was treated with conventional laparotomy, whereas the observation group was treated with laparoscopy-guided secondary spleen pedicle transection. The average operation time, drainage tube indwelling time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative exhaust time, average hospital stay, the incidence of complications in the short-term and one-year follow-up were recorded and analysed. Before discharge, treatment satisfaction was analysed by the current patient satisfaction questionnaire in the undergraduate department.   Results  The average operation time in the observation group of perioperative indicators was longer than that in the control group. The difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The average intraoperative blood loss, drainage tube indwelling time and postoperative exhaust time in the observation group were significantly shorter than those in the control group, which had statistically significant differences (all P < 0.05). The incidence of complications in the short-term postoperative and 1 year postoperative follow-up was significantly lower in the observation group than that in the control group, which had statistically significant differences (all P < 0.05). The total clinical treatment satisfaction of the observation group was higher than that of the control group, and the difference was significant (P < 0.05).   Conclusion  Compared with conventional open surgery, traumatic splenic injury in patients with laparoscopic guided secondary spleen pedicle transection has a better clinical effect. It significantly reduces intraoperative blood loss, drainage time, postoperative exhaust time, length of hospital stay, perioperative indicators, and postoperative complications and improves patient satisfaction, which is worth popularizing in clinical application.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    王谦. 腹腔镜引导下二级脾蒂离断切脾术治疗创伤性脾破裂的效果[J]. 河南医学研究, 2019, 28(19): 3530-3531. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-437X.2019.19.032
    [2]
    倪忠鹏, 张昕辉, 刘养岁, 等. 脾叶动脉结扎联合止血纱布填塞在脾破裂中的应用[J]. 腹部外科, 2019, 32(4): 261-264, 269. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-5591.2019.04.005
    [3]
    裴磊, 李春明, 黄涛, 等. 腹腔镜与传统脾切除术治疗创伤性脾破裂的疗效对比研究[J]. 腹腔镜外科杂志, 2019, 24(8): 577-581. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FQJW201908006.htm
    [4]
    朱烨明. 腹腔镜下脾切除术在治疗外伤性脾破裂中的效果分析[J]. 心理月刊, 2019, 14(13): 221. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XLYK201913197.htm
    [5]
    窦顺吉, 尹文博, 邹莉. 腹腔镜脾切除在外伤性脾破裂中的应用[J]. 当代医学, 2019, 25(17): 27-30. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-4393.2019.17.010
    [6]
    郑磊, 李芳芳. 腹腔镜脾切除术在创伤性脾破裂中的应用[J]. 现代医药卫生, 2019, 35(8): 1220-1222. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-5519.2019.08.032
    [7]
    廖雄文, 朱延安. 腹腔镜引导下的二级脾蒂离断切脾术在创伤性脾损伤中的应用效果观察[J]. 浙江创伤外科, 2018, 23(6): 1180-1182. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-7147.2018.06.053
    [8]
    曹景新. 外伤性脾破裂46例诊治体会[J]. 中国城乡企业卫生, 2018, 33(8): 102-104. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZCXW201808045.htm
    [9]
    刘强, 冯森. 腹腔镜下脾切除手术治疗外伤性脾破裂56例临床疗效及安全性分析[J]. 四川解剖学杂志, 2018, 26(2): 36-38. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-1457.2018.02.012
    [10]
    张灿炜. 腹腔镜脾切除术对外伤性脾破裂患者术后康复及并发症发生率的影响[J]. 现代诊断与治疗, 2018, 29(13): 2024-2026. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8174.2018.13.005
    [11]
    张剑林, 陈卫东, 吴雪生, 等. 20例创伤性脾破裂手术治疗体会[J]. 肝胆外科杂志, 2018, 26(3): 188-191. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-4761.2018.03.011
    [12]
    牟思玉. 脾切除术后门静脉系统血栓形成的影响因素分析[D]. 青岛: 青岛大学, 2018.
    [13]
    MURAD FEROZ B, ANIRUDH MIRAKHUR, EDWARD WOLFGANG L, et al. Portal hypertension: Imaging of portosystemic collateral pathways and associated image-guided therapy[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2017, 23(10): 1735-1746. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i10.1735
    [14]
    敖海清, 沈金根, 张恽, 等. 腹腔镜脾切除术在基层医院创伤性脾损伤中的应用[J]. 浙江创伤外科, 2018, 23(3): 490-491. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-7147.2018.03.036
    [15]
    姜洪池, 李丹. 脾脏外科手术的发展与创新[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2016, 15 (7): 655-657. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-9752.2016.07.002
    [16]
    陶亮, 翁晓晖, 陆逸庭, 等. 腹腔镜下二级脾蒂离断切脾术与开腹脾切除术治疗创伤性脾破裂的效果对比[J]. 中华普通外科杂志, 2017, 32(2): 112-115. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-631X.2017.02.006
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Tables(3)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (163) PDF downloads(2) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return