Volume 19 Issue 3
Mar.  2021
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Article Navigation >  Chinese Journal of General Practice  > 2021  >  19(3): 391-393
LIU Bin-gwei, XU Yan-ping, XI Shao-song, HU Wei, LIN Hua-peng, ZHU Ying, CAI Xue-ying, ZENG Xiao-kang, JIN Guang-yong. Clinical value of SOFA combined with procalcitonin test in assessing the condition and prognosis of patients with sepsis[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2021, 19(3): 391-393. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.001818
Citation: LIU Bin-gwei, XU Yan-ping, XI Shao-song, HU Wei, LIN Hua-peng, ZHU Ying, CAI Xue-ying, ZENG Xiao-kang, JIN Guang-yong. Clinical value of SOFA combined with procalcitonin test in assessing the condition and prognosis of patients with sepsis[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2021, 19(3): 391-393. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.001818
shu

Clinical value of SOFA combined with procalcitonin test in assessing the condition and prognosis of patients with sepsis

doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.001818

  • Department of Intensive Care, Hangzhou First People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310006, China

Funds:

 LY19H030007

  • Received Date: 2020-07-24
    Available Online: 2022-02-19
    Abstract
  •   Objective  To observe the dynamic changes in sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) scores and serum procalcitonin (PCT) in patients with sepsis and analyse the condition and prognosis of the patients through the combined assessment of the two tests.  Methods  Forty patients with sepsis who were admitted in the intensive care unit of Hangzhou City First People's Hospital affiliated to Zhejiang University School of Medicine from December 2016 to December 2019 were included in this study. The patients were divided into sepsis and septic shock groups according to the severity of their illness and following the 2018 China sepsis/septic shock emergency treatment guidelines (2018). The patients were further divided into survival and death groups; the patients in the survival group were those that remained alive within 28 days of admission. SOFA scores and changes in PCT were compared by analysing area under the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve. The predictive value of these scores and changes was used to assess the condition and prognosis of the patients.  Results  On the first and fifth days, differences in SOFA scores between the sepsis group and the septic shock group were statistically significant (all P < 0.01). After the sepsis group was treated, the SOFA scores substantially improved, whereas PCT considerably decreased. On the fifth day, the SOFA score of the survival group (8.36±1.87) was lower than that of the death group (13.22±2.84), and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.01). Moreover, the PCT of the survival group was significantly different from that of the death group (P < 0.01). ROC curve analysis revealed that the AUC of SOFA scores and PCT was 0.607 and 0.814, respectively. The combined AUC of SOFA scores and PCT was 0.875.  Conclusion  The combined test of SOFA and PCT can predict the condition and prognosis of sepsis patients.

     

    • FullText(HTML)
  • loading
    • References(16)
  • [1]
    张慈, 张盼盼, 余华丽, 等. 血浆sTREM-1水平及SOFA对老年脓毒症患者病情及预后的评估价值[J]. 中国老年学杂志, 2019, 39(14): 3443-3445. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-9202.2019.14.032
    [2]
    SINGER M, DEUTSCHMAN C S, SEYMOUR C W, et al. The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock(Sepsis-3)[J]. JAMA, 2016, 315(8): 801-810. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0287
    [3]
    黄文娟. 严重创伤患者MODS预警评分的建立及临床意义的研究[D]. 遵义: 遵义医学院, 2018.
    [4]
    中国医师协会急诊医师分会, 中国研究型医院学会休克与脓毒症专业委员会. 中国脓毒症/脓毒性休克急诊治疗指南(2018)[J]. 中国急救医学, 2018, 38(9): 741-755. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-1949.2018.09.001
    [5]
    RHODES A, EVANSL E, ALHAZZANI W, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock: 2016[J]. Intensive Care Med, 2017, 43(3): 304-337. doi: 10.1007/s00134-017-4683-6
    [6]
    颜海鹏, 卢秀兰, 仇君, 等. 血乳酸在脓毒症患儿病情及预后评价中的意义[J]. 中国当代儿科杂志, 2016, 18(6): 506-510. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DDKZ201606010.htm
    [7]
    刘晋豫, 张国秀, 张亮, 等. 改良SOFA评分及SOFA评分对ICU脓毒症患者病情评估价值的比较[J]. 中华灾害救援医学, 2017, 5(10): 550-553. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JYZH201710005.htm
    [8]
    CHOI J Y, JANG J H, LIM Y S, et al. Performance on the APACHE Ⅱ, SAPS Ⅱ, SOFA and the OHCA score of post-cardiac arrest patients treated with therapeutic hypothermia[J]. PLoS One, 2018, 13(5): e0196197. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0196197
    [9]
    李健, 徐钰, 席雯, 等. APACHE Ⅱ和SOFA评分对不同原因休克预后评估的临床意义[J]. 中国实验诊断学, 2019, 23(6): 959-962. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-4287.2019.06.008
    [10]
    吕俊华, 时雨, 王丹, 等. 急诊脓毒症患者预后的相关因素分析[J]. 中国急救医学, 2019, 39(3): 260-263. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-1949.2019.03.012
    [11]
    王力鹏, 陈军, 罗穆玲, 等. MEWS评分、APACHE Ⅱ评分及SOFA评分对急诊重症患者死亡风险的评价[J]. 广东医学, 2018, 39(6): 893-896. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-9448.2018.06.021
    [12]
    王玲玲, 陈蕊, 莫泽珣, 等. SOFA评分联合AGI分级对老年脓毒症的预后预测价值: 附91例患者的回顾性分析[J]. 中华危重病急救医学, 2017, 29(2): 145-149.
    [13]
    马雪平, 郝钦芳, 刘兰兰, 等. PCT与IL-6联合检测鉴别诊断脓毒性和非脓毒性全身炎症反应综合征的临床价值[J]. 现代生物医学进展, 2017, 17(26): 5124-5127. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SWCX201726027.htm
    [14]
    李翠如, 杨举红, 张瑞萍, 等. PCT在不同病理进程脓毒症诊断中的临床应用价值[J]. 实用检验医师杂志, 2016, 8(2): 94-96, 99. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CJCP201602016.htm
    [15]
    覃小兰, 郭权来, 刘云涛, 等. 降钙素原及C-反应蛋白联合序贯器官衰竭评分对肺部感染致脓毒症老年患者预后的评估价值[J]. 中华危重病急救医学, 2019, 31(5): 562-565.
    [16]
    ROSANOVA M T, TRAMONTI N, TAICZ M, et al. Assessment of C-reactive protein and procalcitonin levels to predict infection and mortality in burn children[J]. Arch Argent Pediatr, 2015, 113(1): 36-41. http://sap.org.ar/docs/publicaciones/archivosarg/2015/v113n1a07e.pdf
    • Relative Articles
    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(1)  / Tables(3)

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML

    Article Metrics

    Article views (292) PDF downloads(7) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    Address：No. 287, Changhuai Road, Bengbu, Anhui Province, 233004, P.R.ChinaphoneNo：0552-3066635； 0552-3051890Email：zhqkyx@163.com

    Copyright © Chinese Journal of General Practice皖ICP备2020018345号-2

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co., Ltd.    

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return