Volume 19 Issue 3
Mar.  2021
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Article Navigation >  Chinese Journal of General Practice  > 2021  >  19(3): 494-497
XU Jian-qiu, CHEN Xiao-lei, ZHAN Lei, CAI Xiao-dan, CHEN Jie. The construction and reliability and validity analysis of the questionnaire on knowledge-belief-behavior of eCASH concept for ICU nurses[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2021, 19(3): 494-497. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.001844
Citation: XU Jian-qiu, CHEN Xiao-lei, ZHAN Lei, CAI Xiao-dan, CHEN Jie. The construction and reliability and validity analysis of the questionnaire on knowledge-belief-behavior of eCASH concept for ICU nurses[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2021, 19(3): 494-497. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.001844
shu

The construction and reliability and validity analysis of the questionnaire on knowledge-belief-behavior of eCASH concept for ICU nurses

doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.001844

  • Department of Critical Care Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang 325000, China

Funds:

 LY16H160020

  • Received Date: 2020-02-23
    Available Online: 2022-02-19
    Abstract
  •   Objective  To construct the questionnaire of knowledge-belief-behavior of ICU nurses' eCASH concept by means of Delphi expert letter consultation method, and to test its reliability and validity, so as to provide a basis for the construction of localized eCASH concept training system and the promotion of ICU nurses' nursing level of sedation and analgesia.  Methods  Based on the theory of knowledge-belief-behavior, the questionnaire framework was established by literature analysis and semi-structured interview. Total 17 ICU nursing experts from 3 Class A tertiary hospitals in Zhejiang Province were selected for 2 rounds of expert consultation to form the first draft of the questionnaire. Finally, the final draft of the questionnaire was formed by evaluating the reliability and validity of the questionnaire among 187 ICU nurses in 3 Class A tertiary hospitals in Zhejiang Province.  Results  Results of the two rounds of expert consultation: the recovery rates were 82.35% and 100%, the expert coordination coefficient was 0.32 and 0.45, and the authority coefficient was 0.845 and 0.913, respectively. The average score of the importance of the four dimensions was 3.56-3.77, with the full score ranging from 44.12% to 65.24%. The average score of the importance of 22 items was 3.43-3.77, and the full score was 43.52%-65.72%. Finally, a questionnaire on knowledge-belief-behavior of eCASH concept was formed, which included four dimensions of eCASH basic knowledge, eCASH skills, eCASH beliefs and eCASH behaviors, and 22 items. Results of reliability and validity evaluation: the contribution rate of the four dimensions was 21.91%, 17.81%, 13.32% and 15.45%, respectively, and the cumulative contribution rate was 68.49% (> 40%). The content validity S-CVI of the total questionnaire was 0.982, Cronbach's coefficient was 0.931, and the retest reliability ranged from 0.814 to 0.923.  Conclusion  The questionnaire on knowledge-belief-behavior of ICU nurses' eCASH concept has good reliability and validity, which can accurately reflect the knowledge level, executive intention and clinical implementation status of ICU nurses' eCASH concept, and can be used as an applicable tool to evaluate the level of ICU nurses' eCASH concept epistemic practice.

     

    • FullText(HTML)
  • loading
    • References(18)
  • [1]
    苗晓, 马靓, 徐萍, 等. ICU镇静镇痛新概念eCASH的研究进展[J]. 解放军护理杂志, 2018, 35(23): 47-50. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JFHL201823013.htm
    [2]
    VINCENT J L. Optimizing sedation in the ICU: the eCASH concept[J]. Signa Vitae, 2017, 13(3): 10-13.
    [3]
    VINCENT J L, SHEHABI Y, WALSH T S, et al. Comfort and patient-centred care without excessive sedation: the eCASH concept[J]. Inten Care Med, 2016, 42(6): 962-971. doi: 10.1007/s00134-016-4297-4
    [4]
    BARR J, FRASER G L, PUNTILLO K, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the managment of pain, agitation, and delirium in adult patients in the intensive care unit[J]. Crit Care Med, 2018, 41(1): 263-306.
    [5]
    ACEVEDO-NUEVO M, GONZALEZ-GIL M T, RO-MERA-ORTEGA M A, et al. The early diagnosis and management of mixed delirium in a patient placed on ECMO and with difficult sedation: a case report[J]. Intens Crit Care Nur, 2018, 44: 110-114. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2017.07.013
    [6]
    孙俊丽, 葛建琳, 陈叶柔, 等. eCASH理念对ICU胸外科术后患者的影响[J]. 西藏医药, 2018(3): 38-40. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XZYY201803020.htm
    [7]
    赵先美, 叶曼, 李知音, 等. eCASH理念运用于ICU机械通气患者镇静镇痛管理的效果评价[J]. 中国护理管理, 2018, 18(4): 533-537. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-1756.2018.04.022
    [8]
    郭晓夏, 安友仲. ICU后综合征在镇痛镇静谵妄指南、镇痛镇静集束化措施及eCASH中的干预建议[J]. 中华重症医学电子杂志, 2017, 3(4): 250-253. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZZYD201704003.htm
    [9]
    李春玉. 社区护理[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2012: 62-64.
    [10]
    LOCKWOOD C, MUNN Z, PORRITT K. Qualitative research synthesis: methodological guidance for systematic reviewer sutilizing meta-aggregation[J]. Int J Evid Based Healthc, 2015, 13(3): 179-187. doi: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000062
    [11]
    AROMATARIS E, FERNANDEZ R, GODFREY C, et al. Summarizing systematic reviews: methodological development, conduct and reporting of an Umbrella review approach[J]. Int J Evid Based Healthc, 2015, 13(3): 132-140. doi: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000055
    [12]
    周英凤, 顾莺, 胡雁, 等. JBI循证卫生保健中心对关于不同类型研究的质量评价工具——患病率及分析性横断面研究的质量评价[J]. 护士进修杂志, 2018, 33(3): 219-221. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FSJX201803007.htm
    [13]
    周英凤, 顾莺, 胡雁, 等. JBI循证卫生保健中心关于不同类型研究的质量评价工具——干预性研究的质量评价[J]. 护士进修杂志, 2018, 33(1): 24-26. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FSJX201801007.htm
    [14]
    顾莺, 张慧文, 周英凤, 等. JBI循证卫生保健中心关于不同类型研究的质量评价工具——系统评价的方法学质量评价[J]. 护士进修杂志, 2018, 33(8): 701-703. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FSJX201808008.htm
    [15]
    GERRISH K, LATHLEAN J, CORMACK D. The research process in nursing[M]. New Jerseg: Wiley Blackwel, 2018: 632.
    [16]
    吴明隆. SPSS统计应用实务[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2003: 11-12.
    [17]
    陈燕雅, 齐蒙蒙, 李泽楷. 护理本科生职业相关社会支持量表的编制及信效度检[J]. 护理管理杂志, 2017, 17(10): 723-726.
    [18]
    HAYS R D, ANDERSON R, REVIEKI D. Psychometric considerations in evaluating health-related quality life measures[J]. Qual Life Res, 1993, 2(6): 441-449. http://ard.bmj.com/external-ref?access_num=10.1007/BF00422218&link_type=DOI
    • Relative Articles
    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Tables(1)

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML

    Article Metrics

    Article views (141) PDF downloads(7) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    Address：No. 287, Changhuai Road, Bengbu, Anhui Province, 233004, P.R.ChinaphoneNo：0552-3066635； 0552-3051890Email：zhqkyx@163.com

    Copyright © Chinese Journal of General Practice皖ICP备2020018345号-2

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co., Ltd.    

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return