Volume 19 Issue 5
May  2021
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
TIAN Zhen-yu, LI Cong, LI Hao-wei. Cerebral protective effects of anterograde cerebral perfusion via right axillary artery and retrograde cerebral perfusion via superior vena cava in patients with Stanford type A aortic dissection[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2021, 19(5): 727-730. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.001902
Citation: TIAN Zhen-yu, LI Cong, LI Hao-wei. Cerebral protective effects of anterograde cerebral perfusion via right axillary artery and retrograde cerebral perfusion via superior vena cava in patients with Stanford type A aortic dissection[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2021, 19(5): 727-730. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.001902

Cerebral protective effects of anterograde cerebral perfusion via right axillary artery and retrograde cerebral perfusion via superior vena cava in patients with Stanford type A aortic dissection

doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.001902
Funds:

 182102310137

  • Received Date: 2020-08-06
    Available Online: 2022-02-16
  •   Objective  To explore the protective effects of Antegrade cerebral perfusion(ACP) via right axillary artery and Retrograde cerebral perfusion (RCP) via superior vena cava on Stanford type A aortic dissection.   Methods  The data of 76 patients with Stanford type A acute aortic dissection from January 2018 to January 2019 in Henan Chest Hospital were analysed retrospectively. According to the way of cerebral perfusion, they were divided into two groups: group A (46 cases) received ACP via right axillary artery and group B (30 cases) received RCP via superior vena cava. The sex, age, disease history, smoking history, operation mode, perioperative clinical data, the occurrence of transient transient nervous system dysfunction (TND), permanent nervous system dysfunction (PND) and death in hospital were compared between the two groups.   Results  The circulatory arrest time and cerebral perfusion time in group A were (16.18±3.28) min and (20.77±2.82) min, respectively, which were significantly lower than those in group B which were (24.82±3.53) min and (24.86±3.19) min. The differences were statistically significant (t=10.892, 5.867, all P < 0.05). The incidence of TND in group A was 17.39%, which was significantly lower than that in group B (43.33%, P < 0.05), whereas the incidence of PND and hospital mortality in group A were 4.35% and 3.33%, respectively, and there was no significant difference compared with those in group B (3.33% and 3.33%, all P>0.05).   Conclusion  The time of cardiopulmonary bypass and cerebral perfusion of ACP via right axillary artery was shorter than that of RCP via superior vena cava. The former could significantly reduce the incidence of TND with better brain protection.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    FUNAKOSHI H, MIZOBE M, HOMMA Y, et al. The diagnostic accuracy of the mediastinal width on supine anteroposterior chest radiographs with nontraumatic Stanford type A acute aortic dissection[J]. J Gen Fam Med, 2018, 19(2): 45-49. doi: 10.1002/jgf2.155
    [2]
    庄瑜, 施盛, 杨迪成, 等. 吸入一氧化氮对主动脉弓置换患者呼吸道功能的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2018, 26(10): 795-796. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.2018.10.024
    [3]
    熊际月, 林静, 罗明, 等. 脑顺行性灌注联合下腔静脉逆行性灌注用于全主动脉弓置换手术[J]. 中国胸心血管外科临床杂志, 2019, 26(6): 524-527. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZXYX201906004.htm
    [4]
    昌金星, 吴智勇, 任伟, 等. A型主动脉夹层中不同脑灌注方式的应用效果比较[J]. 中华实验外科杂志, 2016, 33(5): 1390-1393. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-9030.2016.05.070
    [5]
    刘宏宇, 孟维鑫, 孙博, 等. 急性Stanford A型主动脉夹层的治疗策略-2014年欧洲心脏病学会《主动脉疾病诊断和治疗指南》详细解读[J]. 中华胸心血管外科杂志, 2015, 31(6): 321-324. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-4497.2015.06.001
    [6]
    彭小乐, 刘愚勇, 王晓龙, 等. Stanford A型主动脉夹层术后认知功能障碍的危险因素分析及其与神经元特异性烯醇化酶和S-100蛋白的关系[J]. 中国医药, 2020, 15(8): 1216-1220. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGYG202008016.htm
    [7]
    ALEX M, D'ANGELO, BENJAMIN S, et al. Deep hypothermic circulatory arrest for resection of a right atrial accessory hepatic lobe[J]. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2019, 158(3): 101-102. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.03.076
    [8]
    吕琳, 宋海成, 袁莉. 深低温停循环主动脉夹层手术后高胆红素血症的危险因素分析[J]. 临床麻醉学杂志, 2018, 34(10): 963-966. doi: 10.12089/jca.2018.10.006
    [9]
    吕晓钗, 陈良万, 杜剑之, 等. 近期脑梗塞患者心脏手术体外循环管理要点[J]. 中国体外循环杂志, 2018, 16(6): 372-374. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TWXH201806016.htm
    [10]
    李林, 刁玉刚, 刘婷婷. 双侧顺行性脑灌注对中低温停循环主动脉弓部手术中低脑氧饱和度患者影响[J]. 临床军医杂志, 2018, 46(12): 34-36. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JYGZ201812011.htm
    [11]
    熊际月, 林静, 罗明, 等. 脑顺行性灌注联合下腔静脉逆行性灌注用于全主动脉弓置换手术[J]. 中国胸心血管外科临床杂志, 2019, 35(6): 524-527. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZXYX201906004.htm
    [12]
    李欣, 杨珏, 于长江, 等. 顺行与逆行性脑灌注对主动脉弓置换术患者脑保护的比较[J]. 岭南心血管病杂志, 2019, 25(6): 665-671. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LXGB201906017.htm
    [13]
    TAKAGI H, MITTA S, ANDO T, et al. A contemporary meta-analysis of antegrade versus retrograde cerebral perfusion for thoracic aortic surgery[J]. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2019, 67(5): 351-362. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1632389
    [14]
    孙煦, 朱悦倩, 安静, 等. Stanford A型主动脉夹层手术中不同脑灌注方式的脑保护效果研究[J]. 中国体外循环杂志, 2019, 17(2): 72-75. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TWXH201902003.htm
    [15]
    于浩, 童光, 颜涛, 等. 优化选择性动脉灌注策略在Stanford A型主动脉夹层全弓置换术中的应用[J]. 第二军医大学学报, 2018, 39(4): 404-410. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DEJD201804010.htm
    [16]
    张祖磊, 杨威, 龚艺, 等. 主动脉弓部手术中顺行和逆行脑灌注脑保护疗效比较meta分析[J]. 中华胸心血管外科杂志, 2019, 35(9): 546-550. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-4497.2019.09.010
    [17]
    许海雁, 谢家湘. 主动脉夹层全弓置换术脑部并发症的预防及护理[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2017, 21(14): 65-67. doi: 10.7619/jcmp.201714019
    [18]
    甘霖. 中心静脉压水平与脑外伤患者的早期疗效分析[J]. 临床急诊杂志, 2015, 16(1): 39-40. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZZLC201501013.htm
    [19]
    汪源, 周曼玲, 黄飞, 等. 单侧与双侧顺行性脑灌注在主动脉停循环手术中脑保护效果比较的Meta分析[J]. 安徽医药, 2019, 23(4): 747-751. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6469.2019.04.029
    [20]
    LIN J, XIONG J, LUO M, et al. Combining cerebral perfusion with retrograde inferior vena caval perfusion for aortic arch surgery[J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2019, 107(1): 67-69. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.08.006
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Tables(3)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (354) PDF downloads(5) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return