Volume 19 Issue 6
Jun.  2021
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
SUN Hui-wen, ZHAN Yi-yang, CHEN Min-min, JIANG Min, WANG Chun, WANG Qin, ZHENG Wen. Analysis of related metabolic indexes of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in the elderly popluation of public institutions in Nanjing[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2021, 19(6): 1035-1038. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.001978
Citation: SUN Hui-wen, ZHAN Yi-yang, CHEN Min-min, JIANG Min, WANG Chun, WANG Qin, ZHENG Wen. Analysis of related metabolic indexes of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in the elderly popluation of public institutions in Nanjing[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2021, 19(6): 1035-1038. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.001978

Analysis of related metabolic indexes of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in the elderly popluation of public institutions in Nanjing

doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.001978
Funds:

 BJ17001

 ZKX15016

  • Received Date: 2020-12-17
    Available Online: 2022-02-16
  •   Objective  To investigate the prevalence of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) in the elderly physical examination population in institutions in Nanjing in 2016 and to analyse the correlation between NAFLD and metabolic indicators, such as triglyceride glucose product index (TyG index).  Methods  Elderly subjects who were admitted to Nanjing Public Institutions from January 2016 to January 2017 and underwent physical examination in the physical examination center of Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital were included in the study. Demographic characteristics, biochemical tests, b-ultrasound examination results, calculate body mass index (BMI) and TyG index were analysed. Differences in metabolism-related indicators between the NAFLD and non-NAFLD groups were determined, and the correlation between TyG and metabolic indexes was analysed. Logistic analysis was used in analysing the independent influencing factors of NAFLD, and ROC was used in evaluating the predictive values of different indicators for NAFLD.  Results  The prevalence rate of NAFLD in 2 712 elderly patients who underwent physical examination was 24.52%, and the prevalence rate of NAFLD in males was significantly higher than that in females (25.86% vs. 17.78%; χ2=13.254, all P < 0.05). Logistic regression analysis showed that BMI, DBP, FPG, HbA1c, TC, TG, LDL-C, HDL-C, TyG index, UA were independent influencing factors for NAFLD. Correlation analysis results showed that TyG index level in elderly physical examination subjects was significantly positively correlated with BMI, SBP, DBP, FPG, HbA1c, TC, TG, LDL-C and uric acid (r=0.324, 0.139, 0.110, 0.484, 0.414, 0.246, 0.846, 0.172, 0.172; all P < 0.05) and significantly negatively correlated with HDL-C level (r=-0.44, P < 0.05). The area under the curve (AUC) values predicted using BMI, DBP, UA and TyG index were 0.71, 0.60, 0.60 and 0.74, respectively.  Conclusion  NAFLD had a high prevalence rate in elderly people who underwent physical examination in public institutions in Nanjing. BMI, DBP, FPG, HbA1c, TC, TG, LDL-C, HDL-C, TyG index, and UA were independent influencing factors for NAFLD, and the TyG index was a simple synthetic indicator for IR assessment and thus has a good predictive value for NAFLD.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    冯巩, 贺娜, 王菊宁, 等. 非酒精性脂肪性肝病的流行病学与血清无创诊断研究进展[J]. 中华肝脏病杂志, 2018, 26(6): 476-480. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-3418.2018.06.020
    [2]
    中华医学会肝病学分会脂肪肝和酒精性肝病学组, 中国医师协会脂肪性肝病专家委员会, 范建高, 等. 非酒精性脂肪性肝病防治指南(2018年更新版)[J]. 实用肝脏病杂志, 2018, 21(2): 177-186. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-5069.2018.02.007
    [3]
    胡玲, 李宇. 中老年体检人群非酒精性脂肪肝患病率调查及与代谢相关因素的相关性[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2017, 33(4): 632-635. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2017.04.036
    [4]
    CUTHBERTSON D J, BROWN E, KOSKINEN J, et al. Longitudinal analysis of risk of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in adulthood[J]. Liver Int, 2019, 39(6): 1147-1154. doi: 10.1111/liv.13993
    [5]
    王丽萍, 张晓宇, 邵海峰. 老年非酒精性脂肪性肝病治疗现况调查及应对策略[J]. 河北医药, 2018, 40(21): 3330-3332, 3337. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-7386.2018.21.033
    [6]
    胡晓娜, 黄一沁, 王姣锋, 等. 上海地区中老年人不同程度非酒精性脂肪性肝病的流行病学分析[J]. 老年医学与保健, 2020, 26(2): 191-194, 219. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-8296.2020.02.007
    [7]
    于文雪, 孙禹欣, 金莉莉, 等. NAFLD的发病机制与新型治疗药物研发[J]. 中国细胞生物学学报, 2020, 42(3): 499-506. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XBZZ202003016.htm
    [8]
    陈海静, 孙海燕, 刘红丹. 甘油三酯葡萄糖乘积指数与甘油三酯高密度脂蛋白胆固醇比值评价代谢综合征的价值[J]. 海南医学, 2019, 30(4): 416-419. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-6350.2019.04.003
    [9]
    中华医学会肝脏病学分会脂肪肝和酒精性肝病学组. 非酒精性脂肪性肝病诊疗指南[J]. 中华肝脏病杂志, 2010, 18(3): 163-166. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-3418.2010.03.002
    [10]
    THAN N N, NEWSOME P N. A concise review of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease[J]. Atherosclerosis, 2015, 239(1): 192-202. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2015.01.001
    [11]
    周云庆, 徐昱, 秦燕, 等. 上海某社区老年人非酒精性脂肪肝的患病情况及影响因素分析[J]. 上海医药, 2020, 41(6): 55-58.
    [12]
    胡晓娜, 黄一沁, 王姣锋, 等. 上海地区中老年人不同程度非酒精性脂肪性肝病的流行病学分析[J]. 老年医学与保健, 2020, 26(2): 191-194, 219. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-8296.2020.02.007
    [13]
    洪文忠, 李奕萍. 血清γ-GT、CHE、Apelin及内脂素水平在非酒精性脂肪肝病患者中的诊疗价值[J]. 中华全科医学, 2020, 18(3): 463-466.
    [14]
    刘勤, 牛春燕. 由"二次打击"到"多重打击": 发病机制的演变带给非酒精性脂肪性肝病的治疗启示[J]. 世界华人消化杂志, 2019, 27(19): 1171-1178.
    [15]
    谭惠文, 余叶蓉, 李秀钧. 正常血糖-高胰岛素钳夹技术在胰岛素制剂药物代谢动力学研究中的应用进展[J]. 华西医学, 2017, 32(11): 1801-1804. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HXYX201711035.htm
    [16]
    洪文忠, 李奕萍. 血清γ-GT、CHE、Apelin及内脂素水平在非酒精性脂肪肝病患者中的诊疗价值[J]. 中华全科医学, 2020, 18(3): 463-466. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYQY202003034.htm
    [17]
    张文, 文重远, 解为慈. 利用TyG指数评估胰岛素抵抗及糖尿病的患病风险[J]. 海南医学, 2019, 30(22): 2882-2886. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-6350.2019.22.008
    [18]
    魏文志, 王力, 温晓华, 等. TyG指数与体检人群非酒精性脂肪性肝病相关性分析[J]. 中华保健医学杂志, 2019, 21(3): 212-215. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JFJB201903003.htm
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(1)  / Tables(3)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (213) PDF downloads(3) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return