Effect of 270° autogenous bone replantation around the intervertebral cage on vertebral fusion rate and efficacy after lumbar fusion

WU Hao; YU Hai-yang; ZHAI Yun-lei; LIANG Cheng-min; CUI Xi-long

doi:10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002093

Volume 19 Issue 9

Sep. 2021

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Chinese Journal of General Practice > 2021 > 19(9): 1488-1491

WU Hao, YU Hai-yang, ZHAI Yun-lei, LIANG Cheng-min, CUI Xi-long. Effect of 270° autogenous bone replantation around the intervertebral cage on vertebral fusion rate and efficacy after lumbar fusion[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2021, 19(9): 1488-1491. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002093

Citation:

WU Hao, YU Hai-yang, ZHAI Yun-lei, LIANG Cheng-min, CUI Xi-long. Effect of 270° autogenous bone replantation around the intervertebral cage on vertebral fusion rate and efficacy after lumbar fusion[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2021, 19(9): 1488-1491. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002093

Citation:

WU Hao, YU Hai-yang, ZHAI Yun-lei, LIANG Cheng-min, CUI Xi-long. Effect of 270° autogenous bone replantation around the intervertebral cage on vertebral fusion rate and efficacy after lumbar fusion[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2021, 19(9): 1488-1491. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002093

PDF( 1214 KB)

Effect of 270° autogenous bone replantation around the intervertebral cage on vertebral fusion rate and efficacy after lumbar fusion

doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002093

Department of Orthopedics, Fuyang People's Hospital, Fuyang, Anhui 236000, China

Funds:

1704a0802159

FY2019-024

FK2020081022

BYKY2019226ZD

Received Date: 2021-01-15
Available Online: 2022-02-15

Abstract

Abstract

Objective To investigate the effect of 270° autologous bone replantation around the cage of the intervertebral space on the efficacy of lumbar fusion and the fusion rate of the vertebral body. Methods A total of 64 patients with lumbar spinal stenosis who underwent posterior decompression of the lumbar spine and pedicle screw internal fixation with interbody cage placement and fusion in our hospital from June 2017 to December 2019 were selected as the research objects. According to the random number table method, the patients were divided into control group and observation group, with 32 cases each group. The observation group was given 270° autogenous bone graft around the ring cage, whilst the control group was given anterior edge bone graft of the intervertebral space combined with the cage filled with autogenous bone. After the drainage tube was removed, the two groups of patients were re-examined by X-ray, and the lumbar dynamics and CT were re-examined 12 months after the operation. The Suk and Siepe methods were used to compare the intervertebral fusion rate and the change of intervertebral space height in both groups to evaluate different vertebrae, the effect of lumbar intervertebral fusion and the clinical curative effect of patients under the interfusion mode. Results The patients were followed up for 12 to 18 months, and re-examinations were performed at 1 week and 12 months after the operation. The fusion rate in the observation group was higher than that in the control group at 12 months after the operation. The height of the intervertebral space and the height of the intervertebral foramen were significantly improved at 1 week and 1 year after the operation, and the difference was statistically significant (all P < 0.05). Conclusion The comparison suggests that the 270° autologous bone replantation around the cage in the intervertebral space has a higher fusion rate than the simple intervertebral cage implantation. Therefore, the same kind of autologous bone should be implanted in the intervertebral space before and after the cage implantation, which is more conducive to the fusion of the intervertebral space.
- Lumbar fusion,
- Cage surrounding graft,
- Lumbar spinal stenosis

FullText(HTML)

References(16)

References

[1]	周学亮, 陈云平, 李晓林, 等. 手术治疗退变性腰椎管狭窄的临床分析[J]. 中华全科医学, 2016, 16(3): 509-511. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYQY201603058.htm
[2]	PINSON H, HALLAERT G, HERREGODTS P, et al. Outcome of anterior lumbar interbody fusion: A retrospective study of clinical and radiologic parameters[J]. World Neurosurg, 2017, 103: 772-779. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.04.077
[3]	IWATA T, MIYAMOTO K, HIOKI A, et al. Morphologic changes in contralateral lumbar foramen in unilateral cantilever transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using kidney-type intervertebral spacers[J]. J Spinal Disord Tech, 2015, 28(5): E270-E276. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e318286bb14
[4]	袁振超, 陈远明, 陈锋, 等. 腰椎滑脱症椎间植骨融合中3种植骨材料的远期效果对比[J]. 中国组织工程研究, 2013, 17(16): 3033-3040. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-4344.2013.16.026
[5]	SUK S I, LEE C K, KIM W J, et al. Adding posterior lumbar interbody fusion to pedicle screw fixation and posterolateral fusion after decompression in spondylolyticspondylolisthesis[J]. Spine J, 1997, 22(2): 210-220. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199701150-00016
[6]	SIEPE C J, STOSCH-WIECHERT K, HEIDER F, et al. Anterior stand-alone fusion revisited: A prospective clinical, X-ray and CT investigation[J]. Eur Spine J, 2015, 24(4): 838-851. doi: 10.1007/s00586-014-3642-y
[7]	JUNG J M, HYUN S J, KIM K J, et al. A prospective study of non-surgical versus surgical treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis without instability[J]. J Clin Neurosci, 2020, 80(10): 100-107. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33099329
[8]	PIETRANTONIO A, TRUNGU S, FAMÀ I, et al. Long-term clinical outcomes after bilateral laminotomy or total laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: A single-institution experience[J]. Neurosurg Focus, 2019, 46(5): E2. doi: 10.3171/2019.2.FOCUS18651
[9]	IRMOLA T M, HÄKKINEN A, JÄRVENPÄÄ S, et al. Reoperation rates following instrumented lumbar spine fusion[J]. Spine(Phila Pa 1976), 2018, 43(4): 295-301. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002291
[10]	TROPIANO P, GIORGI H, FAURE A, et al. Surgical techniques for lumbo-sacral fusion[J]. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res, 2017, 103(1S): S151-S159 http://www.onacademic.com/detail/journal_1000039782557710_9c4f.html
[11]	DE KUNDER S L, VAN KUIJK S M J, RIJKERS K, et al. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) in lumbar spondylolisthesis: A systematic review and meta analysis[J]. Spine J, 2017, 17(11): 1712-1721. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.06.018
[12]	黄承, 王艺伟, 李斌, 等. 椎间融合器植骨融合结合椎弓根螺钉内固定治疗腰椎管狭窄的效果分析[J]. 中华全科医学, 2017, 15(9): 1484-1486. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYQY201709011.htm
[13]	唐强, 廖烨绘, 唐朝, 等. 椎间融合器的置入方式对腰椎融合效果的影响[J]. 中国脊柱脊髓杂志, 2019, 29(12): 1071-1079. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-406X.2019.12.03
[14]	ABE K, ORITA S, MANNOJI C, et al. Perioperative complications in 155 patients who underwent oblique lateral interbody fusion surgery: Perspectives and indications from a retrospective, multicenter survey[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2017, 42(1): 55-62. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001650
[15]	HAYASHI K, MATSUMURA A, KONISHI S, et al. Clinical outcomes of posterior lumbar interbody fusion for patients 80 years of age and older with lumbar degenerative disease: Minimum 2 years' follow-up[J]. Global Spine J, 2016, 6(7): 665-672. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1578806
[16]	KIM W J, LEE J W, KIM S M, et al. Precautions for combined anterior and posterior long level fusion for adult spinal deformity: Perioperative surgical complications related to the anterior procedure(oblique lumbar interbody fusion)[J]. Asian Spine J, 2019, 13(5): 417-425. http://www.researchgate.net/publication/333611573_Precautions_for_Combined_Anterior_and_Posterior_Long-Level_Fusion_for_Adult_Spinal_Deformity_Perioperative_Surgical_Complications_Related_to_the_Anterior_Procedure_Oblique_Lumbar_Interbody_Fusion/download