Volume 19 Issue 11
Nov.  2021
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
HAN Guang-hong, PANG Xiao-li, SUN Hui-li, WANG Wei. Reporting quality evaluation of meta-analyses on cognitive interventions for Alzheimer's disease in China[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2021, 19(11): 1946-1950. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002208
Citation: HAN Guang-hong, PANG Xiao-li, SUN Hui-li, WANG Wei. Reporting quality evaluation of meta-analyses on cognitive interventions for Alzheimer's disease in China[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2021, 19(11): 1946-1950. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002208

Reporting quality evaluation of meta-analyses on cognitive interventions for Alzheimer's disease in China

doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002208
Funds:

 81603565

 YJSKC-20201032

  • Received Date: 2021-02-18
    Available Online: 2022-02-15
  •   Objective  To assess the reporting quality of meta-analyses on cognitive interventions for Alzheimer's disease in China and explore whether a linear correlation exists between the reporting quality and abstracts.  Methods  The CNKI, Wanfang and VIP databases were used to comprehensively collect meta-analyses on cognitive interventions for Alzheimer's disease in China. The retrieval period was from inception to September 17th 2019. The reporting quality of abstracts and full texts was assessed on the basis of the PRISMA-Abstracts and PRISMA statement, respectively. Compliance with each PRISMA item was investigated. Pearson correlation analysis was used to explore the correlation between reporting quality and abstract.  Results  A total of 9 meta-analyses were included. PRISMA-Abstracts were rated 6-9 with an average score of 7.56. PRISMA statement was scored 19-24, with an average score of 21.78, and the compliance ranged from 70.37% to 88.89%. Pearson correlation analysis found no correlation between the reporting quality and the abstract (r=0.401, P=0.285).  Conclusion  The reporting quality of meta-analyses on cognitive interventions for Alzheimer's disease in China is generally good. However, the abstracts and 7 PRISMA items [item 5(protocol and registration), item 15(bias across studies), item 16(other analyses), item 19(bias within studies), item 22(bias across studies), item 23(other analyses), item 27(funding)] are not reported adequately and needed to be further improved.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    易娅静, 于颖, 刘旭, 等. 中医药治疗阿尔茨海默病研究进展[J]. 中医药学报, 2021, 49(4): 99-105. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZYLY201728072.htm
    [2]
    GARCÍA-BLANCO A, BAQUERO M, VENTO M, et al. Potential oxidative stress biomarkers of mild cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer disease[J]. J Neurol Sci, 2017(373): 295-302.
    [3]
    WIMO A, GUERCHET M, ALI G C, et al. The worldwide costs of dementia 2015 and comparisons with 2010[J]. Alzheimers Dement, 2017, 13(1): 1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2016.07.150
    [4]
    杨璇, 乔雨晨, 常红. 痴呆病人睡眠障碍非药物干预的研究进展[J]. 护理研究, 2021, 35(7): 1178-1183. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SXHZ202107011.htm
    [5]
    张薇, 许吉, 邓宏勇. 国际医学证据分级与推荐体系发展及现状[J]. 中国循证医学杂志, 2019, 19(11): 1373-1378. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZZXZ201911018.htm
    [6]
    王志稳, 冷敏敏, 赵雅洁, 等. 近5年我国护理领域干预性研究系统评价的方法学质量分析[J]. 中国护理管理, 2020, 20(4): 485-489. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-1756.2020.04.003
    [7]
    褚玮, 张建国, 李伟. 认知训练对轻中度阿尔茨海默病治疗效果的Meta分析[J]. 中西医结合护理(中英文), 2019, 5(4): 23-27. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZXHL201904007.htm
    [8]
    林琳, 李茂全. 怀旧疗法对阿尔茨海默病患者的影响[J]. 中国老年学杂志, 2018, 38(22): 5495-5498. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-9202.2018.22.048
    [9]
    罗玉茹, 牟光容, 代凤玲, 等. 认知刺激疗法对老年痴呆患者干预效果的Meta分析[J]. 重庆医学, 2018, 47(31): 4027-4032. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-8348.2018.31.016
    [10]
    刘艳存, 吴小佳, 周同, 等. 团体怀旧疗法对老年痴呆患者影响的Meta分析[J]. 解放军护理杂志, 2017, 34(9): 1-7. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JFHL201709001.htm
    [11]
    陈梅兰, 欧光忠, 卞坚强, 等. 认知训练对老年痴呆患者疗效的Meta分析[J]. 慢性病学杂志, 2017, 18(7): 743-746. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YYSO201707010.htm
    [12]
    张欢欢, 刘鹏程, 孙皎. 怀旧疗法对轻中度痴呆患者的Meta分析[J]. 中国实用护理杂志, 2015, 31(32): 2467-2471. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1672-7088.2015.32.016
    [13]
    王超, 李娜, 马凤丽. 计算机辅助认知训练改善痴呆症患者认知障碍效果的Meta分析[J]. 中华现代护理杂志, 2017, 23(25): 3279-3284. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-2907.2017.25.022
    [14]
    毛元红, 许彬, 耿桂灵. 怀旧疗法在老年痴呆患者中应用效果的循证分析[J]. 现代预防医学, 2017, 44(13): 2475-2480. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XDYF201713040.htm
    [15]
    刘艳存, 李婷, 罗丹. 怀旧疗法对轻中度老年痴呆患者影响的Meta分析[J]. 护理学杂志, 2016, 31(21): 4-9. doi: 10.3870/j.issn.1001-4152.2016.21.004
    [16]
    周鹏翔, 闫盈盈, 翟所迪. 国内医院药学人员系统评价/Meta分析的方法学与报告质量评价[J]. 中国循证医学杂志, 2017, 17(2): 228-234. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZZXZ201702015.htm
    [17]
    FOX A, MACANDREW M, RAMIS M A. Health outcomes of patients with dementia in acute care settings-A systematic review[J]. Int J Older People Nurs, 2020, 15(3): e12315. doi: 10.1111/opn.12315
    [18]
    NA R, YANG J H, YEMO Y, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of nonpharmacological interventions for moderate to severe dementia[J]. Psychiatry Investig, 2019, 16(5): 325-335. doi: 10.30773/pi.2019.02.11.2
    [19]
    LIAMPAS I, CHLINOS A, SIOKAS V, et al. Assessment of the reporting quality of RCTs for novel oral anticoagulants in venous thromboembolic disease based on the CONSORT statement[J]. J Thromb Thrombolysis, 2019, 48(4): 542-553. doi: 10.1007/s11239-019-01931-9
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(1)  / Tables(4)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (198) PDF downloads(11) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return