Volume 20 Issue 9
Sep.  2022
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
XU Huan, HUO Rui, XU Wan-hong, LI Hui. Analysis of the application of dynamic alternating air cushion bed combined with nutritional support to prevent pressure injury in critically ill patients[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2022, 20(9): 1624-1627. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002664
Citation: XU Huan, HUO Rui, XU Wan-hong, LI Hui. Analysis of the application of dynamic alternating air cushion bed combined with nutritional support to prevent pressure injury in critically ill patients[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2022, 20(9): 1624-1627. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002664

Analysis of the application of dynamic alternating air cushion bed combined with nutritional support to prevent pressure injury in critically ill patients

doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002664
Funds:

 SK2020A0365

  • Received Date: 2022-04-11
    Available Online: 2022-11-29
  •   Objective  To investigate the preventive effect of dynamic alternating air cushion bed combined with nutritional support on pressure injury in critically ill trauma patients.  Methods  A total of 130 critically ill trauma patients who were treated in our department from January 2019 to December 2021 were selected and randomly divided into observation and control groups according to the number-table method, with 65 cases in each group. Patients in the observation group received nutrition support combined with dynamic alternating air cushion bed care, whereas those in the control group received nutrition support combined with jet cushion care. The incidence of pre- pressure injury manifestations, pressure injury incidence, coma and health status, length of stay and hospitalisation expenses were observed and compared between the two groups.  Results  After 7 d of treatment, no patients in the observation group had developed pressure injury, and 3 patients in the control group had developed pressure injury stage 1. No significant difference existed in the incidence of pressure injury between the two groups (P=0.244). From 7 d of treatment, patients in the observation group had a lower incidence of the stress-injury prophase than those in the control group (P=0.020). Significant differences existed in the Braden score between the two groups in time, group, and interaction between time and group. Patients in the observation group had higher Braden scores than those in the control group at 5 and 7 days of treatment [(13.87±1.18) points vs. (13.11±1.38) points, (14.79±1.80) points vs. (13.73±1.86) points, all P < 0.05]. After 7 days of treatment, the GCS scores [(8.11±1.74) points vs. (6.83±1.43) points] and APACHE Ⅱ scores [(16.68±3.01) points vs. (19.16±3.26) points] in the observation group were significantly better than those in the control group (all P < 0.05). This finding suggested that nutritional support combined with dynamic alternating air cushion bed had a good rehabilitation effect on critically ill traumatic patients.  Conclusion  Nutritional support combined with a dynamic alternating air cushion bed are more effective for stress-injury prevention in critically ill trauma patients and warrants clinical promotion.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    HAJHOSSEINI B, LONGAKER M T, GURTNER G C. Pressure injury[J]. Ann Surg, 2020, 271(4): 671-679. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003567
    [2]
    MEAUME S, MARTY M, COLIN D. Prospective observational study of single- or multi-compartment pressure ulcer prevention cushions: PRESCAROH project[J]. J Wound Care, 2017, 26(9): 537-544. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2017.26.9.537
    [3]
    AYELLO E A, LOBO G M, SIBBALD R G. Survey results from Canada and some Latin America Countries: 2016 National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel Changes in terminology and definitions[J]. Adv Skin Wound Care, 2017, 30(2): 71-76. doi: 10.1097/01.ASW.0000511443.83861.d1
    [4]
    TATUCU-BABET O A, RIDLEY E J. Under pressure: Nutrition and pressure injury development in critical illness[J]. Intensive Crit Care Nurs, 2021, 62: 102960. DOI: 10.1016/j.iccn.2020.102960.
    [5]
    任家驹, 王艳, 魏中原, 等. COMHON量表和Braden量表在ICU纵隔术后患者压力性损伤风险评估中的比较[J]. 护理学杂志, 2020, 35(15): 49-52. doi: 10.3870/j.issn.1001-4152.2020.15.049

    REN J J, WANG Y, WEI Z Y, et al. Comparative study of the COMHON scale and the Braden scale in risk assessment of pressure injury for ICU patients after mediastinal surgery[J]. Journal of Nursing Science, 2020, 35(15): 49-52. doi: 10.3870/j.issn.1001-4152.2020.15.049
    [6]
    SCHROEDER J, SITZER V. Nursing care guidelines for reducing hospital-acquired nasogastric tube-related pressure injuries[J]. Crit Care Nurse, 2019, 39(6): 54-63. doi: 10.4037/ccn2019872
    [7]
    王煜, 韩丁, 边寒雪, 等. 链式管理预防小儿神经外科手术压力性损伤的效果[J]. 中华全科医学, 2021, 19(11): 1964-1968. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002212

    WANG Y, HAN D, BIAN H X, et al. Application of chain management to prevent pressure injury in paediatric neurosurgery[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2021, 19(11): 1964-1968. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002212
    [8]
    Editorial Department of Advances in Skin & Wound Care. A dual celebration: Milestones in diabetes mellitus and pressure injury research[J]. Adv Skin Wound Care, 2021, 34(11): 567. doi: 10.1097/01.ASW.0000794028.13848.08
    [9]
    ALDERDEN J, COWAN L J, DIMAS J B, et al. Risk factors for hospital-acquired pressure injury in surgical critical care patients[J]. Am J Crit Care, 2020, 29(6): e128-e134. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2020810
    [10]
    兰园淞, 高文, 廖海涛, 等. 超氧化物歧化酶、丙二醛和内皮素在大鼠压疮模型损伤中的表达及作用[J]. 护理学报, 2017, 24(9): 1-6. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NFHL201709001.htm

    LAN Y S, GAO W, LIAO H T, et al. Expression and role of superoxide dismutase, malondialdehyde and endothelin in rat model of pressure ulcer injury[J]. Journal of Nursing, 2017, 24(9): 1-6. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NFHL201709001.htm
    [11]
    贾盈盈, 张红燕, 马媛媛, 等. ICU患者压力性损伤风险预测模型的系统评价[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2021, 56(8): 1242-1248. doi: 10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2021.08.020

    JIA Y Y, ZHANG H Y, MA Y Y, et al. Systematic review of pressure injuries risk prediction models in ICU patients[J]. Chinese Journal of Nursing, 2021, 56(8): 1242-1248. doi: 10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2021.08.020
    [12]
    张婷, 李朵朵, 李豹, 等. 医院获得性压力性损伤的发病因素分析[J]. 安徽医药, 2020, 24(9): 1783-1786. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6469.2020.09.022

    ZHANG T, LI D D, LI B, et al. Study of the related factors of multiple hospital-acquired pressure ulcers[J]. Anhui Medical and Pharmaceutical Journal, 2020, 24(9): 1783-1786. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6469.2020.09.022
    [13]
    章勤, 宋长春, 邹琪, 等. 改良经口气管插管固定法对ICU患者口面颈部器械性压力损伤的效果观察[J]. 中华全科医学, 2020, 18(8): 1421-1424. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.001522

    ZHANG Q, SONG C C, ZOU Q, et al. Observation on the clinical effect of modified oral endotracheal intubation method on ICU patients with instrumental pressure injury[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2020, 18(8): 1421-1424. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.001522
    [14]
    陈丽娟, 孙林利, 刘丽红, 等. 2019版《压疮/压力性损伤的预防和治疗: 临床实践指南》解读[J]. 护理学杂志, 2020, 35(13): 41-43, 51. doi: 10.3870/j.issn.1001-4152.2020.13.041

    CHEN L J, SUN L L, LIU L H, et al. An interpretation of the International Clinical Practice Guideline for the prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers/injuries 2019[J]. Journal of Nursing Science, 2020, 35(13): 41-43, 51. doi: 10.3870/j.issn.1001-4152.2020.13.041
    [15]
    刘捷, 丁福. 降低住院患者医院获得性压力性损伤方案的制订及应用研究[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2020, 55(12): 1765-1769. doi: 10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2020.12.001

    LIU J, DING F. Reduction of hospital-acquired pressure ulcers among inpatients: development and implementation of a protocol[J]. Chinese Journal of Nursing, 2020, 55(12): 1765-1769. doi: 10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2020.12.001
    [16]
    SHI C, DUMVILLE J C, CULLUM N, et al. Alternating pressure (active) air surfaces for preventing pressure ulcers[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2021, 5(5): CD013620. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD013620.pub2.
    [17]
    张亚琴. 气垫床配合积极翻身措施对重症颅脑损伤患者预防压疮效果分析[J]. 中国药物与临床, 2018, 18(S1): 53-55. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YWLC2018S1027.htm

    ZHANG Y Q. Effect analysis of air cushion bed combined with active turning measures on preventing pressure sores in patients with severe craniocerebral injury[J]. Chinese Remedies & Clinics, 2018, 18(S1): 53-55. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YWLC2018S1027.htm
    [18]
    HUANG C, MA Y X, WANG C X, et al. Predictive validity of the braden scale for pressure injury risk assessment in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Nurs Open, 2021, 8(5): 2194-2207.
    [19]
    万晶, 黄洁, 陈热花. 基于Branden压疮风险评估量表评分使用不同敷料在无创呼吸机鼻面部压疮预防中的应用效果[J]. 中国当代医药, 2022, 29(9): 45-47, 54. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGUD202209009.htm

    WAN J, HUANG J, CHEN R H. Application effect of different dressings based on the Branden pressure ulcer risk assessment scale score in the prevention of nasal and facial pressure ulcers with non-invasive ventilator[J]. China Modern Medicine, 2022, 29(9): 45-47, 54. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGUD202209009.htm
    [20]
    李金花, 任姗姗. 动态交替式气垫床预防重症患者压疮的效果[J]. 中国医学物理学杂志, 2019, 36(5): 597-600. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YXWZ201905020.htm

    LLI J H, REN S S. Application of dynamic alternating air bed to prevent pressure sores in critically ill patients[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Physics, 2019, 36(5): 597-600. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YXWZ201905020.htm
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(1)  / Tables(3)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (238) PDF downloads(3) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return